Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to about 20 sites, most of which stopped updating years ago.
-Nubiles Porn network is a teen-oriented network, featuring a lot of cute teens. Many of the models were real teens (18 or 19) at the time the videos were shot.
-Access to any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-The content is exclusive.
-The listed price is $199/year. But during holiday specials, you can find memberships for $84/year, or $9.95 for the first month. All those options include full streaming and downloading privileges.
Cons:
-The main con, for me, is the stupid plots and stupid dialogue. The videos are supposed to be funny. I think they are just stupid.
-If you can get past the stupid plots and stupid dialogue, the rest of the cons are fairly minor.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-When you enter the members area, the first page you see is filled with ads for other sites.
So you have to click through that ad page to get to the members home page.
-Ads for other sites on every member page. Standard for most porn sites.
-There is a model's page for each model. But aside from links to her videos, there is very little data on the model. Her name, a few physical stats, that's it. The bio information is bullshit:
Here's the bio for Ivy Rein:
"Seductive Russian Ivi Rein is enjoying a gap year before grad school, and she's making sure to experience all the things she's been wanting to do. Flaunting her pretty pink nipples and soft bare pussy on camera is part of her thrill.
Bottom Line:
The videos are supposed to be parodies, which are supposed to be funny. I hate them. I think the plots are stupid, the dialogue is stupid. So I can't enjoy the videos.
There are other sites where I think the videos can be cute or entertaining or enjoyable. But not at this site or the parodies at other sites in the Nubiles Porn network.
That's my reaction.
I saw Thor: Love and Thunder a couple of days ago. I walked out of the movie after about 30 minutes, because I thought the movie was stupid. It's a matter of taste. I grew up on Superman and western series on TV in the 1950s, and enjoyed them. But many of the comics in the movies today are completely different in tone and style and meaning from what was made 20 years or more ago.
If you watch the parodies at Family Swap and enjoy them, that's your style, and I'm fine with that. Different strokes for different folks. I can understand that.
But, for me, Family Swap is a waste of time.
I much prefer the Family XXX site at New Sensations network, or the other sites at New Sensations, which take a less humorous approach, and also focus on the physical beauty of the models more selectively.
Giving the Family Swap site a score of 78. You get access to the entire network of teen sites, but there is a lot of content that doesn't fit my tastes.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. Getting to be rare for porn sites.
-Videos are available in
-Exclusive content.
-Easy login if you have cookies enabled. Just click the login link, and you enter the member's area, without having to enter any login details manually.
-You have your choice of definitions from 270p through 1080p. Some of the newer videos have a 4K option. That is for streaming and downloading.
-There is a photoset for each video. The photosets average around 100 photos per set.
-There is a model page, with some basic information: the model's age, country, height. But little else about the model, other than links to her videos.
Cons:
-The main con is the site stopped updating in 2021. Before that, the update rate was very slow, averaging one new video every few months.
-Although Nubiles Porn is a teen-oriented network, most of the female models in the videos are in their 20s or 30s. So this is a chance to see some older females in the videos, if that's your niche.
-The videos are basically parodies. The plots are stupid and unbelievable, but you're supposed to be laughing while watching the videos. For me, the stupid plots and stupid dialogue destroys the pleasure of watching these videos.
Bottom Line:
The site is an archive site. It has 39 videos, with matching photosets.
If you can turn off your brain and ignore the stupid plots and stupid dialogue, the site gives you good to high quality videos: excellent focus, good lighting and colors, nice sets, good sound. The sex is basically bread and butter: not over the top gymnastics, but basic sex: cock sucking, pussy and breast licking, vaginal sex. Not a lot of affection shown in the videos: they are basically hump and fuck.
The kicker is supposed to be fucking your older teacher. The female models are supposed to be teens, but many of them are actually in their 20s. The teachers are mainly in their 20s or 30s, so they aren't much older than the "teens" they are fucking.
The site does have some cute models, such as Lucy Doll, Jessa Rhodes, Alexis Monroe, Piper Perri and others. But I can't get past the stupid plots and stupid dialogue to enjoy the videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Metart network. So you get a site structure that is easy to use.
-Search is good: can search by model, photographer, date posted.
-Daily update, either a photoset or a video.
-The models are attractive to gorgeous. Almost all are found at other sites in the Metart network.
-There is a short stat list for each model, showing her age, country, physical characteristics (eye color, hair color, height, weight, breast size, race).
-The model's page shows links to her photosets and videos at the site. There is also a separate listing of some of her appearances at other Metart sites.
-PU has a discounted price of $9.99 for the first month.
PU/TBP list the recurring price at $19.99/month, but when I click on the MetartX link from the PU site, and click on the join link, the recurring price I see is $24.99/month.
But for $9.99, you get a month's view of these lovely women, and can tell whether the site is worth a longer sub. The yearly sub is $99.95.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The site is suprisingly large.
Videos: 1270
Photosets: 1084
Models: 371
Contributing photographers: 43
-The video quality is up to Metart's exceptional quality.
-Content is exclusive.
-Videos are offered in 4k, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p.
-Photosets are offered in low, medium, high definition.
-Metart X support is one of the finest support teams of any site. I thought it was the finest, until I joined Adult Time, which has a live chat option for support. Live chat is faster than email for response. But Metart has a fast response to emails, usually within 24 hours, and has always been helpful.
-No streaming or download limits for videos or photosets.
-If you have cookies enabled, login is automatic. You don't have to enter any login details, just go to the site, and the home page opens automatically.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Lack of variety in the models. Almost all are slender, white, late teens to twenties.
Not a con for me. This is the Metart comfort zone.
-I did not find a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. However, most times you sign up for a Metart site, there is a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Rocketgate was the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've used Rocketgate for years for different subscriptions, and never had a problem.
However, even though I assume Rocketgate was the payment processor, there was also a text message that ECHST.NET 866-452-5108 is the payment processor. ECHST.NET is a payment processor
that I've never used, as far as I can recall.
