| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
126
|
Met Art X
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It is similar to Met Art except with more explicit videos and less of everything else.
308 models and 307.5 of them are 8 or higher on a 10 scale. Very pretty women.
They have 1,025 videos and 838 photo sets.
They update daily with either a video or photo set.
Everything is downloadable and without limits as far as I can tell.
Could possibly subscribe to the theory of less is more when compared to regular Met Art. |
| Cons: |
Other reviewers have mentioned this con on various sites on the Met Art Network, those Staff Selection scenes are kind of annoying. There also are ads on the right margin of your screen.
If Met Art’s explicitness is a 3-4 on a 10 scale, Met Art X’s explicitness is a 6-7, I would like to see them up it a little more in the 8-10 range since this is still solo porn and not hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
There are alternating feelings with this site. I also joined Met Art’s regular site. I was completely and utterly overwhelmed by Met Art’s regular site. It would take me a year just to see all their models. Met Art X has a much more manageable 308 models to sort through and it’s more explicit -- just not as explicit as it probably should be.
I was surprised by the lower amount of photo sets than videos since Met Art is known best for photos. The feeling I get from this site is that it's what would happen if Met Art regular let their shoots run an extra 15-20 minutes. You still get the tease, you still get the strip (most scenes) and instead of stopping at showing off their pink, you get to watch them use it on Met Art X.
The site is relatively large and the quality is very high. The photo sets and videos combine for nearly 2,000 potential downloads and I have not read or seen anything about limits on the downloads. They are updating daily which is a rarity these days and they seem to have updates prepared for the future. You can check to see what the next updates are going to be. Which is good for the consumer and for the site too. It could help you decide to keep the membership for another month or decide to cancel.
My biggest con and complaint is the masturbation is on the more gentle side. As a member of 5 of Met Art’s sites right now it almost seems like I’m going through a progression with each site. With me, watching young women masturbate can be very arousing or very boring. There doesn’t seem to be a middle ground. Some of these scenes go into very arousing and the rest are very boring. When I reviewed Nubiles (my once favorite site), I talked about how the most realistic masturbation can be the least interesting to watch. I don’t get that feeling as much on Met Art X, but it is there. What does most realistic masturbation mean? That the model is trying to get off as fast as possible. If she does it in a sexy way that’s good, if she doesn’t, she doesn’t care since she still got off and got paid doing it. The first solo models I remember watching around 2008-2010 did that too, but there were some of those who seemed to be as much into being sexy, being seductive and alluring the viewer into watching her masturbate. Which does give the viewer the feeling they want you to join them. It seems to be the magic ticket with solo porn.
That is a personal complaint and doesn’t really reflect negative feelings towards the site. The site for my money more than delivers on giving you the content you paid for. There are 4K, 1080p, 720p, and smaller download resolutions on the videos. The photo sets can be downloaded in 3 different sizes and are of the same quality you would expect from a Met Art site. I just wish the content was a little harder even as solo content. From the content I have looked through there are no other genres explored than solo. If there’s a lesbian scene in there I must have missed it. Doing a search on the site for “lesbian” brings up 4 scenes, but all 4 are solo. Maybe they are saying the model is a lesbian in real life? There is no male/female.
It’s still a good site as long as you know what you are getting into. In my limited experience with porn it is not that common for me to see a site that is strictly solo. The women, the technical quality and ease of use of the site all help the site greatly. The tags are helpful, but I do think they could find another way to list those. There is no menu for tags. You just see the tags once inside a scene and have to hope one of the tags is one you’re looking for. The search box does let you search, but there is that inaccuracy with the lesbian search. These are ticky-tacky problems to what is to me a better way to introduce yourself to the world of Met Art since it’s not overwhelming. |
|
04-06-21 02:19am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
127
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Poll
I picked, "yes, but only 2nd and 3rd prize". That is the way the raffle used to be and I don't remember any problems coming from it. I do remember when the raffle changed to a winner couldn't win the following week and that led to weeks where there weren't even enough eligible reviewers to win. I believe with the format being monthly now it would be taking a huge risk to say all 3 winners one month would be ineligible the next month.
|
03-10-21 01:51am
|
Review
128
|
Deepthroat Sirens
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site on Top Web Models that doesn’t just have blowjobs, which is strange since the name of the site sounds like it would be all oral.
A large site with 478 scenes and some very cute, younger female models.
Very long scenes, some nearing an hour each. The videos are downloadable with no limits.
The picture sets are some of the biggest (in quantity) I have seen with some having 700 photos. They are also downloadable.
There are other sites included that I feel are better overall than the sites they focus on. |
| Cons: |
Probably not for the newer porn viewer. There’s gagging, choking, some degradation.
The download speeds on the biggest video files are very slow compared to the download speeds on the smaller files. I can’t even differentiate between the different options since the file takes too long to download.
The photosets are also way too large to download. |
| Bottom Line: |
I decided to let this review kind of be for the whole network since this site seems to be the flagship site. If you can’t tell, I didn’t like this site very much. Most of the scenes start off with the guy seeing how far he can stick his penis down the woman’s throat. This includes forcing her head to hold in position, even if she’s gagging and I’m just wondering how I ended up joining a site like this. I was looking for something different. It’s different, but not the direction I was looking for.
They have a site called 2 Girls 1 Camera that I really liked. It is rough too, but it includes scenes with one woman masturbating while watching the other woman and the man have sex. It looks like they were on the right track to creating something fairly unique, but it only has 31 scenes on it.
Deep Throat Sirens with 478 scenes of all forms of sex. There’s anal, there’s vaginal, there’s a lot of choking and gagging too. I realized after joining this network, thanks to Deep Throat Sirens, I was thinking I was joining Net Video Girls.
There are technical problems too. Deep Throat Sirens also lists their two top video download resolutions as 1920x1080, but one is twice as big as the other. I have learned about bitrates and thought that’s probably what the difference is, but when I go to download the “Original” it is 4GB and it downloads at 3.5 MB/s. When I download the “HQ” it is 2GB and also listed as 1920x1080, it downloads at 40 MB/s. When I download the photo sets, some of which are 2GB, it downloads at 40 MB/s. I don’t know why the Original is twice the size of the HQ even though their resolutions are listed as the same. They also offer a 540p and 270p download too. The tagging system does not seem to be accurate. They have 72 tags, but some of them don’t seem like they should be tags like two different ones for “pig tails” and “pigtails”. Or the ones that I don’t see the point of like, “Halloween”, “Christmas”, “Valentine’s Day”. There’s a feeling that they are trying to do too much, but not doing any of it that well.
