| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Cum Perfection
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Yes likewise I see myself as a collector. I've never illegally shared anything, and it's hard not to see these streaming/rental restrictions as attempts to restrict illegal activity. But the irony is that those intent on downloading the content to share still can do, albeit with a fair bit of techy effort. So the younger subscribers won't be stopped from ripping off the content the pornsites seek to protect, just the older generation will, being probably less tech savvy and more honest.
I think the pendulum will swing back due to simple economics. Like putting up your prices in a declining market, streaming only means squeezing harder the shrinking pool of customers you still have, who then shrink some more and must be squeezed harder still. This is not the business model of the Companies that conquered the world (Amazon, McDonalds etc) so I can confidently say they'll not pursue streaming-only for very long.
|
09-03-20 11:09am
|
Reply
2
|
Cum Perfection
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Traditional 'paid-for' porn has been fighting a losing battle with a growing sea of free stuff for years. I'm sure this has squeezed profits. Add to that a new global recession/depression that will shrink cash available for non-essentials like porn. Meanwhile, many younger people see all media (music/video) as free by right and will never pay anything, witness what Napster etc did to the music world.
It seems to me that porn is increasingly supported by an ageing population who once bought their VHS Videos or DVDs, and still now pay up for downloads. But we are being edged out by a younger generation with different attitudes. Against this, we have this new idea that those still buying porn (not torrent file sharing or password cracking) will put up with just 'renting' our porn and being left with nothing afterwards. Well, I expect to see that pendulum swing back towards downloading/owning, for those studios still around to repair their folly.
|
09-02-20 01:06pm
|
Comment
3
|
Cum Perfection
(0)
|
|
08-31-20 08:36am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
4
|
Cum Perfection
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Hi both, thanks for your comments. Yes it's weird that the previews all cut out the cumshot, i.e. the best bit. Sites do need to protect their content against those who'll never pay, but they also need to offer enough to draw the customer in. A mistake I hope they correct.
Signup also has a pre-checked membership of www.purecfnm.com, generally I hate pre-checks but this was only a few dollars for month one. It's a kind of light weight femdom thing, the guys get sexually exploited but far from in a proper BDSM way, I don't think these models (you're right in spotting some as professional) are in to anything too serious. There's a fun aspect you can sense in these two sites that makes them both refreshingly new/amateurish and not quite hard enough at the same time
|
10-27-18 12:07am
|
Review
5
|
Cum Perfection
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Facial Cum-shot focussed site. About the best I’ve found.
Cum-shot filmed from two angles.
Slow cameo of aftermath showing fine detail for about a minute.
Behind the scenes of clean-up for last few minutes.
English accents will appeal to some.
Mostly amateurs/newbies and males are often normal looking too.
Members can add comments. |
| Cons: |
Mostly no penetration (a comment more than a criticism).
Some stories a bit silly and model too willing.
Some fake tits (never good).
Shame no forum for fuller interaction/feedback. |
| Bottom Line: |
If shooting your load over a women’s face is your thing, then this is about the best site I’ve found. Scenes last about 10–15 mins, and start with a storyline leading to the dirty dead. On the way there’s always a blowjob, and rarely penetration too which arguably does not belong here anyway. The poorer scripts for me are the ones where the model is all too keen, the better ones portray some kind of power/coercion like a wayward janitor or a store owner catching a thief. For me to identify with the story, it’s more plausible to imagine that this is the poor victim’s reluctant way out of trouble and more pleasurable to imagine it’s no fun either. Porno-fake over-willingness doesn’t do it for me. I’d like to imagine that the victim is about to call the cops not give me her phone number.
The ejaculation is filmed from two angles in succession, and then replayed in slow motion, great for those of us joining in at home. This is then followed by the fabulous USP of this site; a slow cameo close-up moving from the model’s (probably) semen spattered hair down to her face and then breasts, likewise probably showing collateral damage. The close-up is focused well enough to show very fine hair whilst her makeup runs with semen. Crucially, the model remains deadpan expressionless for about a minute whilst the viewer imagines almost being there. This portrays a very confident voyeuristic style that looks so good; I just don’t know why it hasn’t been more widely copied?
