Maybe you should post this as comment on Adult Time.
Posting this a reply to my comment means most people won't see this information.
If you post it as a comment by itself, it will be seen by people more easily.
I don't download very much any more, and don't stream a lot lately.
But for people who do a lot of downloads and a lot of streaming, it would be good to know.
When I wrote that Adult Time was offering unlimited streaming, I was repeating what the advertising stated.
But the advertising can be wrong.
I didn't do a numerical count of the photosets and videos.
I just took those numbers, and the number of models, from some page or other.
Too lazy to go through the hassle of viewing all the pages of their models and videos and trying to add them for a single count.
I figured that a general figure was enough to give an idea of the amount of the content.
My last join was a few years ago.
So I don't have specific knowledge of the exact content from a few years ago (my memory is not great).
My review basically paints a picture of a site that could have existed in the 1970, if the internet had existed back then. With photo sets and videos that are in the style of the 1970s (except the internet wasn't around then).
Does the site update? Yes.
You get 1 or 2 new videos per week.
Are all of the videos new?
The video of Jana Cova, posted Mar 4, 2020, and Jillian Janson, posted Mar 9, 2020, might be older videos, since I don't know if these models retired. I had assumed they retired, and these videos might have been shot years ago, but I'm not an expert on them.
Neither one of the videos I selected were up to the quality of many of the Digital Desire videos I've seen over the years: the videos lack the sharpness and color vibrancy of the standard Digital Desire videos, which were excellent and outstanding quality.
Actually, I much prefer the older videos of my favorite models, such as Kenze Thomas.
Those videos just make the models much more appealing. For me, at least.
The photo sets and videos have a posted date.
So I assume that they are posting new material, or at least material that has been updated.
I've only started my membership at the site, so I don't have a good over-view yet.
But so far, my impression is that I prefer the older content: there are so many beautiful girls, that were photographed so exquisitely. And the videos were softer. Not as much emphasis on the solo masturbation. More of a tease, although there was plenty of nudity.
But yes, they are updating with new models, in the photosets and videos.
But I prefer the older content on the site.
I'm a current member of the Wow Girls site.
Not on their staff, just a regular member.
I have no idea why you are being blocked.
My suggestion would be to have a live chat with Vendo.
The Vendo website has live chat 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Live chat is immediate, you don't have to wait for an email response.
Also, you can get a written record of what they say, if you copy and paste the chat to a text file.
Click on the "live chat with support" hot link, and a popup box appears.
Fill in the information, and you should be connected with a live chat operator within a few minutes.
Since you don't have a sub with them yet, just give your name, and your email address you want to use.
Vendo also has email support and telephone support, but I've used their live chat, and you get a fast response, within a few minutes or less.
Explain your problem, and see if they can solve your problem.
Separately, on the join page for Wow Girls, there are 2 pre-checked cross-sales for other sites.
Make sure you uncheck those pre-checked cross-sales, or else you will be signing up for a trial to 2 other different web sites, and the trials turns into very expensive subs that you can get much cheaper elsewhere.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They've had a special discount of $9.95 for the first month for a while now. If you don't see that price listed, I'd wait for a holiday special price of $9.95 for the first month, since there are all kinds of holidays they offer that price at.
-They have an outstanding collection of beautiful and lovely models in the 18-early 20s age range.
-They have both photo sets and videos. The photo sets are offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-The videos are also offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-If you know what the site is, a stand-alone softcore glamour site of lovely young women, your expectations should be met. Don't expect hardcore action.
-The biggest con is probably that they constantly delete older material. Members often complain about it. I don't know why they delete when it irritates their members so much.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for most porn sites.
-No information on the models, except for the model's name.
-If you spend $75 at their on-site store, you get a free cock ring. Flash this cock ring at your local gay bar, and you can be the life of the party (sick joke?).
-This is a stand-alone site. No bonus sites are included with your membership.
-Video resolution goes up to 1080p. There are a few 4K videos, but they are definitely in the minority. Many PU members want a 4K option at the sites they join.
-Zip file for photosets is only offered in one definition. Strange for a glamour photosite.
-Some hot links don't work correctly.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Photosets: 3,800+
Videos: 1,000+
Models: 700+
Stephen Hicks died in 2013. He was the main photographer and owner of the Digital Desire website.
He specialized in high quality glamour photography over a decades long career.
His work appeared in such adult magazines as Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler, High Society and many more when those types of magazines were in their heyday (late 1960s through the 1980s).
He had an eye for beautiful women. And he presented them lovingly in softcore glamour photography.
One common complaint from the site members is that a lot of the content has been disappearing for many years. Not sure why. You have memories of some outstanding photographs, you come to the site, and it's not there any more. Which can be disappointing. This can happen at different websites, but the Digital Desire site is almost famous for deleting content.