The network as a whole has 1,258 models and 1,870 scenes so it is a good-sized network especially for the price. It’s also not all oral, besides Deep Throat Sirens having all forms of sex on it, the site Big Gulp Girls also has more than oral even though it’s another one that is named like it should be just oral. You see what I mean by trying to do too much? The sites that sound like they may have more than oral only have oral.
I should also mention the older videos including all the videos on three of the sites only have 480p as the highest download resolution. I am going to have a hard time recommending it to newer porn viewers. Some of the scenes on Deep Throat Sirens are more hardcore than anything I’ve seen on Evil Angel or Kink. I would recommend it to those who are into rougher sex and would even highly recommend it since it the size of the network is good for the price. Maybe the tech problems will get worked out and that would also help my view of it. I am just getting the feeling I’m on a network that there isn’t much attention being paid to it or it’s maintenance. There still is no way to know if it’s updating. I can say the newest videos showing up haven’t changed in the 2 weeks I’ve been a member. |
|
03-10-21 01:18am
Replies (1)
|
Review
129
|
She's Brand New
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Blowjob, swallowing, and most of the women are supposed to be shooting their first scene.
Pretty women, some variety as well.
The scene count on the site is 241 which compared to Rear Admiral’s review from 4 years ago means they don’t update much, but 241 scenes is a lot.
They use Epoch and the price is cheap through Porn Users at $12.50/month.
Some of the scenes do seem to be “new” as the two newest ones are Valentine's Day themed. |
| Cons: |
This is probably the least rough site on Top Web Models and it’s rougher than I was expecting. The name, to me, is very misleading.
No 4K videos and the 1080p seem to have very high bitrates with the scenes topping the 2GB mark in size.
I normally wouldn’t consider this a con, but some of the scenes are just too long for the niche (some nearing 40 minutes) |
| Bottom Line: |
I still consider myself in the exploratory stage of hardcore porn sites. Top Web Models sounds like a softcore site, maybe some lesbian, some solo scenes, but nothing doing. The content on this site isn’t as hardcore as their other sites, but it’s still more hardcore than I normally would join. I am sure there is a market for this site especially since I will estimate 60-70% of the scenes say it’s the model’s first time. I think they should update it and tell if it was their last scene too.
This site does have introductions to the model. This includes typical questions asked by porn producers. The model also teases a little including stripping and that’s when things fall into a similar pattern from scene to scene. They do include downloadable photo sets that focus just on the female model for the first 40-60 pictures and those pictures are 2808x1872 in resolution.
Once beyond the focus on the female model the scenes become POV of the female giving the man a blowjob. These blowjobs vary from scene to scene. Some are rougher, some are more gentle, but all I have watched end with the guy cumming in the woman’s mouth. He then taps her chin so she opens her mouth to show the cum is in her mouth and she swallows. The introduction gains this site some points since the action part is very repetitive.
The newer videos can be downloaded in what it says is “Original” 1920x1080 or “HQ” which is also 1920x1080. These files are the same size. I don’t see the difference. They also offer an odd “Stream” download. I haven’t ever seen a site call a download a stream quality. It is 960x540. There is also a “Mobile” download that is 480x270. There’s too much disparity there. The first two are 2 GB each, the third drops down to 540MB and the fourth is 271MB. Very few of the scenes are worth a 2GB download. I like some of the scenes, but it doesn’t make much sense to me to have 4 different video formats with 1.5GB difference between the two highest and two others.
All in all, I would recommend this site itself to those maybe interested in rougher blowjobs, but not the violent, punishing kind. A few of the women on this site do get their makeup smeared, but this is the tamest of the sites on this network. It doesn’t stand out in any way other than I haven’t seen hardly any of these women before and quite a few are very pretty. |
|
03-10-21 01:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
130
|
Girls Out West
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Australian porn with I think all amateurs.
1,051 models and they vary in looks, body size, shape, hairy, shaven, very unique site in that regard.
At the time of the review, 4/29, 2020, they have 4,358 scenes and 2,692 photo sets.
Easy sign-up and cancel with Epoch.
Six new videos per week and 1 new photo set per week.
Deep advanced search that gives you over 100 tags/actions to filter.
Blend of solo, lesbian and boy/girl scenes.
Behind the scenes videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
As appealing as their blend of models are, I also would think at least some of those models would be unappealing to some. Especially those against hairy.
Boy/girl section is much smaller than lesbian or solo with only 252 boy/girl scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I figured I went outside my comfort zone for long enough. I enjoy these sites with amateurs, models with imperfections, models that probably would not be called models by some people. One of the first things I noticed is the scenes have a fun feeling to them. I do not get the feeling these models are under immense pressure like you see on some sites. I also do not feel like many of these young women are very shy, either.
I think the pros give a good overview of how much content this site has, and I didn’t know any of the models by name. Is it a pro or con that you’re probably going to need to stay on as a member for more than a month? It gives me the feeling it would be a good site to join for a year even. They have over a decade of consistent updating.
Before I go much further into the bottom line, I do want to go back to that first con. As a female, I don’t think I’m as critical of models looks as most guys are, but even saying that I would say there are 15-20% of these models that I didn’t find attractive. The other side of that is you’re going to find models that are very attractive, and you’ve never heard of them.
Most of the content here is what I would call female-friendly. It’s not softcore solo or lesbian. These are real women masturbating and as we all know when us non-porn stars masturbate; we are going for the fastest orgasm. It does lend itself to more expressive, more vocal, would sloppy be a negative word to use? I don’t mean it as such. I just mean this isn’t the masturbation you’re used to seeing on a major site. The lesbian scenes go from looking like real lesbians having sex with each other to the more playful lesbian scenes where the women look inexperienced.
You’re going to get random settings which I enjoy in porn. The solo scenes might be on an exam table, in a garage, on the bed, on the floor, in a cubicle, dinner table, outdoors and everywhere I think sex is possible.
The video quality is very good. They have 4K going back to 2017 and unless I missed something, all video scenes have 1080p, 720p and 480p. This includes remastering some of their “classic” scenes.
The boy/girl scenes are more inconsistent. It seems like some of the couples are possibly real couples, while others aren’t quite as interested in each other.
