Looks like a nice site.
Sorry to keep harping on price, but membership is not cheap.
You would think that with old content deleted from sites, they would give you a bargain rate.
But I guess they think that if you want to view or collect this older content, you are willing to pay full price.
Mainly, I try to get full value for the dollars I spend.
So I will pass on this site, even though there are some videos I would like to see.
If you're paying with a credit card, the charge and the telephone number for rocketgate should be listed on your monthly credit card statement.
Rocketgate is a lessor known payment processor, but it is still reputable. There shouldn't be any false charges. MetArt (and it's network sites) sometime use rocketgate.
I have a recurring sub through one of the MetArt sites that is handled by rocketgate.
UMBAR,
If you do join Nubiles Porn, make sure you visit (or put in a lot time at) Nubiles.net.
Several PU members have stated Nubiles.net is not part of Nubiles Porn.
That is wrong.
Personally, I think that Nubiles.net is the prime jewel of the Nubiles Porn network. Nubiles.net is more like an encyclopedia of porn starlets, most of them at the early stage of their porn career.
It has thousands of models, with a few photo sets and videos for each model.
I think the content at that site goes back to around 2004.
So it gives you a small amount of content for a lot of very young porn starlets.
Once you join Nubiles Porn, you can either access Nubiles.net directly, with the the same login details that lets you into Nubiles Porn.
Or you can use the drop-down menu, that is located in the upper right corner of the Nubiles Porn home page, that lists all the sites you have access to with a membership in Nubiles Porn.
There are some good sites in the Nubiles Porn network.
But my favorite site is Nubiles.net, because I enjoy looking over the models to see what they looked like when they were first starting out.
Also, if you look around, you can often find a discount to Nubiles Porn, or to Nubiles.net, both of which give you access to the entire Nubiles Porn network.
The discounts are common at holidays, throughout the year.
Joining any one of the network sites gives you access to all the sites in the Nubiles Porn network.
Wraith0711 used to belong to Teamskeet Unlimited.
But when they raised the price this last time, he said it was too expensive for him to belong.
I thought, even before they raised the rates this last time, the price was too expensive.
There are better places to spend the money, I believe.
Just my opinion, of course.
I've been a member of the network for at least the last couple of years.
Technically, I think the 3 sites are supposed to be separate sites.
The URL for each site is still different.
But on a practical basis, the content for the 3 sites is the same.
The same videos and photo sets for all 3 sites.
And you can join any one of the 3 sites directly, but you will gain access to all 3 sites (plus the Ultra Films site).
Technically, I was told in an email that I only have a membership in only one of the sites, even though I have access to all 4 sites.
I don't know if that is a legal distinction, a technical distinction, or how you label it.
On a practical basis, it doesn't seem to make a difference.
Except it would be simpler, more understandable, if they said I was a member of all 4 sites.
But they definitely told me I'm only a member of one of the 4 sites, even though I have full access to all 4 sites.
So when PU admin says all 3 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) have been merged into All Fine Girls, that is the opinion of PU admin, not the opinion of the sites themselves.
They are still marketed as 4 separate sites, even though joining any one of them gives you total access to all 4 sites. Even if the content of 3 of the sites is the same.
This is a long-winded explanation of something I don't really understand.
LOL
But the girls are lovely.
I've been a member of the network for at least the last couple of years.
Technically, I think the 3 sites are supposed to be separate sites.
The URL for each site is still different.
But on a practical basis, the content for the 3 sites is the same.
The same videos and photo sets for all 3 sites.
And you can join any one of the 3 sites directly, but you will gain access to all 3 sites (plus the Ultra Films sites).
Technically, I was told in an email that I only have a membership in only one of the sites, even though I have access to all 4 sites.
I don't know if that is a legal distinction, a technical distinction, or how you label it.
On a practical basis, it doesn't seem to make a difference.
Except it would be simpler, more understandable, if they said I was a member of all 4 sites.
But they definitely told me I'm only a member of one of the 4 sites, even though I have full access to all 4 sites.
So when PU admin says all 3 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) have been merged into All Fine Girls, that is the opinion of PU admin, not the opinion of the sites themselves.
They are still marketed as 4 separate sites, even though joining any one of them gives you total access to all 4 sites. Even if the content of 3 of the sites is the same.
This is a long-winded explanation of something I don't really understand.
LOL
But the girls are lovely.
Congrats on winning first place in today's raffle.
The gods must be smiling down on you.
Maybe you can find some bargains on Amazon prime day, which will be June 21-22.
Best wishes.
A nice summary of the site: "This is more like the porn sites we used to join to enjoy the hunt. That's what you're going to be doing here."
That leaves me out. I don't have the patience I once did, to hunt for good content. I want it easily available, without a lot of filler material I have to slog through.
I've complained about the Adult Time network navigation problems in the past.
Some people praise how easy it is to navigate the network.
They must have some secret I haven't learned yet.
But navigation is probably the main reason I don't use Adult Time as much as I would like to.
I really like your cons. Think they're important, at least for me:
-Slow update rate.
-Poor search capability.
-Too many breast-implant models.
-Porn-valley look (great phrase to describe models' looks).
Different people can have wildly differing opinions of the same site.
The same with a movie: a critic can say a movie is wonderful, a different critic can say the same movie is disappointing.
That's why I used to try to find a critic that I could try to depend on, because his/her reviews of movies were in alignment with my opinions of movies.
Some PU members scored Wicked Pictures very high. Other PU members thought the site was poor. Other PU members thought the site was good, but not great.
Different strokes for different folks.
Do you believe a site has an intrinsic value that shines through the same for everyone?
I think you're being harsh when you question the value of The Best Porn site.