They have over 700 models, most range from attractive to lovely.
Lena Anderson, Lexie Fox, Bailey Rayne, Keisha Grey, Shyla Jennings, Jade Couture, Kenze Thomas, Kasey Chase, Victoria Valmer, Aubrey Belle, the list of gorgeous women just goes on and on.
How a model is presented can make a world of difference in how attractive she looks. Digital Desire, under Stephen Hicks, was famous for its softcore glamcore approach.
Since he died in 2013, the site has featured a harder edge: it's not hardcore, but what you could call midcore, with female masturbation, lesbian. But I couldn't find what you would normally call hardcore, which features men having sex with women. No men at the site (except for the photographers).
Note: the site did feature female masturbation and lesbian before 2013, but it was with a softcore approach. I'm not explaining this very well. Let's call this a softcore site featuring some female masturbation and lesbian activity.
If you are a fan of the Playboy and Penthouse magazine photo layouts from the 1970s, then this site will probably appeal to you. Stephen Hicks contributed to those magazines. He had an eye for beautiful young women, and presented them in a loving glamcore setting. In both indoor and outdoor shoots.
Many photographers seem to have a problem with outdoor shoots. With the lighting or sound control or other factors. But the Digital Desire site has a professional approach that showcases the photo sets and videos and they are just a pleasure to view. And the soundtrack, which can often be annoying with random sounds or over-loud music at some sites, is not distracting. The Digital Desire site just presents you with a polished, softcore product, which is what you are looking for.
Although this site does not compare in amount of content versus such mega-sites as MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, I think it's definitely worth a join, if you are a fan of softcore glamcore photography.
Especially with the $9.95 price for the first month of membership.
Tom D Admin, did you ever post the tally for the June 17, 2020 raffle?
The number of points each entrant had for the raffle?
I am curious to see that listing.
Also, instead of putting news items in the Announcements section, which most PU members and visitors probably don't see, it would be better to post the news items on a new thread, which more members and visitors are able to see easily.
Unless you are looking around the site because you have a lot of extra time, most people overlook the Announcement section, I believe, and miss the Announcements.
Sticking the news in a new thread makes the news/Announcements more easily seen.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-As part of the Teen Mega World network, you get access to 30+ teen sites.
-The last few years, the site offers videos with definitions from 360p through 2160p (UHD).
Earlier videos are from 360p through 1080p.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
-This is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks. Based on the level of attractiveness of the teen models, the quality of the videos. They are not glam videos, but they are excellent quality: nice sets, nice costumes (nothing fancy or glamourous, just nice clothes), good lighting and sound control.
And the videos are, in my estimation, bread-and-butter videos, showing teen sex in different categories. That applies to the network.
The site features anal sex. Maybe some cock-sucking, pussy-licking, pussy-fucking, but each scene that I saw had at least some anal sex.
I don't know why the videos appeal so much to me. They are just straight sex. Not violent or abusive, just a guy and girl having sex.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
And since the site theme is anal, they include that as part of the sex. The girls seem to really enjoy getting fucked up the ass. Along with getting fucked up their pussies. What can I say? The models, which are mainly attractive to some really lovely girls, are having a good time. And I would assume the guys are too.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Login and member pages are non-secure (not https).
-The search engine is poor. If you enter a model's name, you get a bunch of hits that are not the model's name.
-If you want to find the model's content at the site or at the network, go to the model's page, and that will give you links to her content.
-They advertise daily updates. That refers to the network, not to the site. Anal Beauty site updates with 1 or 2 videos per month (with matching photo sets).
-The thumbnails of the models need to be upgraded to show how attractive these girls are.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-I wish they would tone down the moans, groans, screams of pleasure of the models, to make the sex more realistic. I assume the girls are having a good time, but moans, groans, and screams of pleasure are just too theatrical to be real. It's better than having the girls crying and moaning as if in pain, but are these girls really such nymphos that just touching a cock will start them moaning and groaning, and licking the guy's ass and cock and balls while emitting strange sexual noises?
I know some girls do get excited in sex, and make noises, but these models are directed to show excess enthusiasm.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: anal sex.
The site definitely shows anal sex in action. Along with vaginal sex, licking pussies, licking balls and cocks, licking the guy's ass.
So if you are into anal sex, this site should be a good fit.
Just turn down the volume if you don't want your roommates and/or neighbors to hear the screams, moans, bodies-slapping against each other. Although I wrote that the sound control is good, that means that you don't usually hear trains or airplanes or other extraneous sounds. But the noise these girls make is truly excessive. I know they are supposed to be excited, and enjoying the sex, but the noise level from the girls is just too fucking loud. And the guys, while not as noisy, are also told to make grunts and groans to show how much energy they are putting into the sex.