The last few minutes is the Behind the Scenes, where the clean-up starts together with some chat on how they feel about the scene, and just occasionally she masturbates. For me, the clean-up and chat is sometimes better than the preceding scene, a brief glimpse of real life in porn, and quite funny often too.
Overall, I think this UK site is uniquely good. If they could just work on the scripts a little, and develop the theme of controlling or exploiting the poor victim, this pervert would score it even higher. |
|
10-14-18 05:53am
Replies (3)
|
Review
6
|
Gyno X
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
About the best Medical Fetish site I’ve found.
Script sticks to a serious, detailed medical exam until about half way, when sexual abuse slips in.
Ladies are comprehensively examined in close-up, well-lit detail. Deeply probed with gloved fingers etc.
Forum for interaction.
282 movies at last count, 45mins of decent quality at 1.2Gb, 4000kbps. |
| Cons: |
Very formulaic, script never varies. Models rather too compliant.
Mostly younger, slimmer models. Other body shapes/ages are available.
No penetrative sex, more an observation/heads-up to potential subscribers than a negative.
Not cheap, $35.95 a month.
Some older lower quality archive content can be bought separately but isn’t worthwhile; stick to the main site.
Czech dialogue but with subtitles. |
| Bottom Line: |
Medical Fetish sites tend to be fairly ridiculous, with comedy Nurse outfits and sex that starts within about a minute of the Doctor meeting the all-too-willing patient. So, Gyno Clinic is a welcome change, with a slow steady erotic build whilst the patient plays a pretty serious part.
A brief chat with the medic (mostly the ageing Dr Fungus, sometimes a female stand-in) leads fairly quickly to undressing and a variety of medical checks. Expect blood pressure, reflexes, weight, ultrasound pulse, temperature, breast exam (lingering a little of course), some exercises. Then she lies on a table, where more detailed examination begins. Eventually this of course becomes gynaecological & anal, with gloved fingers inserted and ‘clitoral reactions’ tested whereupon the model starts to lose their impressively maintained cool. An enema may be administered too, and maybe some urine taken. Insertions to measure vaginal depth may be made.
Next, off to the Gyno chair proper. Expect vaginal douches, speculum cervix exam, and gradually the introduction of a vibrator whilst some spurious medical response is measured until orgasm. The patient then gets dressed again and leaves. The scene never descends into conventional sex; it’s all one-way from doctor or else masturbation.
The price is not low, and I can’t help but think that Gyno Clinic’s continued success despite this reflects partly two separate special interest groups: Firstly, those healthcare professionals for whom a medical exam leading into an abuse/sexual situation is a fantasy they must daily supress but can vent via this website; Secondly, a more general voyeuristic interest, where sexual pleasure is obtained from ladies who are not (initially at least) aware of or obtaining the same. In an age where porn sites struggle to differentiate themselves, this must surely be congratulated.
Overall, I have to praise the deadpan portrayal of a medical abuse fantasy here, this site clearly separates itself from the rest. If it could vary the script/situation a little, e.g. the use of other authority situations to enact the simliar examinations, and perhaps have the models show a little reluctance/horror/embarrassment, and maybe widen the age & body type examined, it would be even better. |
|
11-18-18 07:28am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
7
|
Haze Her
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Now Streaming Only?
Just joined this site, which as others have said hasn't been updated since about 2013, and found videos can only be watched in their 'JW Player' browser window. No way I can find to download anything.
This angers me as I never join streaming-only sites, especially tiny ones.
Anyone else found this?
|
06-23-18 08:35am
|
Review
8
|
Senior Cunt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
An up-close, well imaged exploration of middle to older aged women's vaginas.
Excellently lit with close-up detail in high quality (1280 x 720, 5000Kbps, about 600-700Mb for 16mins average scene).
We see facial expressions whilst they are opened up.
Middle to older aged models have natural curves and real-world body shapes
Forum for interaction with creators.