It's a good source of information about porn sites.
Some information might be wrong, and the score is only a guide.
I find the PU reviews to be more useful, to get a feel for what a site offers.
But that's just me.
But before I join a site, I usually like to read TPB and PU reviews, to see if a site is worth my money.
Tom D,
Thanks for the explanation on the site update.
Several times, when I tried to post a response to a message, I was logged out, instead of posting a message.
No big deal. I just had to re-login, and then try to post a message again.
But the site software seems to be sensitive to any maintenance updates.
LOL.
Thanks for the fast response to my comment.
And for the helpful hint about a discount.
I've looked for a discount to X-Art many times, and never found any.
But using your tip, I found a nice discount.
I might join X-Art for a month, when I have more time.
Thanks again.
The PU site is messed up today.
The site was un-available for a few hours this morning.
And when I posted a reply to your message, it was posted with the alias of Tom D (the PU site staff), instead of being posted under my alias.
Really strange.
Was the PU site hacked, or under some kind of cyber attack?
X-Art membership seems very expensive.
Also, they bundle a membership to X-Art with a membership in SuperHot.
So it's $100 for 6 months to X-Art and SuperHot.
Or $150 for the first year's membership.
Or $200 for 2 years membership.
Years ago, you could have a membership in X-Art, without the SuperHot membership.
Actually, years ago, there was no SuperHot.
What membership did you have?
Combined membership to X-Art and SuperHot?
Or a membership in X-Art by itself?
If you were a member of SuperHot, did you like the site, think it was a worthwhile join?
Or a waste of money?
Also, what did you pay for an X-Art membership?
Were you able to get a nice discount?
They used to have an occasional sale, but I haven't seen a discount to X-Art in years.
For $100 for 6 months, I'd rather spend my money elsewhere. X-Art was one of my favorite glamcore sites, but that was years ago, when the price was much less.
It's been a while since I was a member of Team Skeet.
But my best guess is that $60/year is a streaming only membership.
Downloads will almost certainly cost more, per month.
PU member Wraith0711 is the expert on this network, since he's joined them fairly recently. So if he responds, he can probably tell you what's what.
Or, you can email Team Skeet customer service with your questions, for another expert's reply.
The link I got opens a page (the URL above) that seems to offer your choice of joining all 6 sites, or any sites of your choosing, for a discounted price.
Hope this helps, if you want to join.
I've got too many subs already, to want to join these choices.
marcdc1 posted a review of Rebecca's Office on 05-22-21.
That review has disappeared from the normal listing of reviews on the PU homepage.
On the tally for June 9, 2021 raffle updated may 25th, marcdc1 is shown with only 1 entry.
Is there a reason why marcdc1's review was removed from the review list?
Is there a reason why marcdc1 only has 1 entry for the raffle, instead of 5 or 6 entries that should have been given for an approved review?
Anyway, if the review by marcdc1 was accepted, it seems only fair that he should be given 5 or 6 entries for the raffle, instead of 1 entry.
A work-around might be:
Clear cookies from your computer.
Use a different (or new) email address.
Then try the promotion to see if it works.
I've used that to join sites with a reduced price, that at first denied me the reduced price because I was a former member.
These were non-porn sites, like Hulu and Starz and a few other sites.
It depends on whether you think such an approach is ethical.
Businesses often think a new subscriber is entitled to a lower rate than a returning or current subscriber.
That's very different from the old-time approach of rewarding customer loyalty.
But both porn and non-porn businesses favor new subscribers over returning subscribers. Cable, newspapers, porn sites, internet, offer lower rates to new members versus old members.
I'd email customer service for Metart.
They usually respond to emails within a few hours or sooner.
And they've been friendly and helpful with any problems I've had.
I don't have a problem with the site name being Pure Taboo.
The way I see it, it's based on the idea of all sex outside of marriage as taboo. And even in marriage, sex is a duty to be performed, not enjoyed.
(The old Puritan view, which most PU members no longer believe.)
Note: I'm not saying my view is historically accurate. Some believe that Puritans could enjoy sex in marriage as a bond between husband and wife. Whatever.
The site is trying to be a cinematic version of high-grade porn, but the foolish plots can get in the way.
However, if the girl is attractive, and the sex is good, some plots can increase the impact of the scene.
Pure Taboo is my favorite site in the Adult Time network.
Navigation is simple and easy: All you have at the site are photosets (except for the small number of Staff Selection videos).
Photosets are dated.
There are some tags for the photosets.
In 2016, after MetArt took over running Domai and Goddess Nudes from the original owner, they raised the price from $10/month to $30/month or $100/year.
At $10/month, it was a worthwhile join.
For $30/month, or $100/year, I feel it's an expensive membership.
You can pay the same price, or a lower price, for many other fine photographic sites, or photo + videos sites.
So I would join Domai or Goddess Nudes once in a blue moon, if you have extra money to spend.
That's in spite of the model catalog of attractive to lovely young models.
My feeling is that MetArt has priced the site too high for what it offers.
If you want a softcore site, I would suggest joining MetArt.com.
That site blows both the Domai and Goddess Nudes sites out of the water.
MetArt stats: MetArt updates with 4 (photoset + video) per day.
Number of photosets: 22544
Number of videos: 1804
Number of models: 3831
Number of photographers: 291
The models at MetArt range from merely attractive to gorgeous. MetArt uses a more glamorous style than Goddess nudes.
The settings are more expensive, the costumes are more expensive. MetArt is probably the finest softcore teen site on the internet.
I say teen, because that's the way MetArt started out around 1999.
But they can feature models in the twenties and even in their thirties, as well.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN NEXT REPLY:
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