As a whole, this site does it a lot right. There are amateurs that are doing a good job of looking like pros. Some excellent solo videos and they explore a lot of fetishes from peeing to squirting to possibly the biggest collection of hairy models (body hair). I will have to join it again in the future. That could be its biggest con. It’s a lot of content to take in over one month. |
|
04-29-20 01:16am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
131
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I used to not download anything so I picked $25. I would still join a site for $25 without downloads. I just don't like it when a site doesn't tell you there are no downloads until you get inside the member area.
|
04-28-20 09:13pm
|
Reply
132
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
I don't think it's a conspiracy. I also don't think it's coincidence that his critical words are only to female members. My previous reply while sarcastic in tone wasn't sarcastic. With him being an older man, I do believe he believes women shouldn't be here reviewing with the men.
|
04-28-20 09:11pm
|
Review
133
|
Club Bang Boys
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Network of 5 gay sites that has some appeal for women.
Currently has 696 scenes and averages 2 updates per week.
Videos and photos are downloadable with no limits.
Navigation is handled through tags.
Group scenes which I think are better than the one on one, but not better than the solo.
Includes access to a large streaming network. |
| Cons: |
Still not enough solo scenes, not in relative comparison to the total number of scenes.
Sites seem to change focus. Gay Public Hardcore has most of the solo scenes on it, but the scenes leading up to the solo scenes are two guys in public. The solo scenes are not that public.
No model list, I have noticed most guys that are in solo scenes have other solo scenes on gay sites. There are also no model names on the scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I saw several solo videos from this network while streaming videos. I probably should have checked further into how many solo scenes they have as the number is under 30, but they are good. The guys for the most part are handsome and fit except for the strange masked man who appears in numerous scenes. I do think the masked man kind of fits the whole feel here since there is no model list and there are no model names on any of the scenes. The one guy you know is the masked man.
The five sites are: Gay Public Hardcore, All Barebacked, Bareback Boy Bangers, Boys Club for Men and Gay Bang Boy.
This is maybe the 5th or 6th site I have joined that are considered “gay” sites, but it the first I have seen with orgies. The site Gay Bang Boy has scenes with as many as 10 or more men in each scene. This has its pluses, since I like to see men masturbating, the ones not directly involved in the sex are usually standing around masturbating. Some are guys just masturbating together. The only problem with these scenes is there are masked men. The masked man referred to earlier wears a black mask that covers his face. The masked men in these orgy scenes are more like Halloween masks. It is just a little strange.
They have 696 scenes with 2 updates per week. The videos can be downloaded in 1080p, 720p and 480p. The photos are more like screen captures and can be downloaded too.
Besides the orgies surprising me, a lot of these orgies have men that look 18-21 and some that look over 50. It kind of reminds me of Party Hardcore except they’re in a house with no women. The camera does get lost at times and tries to show too many of the men at one time. It is still is new to me see all-male orgies.
The other sites, Bareback Boy Banging, has some group (5 or less), threesomes and some male/male. It seems like adding more than just two guys makes these scenes more arousing to me – a female.
The site, All Barebacked, is small and hasn’t updated in 2 years, male/male scenes with one threesome. These scenes are a little on the rougher side.
The last, Boys Club for Men, is a blend of young/old and group, a few of these scenes are very good, the five guys in a spa scene is one of the better gay scenes I have watched.
All in all, it’s one of the better “gay” sites I have joined that also at least caters somewhat to women. |
|
04-28-20 09:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
134
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
I replied but received an invalid screen. The site must have timed out.
I didn't say what he said was fake. I am aware of the accusations. The beginning of my review says I read a story about James Deen years ago and how he was the boy next door in porn. The story is still online. James Deen boy next door it's on abcnews.
The problem I have is with him calling me naive. It's not the first time he has said something like this to me. I reviewed a site called Fucking Glasses and gave it a 65. I signed up for a full membership at full price and they only gave me trial access. They didn't respond to my emails. LKLK replied, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them." I could download 2 scenes. The site later apologized and fixed the problem. I raised the score by 20 points.
He had no problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site.
He doesn't tell the other members to overcome their bitterness when they're getting ripped off.
Maybe that's just me being naive? I should stand in the other room while the men talk? Maybe I'll find the word misogynistic in the dictionary while waiting to be allowed to have an opinion.
|
04-27-20 11:20am
|
Reply
135
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
There's more to this than whether what he said is fake or not. I rated this site 36th of 42 sites I have reviewed. The ones below it are mostly sites that ripped me off. Yet, he calls me naive. The comment I made about James Deen size was an insult. It's also a reality in the field I work in that some women do lie. If accusations matter that much, maybe a search of the internet for, "Porn producer accused of abusing models" should be done? There are 1.7 million results. There's just a feeling from me that LKLK has a problem with women reviewing.
In a previous review of Fucking Glasses, he called me bitter, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them."
I had scored that site a 65 because I paid full price and they only gave me trial access. It went from being able to download all scenes to only being able to download 2 scenes. The site also wouldn't reply to emails until I posted the review. They then replied to the emails and apologized saying it was a sign-up error. They extended my account for another month and I raised their score to 85.
Here's the question. Why didn't LKLK or his other account have a problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site? Which was posted during the time the accusations were fresh (2 years ago).
Why doesn't he reply to reviews or comments that are getting ripped off and tell them to overcome their bitterness?
If I wasn't so naive, I would say he's a little misogynistic towards women reviewing porn.
|
04-27-20 11:06am
|
Reply
136
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I'm naive?
What do you call the models that based on what you've said here chose to do a scene with a man known to abuse women in the scenes? Surely they would know it. And what do you call a man of your age that believes slapping and choking is some kind of terrible form of abuse? There are women that love being slapped and choked during sex.
What I can do is put you in contact with the agency I work for. We have entire days we work with abused women. I've been doing it for 10+ years. I've seen women with 2 inch deep rope burn scars around their necks that can't talk. Women with their skin melted by battery acid. Women with their legs broken behind their heads. I don't know what it is about this site that makes everyone a know-it-all. Maybe I am being naive about why you reply since that gets you more tickets in the raffle? Stick to the political nonsense. You know nothing about abused women.
|
04-26-20 07:46am
|
Review
137
|
Full Porn Network
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A 16 site network of sites that are mostly rough and anal-centered. Would that be analcenteric?
Most of the scenes have 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K video download options.
The network has updated 9 times over the last week.
Pretty models in about 80% of the scenes.
Well-known models even for me, but there are some amateurs.
Mixture of male/female, threesomes, group of men with one woman.
Photos and screencaps can be downloaded. The photos include pictures of just the female. |
| Cons: |
This one was not on my list to join, but I decided to be open-minded and try it. It's probably time to stop opening my mind.