-This is a minor quibble: I tried to sign up with a different email address, and a different user name. But the site recognized me, and gave me my old username and old email address.
I was trying to use a new email address, because the old email gets over 100 spam messages each day. But I decided to accept using the old email address, and old username.
The Metart network, for years, has been trying to keep each subscriber to a single username.
Which can create problems for the user sometimes.
-Videos play with soft background music. The music is not jarring, but I don't think it adds to the mood or the experience.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Basically, Metart X is a smaller, more explicit version of Metart, which is the granddaddy (or grandmother, if you're trying to be non-sexist) of the Metart network.
The main focus of the site is lovely women masturbating. Metart is strictly softcore. With Metart X, they are trying to spice up the experience, and show you the models you crave getting down and dirty. Except not too dirty, since it's Metart.
A little wilder sex would be found at Sexart or Viv Thomas, also part of the Metart network.
The Metart network, and the Metart X site, feature women that are lovely to fucking gorgeous.
The women are late teens to early 30s in age. Most models start as teens, but a lot continue into their 20s and a few are still modelling in their 30s.
What's nice is there is not a lot of obvious plastic work done on the models: they mainly appear natural: not a lot of boob jobs, not a lot of botox. MetartX is now allowing tatoos on the models: Most Metart sites removed all tatoos by airbrushing in their photosets, but I guess the Metart network is moving into the modern age where they now allow the model's tatoos to remain on view.
I personally am not a fan of tatoos, but both men and women seem to find them attractive.
If you're a fan of Metart.com, and like the models, Metart X is a chance to view some of them in a more explicit setting. Metart is a giant site, with tens of thousand of softcore galleries, very softcore videos (that are mainly boring, in spite of the lovely models), and thousands of models. Metart X features a few hundred of the same models, in masturbation scenes.
The attraction is not so much the masturbation, but watching these fucking lovely women expose their bodies for your viewing pleasure.
I definitely think that for $9.99 for the first month, the site is worth joining.
Whether you think a longer stay is worthwhile is up to you.
But just watching some of these lovely models on display, in only a few of the better videos (better, meaning you really like the model, and also enjoy the videos she's in), is more than worth the admission price.
I should add that the videos are basically artistic, erotic porn: very gentle or mild. Don't expect violence or dirt or over-the-top acrobatics. If that's what you want, look elsewhere.
The videos and photosets are solo models. They don't bother shooting two female models together. And men? Men only appear in a few of the Metart network sites. I figure Metart doesn't think most men are attractive enough to be in porn.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Probably the biggest porn network around today.
Over 200 channels.
Over 55,000 videos.
Over 10,000 porn models ranging in age from late teens to 40s and older.
The range of ethnic models is good: plenty of white, latino, and black models.
They are increasing the gay content to include the gay audience.
The network covers a wide variety of sexual niches and styles.
You get around 8 updates per day, which is a huge amount of updates for a massive network.
Videos are offered in definitions from 160p through 2160p for most videos posted the last few years. That is for both downloads and streaming.
The production values are excellent for the videos: good focus, good camera work, good lighting, good sound control, good colors, nice to expensive sets. The network offers a quality product for a very low price. And the content is massive, well over 55,000 videos. They've been advertising 55,000 videos for years, while adding 8 new updates daily.
Cons:
-The monthly subscription is normally streaming only, with no downloads.
But a PU member has mentioned that if you talk to customer service, not only can they give you downloads with a monthly sub, but they might also lower the membership price. It depends on who you talk to, and how well you talk.
-They have a search engine that is supposed to be good. But, for me, the network has so much content, that I find it difficult to easily find all the content of most sites, especially the larger ones. You not only have 55,000+ videos, most of which have matching photosets, but you also have well over 200 channels (Adult Time calls its sites channels).
-They advertise the network is still in beta. It's been in beta for years already. By saying beta, that implies that they are working to improve the network structure. I would rather they improve the structure and stop adding more daily content and more sites to the network. The network has been massive for years already.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Make the content easier to find, instead of making even more of a jumbled mess. Did anyone ever hear the phrase, "Less is more"?
The network has more than enough content to take a person years to search through to find what he wants to see. So enough already: make the content visible, and easily found. Instead of burying it under more content.
In contrast, Metart is probably the largest softcore photosite on the internet. Yet it can be searched easily, by date, by photographer, by model. The search isn't perfect, but it's far easier than the search at Adult Time.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Adult Time has introduced a new era in porn: never before, have so many porn performers fucked on the screen with so much passion.
I've seen ads stating that with a sub to Adult Time, you won't need any other porn subscriptions.
So if you can swallow the hype, and plunk down $95.40/year recurring, you can then stream and download all the porn you can view.
There is a daily download limit of 300 GB, but that seems like a huge limit.
I don't believe Adult Time will satisfy all the porn urges of most PU members. They will almost certainly want to sample other sites. I know I personally have too many subs that are probably wasted money, because I don't have the time or energy to visit them very often.
But I keep looking for gorgeous young women, and the internet keeps throwing them at me on different sites.
I definitely think Adult Time is one of the better bargains in porn.
For a very low price ($95.40/year with a PU discount, or an even lower price if you catch one of the many holiday discounts that are offered throughout the year, you can stream and download a huge amount of quality hardcore porn across a wide variety of niches.
The Pure Taboo channel of Adult Time is the finest story-driven porn I've ever seen.
The videos are cinematic quality.
Many of the lesbian channels feature lovely young models.
And there's plenty of boy-girl, girl-girl, trios and above, with trans, and other fetishes on display.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the teen network 18Videoz.
You get access to the entire 18Videoz network. No sites require a premium membership.
-The models at the site are basically young teens (18 to early 20s). Most of them are attractive to very attractive. They are from Eastern Europe, almost all white, slender to medium build. Very few implants, not a lot of tattoos.
-The public page does a good job showing you the kinds of models at this site. The thumbnails are approximately 3"x4" on a 27" monitor. The thumbnails are brightly lit.
-The site is currently updating.
-Recent videos are offered in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
-Photosets have around 56+ photos per set.