Having said that, these teens are fine-looking girls with lovely bodies. And they put on a sexual show for you. The noise might be excessive, but the basic action is not. And I appreciate that the sex is energetic without being over-the-top with violence or sadistic elements. The girls seem to really appreciate the attention the guys are paying to them.
Anal beauty is a fine teen site. With 144 videos and matching photo sets.
If you are into anal sex, the network has plenty of other anal content.
As well as a wide variety of other teen sex niches.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. Because the site is good, and the network is excellent, if you are into attractive teens having sex.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all 17 sites in the network.
-Tiny site. Only 5 videos (and matching photo sets). So you can view and download the entire site in less than a day. That's a pro and a con. Pro, that you can easily see and download the entire site in less than a day. Con, in that once you've viewed/downloaded the videos, the site itself has nothing more to offer. Except that you also have access to the rest of the network.
-The site theme is bounty hunters chasing bad girls and then having sex with them. This is an easier plot to follow than most teen porn site themes, because it requires less acting on the part of the girls. All the girls have to do is cry and plead to be freed, which is simple acting. Much easier acting than trying to follow some script where the girl is supposed to show emotion and the girl just looks stupid because she's not an actress.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
I'm not saying the bounty hunter plot is believable, but it's more believable than many of the teen hardcore plots that sites come up with.
And since you only have 5 videos at the site, you don't start to get bored with the same plot being used over and over again.
-Easy site navigation. With only 5 videos at the site, it's easy to see all of them. The only thing simpler navigation would be if they only had 1 video at the site, which would definitely make the site navigation even simpler.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Tiny site. Only 5 videos (and matching photo sets).
-Archive site.
The first video at the site is dated Dec 18, 2015.
The last video at the site is dated Sep 19, 2016.
So the update rate was very slow and erratic.
Bottom Line:
The videos are available for streaming and downloads from 270p through 1080p
The video runtime is about 20 to 30 minutes.
The photo sets have about 80 to 100 photos.
The faces of the bounty hunters are blurred, to protect the innocent. But faces (and bodies) of the criminal girls are shown, along with their entire bodies. No blurring for the girls, who are really dirty sluts, except they must have taken a bath before the video was shot, because their bodies are clean and white in stunning color.
Site theme: The models are cute teens. But they are bad girls, who are wanted by the law. Once a bounty hunter sees the girl, he chases her down. Your heart goes out to these girls, because they are so young and pretty, and you know, in your heart, they didn't mean to commit any crime. But the bounty hunter is relentless, and he either ties her up, or puts her in handcuffs.
The girls are terrified, and plead to be set free.
The bounty hunter is a mean son of a bitch, who ignores the girl's pleas. But maybe, just maybe, the bounty hunter is also a little bit human. And he is attracted to the girl, because she is young and cute. Once the girl is on her knees, and somehow rubbing the bounty hunter's cock (because a girl on her knees close to a guy's crotch instinctively knows to start rubbing a guy's cock), the hunter and girl start to get even closer. The girl knows the bounty hunter is a mean son of a bitch, and that turns her on. And the hunter knows the girl is willing to do anything to be set free. So, an unconscious is struck, where the guy and the girl are going to have sex.
This is the dramatic plot that guides these videos.
Be prepared to hold back your tears of pity for these vulnerable girls, because the bounty hunter, a bad man with a strong cock, will make these girls squeal with pleasure while he is borking them like crazy.
The fact that some of these girls, while cute, are also tiny teens, just adds to the pleasure of seeing them get off with the bounty hunter.
The idea for the site is great. I don't understand why they only made 6 videos for the site, before stopping the series. The site theme is at least as good as most of the rest of the network themes, and the models are able to act out the plot more believably than many of the other site themes.
Also, even though this is forced sex, the sex is not rough or crude or violent. It's just straight, hardcore sex, with no slapping, hitting, spitting, cursing, etc. The girls squeal a lot, but that's supposed to show sexual excitement, not pain or torture.
So, even though this is a tiny site, it does a good job of filling the niche for dominant male, submissive female story line. And the fact that the models are cute teens, and mainly petite, just adds to the theme.
The twist at the end of the video is that the girl, who has been given the fuck of her life, expects the bounty hunter to let her go free.
But the bounty hunter is a dominant male. He knows he gave a thrilling fuck, and he is still going to turn her over for the bounty. So he's fucked her twice: once sexually, and a second time because the girl thought she was exchanging sex for freedom, and she is wrong: she is still going to jail for the bounty hunter to be paid.