Epoch/PayPal billing and no pre-checked boxes for easy signup.
Decent preview shot of every scene (but not the video). |
| Cons: |
No anal attention or pissing. Likewise breasts receive little attention.
No story/script.
East European so no dialogue.
No sex with the male but that's more of an obsevation than a criticism as this is somewhat voyeuristic.
Some models will be too old for most tastes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I think this is a little gem of a site. Not huge (73 scenes at last count), but high quality and inexpensive. If you've ever wondered what a middle or older aged women's cunt looked like, look no further. These East European ladies show us everything, and mostly they look pretty good. Depending on your age, some may look like your mother or even grandmother, this is a niche not all will like all of and some may like not like any of. Scenes gernerally progress to masturbatory orgasm. Whilst some ladies are frankly a bit too old/worse for wear, many others look great, and like real women not pornstars. Stretchmarks and fat, not silicone. And something younger viewers may not remember called pubic hair.
Not much deviation from the theme here, the lady quickly strips and lets a younger clothed man help with the exploration of her cunt. He pulls her open with fingers, nice prolongued stretching here clearly filmed, leading to fingering/gaping. Dildo and speculum may well follow along with masturbation from either model or male.
This site is related to Exclusiveclub and Spermhospital etc so shares their older models. Discounts are often availiable via the forum www.exclusiveclub.com/forum
Overall, this site reminds us that sex does not stop at 30. Lack of English probably limits it a bit, I feel that with a story/script it could be taken to another level. The fact the males remain clothed throughout makes this site accidentally CMNF, but in the absence of any story this is not exploited. This is cavity exploration porn without partner penetration and whilst that may be a requirement imposed by some older/ more reticent (first-time?) models, it could equally become a CMNF reality storyline.
If college girls are all you want to see in porn, then pass this one by. But if you think 40-60 year olds still have beauty down there, check this site out |
|
09-01-18 10:34am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
9
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Couldn't agree more with pat362. When the action finally starts, after 20 long minutes, I want the fly-on-the-wall camera angle to give way to something up close and detailed. Shoplyter have done this for the BJ scenes, which look good as the original reviewer rightly said. So why am I watching most of the penetration from far away?
Shoplyter need to remember that the best porn is closely filmed in HD. The mock spycam needs to vanish once the action finally starts. Take a look at gyno-x.com for how this should be filmed.
ENF/CMNF is a really underserved niche; strip/cavity search would be such a winner if Shoplyter could just make a few minor changes. The E is for embarrassed, and the undressing and searching needs to be made slow and intimate and detailed. Split/inset screen showing the model's face whilst her lower regions are examined (as in the slow anal penetration of Backroom Casting Couch) could transform this site from a frustrating letdown into something special.
|
06-24-18 01:14am
|
Reply
10
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks for the suggestion, I've had a quick look and appears interesting if not huge. I'll let you know. Cheers.
|
03-01-18 10:35am
|
Reply
11
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Hi rearadmiral - yes rather odd to be threatened with legal action for telling the truth. Not sure that case would have got very far!
No, I correctly read you as liking petite models, and that's no problem. I wish I could too, as it's the way so many young girls want to be anyway. I just wish there were more sites capitalising on fuller figures without going for the outright huge. I'm open to suggestions.
Perhaps one of the better/more realistic I've stumbled accross has been Dirty Director, though I'd point out that it seems to have stopped updating due to the one-man pornstar/cameraman having had an accident, from which I can only hope he recovers and resumes filming.
Whilst perhaps rather too crude/raw for those seeking polished work, and having no shortage of simply huge women, it did also have quite a few fuller figure/girl nextdoor types, never seen before or since on camera, and enjoying what they did.
|
02-28-18 11:53am
|
Reply
12
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Hi rearadmiral - thanks for the positive comments and welcome!
As well as all the valuable information from frequent posters like yourself, I think this forum offers the chance for users to influence the pornsites themselves. This is very valuable. I'm guessing they probably do read what people take the time to write, I know some have replied here.