Cons:
-Very little information about the site or network from the public pages. You can't get an idea of the update rate for the site or network. You can't get any idea of how many videos a model has, or an overview of the model listing.
-The videos are slightly disappointing. In spite of the cute girls, many of the older videos seem low-rent. The sets are mainly a room in a cheap apartment, the video usually seems like it was filmed cheaply. The videos often seem to have a film over the lens that makes the images seem un-vivid (not sharp, vibrant colors and flesh tones and immediacy--you are seeing images in a very slight fog, almost).
Bottom Line:
I should note that over the last few years the network and site have tried to improve the video quality with better sets, better costumes, better lighting.
Having said that, if you compare Teeny Lovers and the 18Videoz network with the Wow network, the Wow network gives you a higher quality experience.
Comparing the Teeny Lover site and the 18Videoz network to the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), the quality of the videos at the Wow network is a better value experience.
Wow network videos have nicer sets, better videography, better overall lighting, that make you really appreciate how physically attractive the models can be.
The 18Videoz network has plenty of physically attractive teen models, but the videos and photosets don't showcase their beauty. Which is a shame.
The Teen Lovers site has a zip file for each photoset. But in only 1 definition.
The Wow network photosets have your choice of 4 definitions for each photoset.
18 Videoz photos download in sets with photos that are 1666 pixels x 2500 pixels, which would seem to indicate superior quality. But looking at the individual photos, there is often a focus issue with the photos, and the photos don't have the vibrant colors of the Wow network photos.
The photosets at the Wow network are so much better:
Better colors. You choice of 4 definitions for the zip file photoset.
Better focus of the photos. Nicer sets. The models just appear more attractive and appealing.
18Videoz and Wow network often run special discounts.
You can often find 18Videoz network for $60/year.
You can often find Wow network for $60/year. Or for $70/year. I'm currently paying $70/year for a Wow network sub, but I hope to remember to cancel before it re-bills and start a new sub at $60/year.
A few years ago I was paying $120/year for the 3 Wow network sites, plus a separate fee for the Ultra Films site.
You now get Ultra Films and the 3 Wow network sites in a subscription to any one of the sites.
Note: Porn sites normally do not reward members for loyalty. They will often give new members a lower membership price than recurring members. And most porn sites, when you renew your membership, will gladly charge you your higher recurring price than emails or other offers of a lower membership price.
So it pays to shop around to see what the lowest price is for a membership to a porn site.
I was paying $120 for the Wow network, and, I'm not positive, at least $60 or more for the Ultra Films site. Until I cancelled and renewed for $70 for all 4 sites.
I think 18 Videoz and the Teeny Lovers are good teen site.
But I think the Wow network + Ultra Films is a better experience. The videos and photosets are better quality. And if you can find an email for $60/year for the Wow network (which includes Ultra Films, even though Ultra Films is not listed as part of the Wow network), I would jump on it.
Wow network has lovely young teens expressing the joy of sex.
I appreciate your blunt style and talking points. Makes the review more appealing/interesting.
My own reviews tend to wander all over the place.
Old age creeping up on me.
LOL.
I'm not a current member of thisyearsmodel.com, but looking at the update page, I see a lot of old photosets shot years ago, with a current posting date.
Many of the current updates are not updates, but content that was posted at this site years ago, but the listed posting date has been changed to make it appear to be current updates.
So I would be very careful (or simply avoid) any long-term membership at this site.
And if you've been a member of thisyearsmodel before, you probably have downloaded much of the site contents.
Call it a scam, or misleading advertising.
The site has lots of cute models, in softcore photosets.
So if you haven't been a member before, it might be worth a one-month join.
But it's a shame when a site uses deceptive advertising for it's updates.
Excellent review.
Actually, one of the best reviews posted lately.
Complete overview, and lots of nice details.
Always happy to read your reviews, even if I wouldn't join some of the sites you review.
LOL. :)
Good to hear from you, Sir.
Hope you're doing well.
I think that as Adult Time expands its offerings, it becomes even more of a bargain.
Adult Time is not perfect. I have problems navigating the site.
And when they take over another site, they can make changes.
For some reason, Adult Time likes to decrease the number of photos in a set.
And Adult Time doesn't offer the same choices of definition in streaming or downloading a photoset as in the original site.
But still, you're getting an increased amount of content included in an Adult Time membership.
Even if Adult Time thinks 35 is the magic number for a photoset.
But sometimes they do include more photos in a set, for some reason.
LOL.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Videos are offered in 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p for streaming and downloads.
-Unlimited streaming for videos.
-Unlimited downloads for the photosets. But see the CONS section to see why the photosets are usually not worth collecting.
-Content is exclusive.
-Nice sized site. 214 videos.
Cons:
-Very slow update rate. One new video per month for the site.
-Limit of 100 video downloads for the entire network.
They allow you to download each scene as many times as you need, in any resolution, for a 24-hour period, and only one download will be deducted. So they are treating a video download as a precious commodity, which I find offensive. Technically, when you download a video from a paysite, or a movie from a streaming service, you don't own the video, you only have a privilege of viewing the video or movie. But for a porn paysite to push boundaries of download limits is not a practice I want to encourage.
-Limit of 4 video downloads per day for the network.
-A photoset of a video can hold anywhere from 6 to 23 photos. Most photosets hold around 6 to 13 photos. So the photosets are tiny to very small.
Bottom Line:
A Girl Knows is a lesbian site in the Lets Doe It network.
The site has 214 videos, plus a matching photoset for each video. I write "matching", when the photosets are actually limited to anywhere from 6 to 23 photos. Most of the models at the site are attractive to extremely attractive. Why they limit to photos to such a small number is fucking annoying. The site (and network) specializes in finding attractive models, they can put them in some very nice videos, and then they limit the photosets to a small number, which seems ridiculous. The photos can be very nice quality: high production values, good lighting and colors, mainly nicely focused. So it's like a tease: you want the whole package, not just a taste.