It's a man's world, kitten.
End of story.
Makes you feel good you're a man. And can fuck these poor girls over again and again.
How can they improve the site?
The easiest way would be to start adding new content to the site.
A second method would be for the bounty hunters to add a siren to their chase vehicle, which a van.
They need to upgrade to a Maserati or some exotic sports car which can go zoom-zoom while they are chasing the girls, and blast their siren to add to the excitement. That would get the blood racing of the male audience, who want to jump on their Harley-Davidson motorcycles and help capture the girls.
In your mind's eye, you can see yourself zooming along the streets and highways, helping the bounty hunters catch hold of these girls, maybe holding them down while the bounty hunters use handcuffs or ties to subdue the runaway teens, maybe even helping the bounty hunter while he has sex with the girl.
And at the conclusion of the video, you can imagine yourself telling the girl: "Crime does not pay."
That's almost as good as watching the creampie the bounty hunter leaves on the girl's pussy.
Porn is fantasy. So why not go all the way, and imagine you're part of the video. Either as an active participant who is helping the bounty hunter. Or acting as the bounty hunter himself.
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
That's because, in spite of the tiny amount of content (5 videos and matching photo sets), I think the videos do a great job showing how men can dominate and control women in the real world.
You also get access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network of 17 sites.
Without access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network, which has a lot of lovely young teens, the score would drop considerably.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubliles Porn network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you full access to the entire network of 16 different sites.
-No download limits, no streaming limits. Many sites are starting to limit downloads, or starting to charge extra for downloads, so unlimited downloads for no extra charge is getting to be a nice feature.
-login and member pages are https, which means the pages are secure, less prone to hacking.
-Easy navigation of the site. Easy to switch between sites.
-A major strength of the site (and network) is how attractive these young teens are. Many teen sites have lots of attractive to gorgeous models, so this site and network don't stand out for the quality of the models, but you have to give the site and network credit for picking such attractive models.
-CCBill and Epoch are the primary billers, so they are trusted names, easy to cancel, easy to deal with.
-The site has 202 videos with matching photo sets on 2020-06-13.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The videos average 15 to 25 minutes, which is shorter than most teen hardcore sites, but the videos cover all the action needed for a hardcore porn scene.
-You can control the streaming speed of the video: from 0.25X to 2.0X.
-Can select the streaming definition from 270p through 1080p.
-Video download definition choice from 270p through 1080p.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. One of the better teen networks.
-Slow update rate. Recent updates are 1 video (and matching photo set) per month. But with the coronavirus epidemic, you take what you can get, and try to be thankful.
-The thumbnail that illustrates the model in the video is small. Would be nice to have a larger thumbnail, so you can get a better idea of what the model looks like.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The regular 1-year membership is $199. Wait for a holiday special (lots of them each year) and you should be able to join for $100 or less.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: petite teens having sex: female masturbation, lesbian sex, boy-girl sex, 2 boys-1 girl, 2 girls-1 boy.
The girls are real teens, small, cute to lovely. They put on a good show while demonstrating their appetite for sexual satisfaction.
This would be considered reality porn: it's not glamour porn, the girls are not put into glamourous settings or glamorous costumes, but they are young and attractive, and eager for sex. The sets and costumes are not glamourous, but they aren't the cheap low-rent settings and costumes of porn from 2000 or earlier that many Russian sites started out with.
The mood of the lesbian videos can be slow and sensous. It's not really seduction, more like two girls expoloring each other's bodies in a friendly, loving way.
The moods of the videos varies. It can be slow and senuous, or perky and fun, or whatever.
Since the girls are young, petite, and mainly attractive, you're just supposed to relax and enjoy these videos (and photo sets).
Most porn models are not great actors. So when you see some of them trying to do the perky teen bit, it can seem false. Dakota Fanning, not a porn model but a fine actress, when she was a pre-teen, did lots of interviews for her movies, and she came across as a cute, wonderful girl with lots of energy and enthusiasm and intelligence. And it seemed real. Watching a porn model trying to project the same bubbly image, it just seems fake. I'd much rather watch a Dakota Fanning movie made years ago than watch a blonde porn model smiling and twirling and shaking her ass and waving her arms because she's so full of fake enthusiasm and happiness for life.
Kiara Cole, fine petite teen body, shitty actress. They should write a script for her that doesn't require much acting. And less fake smiling. Along with her false eyelashes. Why do so many porn models wear false eyelashes? Less moans and groans and fake screams would make the video seem more real.
You have access to the entire Nubiles Porn network of 16 sites. All the sites are teen-centric, and almost all the teen models are attractive to cute. But the site themes and plots are paper-thin.