The James Deen site seems to be the dominant site here and the newer updates include old scenes on it. I think that's also a con for the network since those are shown as network updates.
The amount of lube they go through. They must have something like a 55 gallon barrel of it.
More implants than I like to see. I don't mind the tattoos as much.
Do they put the cheapest mascara on the women to get it to run down their face like that?
Scenes shared between the sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
A lesson in being newer to joining sites outside of my safe 8-10 sites I like, don't have multiple sites open when deciding which to join. Despite joining this on what I'm going to call an accident, I'm going to try and be as fair and as objective as possible.
I would have listed all of the sites included and listed how many scenes they each have, but there are several sites on this network that just have scenes from the other sites on them. The site DTFSluts has scenes from James Deen and Analized on it. The site Your Mom Does Porn has scenes from at least 4 of the other network sites. I'm not looking to give them any extra credit.
The whole network has 1,699 scenes. When I had added them up going by each site it was over 3,000, that should add some perspective to how many scenes they are sharing between their sites.
There are some scenes I liked. It seems like the older scenes are not quite as "me, caveman" as the newer scenes.
The quality of the videos is good except for the random 720p max scene they throw in. The oldest scenes on the network have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The photos are also what I think are studio photo sets, they are small, but those focus on the female model before the scene starts. You get to see how pretty she is before the scene ends. Maybe that's a porn conspiracy? Women that watch this porn are not going to be willing to do these acts. The models go from 7-10 to 1-3. Some of them look like they got drunk and decided to stick the big end of the wine bottle up their butt, fell asleep in that position and woke up with a hangover and a 4 inch diameter wine bottle in their butt.
I know there is a market for this type of porn. There's nothing wrong with that. I admit, I laugh and heckle the small dick porn sites like on Pure CFNM.
Which is what the guys on this network remind me of. They were once laughed at by a woman and now it's their turn.
There are various disclaimers and warnings on the videos. I didn't think the actual sex was that hardcore for the disclaimers to be needed, but it seems to be more about the treatment of the women. The most common disclaimer talks about consent, probably should say, "We didn't tie this woman up and fill her with roofies."
Some of the sex is quite good. Some of the women look like they could have added 3 more guys and they wouldn't have cared. There is a light at the end of the tunnel, I really tried to work an anal joke in, the site Big Daddy POV has some solo scenes for jerk off instruction. I thought those were good and those work just as much for women as men. Though I do think they go overboard with this site's production values. Most of the models are dressed in pink, in a pink bedroom with little glittering lights behind them, some are hugging their teddy bears. I can see a site like Nubiles doing that since their models look 18-19, but some of these models on Big Daddy POV look in their 30s.
Maybe the most important part to know and it's why I also reviewed the James Deen site is more than 50% of the total videos come from the James Deen site which kind of deflates that 16 sites included sales pitch.
If you're really into the more dominant male style of porn you'll probably like this. I'm not even against dominant male porn. I just thought they could have executed everything a little better. Bringing moans into screams with any sex act can be very arousing. Bending a woman's arms up to the back of her head, slapping her, maybe even a few eye pokes in there, trying to fit your dick and fist in her at the same time is just a little too much for me. |
|
04-26-20 02:35am
Replies (1)
|
Review
138
|
James Deen
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Straightforward, gonzo style porn featuring James Deen.
846 scenes with new scenes added regularly, but not on a set schedule.
Photos, screencaps and videos can be downloaded.
Videos go up to 4K, some oddities in the video quality specifications.
Mostly rough sex if you're into that.
Blend of scenes which will be in cons too. Male/female, threesomes, casting, etc... |
| Cons: |
This seems like some kind of best of James Deen site. There are scenes from other sites and other studios and scenes from JamesDeen.com. This causes the next con.
The video quality varies from scene to scene. Based on user comments some of the scenes are very old and are being "found" one comment says, "Great find", it is one of the newest scenes released, but tops out at 720p.
I was only a little familiar with James Deen. The scenes are as much about him putting what looks like wrestling holds on women as sex.
Navigation is poor. |
| Bottom Line: |
I once read an article about James Deen being porn's "boy next door". I remember the article well. It talked about how women loved being in scenes with him because he was gentle and so nice.
So, what happened? You know you're going to get a scene that might be harsh when it has a 20 second warning before the scene starts that explains everyone in the scene is a consenting adult, no one is being forced and people watching should not try this at home. In one scene, he has the woman's arms pulled up behind her back while bending her over a sofa.
It's not that the scenes are bad. It's more like a feeling that you know what's going to happen in every scene. She's not going to moan enough from the sex so he's going to bend her arms behind her head or slap her.
He's really not as obnoxious as I expected. It does seem like he gets off on the woman feeling pain, but other than that, it's very basic and straightforward sex. He really doesn't look big enough to seriously hurt anyone. I just was expecting some of that content of the "boy next door". It's more like the guy you picked up at the bar.
There are tags, clickable model names and that's the limit of the navigation. The site could be put together better. It looks like the most time spent was on the terribly written scene descriptions like, "He continued fucking her from behind as he pull her by the hair and neck. Halfway through it, he pins her down and gets power fucking to the next level. It may be a rough fucking for Sadie, James was nice enough to lick her fuck holes from time to time." That is about 1/8th of the scene description.
The biggest problem is the scenes are from different sites. I even saw one from Bang.com and it says on it, "Exclusive Bang.com scene" on James Deen's site. This does make the quality of the scenes vary throughout the site.
The time of the scenes also varies greatly from 19 minutes to 55 minutes. If you like James Deen and like rough sex, especially anal, you would probably like this site. For me, it's an okay site with some good scenes thanks to the women in the scenes.
You can download videos, photo and screencaps. The video quality is hard to describe or list since they are blending in James scenes from other sites. One of the newest is with a model that has bios up saying she retired in 2014. Maybe the Coronavirus is causing them to bring in these scenes from other sites?
You could do worse than this site, but I think your odds would be just as good to do better. |
|
04-25-20 09:36pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
139
|
Catalina Cruz
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My first try at an interactive porn site, I like it, but there are some downfalls.
I don't have a very good knowledge of Catalina, but she is still doing live cam shows on this site and that's something I really hadn't experienced.
I wouldn't want to guess at her age, but she is an older model, she is still very attractive and is very good on the cam shows.
Includes hundreds of her videos as well, but streaming only.
33 other sites are included each of a different model and these also have many videos and photo sets to view/stream with no downloads.