Contrast this with the photosets at the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn). The photos from the last few years at the Wow network compare favorably with the Lets Doe It photos.
Actually, the Wow network photosets are superior to the Lets Doe It photosets.
The Wow network photosets are not limited to 6 to 23 photos, but give you 80 to 100 photos or more, and cover most of any matching video. So you get the full package, and are not left wanting more.
The quality of the Wow network photosets is outstanding. The Wow network did not start out as a glamour network, it's been around for at least 16 years under different names. But the young models at the network go from attractive to stunningly beautiful, and the photograpy over the years has improved to where it's now as good as what you get at most glamour sites. The vibe at Wow networks is not glamour, it's more like lovely young girls having sex, with themselves, with other girls, with one or more boys. They're not going for glamour, but for straight sexual pleasure. But the videos and the photos are such high quality, with lovely young models, that it's borderline glamour.
You look at a few photosets from A Girl Knows, and you think: "What a waste. Why couldn't they create a full-sized photoset, instead of a tiny one?"
You look at photosets from the Wow network, and you think: "These girls are fucking lovely. Where can I find one of my own?"
And even though the Wow girls aren't on your street, at least you can drool over their videos and photosets.
Actually, if you compare the Wow network with the Lets Doe It network, or with the A Girl Knows site, there's no comparison: I think the Wow network is a far better value.
The photography and videos at the Wow network is excellent quality, with good production values. Not quite as good as The White Boxxx videos, but close.
The Wow network has unlimited downloads.
The Wow network membership is cheaper than the Lets Doe It membership.'
PU price for Lets Doe It network is $119.95 (recurring).
The PU site gives you a discount price of $89.95/year (recurring) for Wow network.
But if you search, you can often find a price of $69.95/year.
That membership gives you access to 4 sites:
All Fine Girls; Wow Girls; Wow Porn; Ultra Films.
The models at the 4 sites are attractive to lovely.
The videos and photosets are high quality.
If you enjoy lovely teen models who are into hardcore sex, you can't do better than the Wow network.
A Girl Knows is a good lesbian site. With high production values for the videos.
But the download limits are a turn-off.
And the slow update rate (1 new video per month) is also a turn-off.
If you have extra time and money, you can join the Lets Doe It network for 1 month to see what it has to offer. But I think there are better values in porn. The Wow network is one of the better values, along with a bunch of other sites, such as Adult Time, Adult Prime, etc.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A network of primarily European sites. Two of the sites, The White Boxxx and A Girl Knows, are excellent glamcore sites. The White Boxxx has some of the finest glamcore videos on the internet, where they make an art of presenting attractive models in crystal clear videos.
-There's no limit on streaming the videos or photosets.
-You can download unlimited photosets. But see the CONS section why the photosets are not worth collecting.
-Content is exclusive.
-The models at some of their sites are stunning. Really gorgeous.
Cons:
-The video definition maxes out at 1080p, which is suprising for a glamcore network. Many porn sites started offering 4K videos years ago.
-Almost all videos have an accompanying photoset. But the photosets are not worth collecting. The photosets are tiny, around 10-13 photos per set. I have no idea why the photosets have such a small amount of photos. Seems like a wasted opportunity, when you consider how attractive many of these models are.
-There is a limit of 100 video downloads per month for the entire network.
-There is also a limit of 4 videos per day.
-You only get around 10 or 11 new videos per month for the network.
-Only 4 of the 18 sites are still updating. Most of the network sites stopped updating years ago.
Bottom Line:
The network covers different niches. The White Boxxx features girl/boy sex and some threesomes. A Girl Knows is a lesbian site. Both of those sites are high quality glamcore, with top-notch production values. The videos at The White Boxxx are the finest glamcore hardcore porn I've seen on the internet: the models are uniformly gorgeous (they are attractive to begin with, and every effort is made to present them looking as beautiful as possible). The settings are in a white room with one or two models and a stunt cock. The theme is sensuous hardcore. The photography (I really mean videography, but it's so crisp, clear and vivid you realize you are watching moving images) is top-notch. This isn't story-driven sex, the plot is minimal, but you are watching a premium product at The White Boxxx, the crown jewel of the Lets Doe It network
However, the value of the network is constantly going down. And since the price is not getting any less expensive, there's less reason to join the network.
-A few years ago you had access to over 40 different sites. Then they split the network into different networks, each requiring a separate membership. The Lets Doe It network has 18 sites.
-As time goes on, they keep putting limits on the members.
They started limiting downloads to 100 videos per month for the network. Before then, there were no limits.
Now they have an additional limit of 4 videos per day.
-Due to covid, the last few years the updates for the network have decreased.
They are now updating with 10 or 11 new videos per month for the network. They used to give far more updates.
-Only 4 of the 18 sites are updating. The other 14 sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years.
Inflation is everywhere. But it's stupid to keep paying the same price to get less porn, when there are so many great bargains in porn.
So I finally wised up, and will cancel my membership.
Thanks for the update.
Terrible situation in the Ukraine, as everyone is aware of.
Hoping that the conflict will be over as soon as possible.
That no more lives will be wasted, the suffering to end.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Dirty Flix network. A teen oriented site. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network.
-Many of the models at the site and network are cute teens. I know I keep writing that there are lots of cute teens at many of these porn sites, but visit these sites, and see what you think: Michelle Can, Vika Lita, Dolce Vita, etc., these girls are cute and sexy.
Cons:
-If your login is not secure (no https in the address bar), just add the "s" character to the "http" in the address bar, for a secure login.
-Then, if your member pages are not secure, do the same: add the "s" character to the "http" in the address bar, for secure pages. Otherwise, your ISP will have a record of the pages you visit. Police can use your internet browsing records against you in court. https://members.dirtyflix.com/en/
-Archive site. Last video was added Jul 3, 2019. Before that, 1 or 2 videos were added per year. So the site never got much attention.
-The biller I used was Verotel. Not as easy as CCBill. You have to use your credit card # and expiration date of the card to communicate with Verotel, instead of your login details or other data.