So turn your brain off a little, to enjoy these lovely girls.
Some of the videos are crystal clear, and watching the fine bodies of these teens can be an enjoyable experience.
I'm giving the site a score of 93, because you not only have access to a site of 202 teen videos, but access to 15 other teen sites.
So those sites might be buried in the Adult Time network, as well.
Just guessing, I figure your chance of accessing the old lesbo101 content is slim, if you join Fame Digital directly, or join Adult Time directly.
You can check tube sites, which often have condensed versions of some videos from other sites. That would be your best chance of finding some content from the lesbo101 site, but you would only get a small number of hits, and the quality of the videos might be sub-standard, from what was offered at the original lesbo101 site.
Bottom line: redirecting from a dead site to a currently active site is a marketing ploy. There's no guarantee you will find the old dead site content at the currently active site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the MetArt network. So you can expect a professional, high class offering of erotic porn.
-A large catalog of photo sets and videos.
-Updates daily. Either a photo set or a video.
-The main strength of the site is the level of the attractiveness of the models. Both the girls and the men are attractive. The women range in age from late teens to the twenties, and are either good-looking or beautiful.
-Videos are offered from 220p to 4K (UHD), in download.
-Photo sets are offered in high, medium and low definition zips.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. No limits, no extra charge for downloads.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.99/month recurring.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale in join page.
-The videos lack heat. Although this is glamorized hardcore sex, it's more like a softcore version.
The site offers high-quality professional videos and photo sets, but the videos just lack heat.
-The videos often have a setup of 10 minutes or less, before the sex starts. Since the video runtime is 30 minutes or less, that doesn't leave much time for the sex.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Videos: over 1200
Photo sets: Over 1600
Number of photos per set: Over 100
The site theme is softcore erotic sex. I say softcore, because it's glamourized sex, not raunchy, but it would be considered hardcore. You have guy/girl, girl/girl, and solo female masturbation.
-SexArt is like a glamorized, erotic version of MetArt. MetArt focuses on photos, although it also offers some videos, and the videos at MetArt are becoming slightly more erotic. But there is no sex in the MetArt videos. There is sex in the SexArt videos (and photo sets).
-Although I think the videos lack heat, the photo sets are more erotic. Looking at Candy Kate, in her first photo set at SexArt, titled "First Time", posted Jun 04, 2020, she is a wet dream come true. It's a solo model set, but she is fucking gorgeous. Or maybe sexy is a better word, because I've seen prettier models, but none more luscious, more fuckable.
Note: you are supposed to respect the models, but respect has nothing to do with it: Candy Kate is hot. At least in the Sex Art photo set titled "First Time".
She has 2 photo sets at MetArt. The same model, professionally photographed in high-class glamour setting, but the set at SexArt is far more erotic.
The site is easy to navigate. And the search feature is excellent for bringing up a model's content at the site.
I can't describe what makes the photosets are SexArt more erotic than the photosets at MetArt. Maybe it's because I have seen thousands of photosets at MetArt, and I'm becoming slightly bored with that site.
But the photosets are SexArt are just more enticing. More erotic. I have a hunger for the model at SexArt, while at MetArt, I think she is cute or attractive, but no hunger. Even though MetArt has thousands of really attractive, even beautiful or gorgeous women.
I'm giving SexArt a score of 90. It has a fine catalog of outstanding women. But outstanding women are common: Femjoy, MPL Studios, MetArt, and a score of other fine photo sites have 1,000s of outstanding, lovely models.
What could SexArt do better? They could put some heat into their videos.
But their photo sets are really outstanding.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site has a lot of cute teens. But not much effort is put into making them as attractive as possible.
-You have a choice of two formats for videos: MP4 and WMV. But the MP4 has more definitions to offer.
From mobile to 4K (Ultra High Definition).
-The photosets have a zip file, that downloads with the title of the video (but not the model's name).
Cons:
-Although the photosets have about 60 photos per set, the individual photos are screencaps, that are not very good. I'm seen much better screencaps at other sites that were produced by a software program that makes photosets from a video shoot. So even if the model is attractive, and many of these models are, the photoset is not worth collecting. You could problably produce your photosets from the downloaded video with better quality from a free software program.
-Slow update rate: 2 or 3 videos per month. You also get matching photosets with each video.
-Login and member pages are not secure. Not https. So easy to hack login details.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Username and password are computer-generated.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Movies: 460
Models: 2249
Photosets: 2468
Videos run about 30 minutes or less.
Site theme: teens fucking. A guy fucks a girl. Very basic teen hardcore sex.
Many of the models are cute to very attractive, but not much effort is put into making the models look good. The good looks come from their youth (18 to early 20s in age), and the care taken to select good looking girls.