Accidentally clicked pay by Paypal and it said my card was declined, I didn't input a card or make it to the Paypal screen. It redirected me to Epoch which wasn't the original biller.
Subjective as it is, she has one of the prettiest pussies I have seen. |
| Cons: |
There's no downloads anywhere. None of the bonus sites have them. You can't download photos either.
The site is cluttered. It has 8 ads in the right margin and there's a section for Catalina's content plus all 33 included sites are shown too. Maybe the most cluttered screen I've seen.
Have to sign in on each of the 33 bonus sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm still trying different types of sites and saw this advertised as an interactive site since you can email Catalina, you get access to her Snapchat, which I didn't have and she does live cam shows where she sometimes masturbates, sometimes she is more teasing in them.
I'm giving the site a higher score than I probably would most sites without downloads. It introduced me to the live cam show and I have a membership to Cherry Pimps, where they have live cam shows too and you can download them. I just usually miss the Cherry Pimps ones.
As someone that is sure I'm not a lesbian, I found the oddest attraction to Catalina's pussy. She just looks pretty, fake boobs notwithstanding and she seems like a genuine person.
The content is the normal or common kind. Cam shows are fully nude, some are a little more showy and sexual than others. I would imagine a person's mood would change from day to date. The videos are like any porn you can get from any site. There's nothing that stands out about it.
I would like to see more cam shows, the next one is 2/29, the following one after that is 3/8. They do keep an archive of previous cam shows too.
I do think the amount of content helps it a lot except in the cluttered department. Catalina has around 700 videos in her archive and you get another 33 sites.
I don't have as much of a problem with the no downloads part as some do. Most of this content wouldn't be content I would download. I just stream a scene or two at a time and I don't know if that's a negative or positive. It doesn't make me think I wish I could download this and watch it some more.
Of the other 33 sites, I found several I liked including Sienna West, Brooke Banner and the site Licensed to Blow.
Even though the site is cluttered it is easy to navigate since they stuffed everything onto one page. I don't know how big of a deal that is about having her Snapchat. I avoid anything social media-looking as my job has policies against social media.
I did notice the newer webcam shows and videos are 4K, some are Virtual Reality, so it does look like they spend a lot of time and I assume money on making these shows top-notch.
It's a pleasant change for me. She's friendly and talks to those watching her webcam shows. She seems to really enjoy showing her body and she looks like she's having fun. Maybe that's something I have missed in a lot of porn I've watched? The live shows give you more of a feeling that she wants to be there and took time out of her day to get naked for the viewers.
I think if you're a downloader you won't be happy with this site. If you can see it as something you don't see everyday in porn, and just enjoy it in the moment with streaming, it's a good site to join. The Porn Users price also made the no downloads a lot easier to swallow. |
|
02-25-20 01:59am
Replies (1)
|
Review
140
|
Beach Hunters
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It's like watching everything that goes on at the beach!
Public exhibitionism, voyeuristic, with a lot of content of 100% amateurs.
More sex than I thought there would be.
They have over 6,500 videos and 125,000 photos.
CCBill takes your money to the site.
The updates don't seem to be scheduled, but when they update, they post 10+ videos and hundreds of pictures, those come several times a month. |
| Cons: |
There's nothing here that you're used to on porn sites. No model list, no search box.
Camera problems, a lot of the videos are shot from a distance that you can see everything, but not anything that clearly.
Short videos, it's probably part of the niche. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was becoming frustrated and even bored with the glossy world of mainstream porn.
I was watching a scene on a tube site where a "wife" was getting suntan lotion rubbed on her by a stranger. The stranger decided she needed some suntan lotion on her parts covered by her bikini. I found it oddly erotic. I don't think I ever thought about beach porn.
The site is easy to use which I was not expecting. It looks like the last time they programmed it was before the internet was created. It's instead really easy to use and I kind of find the colors to be pleasant to my eyes. There are no ads anywhere on the site.
You have these choices:
Sex on the Beach, they have 1,005 of these scenes.
Nudism, they have 4,441 of these.
Then, 514 topless, 48 changing room, 334 foreplay and 119 not straight. That's how they have it listed. I found that a little confusing since I knew what it likely meant (gay), but thought maybe it meant the camera angle was off center. It is an amateur site.
This is very easy to use and find what you're looking for, but I won't go too far on the praising. When you click, "Sex on the Beach", it opens a page of the 18 newest videos. There's 56 of these pages.
I liked that they list the "author", but after watching enough scenes, I realized the "author" is the person filming it not one of the people involved in the scene.
The sex scenes are good, but I think it's because they're in public and you can hear the ocean washing in. The part I felt most disappointed in was the cumshots. Some of them use condoms and cum in the condom. Other times the guy jumps up, woman on her knees in front of him and all you see is his hairy back since the camera is behind them. When you do get the right angle on the cumshot it's one of those where the distance makes it nearly impossible to see. You have to go more by the woman's reaction.
I do get the feeling most if not all of this is filmed on nude beaches. The nudism videos have multiple nude people walking around and besides just seeing someone nude and unaroused there's not a lot of sexual energy in these.
The videos are downloadable in 720p, so they are good quality. It's just that distance that causes a problem with seeing the action. It kind of feels like I'm wanting a professional porn studio to go shoot these scenes with 3-4 cameras.
This is a community site and it has a forum for members to post in. I'm not really for sure what to think of it. One of the downsides to having a forum is it shows disgruntled customers. There are numerous posts about archives of content disappearing. There also are hardly no new posts on it. I only see one from 2020 and 6 from 2019. I will confirm they are adding content.
It wasn't really what I was looking for. I think I should maybe look for bikini/beach porn filmed with the camera closer, but it's not a bad site for seeing some surprising beach situations. If you're like me you might get frustrated with some of the content. Like 7 minutes of the guy and woman talking (you can't hear them), then 2 minutes of sex. Did they just have 9 minutes of video to use? It's probably rare content and I'm sure that makes it appealing to someone out there. I'm giving them an 80 for at least having 720p video and they do have zip files for their photos. Some of these look like aerial views. |
|
02-17-20 07:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
141
|
Mike's Apartment
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
European models being coerced (probably not) into going back to an apartment to have sex.
Started out as Reality Kings initial step into the world of European porn.
Gorgeous, AAA European models with many major Euro stars.
Site has 812 scenes on it.
Streaming player works well with little to no buffering.