Bottom Line:
This is an archive site. Stopped updating in 2019.
Site has 63 videos, with matching photosets.
The latest videos have a 4K option.
But even the earliest videos have a desktop and 1080p versions.
Along with a matching photoset for each video.
The photosets run around 80 to 100 photos per set.
-Young Courtesans is probably the best known site in the network. That is a fine site that has a simple plot that is easily filmed: a young girl needs money, so she has sex with a guy. The premise is simple but believable. Many of the models at the site are attractive, and the videos are professionally filmed: Excellent lighting, good colors, good sound control, good focus on the models.
I'm including Young Courtesans because it's my favorite site in the network. But recently they seem to have ignored the basic theme and are just adding any sex encounter for a young teen model, instead of the premise of sex for cash. Not a major defect, but the current theme seems to be a young girl having sex, instead of a young girl trading sex for money. When the Young Courtesan site first started out, they made it clear in the video the girl was trading sex for money, and it added a bit of meaning to the video.
The difference seems slight, but if you watch the older videos at Young Courtesans, and the newer ones, the newer videos lack impact or meaning beyond a horny girl having sex with a guy. With a courtesan, you expect a bit of eroticism or flavor beyond basic sex.
Although the site theme of revenge porn seems like it would be difficult to film, the site videos do a surprisingly good job with the premise. The plot is basically simple: the girl finds her boyfriend/husband is cheating on her and then she fucks some other guy and forces her partner to watch. It's not stupid comedy, but a nice hardcore sex video. The attractive models are a bonus. If they used the same plot at Pure Taboo (a site in Adult Time), the production values would be higher, the film more glossy, but this site gives you a cheaper but watchable version of revenge porn.
"Fucking in front of cuffed bf" with Vika Lita is surprisingly effective.
For one, Vika Lita (aka Belinda, Callie, Lizzy, Melissandra, Thalia D, Vialika) is a very attractive girl.
And she puts on a fine show fucking some guy in front of her tied-up boyfriend.
Actually, watching these videos, they put more thought into the videos than is first apparent.
In one video, you think the wife finds out her husband is cheating, and she has revenge sex with a friend. But at the end of the video, it turns out the wife and the husband were role playing, and he enjoys watching his wife get fucked by other men. Wich ads an unexpected twist to the plot.
I'm giving the site a score of 85.
It's an archive site, no longer updating.
An even though I think they do an okay job with the site theme of revenge porn, I personally think Young Courtesans is a better site because the idea of a young courtesan is more enjoyable than watching revenge porn.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. A fine network, with a discounted membership price of $60/year offered during holiday specials. The listed membership price is $120/year, but the normal PU discounted price is $95/year.
-All sites in the network are available with a regular membership. No sites require a premium upgrade.
-Unlimited streaming.
-There is a daily download limit of 300 GB, which is generous.
-Easy login, if you have cookies enabled.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Videos are offered in 480p for the very earliest videos. Then they started offering 720p and 1080p definition. Most videos were offered in 2 or more bit rates.
-There is a photoset associated with almost all videos. The photos are good quality, and many of the models are suprisingly attractive. So I can see why someone might collect the best of these photosets.
Cons:
-The biggest con is that the site stopped updating in 2017. It's an archive site.
-Two pre-checked cross-sales on the join pages. But a cross-sale is standard for any porn site join page.
-Ads on every member page. Again, standard for almost all porn sites.
-PU lists the site as "Shane Diesel's Bangin Babes". But the New Sensations network, and the site itself, call the site "shanedieselxxx".
Bottom Line:
Shane DieselXXX features a large black man (Shane Diesel) banging white women.
Interracial sex is a popular niche in porn.
Shane Diesel is featured as the stunt cock in all the videos.
There are 317 videos at the site.
This is an archive site, stopped updating in 2017.
The videos run around 28 to 40 minutes.
You get a photoset of the video with around 100 photos per set.
The individual photo in a set is 683x1024 pixels.
I assume the individual photo is an actual photo, and not a screen cap: the photos are well lit, OK to good colors, nicely foucused and centered. It's not a glamour photoset, just a record of individual women getting fucked by Shane Diesel. I have no interest in collecting these photosets. But if you're a fan of Shane Diesel, you might want to collect them.
The basic plot of most videos is Shane Diesel satisfying the basic urge of white women who want to fuck with a massive black cock. Shane Diesel is not a gangster, he knows he's the black man put on earth to let white women suck his dick, then ram that massive dick up their ass and pussy and drive them wild.
Shane Diesel comes across as the self-confident stud we've all wanted to be.
Shane Diesel is not as famous as Rocco Siffredi and Peter North, but his site does a fine job showcasing his talent.
Shane Diesel comes across as a smart guy who built a career and a business in porn.
You can actually purchase, on the internet, a 10 inch "replica of adult star Shane Diesel's cock and balls. Same feel! Same look! This huge ebony dildo is ready for you. Look and feels like Shane Diesel's cock. Firm, yet flexible design. Waterproof, non-vibrating dildo. Suction cup base for hands-free fun. Works with all lubes. Includes autographed photo of Shane Diesel. 100% phthalate free, safe for your body. Weighs 32.70 ounces. Shane Diesel Dildo from New Sensation Novelties NS Sex Toys. Made is the USA."
I don't have any experience with dildos, but 32.70 ounces sounds like a lot of dildo.
Watching a Shane Diesel video gives you a very different feeling from watching a Blacked.com or Blacked Raw video. Blacked.com and Blacked Raw are glamour style interracial porn, where one or more black men have sex with white women. The videos at those two sites are extremely high quality, in terms of the female talent, lighting, professional camera-work, settings, etc. The videos and photosets are of the highest glamcore quality you can find.
Shane Diesel is not glamour, it's more like reality porn, where you get a Okay-looking black man fucking white women. Some of the videos have a cuckold element as well, where you get a wimpy white guy fawning over an attractive white woman, shane diesel shows up and gives the woman a few kisses, he whips out his cock, the woman is so turned on she starts sucking it, and the white guy runs off in tears. Or the woman says she has a boyfriend who doesn't really satisfy her, and Shane smirks and says he's the black bull who will do the job on her.