The vibe of the site is the same basic vibe used for most of the 18Videoz sites: this is reality-based porn, and no effort is made to glamorize the movies with nice clothes, expensive sets, great lighting: they are trying to present videos that look like they were shot by an amateur, even though the videos are professionally shot: but the clothes, settings, models, are trying to present an everyday hardcore sex scene that is a girl or a guy/girl having sex. Not over the top sex, but sex in which both parties are getting their kicks.
So the sex they show is teen hardcore sex, no glamor, just blowjob mixed with vaginal and anal fucking.
Even though many of the models are cute teens at Teeny Lovers, I much prefer watching the videos at Teen Mega World, or at the Wow sites, or the sites that are run by the Wow managers (Ultra Films). The Teen Mega World is straight teen hardcore, the Wow sites and Ultra Films add a touch of glamour, but the Teen Mega World videos are just more enjoyable, and the network has a ton of lovely young teens. The Wow sites and Ultra Films have many of the same models as the Teen Mega World network, and the quality of the videos and photo sets at these sites is outstanding: gorgeous teens, high production values for the videos and photos.
I'm giving the site a score of 82.
That's very random.
If watching a guy and girl get it on, and you don't need any frills to make it more interesting, this site might be worth joining. Especially if you can catch a holiday discount. I joined for 12 months for $60.
The Best Porn lists the following memberships:
Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $49.95 (3 months, non-recurring)
1 Year: $119.95 (recurring)
I would advise joining Teen Mega World, if you can catch a low-priced offer.
Or, pay a slightly higher price, and join one of the Wow sites (you get All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn with a membership in any one of the 3 sites).
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of the premier softcore glamcore sites on the internet.
-The biggest collection of models and photosets on the internet. The site has been around since 1999, and updates with 4 new sets (photosets + an occasional video) daily. On the first of the month, they update with 6 new sets.
-They offer a zip file for each photoset in 3 definitions: low, medium, high.
-They offer a streaming photoplayer to view the photosets, with a time-lag you choose for each photo.
-They offer a cover and also a clean cover (the cover of the photoset without any script) for each photoset or video. Useful for collectors who want a simple reference to the collected content.
-They offer unlimited streaming and downloading. Which is a nice feature, in the period where many sites are starting to charge extra for downloads or have download limits.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-They did a recent site update, and dropped some useful features:
They used to have a listing of all the sets posted for each year, with the years divided by months.
That feature is gone. It was an easy way to browse through the back catalog. Now, I don't know an easy way to browse through the back catalog in a systematic way.
-They used to have a feature where you could mark your favorite models and favorite photosets. That is gone.
-The videos at MetArt used to be boring. In spite of the nudity of pretty or lovely models, the videos had almost zero erotic content. Lately, the videos are showing some erotic content. Although there is no masturbation or sexual activity, the models are now allowed to touch themselves, which is a giant step forward. Almost all the videos are solo girls, but the new videos can be considered slightly erotic.
-The quality of the models has been going down recently. That is a personal opinion.
Bottom Line:
Stats
-Over 3,000 models.
-Over 21,000 photosets
-Almost 300 different contributing photographers
-Number of photos per photoset range from 100 to 170.
This is probably the finest softcore glamcore site on the internet.
I've been a member of this site, continously, for 7 years now.
Maybe I'm getting crotchety in my old age, but I personally don't enjoy the site as much as I used to.
I think the level of the model attractiveness has been going down.
I miss the old features, where you could list your favorite models and photosets.
I miss the listing of the site content by year and month, that made searching the content much easier.
The videos are getting slightly more erotic, whereas in years gone by, they were a waste of time and money and talent, because they were almost all boring.
But for variety, I think I should join MPL Studios, or Zemani, or Femjoy, or some other fine glamcore site.
This review is very subjective.
I wrote in an comment on MetArt a few months back, that I didn't like the recent changes at MetArt.
PU member blaine responded, on 10-29-19:
"Completely disagree, I love the new layout, look/feel of the website, I found all the important features still available, just access is more intuitive. Been subscribing to Met and the available network of sites for years, hadn't noticed any drop off in the quality of the models. But just my preference I guess. I still love the site."
Maybe my review is too subjective. But it reflects what I believe.
I don't enjoy the site as much as I used to.
I'm giving the site a score of 92. A few years back I gave it a 95. However, other PU members can score the site higher than I do, because they seem to appreciate the site more than I do.
But any score of 90 or more indicates an excellent site, on technical merits.
I watch most of my porn on my laptop.
Even though I also have a desktop, which has a bigger and brighter and better monitor.
The laptop is easier to use.
But the desktop gives a much better image.
Convenience rules.