If taking the download upgrade the videos are mostly 720p or 1080p (HD) |
| Cons: |
Stopped updating on December 27, 2018
Downloads cost extra ($14.95 per month)
Not as much story or talking as other RK scenes since some of the models don’t speak English. |
| Bottom Line: |
My initial interest in porn was on European models. Sites like Nubiles, Sapphic Erotica, Club Seventeen were really all I joined for several years. I had always wanted to join this site to see the usually softcore European models in reality themed, hardcore sex.
The site’s older scenes stand out as there are more known stars and the scenes had more of a story or at least dialogue. Some of the scenes are lacking so much in story, the model just walks in the apartment, sits down, takes her clothes off and the sex or masturbation starts. Some start in a car where they (Reality Kings) are driving the model to the apartment and you do get some car action from flashing to blowjobs.
The site stopped updating at the end of 2018, but it had a nice run with 812 scenes and is one of those sites if you like the content you might download 200-300 of the scenes. There’s not as much playfulness in these scenes as the other Reality King scenes but depending on the viewer that could be a positive or a negative. The sex in these scenes is average to above average in quality. I do think these are the prettiest and closest to natural models on Reality Kings.
If you choose to upgrade to the download package there are plenty of HD videos 1080p and 720p to download, but no 4K. The photo sets are also worth downloading if you’re into photos as this content is 100% exclusive and can’t be found anywhere else. If you don’t choose to upgrade to downloads you can still use their very good streaming player.
One thing I have noticed is the scenes are not quite as hardcore as the hardcore scenes on Reality King’s other sites. A lot of these European stars were not known for male/female scenes. There are also some girl/girl scenes and solo as well. It's a good site if you ever wondered how your favorite European models would do in hardcore scenes. So far, it has been my favorite site on the Reality Kings network. |
|
01-27-20 07:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
142
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of the Reality Kings network, it’s a very large MILF site.
815 scenes, each scene includes a photo set and 35-45 minute video.
If you add-on downloads the majority of scenes are available in 1080p or 720p.
Scenes vary between woman in control, man in control.
Overall, good production values with many of the scenes having some funny dialogue and setup.
If you’re not into downloads the streaming player works well. |
| Cons: |
Downloads cost extra, $15 per month for them and the download upgrade does include photo sets.
Too much clutter, ads, upsells
Site stopped updating on June 12, 2019. |
| Bottom Line: |
Milf Hunter is a hardcore site about a man on the hunt for Milfs to have sex with. That’s how it started; they eventually went to a format where there was a different man in nearly every scene. The sex is common hardcore, blowjobs, doggystyle, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, cumshot.
Despite the site no longer updating it is still one of the biggest Milf sites available with 815 scenes and each of those videos average around 40 minutes. There is a playful nature to a lot of the scenes including light exhibitionism, car flashing and some scenes starting in public locations.
I think the downloads are worth it for a month or two. They have good quality videos with nearly all having HD (720p or 1080p) download options and I haven’t run into a download limit. Maybe they removed the limit once you’ve paid for downloads? The photo sets are screen captures and can be downloaded with the download upgrade. It’s still a worthy site for those into the Milf niche. |
|
01-27-20 07:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
143
|
Fucking Glasses
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
01-27-20 07:30pm (Update History)
Reason: Technical problem that the site fixed.
|
| Pros: |
*Added 20 points to score. My membership started out saying it was a trial even though I paid full price. A few days later, the trial part was removed and I had full access and downloads of all scenes.*
I took a risk on an interesting premise and can't say it's bad, but the experience was. The content itself is good.
The concept is recording sex with what I believe are complete amateurs while wearing glasses that record the action.
Very high quality 1080p, I assume that's high quality for recording with their eyeglasses.
A lot of content, but there are multiple buts in this, they have 122 videos and over 1,000 photosets just on this site.
It was not advertised as a network, but once inside it has 15 other sites and says a total of over 1,000 videos and 90,000 photos.
They use Epoch as the billing agent. |
| Cons: |
It took 30 minutes to access the site as it kept telling me my account doesn't exist even though I was using the username and password they sent me!
Once inside the members area it says my account is a trial. It was $15. I have access to I'm going to say maybe 20% of the videos. The others have a pink X on the them and say not for trial members. To see those, I have to upgrade and pay more money. I'm not an angry person, but what's the fucking point of me joining a site for $15 a month then telling me it's a trial that doesn't include everything?
Their frustrating first login was made worse by the login page not being secure. I'm guessing when someone hacks my non-secure login they'll blame that on me too. |
| Bottom Line: |
I saw an advertisement for this and I really thought it was a site about women with glasses. After taking the tour, I saw that it's about video camera glasses recording the pickup, the sex and whatever else goes on (talking, getting to know, etc...)
Here's just a random thought from a scene I watched. Nerdy girl in the library, guy walks up and starts talking to her, they end up in what looks like a hotel having sex. It became very confusing. She had on glasses. The recording wasn't from the guy's eyes perspective. I don't know if they even know what Fucking Glasses is based on. The part that surprised me was this very full network that came with it. There's a reason for that, Fucking Glasses hasn't been updated since 2014. These other network sites have been updated and most of those are NOT for "trial" members.
Just focusing on Fucking Glasses, I have access to TWO of 112 videos.
So, I went ahead and upgraded since I do like how this content looks. It's not worth the trial + upgrade price. The full price came to $44.95. It was $29.95 to upgrade to full membership.
It does seem to be amateur content and it looks like any other amateur site. There's times where the cameraman looks like he/she has a clue and there's time the cameraman looks like he/she is watching a fly on the wall. There's too much going on in some scenes with more than one couple and the one couple scenes are surprisingly formulaic for amateur porn.
These are the sites included with the network.
Fucking Glasses, She is Nerdy, Tricky Agent (their marketing team), Mom's Passion, Make Him Cuckold, Young Courtesans, Disgrace That Bitch (can't make this up), Private Casting X, Trick Your GF, X Sensual, X Massage, Brutal X, Kinky Family, Spy POV and Debt Sex.
The more I've signed in I've noticed there seems to be a hub site called Dirty Flix or that's what the network is called.
The sites amount of content ranges from 1 scene to 368 scenes. With full access they do have 4K on the newer videos and even though I believe it's amateur content it feels more like a Reality Kings Lite or Brazzers Lite.
My opinion of it has went up and down since joining. Since I'm still a member, I don't know if there's a way to join it without going through the $14.95 trial and upgrading for $29.95. At best, this is a $19.95 a month site and that includes downloads.
They advertise 1,000+ videos, 90,000 photos and 620 models. That's not really a very high amount for 16 sites.