You know you're not watching Shakespeare with these videos, but they are good quality porn:
Nice sets, the models are mainly attractive white women in their 20s or 30s, and Shane Diesel is excellent as a stunt cock.
I really appreciate the plots are not stupid or trying to be funny.
I'm giving the site a score of 85. If the site started updating again, the score would be higher. The videos at ShaneDiesel don't have the glossy feel of Blacked.com videos, but they are definitely watchable.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Dirty Flix network of around 12 sites. Join any site, you get access to all the network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. But check to be sure, because it's very unusual for a join page not to have at least one pre-checked cross-sale.
-On videos, they give you both mp4 and wmv file formats. The newer videos have mp4 definition for mobile devices, on up to 4K.
-Navigation is basic but adequate.
-You have tags and category labels to describe the videos, but no plot summary. Except there's not much plot. You have a guy, a girl, and they have sex.
Cons:
-The default for the login page and the member pages are not secure. But if you put "https" (without the quotation marks) in front of the login page, or if you go directly to the member page and put that "https" in the address bar, your login and the member pages will be secure.
-The level of attractiveness of the models is sub-par for a hardcore porn site. At least, the porn sites that I subscribe to.
-Regular price is expensive: $30/month, or $120/year. But you can find holiday specials for $60/year. The holiday specials are for the dirty flix network, which includes the Fucking Glasses site. Normally, if you want to save money, search for a discount to the network, not an individual site in the network. It's much easier finding discounts to the network name, instead of a discount to one of the network sites.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-One problem with porn sites are the names. You join enough sites, all the names start to seem the same. I'm a member of Dirty Flix. Also a member of Filth Flix, which are competing sites.
The same people who run (or own?) Dirty Flix also run 18 Videoz, and both Dirty Flix and 18 Videoz share some of the same video content. Both Dirty Flix and 18 Videoz focus on hardcore teen porn.
-Videos have an accompanying photoset, that you can download. But almost all the photosets are made of screencaps, so the quality of the photosets is poor, and they aren't worth collecting.
-The sound track for the video goes in and out. So it doesn't match what the actors are saying. Not a big deal, since the dialog is basically bullshit, but it just adds to the cheap impression of the video.
-Ads for other sites on every member page. Standard for porn sites. But since a lot of the site videos seem boring, you click on the ads of attractive models for other sites, but don't join, since the ads don't offer attractive discounts.
-The site has 123 movies. So it's a small site.
-The update rate is very irregular.
The most recent video was posted Feb 28, 2020.
Before that, you would get 2 or 3 videos in a year.
-The camera focus is often poor. They need a better camera operator to film these videos.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is a guy who has a camera concealed in his glasses is secretly filming his pickups. So this is supposed to be voyeur sex. Which gives you chills when you realize the girls getting fucked are unaware they are being filmed (Sarcasm. You're supposed to enjoy the video more because the girl supposedly doesn't know the encounter is being filmed.).
I'm giving the site a score of 75.
The cons outweigh the pros.
A small site. Last update was Feb 2020. Before that, you would get 2 or 3 new videos per year.
The models are not very attractive. Even when you have an attractive girl, she isn't presented to her best advantage. The way you photograph or video a model can make a tremendous difference in how appealing she appears. And the models at this site just don't appeal to me.
The network is called dirty flix, and that's what the site videos are: cheap sex videos.
I mean, there are some models at the site that are physically very attractive: Alaina Dawson, Inga Zolva, etc. But the videos don't use that physical beauty to make clear, crisp videos with good lighting, good sound control, nice sets, good camera work.
The videos are just low-grade videos. And the photosets are cheap screen cap collections.
So what's the value of the site?
Look at a few videos, and decide if it's worth your time to watch these videos.
I don't think it's worth my time.
I'd rather watch better videos.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-If you join one of these 4 sites, you gain access to all 4 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, and Ultra Films. Technically, you are only a member of one of the 4 sites, but you have access to all 4 sites.
-The 4 sites are basically a network. But All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are treated as a group: if you log in to one of the 3 sites, you have access to all 3 sites. You don't have to re-login to switch to one of the other sites to load their videos or photo sets.
But Ultra Films is treated as a separate site. To access the contents of Ultra Films, you have to log in to that site separately. And with a different password specific to that site.
-The models at Wow Porn are attractive. They range from cute to lovely. They are teens and early 20s. You don't get better than this at any site on the internet.
The last update to All Fine Girls was 29 Dec 2021.
The last update to Wow Girls was 14 Jun 2022, so it's still updating.
The last update to Ultra Films was 14 Jun 2022, so it's still updating.
That means 2 sites out of the 4 are still updating.
The main con for Wow Porn is it's no longer updating.
Bottom Line:
I guess Covid has really hit the network hard, and they are having financial problems.
That's my guess, based on the fact that 2 of the 4 sites have stopped updating. X-Art.com, a competing site, stopped updating in September 2021.
The site (and network) is one of the finest hardcore teen sites on the internet.
The main reasons:
-The models at the site are fucking attractive.
Many of the girls have appeared in glamour photo sites like Metart, Femjoy, MPL Studios.
-The videos and photosets are clear, crisp images. Fine technical qualities: good lighting, good colors, good sound control, good focus on the models.
-Even though the site is not small, navigation is basically easy.
-The sex is basically bread-and-butter. I mean that in a good way: it's straight sex, not over the top, not extreme. By straight sex I don't mean it's restricted to boy-girl, what I mean is, it's simple sex, young people enjoying their bodies. No hard or harsh sex, no slapping or spitting. You have solo masturbation (by a female), mutual masturbation (two or more girls), lesbian (girl-girl, more than two girls), boy-girl, 2 boys with one girl, a boy with 1 or more girls. Not much plot, not much romance. It's good, clean fun, no drama, no stupid comedy elements, just young people enjoying sex.