Otherwise, pornsites have only good or bad subscription figures to give them the broadest of directions on what works or doesn't. Feedback is, after all, the Breakfast of Kings.
I've seen some of your recommendations and sites I think you said you regularly join, so had guessed our tastes differ on model size. Strange, isn't it? The modern trend for slimmer girls, sometimes with almost boyish figures, just leaves me cold. Like I haven't got what I paid for.
Or maybe it's an age thing? Wasn't Marylyn Monroe's hourglass figure just the definition of sex? Has that really gone? The next stop after Slim in the porn world seems to be BBW, often meaning hugely fat, with little in between. It may also be that plump figures are more the 'girl nextdoor' look which we find subliminably attainable.
True MILFs can deliver this, but often even that word is used to cover a 30 year old model with a 20 year old's figure, hardly the point.
Perhaps I will start a thread in its own right sometime about this. As well as all seeking certain figures/features we find appealing, there is so much porn out there already that we all seek something different and more real.
|
02-27-18 11:20am
|
Reply
13
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I was aware of the other Team Skeet sites, but didn't really get around to trying them, perhaps because collecting all these 4Gb downloads took quite a bit of time! I can't say I noticed any speed issues however.
It is praiseworthy that this Company is persuing novel storylines; porn seems to have turned full circle and now we're back seeking the storylines which went out of fashion way back when. I guess when pretty well anything sexual has been done on some pornsite or other, we're left looking for some background situation/acting that injects a little spice again. But I just wish they'd used their bandwidth more creatively than here.
|
02-26-18 11:15am
|
Review
14
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Unusual story format
70+ videos
1920 x 1080 at 12K or lower resolutions available
Weekly updates |
| Cons: |
Too much 'story' before the sex
Large file sizes due to the above
Undressing/searching too quick
Camera work too distant & lacking closeups
All younger and often skinny models |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm not going to repeat rearadmiral's typically thorough 2017 review, just add a few thoughts as a recent (2018) subscriber.
Potential joiners should be aware that movies run for about 1 hour each (give or take 5 mins) and in best quality are over 4Gb each. Despite this sizable investment in download time/HDD space, there is a very slow build-up to the actual sex; typically 15-20 mins before ANY item of clothing is removed!
Whilst some may value this delay as a tension builder, whilst the model plays the 'anxious criminal' waiting (often alone) in the storeroom, most will find it a dull waste of time & space and probably skip it.
When the young felon is finally undressed & searched by the deviant Security Guard, this process is ironically quite brief. Worse, it's shot from fairly distant/static camera angles (perhaps aiming for a 'fly on the wall' voyeur perspective?) which feel dated and unrevealing by modern porn standards.
When the sex finally begins in earnest, it's fairly vanilla flavoured stuff, hampered by the bizarre need to pixellate the male actor's face area. Why? Not only is this weird (name me another site that does this) it means that when his head nears the model's body, that too is briefly pixelated. This is unforgivable.
The models play the part of a young thief reluctantly surrendering to the wayward guard (to avoid Police intervention) surprisingly well; even better when the mother sits beside them telling them to take their punishment.
But in an era of detailed, brightly lit close-ups of pornstars’ bodies, I felt cheated out of the slow lingering strip-search and detailed examination which should surely be this site’s USP. This is after all almost CMNF porn in effect (though the guard later also undresses fully) with her humiliation and embarrassment just what the whole thing should be about. Otherwise it’s just plain porn with an irrelevant (unchanging) 20 minute story beforehand.
I think as well that porn needs curves, and too many young/skinny models is never a good direction to take. Are there no middle-aged or fat thieves in the USA?
I so want this site format to improve and succeed. Given the high video resolution and duration/filesize, the owners haven’t skimped as many others might.
Overall, I think the novel format will appeal to anyone seeking scenes replicating domination/abuse by authority figures. But with that delivered, I just want to feel I’ve then watched something more intimate and intrusive than a backroom sex scene. |
|
02-25-18 07:09am
Replies (8)
|
|