X-Art and SuperHot seem to be marketed as two sites for one.
$99.95/6 months subscription to both sites, recurring every 6 months.
There's probably a way to subscribe to X-Art by itself.
There's also a simpler way to subscribe to SuperHot by itself, for $49.95/year.
And if you are a creator, model, or photographer, you can get a free account to SuperHot, and get paid for your content, mesages, contests, etc.
Exactly what SuperHot is, I'm not sure.
And the public preview page shows almost nothing.
But $99.95/6 months for X-Art, even if it comes with the unknown SuperHot, seems very expensive.
I'm wondering how many subscribers are paying those prices, especially since the updates for X-Art seem to be very slow.
Maybe one new update per week, or less. X-Art had a lot of gorgeous models in the past, and the videos and photosets were high quality glamour, but they seem to have priced themself way too high to join.
The Best Porn states there is a new review of X-Art "completed on May 22, 2020 and will be released in less than a week."
It's now June 02, 2020, and the last review posted was released Oct 2, 2019.
October to May is about 7 months, so the latest posted review is only 7 months old.
I'm surprised they did a re-review so soon, even if they have not released it yet.
RabbitsReviews shows a link to join X-Art for $9.95 for the first month, rebilling at $19.95/month.
But the link connects to the X-Art site, and when you hit the join page link, it shows a join price of $99.95/6 months for a sub to X-Art and SuperHot, recurring at $99.95/6 months, and a $40/month sub to X-Art and SuperHot.
Excellent review.
Easy to read, covers the highlights of the site.
Makes me want to join, even though I already have too many subs to look at already.
But I will definitely put this on my to-join-next list, when I finally have more time.
I've been a member of this site before, and enjoyed it.
But there's so much great porn out there, there's just not enough time in a day or a week or even in a year to visit all the fine sites that are worth joining.
I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem with them.
And cancelling a sub through them, on their website, is simple and easy.
And you automatically get a confirming email of your cancellation, with the date on which your sub expires.
So I think Vendo is excellent, up there with CCBill and Epoch.
I just cancelled a sub to Wet And Puffy today, and it was easy.
Thanks for the generous helping of information.
I believe you're right, the problem was with Firefox, not with Windows.
The new version of Down Them All is much harder to use, and I haven't tried to learn how to use it.
The old version of Down Them All was much simpler, easy to use.
At the moment, I'm kind of snowed with problems.
I got a re-newed desktop, which I'm learning to use.
And, off topic, I have a bunch of cavities in my teeth, which are going to be slow and expensive to fix, as well as freaken painful. The freaken pain has already started, and that's before they have pulled any teeth yet.
So until I get the time and energy (and ambition--at the moment, all I want to do is crawl into bed and hope the pain goes away), I won't be trying your excellent suggestion.
I think someone else suggested something similar a while back, but I didn't follow up on it, because I was thinking an older version of firefox might be more open to viruses.
But I hope to try your old version of firefox with the old down them all, because it was so easy to use.
REVIEW(CONTINUES):
There are no download limits.
The content is exclusive.
The content does not appeal to me.
The models are teens, which are my favorite type of models.
When I stream a video, the definition of the video seems low: it's like I'm watching a 360p video.
The images are not clear and crisp.
I can watch videos at all of my other paysites, and get clear, crisp images.
But at Wet and Puffy, the videos seem like they were shot by an amateur.
The videos are not sharply focused.
I can appreciate the videos at the Wow sites, the Teen Mega World sites, but not at the Wet and Puffy site.
So even though other PU members have found a lot to appreciate at this site, I regret my join.
I only paid $9.95 for one month, but one month was enough for me.
However, the $60 for 1 year price is very attractive, if you do enjoy the site.
I would rather pay a higher price, and find a site i enjoy more.
I don't like the clarity of the videos.
I don't like the photo sets.
I don't like the content.
Giving the site a score of 79.
If you enjoy the videos and photosets, as other PU members seem to, then you would rate the site much higher.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They are running a current special of $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month.
But the special one year price is $60, which is very low.
-Vendo is the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). So ISP does not keep a record of each member page you visit
-No streaming or download limits that I can find.
-You get confirming emails on signup, with your login details, subscription id, order details (price and duration of membership), credit card used, etc.
-Most videos are available in 320p through 4K definition.
-Videos have a runtime of 20 to 30 minutes.
-Photosets are available in zip files in 2 definitions: low and high.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-User name and password are computer generated, so have to write them down. But they are in the confirming emails, so can copy and paste into login page.
-The site has nice-sized thumbnails of the models, but the thumbnails are usually poor photos of the models: a home photographer could easily take photos that would make the models more attractive.
