> To you which do you prefer the buying the girl you want or the $15 option?
Both :-). Buying a bunch of girls is good to make initial collection, but then $15 option is nice to keep things interesting without much effort.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
++ stripping girls on desktop as advertised
++ if subscribing, new girl every day
++ girls are hot
++ HUGE variety of girls (comes at the price)
++ variety of outfits
++ several different scenes with the same girl included (from "no nudity" to "full nude")
+ "extra" WMVs and photos of the girl
+ canceling option on site, kudos for webmaster (it shows that they're not looking for "forgotten" subscriptions)
+ option to subscribe OR to buy girls one by one
Cons:
-- stripping only (no toys, no fingering, nothing else)
-- not all the girls dance well
-- mood of some girls could be better
- downloads are HUGE
- CPU-intensive (forget about it if you don't have at least Core Duo)
Bottom Line:
As it was mentioned by other reviewers, this site is VERY different from the others. When subscribing (for free) you get an application on your desktop which shows you dancing girl(s), one at a time. "Free" version is more like "teasers" with no nudity. Fortunately (for both you and site owners :-)) it's easy to pay them some money to get full versions where girls strip completely (but not much else - there are no toys or fingering on the site). They provide TWO options: either to buy girls one by one (at about $2-$4 per girl, which includes 15-30 min of dancing, SOME of it is full nudity), or to subscribe for a month at $15 and get such a girl every day (but girls are random in this case, and you can't choose which do you want).
Overall, it was surprisingly entertaining, with quality being decent (though I've expected better quality for HD and for download sizes, which can easily be 200M per girl), girls being mostly hot and some even being able to dance (though obviously NOT all of them are professional dancers).
Bottom line: if you're not scared away by "stripping only", it's definitely a nice thing to try, provided that you don't have a kid or boss with a bad habit to look over your shoulder :-).
Thanks for explanation; as for talking to Khan - he reads it anyway (to approve), so if he agrees it's a problem, he will probably fix it sooner or later.
I've read that, but shouldn't it also be reflected on "Feedback History" page? Click on "Feedback History" link - it shows very detailed calculation (obviously aiming to explain how the rating was calculated), but end-result is DIFFERENT from the rating shown on the main page.
PU says that rating for TheTrainingOfO is 94, but there are only 2 reviews, one is 95, and another is 90, so I expect it to be 92.5. Ok, I know that there are ratings and so on, so I went to "Feedback History" and found that's it's 92.5 there. So it's 94 on site page, and 92.5 in "Feedback History". Not that it really matters much, but which one is correct?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
++ decent 3D virtual setup
+ 4 different action spots (but in the same room)
+ variety of dildos
+ skin/hair/breasts modifications for the girl
Cons:
--- not much to do
--- the only action allowed (in addition to asking girl to take some position) is moving dildos (mouth, pussy or anal)
- single girl only (with toys)
-- it's THE SAME girl despite modifications (face is always the same :-( ).
- the only clothing is bikini
- removing bikini is one-step without animation
- need to keep subscription to play (not that I think somebody will need it)
Bottom Line:
When I've played Digamour (see my review) by the same SomaVision company, one of my thoughts was "oh, it cannot possibly become any more boring", but my recent experience with 3DPlaything by the same company has proven I was wrong :-(.
The beginning of the game is fine - you can "build" your girl, selecting skin tone/breast size/hair and so on, so there are quite many variations you can build. But on the next step comes the disappointment: all you've got is a girl which you can ask to take different positions (and position change is NOT even animated), ask her to remove bikini (NOT animated too), and move dildo in and out of any of her three orifices (this IS animated). And that is all the "game" you get for 19.95/month! Ok, as usual in 3D, you can move your "camera" to look from different angle, and you can also move to one of 4 different spots in the same room, but the action is always the same - girl in some position and all you can do is to move dildo in and out of her, that's it.
Bottom line: while I can't say it's completely useless and rate it at 50, I honestly see that only VERY few people would want to pay this kind of money for this kind of entertainment.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
++ quite realistic 3D sex
++ movements are natural
+ 4 types of girls ("Brazilian", "Japanese", "South African" and "German")
+ each can have different haircuts, complexity, and skin tone
+ one round of arcade play is quite interesting compared to the other similar games
Cons:
--- booooring gameplay
-- clother to "arcade" game, not really RPG as advertised
-- no clothes
-- when starting the game, have only 4 different actions
- no toys
-- active subscription is required to play
-- no "extras", except for "bulk" membership with 2 other SOMA sites (3DPlaything and SexStation7).
Bottom Line:
This site is another site built around "virtual 3D sex" game. And while the graphics (IMHO) isn't bad, gameplay is unbelievably booooring.
First of all, it is NOT MMORPG, as it erroneously stated in some places on the Internet (not a fault of the site itself), it's a single-player game, period. And IMHO it's not really an RPG at all, but more of arcade game.
The plot is almost non-existent (you need to fuck as much as possible with cyber-girls) but that's not a problem. And the first rounds don't pose a real problem too - it's some fun to understand how it works, and to see pretty realistic 4 positions. But the problems start a bit later. To get experience to get to level 2 (to get another 4 positions), you need to fuck 50 times, and each time it's 5 mini-fucks, each of mini-fucks representing one of original 4 positions. Ok, there are a bit different settings, and somewhat different partners, but to fuck 50*5=250 times with THE SAME 4 positions (making it 62 fucks per position) is unbeleivably boooooring for me. And when I was promoted to level 2 and got 4 new positions, totaling to 8, I've found that to go further it's necessary to fuck 100 times to get to level 3 and another 4 positions. This was too much for me and I gave up.