The majority of the content is straightforward male/female sex and it follows the pattern most porn sites follow. You can tell I'm more on the down side of my feelings towards the site as my membership is nearing the end and I feel like I wasted $45.
I am figuring price in with my score since if I didn't pay the extra price I wouldn't have been able to access 80-90% of the content. I can be nice about it and say they should look into a new way of billing, a more honest way or I can be blunt and say there's no way I would recommend this site for $44.95. I wouldn't even recommend it for $29.95.
There are a few of the sites that might hit a fetish for some like the Sell your GF site where a boyfriend agrees to let his girlfriend have sex with another guy while he sits and watches. Another is the Fucking Glasses site and She is Nerdy which has the nerd/cum on glasses fetish, but overall, I just can't recommend this network until they figure out how their site is going to work.
They have an updated box on the network in the members area that says once your membership is expired you can still access the site, look at the photos and a few of the videos, which is exactly what my $15 membership fee got me. I'll just write this one up to experience and try to be more careful about joining sites. I went to the site with a different browser and sure enough, it says nothing about the membership being a limited $15 trial. It even says multiple ways to download and stream.
If I had received all the content it said I would for $14.95, I would have scored it in the mid-80s as a network. As it is, I wouldn't score it over a 65. |
|
01-14-20 12:29am
Replies (2)
|
Review
144
|
Dyked
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the better lesbian sites I have joined.
Very good production values and the scenes have an added touch of creativity to them.
Only 74 scenes, but I have downloaded nearly all 74.
Varied scenarios unlike a lot of lesbian sites that stick with a soft background, in the bed.
All videos have 1080p option.
Included photo sets and screencaps. All videos, screencaps and videos are downloadable.
Billing through Epoch or Paypal with Epoch. I had a slight problem with Paypal with Epoch and will explain below. |
| Cons: |
The scenes could be longer, have more story, they have a good lesbian site here and they should keep trying to improve it. It could be one of the very best if they did.
I had a major problem with the billing and it's why I've had the account for 3 months. I don't think it's the site's fault.
How many pretty and cute girls getting naked can you watch before it gets boring? |
| Bottom Line: |
The billing problem, in my opinion, was either Paypal or Epoch's fault. When I signed up for the site through Paypal, I received an email confirming it. I didn't read over it. When it came time to cancel, I went back to welcome email and there's no information in it. No login info, no member ID, and no way to cancel it on Epoch. I sent Epoch an email and they said it was a common problem. The billing is being listed as charged to Epoch Customer Service instead of to the porn site. They were able to find my information based on the Paypal transaction ID. I won't be using Paypal to pay for porn again until that gets fixed.
This site was promoted to me as a Team Skeet Premium site. I have really enjoyed their premium sites and it was a big reason I joined it. Instead, as soon as I joined it said I had access to all of Team Skeet. I'm not including any of that in my review as I believe Dyked is an excellent lesbian site.
Most lesbian sites I have joined are very soft, very lovey, even soft. Dyked takes a different approach. There are scenes with two dominatrix females whipping the teen lesbians into having lesbian sex. There are gym scenes. The almost overdone video game geek girl lesbian scenes. There are scenes with more than 2 girls, hardcore strapon scenes that are rough and a little bit of everything. There's rarely of feeling of love or passion, but there's a feeling of very high lust.
The models are all attractive. They only have 74 scenes, and the update schedule doesn't give me much hope for long term growth. They have 3 updates some months, 0 updates some months and 2 in other months.
The video quality is very good with 1080p, 720p and 576p, 480p and 360p available. The photo sets and screen captures are downloadable and some of those are even better than the videos.
There's a good blend of playful, silly, rough, lots of tribbing/scissoring, and unless you get tired of watching pretty girls naked there's not much to complain about. Believe it or not, as a non-lesbian, I do sometimes get tired of watching pretty girls naked!
The scenes are generally fun and light-hearted, there are stepfamily scenes mixed in too. I would recommend it by itself as a site for those into lesbian scenes that don't follow the typical formula of lesbian scenes so it's a definite recommend with the added Team Skeet network. |
|
01-13-20 11:12pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
145
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An exceptionally large site that leans heavily to the photography side, but has a bigger than most sites’ collection of videos too.
10,700 photo sets and 7200 videos, all are downloadable.
A site with 3800 attractive European teen models
Multiple updates every day
Comes with over 14,000 bonus streaming only videos as well as a cam site.
More explicit than many other similar sites with mostly masturbation or solo. There are some hardcore sex and some girl/girl scenes too.
Bills with Epoch, a trusted company |
| Cons: |
It had a pre-checked cross sale on sign-up and I nearly missed it.
Annoying advertising in the members area |
| Bottom Line: |
This has to be the best site of this type that I have ever joined. I would even move it just a little ahead of my previous all-time favorite, Nubiles. Not only is there more content than I could watch in even a few months, but the models are attractive and some are to me top-level in looks. On the whole, these might be the prettiest models I've ever seen on a site or network.
There are four types of scenes here. You get solo, masturbation, lesbian and boy/girl. The exceptionally good camerawork adds a lot to these scenes.
About three quarters of the scenes and photo sets are of sexy young women alone, either posing nude or masturbating. Even the guys are nice looking. Few if any are much bigger than average in dick size and they make believable couples with the young and natural looking female models. My favorite part of the site is that most of the models come across as shy and sweet. They seem genuinely turned on by their partners, both male and female. They are so young too!
I do not consider myself a lesbian. I have never had a sexual experience with a woman, but I would consider it with some of these models. They were just that cute and irresistible. None of the scenes were at all extreme and seemed believable, unlike so many porn scenes on other sites.
You will find 10,700 photo sets and 7200 videos, All are downloadable and there are new updates every day. I could not ask for more.
There were some nice bonus streaming scenes as an extra, 14,000 of them as well as a cam site with 8000 models and a DVD site. I thought I only got this site and was happy I got these other extras when I signed up. I think this type of porn could easily be advertised as female-friendly. |
|
01-06-20 07:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
146
|
Bopping Babes
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site that was recommended to me by PU member mbaya and it's exactly what I was looking for. More softcore, dancing, stripping and teasing.
New videos are added every two days.
The number of videos is more than 1300. Each one is around 10 minutes.
The models have sexy English accents
Pictures for nearly every scene.
There are no download limits. |
| Cons: |
For the most part, the stripping only goes to nude. I would like to see a little more down there.