You look at the thumbnails of the models, and realize that the girls in any mall would look much better than what these models look like. How you photograph a model can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears.
I look through the thumbnails of the models, and I find some models I'm familiar with, such as Delphine, who is a very attractive blonde model, and at this site (at least, in the thumbnail), she is not attractive. Nika O, another attractive model, looks poor.
If a site does not have attractive female models, I usually have little interest in the site.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Even the models I know can be very attractive, at this site thumbnails, are not attractive.
-The online photoplayer is slow.
-The quality of the photos varies. From poor to OK.
-I've seen many screen caps at competing sites that were far better quality than the photos at this site: two problems with the photos at this site: the models are not made up to be attractive. The second problem is the quality of the photos: they are just poor photos. Even models that I've seen can be very attractive at other sites, at this site, they are not attractive. The colors of the photo are poor. The model looks poor. The photosets are a waste of time.
I look at the photos of Nika O, an attractive teen. I know it's her, because I've seen her at other sites. And I've seen her at other sites with the same name. But at this site, in the photos, she looks like poor. At MetArt, Nubiles, ShowyBeauty, she is an attractive young teen. Sexy. Erotic. An object of desire.
At Wet and Puffy, she is a piece of meat I would not look at twice.
Am I over-reacting? I don't think so.
Porn is fantasy.
But if the image of the model is so unappealing, the value of the porn is damaged.
There was a recent poll at PU that asked: "Do you feel high-quality photos are an important part of a site's content?"
Well, the photos at Wet and Puffy are not high-quality photos. They are low-quality photos, that degrade the value of the models, that degrade the value of the site.
Sites like X-Art, the Wow sites have good to excellent photosets, that display the attractiveness of their models.
The Teen Mega World network has improved the quality of their photos over the years, to the point where the photos can present attractive young teens and contribute to the quality of the network.
The photos at Wet and Puffy are poor photos, that degrade the value of the site.
Even when they do have models that are naturally attractive, those models are presented as un-attractive females.
Holly, another attractive model, has 1 video at Wet And Puffy. An attractive model, pretty face, voluptious body, but the video is hurt by the skin tones of the model. She's just not attractive.
At Wow Girls, where she's listed as Barbie, she looks great. At Wet And Puffy, because of the poor skin tones, she looks blah. Not pretty or attractive.
The lighting and other factors can add or detract from the value of a video, and at Wet And Puffy, the photos and videos are poor. Even when they take a pretty model, she will look poor or unattractive in her photos and videos at Wet And Puffy.
BOTTOM LINE(Start of):
Site theme: The site classifies a woman's pussy into one of three types:
puffy peach, juicy cherry or big taco.
So the site focuses on pussies and toys.
Whatever it takes to get a woman off.
(Except no men are allowed.)
So you get all kinds of masturbation with toys.
-You get access to 6 sites with a membership.
wetandpuffy
weliketosuck
wetandpissy
puffynetwork
simplyanal
eurobabefacials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Porn is fantasy.
One of the main factors I look at is how attractive the models are.
The models at Wet and Puffy are not presented attractively.
That is a major negative factor, for me, at least.
So, in spite of the current special price of $60 for one year, I would not join this site.
That is a personal judgment.
Other PU members have found the site to have value.
Homegirl gave the site a score of 90.
mbaya gave the site a score of 95.
tangub gave the site a score of 84.
It's a large site.
Over 900 videos.
Over 900 photo sets.
Pre-checked cross-sales seem to be a special case.
I've been dinged when I miss seeing a pre-checked cross-sale, and always had to pay for the trial period, but at least I cancelled the membership immediately, because the trial turns into a very expensive monthly membership.
I remember reading one PU member who was able to get a pre-checked cross-sale refunded, but he was aggressive, and I don't remember what threats he used: whether he was going to report it as fraud, contest the charge with his credit card company, or what else he threatened.
When I sign up with any porn site, I spend a lot of time checking the site for pre-checked cross-sales. Almost as much time as filling out the form.
They are a normal part of the join process.
There are a few sites that don't use a pre-checked cross-sale, but they are definitely in the minority.
I went to the CCBill website to cancel my sub to My Naked Dolls.
After entering my email address and subscription number, the site told me my subscription # was invalid.
I tried entering the same sub # and email address a few times, and got the same response: invalid subscription #.
(I was pasting the number from the original confirmation email from CCBill).
Luckily, CCBill has a live chat, 24/7.
I used the chat, an agent came on almost immediately, he asked for my home address, and quickly found my account information at My Naked Dolls.
And cancelled the sub, without trying to argue me into extending the sub, which is something many sites try to do.
So I am happy with CCBill, and think they are an excellent service to deal with.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