I've been a year-long member for several years. The network is one of my favorites.
They offer a special discount of $69.95/year throughout the year. Which is a bargain for the amount of high quality content you get. The normal discounted PU price is $89.95/year.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The main reason to join the XVideos Red site is the ability to stream and download the premium videos. With the free version of XVideos, you can't watch the premium videos. You can't download them.
-The definition of the videos varies. Many have 240p, 360p, 1080p. Or the highest definition might be 720p
Older videos (mainly 8 years back or older) might only have 240p and 360p. Or go up to 720p.
Newer videos from the last 3 or 4 years might have a 4K option.
-You get a wide range of niches. Covering many different fetishes.
-The content is almost all from pay porn sites. There is probably very little exclusive content. Not a normal pro, but the quality of most of the videos is very good. Sometimes you can see what site the video is from, other times, you can't.
-Streaming playback is good. You can fast-forward the video, and it won't freeze.
-Most videos have lots of tags, to describe the action. No text description of the plot, but a lot of videos have almost no plot, anyway.
Cons:
-The password for your membership is hidden.
On the confirmation email for your membership, they don't list the password.
Instead, you get a hot link to login to the member area.
I contacted Vendo, the payment processor. They could not give me the password for the account.
Instead, they gave me another hot link to login to the member area. I already had that link in my confirmation email.
-Most videos you see(from other paysites) are edited versions of the original video. Most videos are around 10 minutes, some are shorter. But many videos have a message: If you want to see the entire video, join the site this video came from. So I think this is a form of cross-advertising.
-A lot of people saying that much of a tube site content is pirated. But I think that a lot of the content is taken with permission; otherwise, why all the messages to join the originating site of the video?
-The search engine is excellent.
Bottom Line:
-The amount of hardcore videos is huge. Adult Time is the largest network collection of hardcore videos I've seen, but X Videos Red started as a tube site (it still is a tube site, if you're not paying a membership fee, and then it's called xvideos.com). But most videos at X Videos Red are edited videos, not the original videos. Most videos I've seen at X Videos Red are 10 minutes or less, while the original videos were 20 to 60 minutes or more.
However, I've seen some erotic movies at X Videos Red that are the complete movie.
These are mainly European skin movies, but it's a chance to see some old European movies from the 70s or 80s for a small membership price, or for free if you aren't a paying member.
Note: the search says "Search 10,546,022 videos", but that number is probably inflated. I mean, 10+ million videos?
-Not only do you get a ton of models of all kinds (ages, body styles), and the thumbnails can be helpful. I find looking through the videos easier and faster than looking through the videos at Adult Time. Adult Time is a great value for porn, you get a ton of content for a low membership price, but searching the Adult Time content is time-consuming. It's much easier to find pleasing content at X Videos Red. You're getting edited content, but you can join the originating site if you find some videos you really enjoy.
-A lot of the videos give the name of the model. Some don't, which is frustrating, if you think the model is really attractive, or the video is really hot.
-The membership price is not exactly cheap, but not really expensive, either.
$9.99/month, or $7.98/month with a yearly membership.
Although the site is huge, you have lots of categories to make searching easier.
As well as tags describing each video.
-I wonder about the definition of some of the videos. I'm watching a video that is supposed to be 1080p, and the image is not crisp and clear: it seems like the image is slightly fuzzy or out of focus. The details of the video file are 1920x1080, bitrate 2687kbps, so the dimensions should give a clear, crisp image. But the images are slightly out of focus. I'm guessing the fault is with the camera operator, who didn't bother to focus the video.
-Videos download with a generic computer-generated file name. You have to add the name of the model (if you know it), plus title of the video, plus the site name (if you know it).
-There are a lot of duplicate videos with different file names.
-Some videos require a separate subcription. So I guess the thumbnail for the video is an ad, which doesn't hit you at first: you click on the thumbnail, and wonder why the video doesn't load, then realize, you're supposed to join some other site.
-No model index. The models have no stats or bios.
Bottom Line summary:
X Videos Red is the premium version of X Videos. X Videos is the free version.
I suggest using the completely free version to see what the basic site looks like.
Then, start your free 7-day trial of the X Videos Red membership.
That should give you a good idea of whether the site is worth a premium membership.
For a low price, you get access to thousands (millions?) of hardcore videos, with downloading privileges. Covering a wide variety of niches.
With lots of attractive models.
And even though there's a lot of content that won't appeal, it's easier to find the content that does appeal, than at a network like Adult Time, where the navigation is more time consuming.
Adult Time is a fine join.
X Videos Red is a fine join.
There are plenty of fine sites on the internet, that are worth the money.
The main limiting factors are the time you have to spend, and the amount of money you can spend.
It's easy to overspend on porn, since there's so much quality porn on the internet.
But I'm very glad there is so much quality porn available at a low price.
Around 2019 or 2020 Adult Time started a Joy Mii channel.
They started out with a few videos from the Joy Mii site.
But now, June 2022, the entire Joy Mii site has been folded into Adult Time. The entire catalog of around 900 videos.
The only thing I can see that might be a minus is that the photosets might not have been transferred.
There are photosets for each video, but they seem to have been reduced in the number of photos per set. And the quality of the photos might have been reduced as well. The photos might be nice screencaps. They don't seem to have the quality that a glamour studio like Joymii would have.
But you're now getting all the Joymii videos for free, with an Adult Time sub, instead of a sampling. Which is great news.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. So you get access to all the New Sensations sites.
-Unlimited streaming. Downloads are limited to 300 GB, which is generous.
-You can stream videos in 720p and 1080p, with multiple bit rates for each definition.
-You can download videos in 720p and 1080p, with multiple bit rates for each definition.
-You get a nice, short text description of the plot of the video, plus tags for the video that can be used to search for your sex niches and fetishes.
Cons:
-Site stopped updating around 10-10-2018.
-Site gives me slow download speeds. I have a 200 Mbps connection, but my wireless connection can drop to 9 Mbps.
Theoretically, I've read that the minimum speeds required for:
SD (480p): 3+ Mbps.