Bottom line: 3D engine isn't bad, and movements are natural, the game works ok without crashes, and arcade actions are much better compared to simple "press it harder to win" style of arcade, but complete lack of balance between time spent and benefit for it make it very difficult to recommend this site or this game. But should the guys listen and shorten the number of fucks required per level 5 times or so, it could become quite an enjoyable game.
> Still, I'll go for it...
Please share your thoughts after trying it (while I do like the way she moves, everybody has different points of view and expectations, especially when it comes to 3D).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
++ virtual 3D stripper as advertised
++ movements are surprisingly natural
++ clothing "fits" the girl surprisingly naturally
+ different outfits
+ several dozens of movements
+ "queue" of movements to make continuous dance
+ "stripper time" to keep "game" feeling
Cons:
--- only one girl
-- removing clothes is not animated
- sometimes there are "jumps" between different segments
- somewhat confusing interface
-- no site value except for the game
- complicated game activation procedure
Bottom Line:
This site proposes subscription, but obviously it's not about subscription at all. It is just selling of the downloadable 3D game, that's it. Site "extras" in addition to the game itself include only a few 3D toons and several "same old" video feeds of dubious quality.
Now about the game.
The good. On the first glance it is surprisingly entertaining. After getting through download and all the registrations and activations, you can see a girl which dances some random dance, and you can tell her what to do next. Actions are placed into the "queue" so you can make long dance sequence. You can change girl outfit, or ask her to remove some or all clothing. To keep things more interesting, there is "stripper time" which requires some attention (not too bad to distract from the girl). Girl movements are surprisingly natural (obviously somehow scanned from some real dancing girl), and clothes fit her naturally too. There are a few dozens of different movements, and 4 or 5 different outfits (each consisting of 4 items, and each item can be taken off separately).
The bad. On the second glance, it starts to become boring. There is only ONE girl, and number of outfits and movements, while pretty big, still starts to become boring in an hour or so. When the girls takes something off, it is not animated (item just fades away) and it doesn't help too.
The ugly. There some minor but annoying things with the site and game: my login wasn't activated until a few hour after paying, activation procedure was complicated and confusing, and UI isn't too obvious. But these issues were quite minor and don't affect bottom line much.
Bottom line: while there is definitely NO value in recurring subscription, one-time "subscription" (to purchase the game @19.95) MIGHT make some sense if you're turned on by the girls merely stripping. While usually I don't include pricing into consideration, in this case I can't help but to say that value for money isn't good here. If the site would throw in more girls/outfits/movements (or at least include their 3D Girls), I would rate them higher.
Sure, it wasn't my point to have everybody join :-). I'm just sharing my own very subjective feelings about the site, and it is always up to reader to decide if to join or not. Unfortunately, there is no "holy grail" of porn out there, especially if looking for something original :-(.
As I've said, it's love or hate. You seem to be on "hate" side :-). Right, it is downloader's nightmare, but for some people (like me) looking for original content it can be worth it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+++ very original content
+++ no, make it EXTREMELY original content
++ LOTS of content
++ obviously VERY expensive and unusual setups
+ pretty good overall video quality
+ CCBill as a processor
Cons:
--- Japanese-only with no dubbing or subtitles
-- infamous Japanese pixelation
-- no ZIPped downloads (downloading 24 pieces per episode is REALLY annoying).
- encoding quality is rather poor for the bandwidth
- XDiv only
- site design
Bottom Line:
This site is SO unusual, that it will most likely cause immediate "love or hate" feeling for many people.
The content is EXTREMELY unusual. What about all-nude all-girl orchestra playing Mozart or all-nude Swan Lake ballet? Unless the content is stolen from some other site, I don't think you'll find something like this elsewhere. And they have TONS and TONS of content (they claim 392G, and they're probably accurate about it, but see below). Now to the bad. First of all, all the dialogs are in Japanese, and they're important for the storyline (yes, there IS storyline there) and translation (either dubbing or subtitles) would be VERY useful. Then, all movies are "pixelated" (as it is common in Japan).
The rest of my ranting is about technical issues. Movies are HUGE (episode can be 2hours, and with 1.2-1.6Mbit/s encoding they easily take 1-1.5G each). To add injury to insult, these 1-1.5G are split into 6-min downloads, so it's 20-24 separate files per episode, ouch. And while encoding quality isn't bad, it's definitely isn't the best for the bandwidth (I've seen much better than 768x540 in 1.6MBit/s), plus only in XDiv, which I consider as a minus too.
Bottom line: if you're into Japanese girls or into VERY unusual setups, take a look at the site, what you see in previews is what you get (but keep in mind that there won't be any English there), and then you'll either love it or hate it.
First I voted "To some extent yes", but then changed to "Not usually", because IMHO there is a BIG difference between "showing unrealistic sex" (about which there are no doubts) and "creating unrealistic expectations". Come on, are there that many people who believe into everything which is shown on TV, leave alone the Internet?
> It saves bandwidth (aha! my "compression" guess was in the ballpark),
> but too much to the detriment of visual satisfaction.
Right, but there is also another side of it: it seems that most of web porn is shoot with amateur camcorders these days :-(, and progressive scan is usually not an option there :-((. Or from a bit different angle: 720p is usually about the same class/price/amount of information as 1080i, but see how much better "we have 1980x1080" looks on site web page (either camera manufacturer site or content web site) than measly "we have 1280x720" :-(.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