Doesn’t come with any other sites. I have been a member for two months now and am starting to feel like there needs to be more or slightly different content. Like it could evolve into more. |
| Bottom Line: |
I sometimes feel frustrated as a porn fan. I haven't gone outside my comfortable box much. Some of the most hardcore sites are still turn-offs for me. I tried some sites more focused on photos and those left me feeling like I needed more. It's like I'm going through porn puberty! This site was recommended to me and I really like the site.
What I got from this site was a lot of teasing, softcore stripping videos. There were a few things that attracted me to them and to the site. I like the idea of getting my man all hot and bothered by how sexy I can be when I show him just enough to get his FULL attention.
The women are about my age or a little younger as they were nearly all between 25 and 35. They seemed very comfortable with their bodies, although many were not so perfect. This was just like me too. I liked that they talked in very sexy ways while they slowly stripped, mostly while dancing. Some were not very good dancers, just like me. There was something else here that I have never seen before. When they talked to the viewer, they were asking him to show their cock and stroke it. I found it worked for me too. I would love to try this kind of dirty talk on my man to see his reaction.
Mostly I understood the women who spoke in English accents that I found very sexy. It seemed to add a nice touch of class. I kept waiting on one to ask if I wanted a spot of tea. The outfits such as nurse, stewardess, tennis player etc. made the scenes better as they seemed like there was some roleplay. Being a former Catholic schoolgirl, I still have the odd fetish of seeing women in schoolgirl outfits and they have those here.
I also found it enjoyable in a personal way as five models were named Katy, Kate, Katie or some variation. They could be me!
The site has more than 1300 updates and adds new ones about every two days.
I found the site easy to use and a lot of fun. It at least made me feel like it did more than the photo softcore sites and didn't make me cringe like some of the hardcore sites did. I really like it and would like it even more if they worked in a handjob, tease, CFNM twist. |
|
01-06-20 06:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
147
|
Milking Table
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of Fantasy Massage network of six massage themed sites.
Comes with access to Adult Time, which has over 56,000 videos
There are no download limits
The women range from innocent barely legal to MILFs who know what they like.
The site was easy to use and the streaming player works without needing to buffer. I like to stream scenes before downloading them. |
| Cons: |
No longer updating as of February of 2016.
One thing I noticed was there are a lot of tattooed models on here if that's a problem for you. |
| Bottom Line: |
Milking Table is no longer updating and that is a shame as I found it deserving of my time and attention. I found 112 videos of men getting massaged and women helping them with hand and blowjobs.
What I liked best is the way the cum shots were shown as a reward for the women, who were visibly excited by what they were doing and what they were about to get. The pretty models seemed to enjoy the scenes even more than the lucky guys. The scenes generally start with the couple talking, but not a real story. She next helps herself and her guy with a good slow stroking hand job, then some oral loving. What happens next is something I have not seen on another site. He lays down on a massage table with his nice very hard cock sticking down through a hole in it. She is stroking and sucking his cock, but you don’t see his face. Instead the focus is on her look of pleasure as she is enjoying him as an object of her desire. As a reward she gets a nice cum shot in her mouth or on her face. I love to watch men cumming, especially big amounts. For me seeing that creamy filling shooting out is always the best part in a porn scene.
The models varied as you see some that are innocent and barely legal and some that are into their thirties and even forties. The younger models were fun to watch. What I liked even more was that I could easily see myself as one of these older women, doing what they were doing.
My biggest complaint is that there were so few videos. However, you also get Adult Time with over 56,000 videos of many different kinds of sex action. For massage content, you get this site as well as the six sites of the Fantasy Massage network. It's a site worth looking into if you find yourself bored with Adult Time's regular content. This is close to being CFNM porn with the models keeping at least some of their clothes on throughout most of the scenes. |
|
01-06-20 06:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
148
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Being helpful is one thing. You started it with a correction of something I can reword to say "content that dates back 19 years". That would have been helpful to suggest. Instead, you stick to the technicality that the site itself is only 2 years old. Do you think to a person considering the site they care more about some of the content being 19 years old or the site only being 2?
You then replied with a LOL like a 12 year old. That's really helpful and not mocking is it? I'll edit it and reword it to say the content on the site is as old as 19 years. And there is an elitism here. See pointing out a technicality that has nothing to do with the actual content. That's a need for correcting people.
|
12-09-19 06:39am
|
Reply
149
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I see it that some of the content in the member's area is 19 years old. That makes the site 19 years old to me. The snobbery and elitism here is disgusting.
|
12-09-19 05:27am
|
Review
150
|
Love Hairy
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site with 469 "hairy" models
More explicit than other sites in this genre, masturbation, girl/girl scenes and fully spread photos.
1,142 photo sets and 169 videos, all are downloadable.
Tagging system that can help you find models with similar traits as the one you're looking at, I even noticed a tag for "painted nails".
The majority of the hairiness on this site is in the pubic area. Some other hairy sites include hairy legs and hairy underarms, I haven't noticed any of those. |
| Cons: |
The site is newer, but some of the content is 19 years old. The layout is a modern layout, but those older photo sets feel like I'm looking at vintage porn.
While there are videos they are not that common and there's no set update schedule. They had 4 in October and November 2019, combined. Before that they only had 3 in the previous 9 months.
Small in quantity photo sets, some have as few as 20 photos in them. |
| Bottom Line: |
I find myself on the fence when it comes to hairy content. I think the biggest reason is too much pubic hair makes it hard to see the action (if there is any) that's going on in the pussy area. This site focuses more on women with hairy pubic areas than full, complete bushes. The content is mostly softcore, but there are usually 3-5 explicit photos in each set. The videos don't really feel like the belong on the site and I'm guessing they don't. Some of them credit Viv Thomas as the producer and look like content from 2006-2012. The videos are more explicit and even include lesbian scenes.
I like this site for including more explicit shots. I've joined several of these artsy sites over the last few months and I needed one to show me it was still pornography and not just women standing around naked. The explicit poses on here are even very good, done in what I would called "sexually provocative" ways.
I notice some big name models mixed in here that I think are now retired. The life of this site makes it seem like there should be more content. Maybe it was down or dormant for years?
The models are attractive and some are top-level in looks. I don't think "hairy fans" will think the content is hairy enough. A lot of these models have trimmed pubic areas.
The 1,142 photo sets can be downloaded as zips and will be the main focus of most members memberships. A better, more frequent and consistent video update schedule would help. It's a good, but not quite great site. |
|
12-08-19 08:47pm
Replies (6)
|
|