HD (720–1080p): 5–13+ Mbps.
4K (UHD, 2160p): 16–25 Mbps.
So even 9 Mbps, which my wireless speed can drop to, should be fine for 720p videos.
But it doesn't work that way.
On my monitor, the stream is not smooth for 720p. And if I try to fast forward the video, the playback will stop completely.
The way to get around slow streaming speeds is to download the video, and play the file on your PC.
The technical features of some of the videos are top-quality. They have plot and some special effects and good to excellent video, nice sets, nice costumes, etc.
Bottom Line:
The videos at Parody Pass don't have a single focus or tone: they might try to be serious, or comical, or stupidly funny.
In contrast, the stories at Pure Taboo, a site in the Adult Time network, can be interesting and add to the impact of the sex. The Pure Taboo videos are trying to create an artistic, erotic visual experience where the sex is illicit. The Pure Taboo site is probably the finest story-driven porn site I've seen.
Candide, a novel by Votaire, published in 1759, was a satire on the Leibniz philosophy of optimism. The novel Candy, by Terry Southern and Mason Hoffenberg, written around 1958, was supposed to be a satire of Candide.
Candide, and Candy, are both considered comical, or humorous. I read them years ago, and enjoyed both of them. The humor is not really laugh-out-loud funny. More a quiet humor that, "Oh, I get the idea, and it's nice".
The Sex Files #2 is an imitation of The X-Files with sex.
My idea of parody movies include Airplane!, Blazing Saddles, Young Frankenstein, Hot Shots!. A movie where you get exaggerated ideas or acting that is supposed to be funny or enjoyable.
"The Sex Files #2" is not funny for me. It's not enjoyable. It's a waste of time.
On reflection, I realize that by "parody" what they mean is "imitation". The Sex Files #2 is an imitation of The X-Files. It was not meant to be funny, but interesting and enjoyable. Spiced with sex. But at 2 hours runtime, I was bored.
Reasons why I don't like the site:
I don't appreciate the humor of the videos.
I've never followed most of the TV shows that are parodied.
So the parodies don't strike a chord in my mind, that makes me laugh or appreciate the points being parodied.
Also, some of the parodies are just not funny.
The technical qualities of the videos are good to excellent. The acting by the models is OK for porn videos, which sets a low bar for acting. The sets are nice, the filming is done professionally: good focus, good lighting, good sound control, nice colors.
I'm giving the site a score of boring 78. That's a new category for boring sex and boring videos.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A while back, they increased the size and brightness of the thumbnails illustrating the videos on the public page. That makes the videos seem much more appealing, the models look more appealing.
-The network and site are teen-oriented. They have mainly Eastern European teens, and most of them are cute or attractive. That is the main value of the site and network, how attractive these models are.
-Since the site is so tiny (only 21 videos), navigation is simple but basic. They use the same layout for all the network sites, listing 12 thumbnail per page. The thumbnails are hotlinks to the videos.
-Exclusive content. But this doesn't have the value that it used to have. Tube sites feature porn from almost all major and minor hardcore porn sites (edited videos, but not the photosets).
-No cross-sell on the rejoin page. I searched the page, but couldn't find a pre-checked cross-sale to some other porn site. Will have to check to see if I overlooked the cross-sale later.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Verotel is the billing agent I used. They have been responsive within a single day, when I emailed them with 2 different problems I had with my membership. Not only fast, but they actually read what my problem was, and responded to it. Many times, a billing agent, or even customer service, will give you a garbled response for help, which is worthless.
CONS(START OF):
-Sometimes, when you try to login, you get a non-secure login page. Put https in front of the address bar, and your login changes to a secure login page. (This tip came from exotics4me).
-Tiny site. Only 21 videos.
-Archive site. Site stopped updating in 2014.
-The member pages show tiny thumbnails that are low-quality gifs of the video. They really need to enlarge and update the gifs to make the videos seem more attractive, because it degrades the experience of using the site. You're paying for a porn site, you deserve a quality product. Maybe years ago they could have gotten away with cheap-looking
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
product, who's going to pay for it? Either upgrade the site contents, to make it seem attractive, or delete it.
However, there are people who seem to enjoy unattractive photos and videos and low-rent porn, so if the owners/operators can attract paying members, I guess they figure that's good enough to sell.
-There is a photoset of each video. The photoset is a computer-generated series of screenshots of the video. It's a surprisingly good program that creates the screenshots, since the screenshots are nicely centered on the action. But the quality of the screenshots is just OK. The teen models can be surprisingly attractive. I realize I'm being unrealistic, but many of these models could pose for Metart or Femjoy or any glamor site, and they are instead put into junk porn.
-The login details are computer generated. You don't choose your username and password.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
You get access to the entire Dirty Flix network. This site and the network has a lot of attractive teen models from Eastern Europe.
The main negatives:
Tiny site. Only 21 videos.
Archive site. Stopped updating in 2014.
The quality of the videos is low-rent. That's the impression. Maybe I'm being overly harsh. The technicals are not poor, they just seem poor. The sound control is lousy, which is the most obvious problem.
I'm giving the site a score of 78. Years ago the site had more value, when cheap porn was first being presented on the internet. But for many years now, you can find porn paysites that offer good to excellent quality porn. So this site is a throw-away. Since you paid for the network, you can see if any of the site videos appeal to you. But there are better sites in the network that you have access to.
Note: I am giving you my honest opinion of the site.
But you are allowed to give comments on the videos.
And almost all of the member comments are positively glowing.
After thinking it over, I realize I was turned off by the site theme of degrading these lovely teens, not treating them with respect or tenderness. Which is stupid, on my part. If you enjoy watching attractive teens treated like trash, this site has strong value. The treatment is not overly harsh or rough, it's just the attitude that we're hep guys who can treat these cute sluts like the trash they are.
Second Note: I'm not a fan of ads, but some of the thumbnails of the models used in the ads for other sites are fucking lovely. If you like teens, you can drool over the images of these lovely teens.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
