This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on https://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're "unethical".
Review of non-member pages: not much to say, no even tour page, promising DAILY updates (I don't believe it, do you?), and as a final touch, they're proposing "Join for free" combined with one of infamous PRE-CHECKED offers by Epoch (auto-renewing at $39.95 or so). That's what I call unethical.
> I think its fake, have you ever watched a video by them?
No, that's why I'm asking.
> The guys always seem to never be nervous. Also no way a normal
> guy that walks into a pornset for the first time, and sees a
> sexy pornstar is going to last 15 minutes during sex.
Thanks, I see your point. Probably you're right :-(.
These guys claim that they're making lotteries among members to participate in shootings with stars. Does anybody have an idea if this is for real? (as a loyal husband personally I won't participate anyway but knowing it is indeed for real would be a kind of turn-on for me).
When registering, I've entered e-mail and password when registering into BigSister, and some login and another password when paying (to CCBill I think). If you think this is complicated, read on :-). NONE of these worked. When I asked support, I've got quite prompt e-mail saying that "you've registered e-mail address XXXYYYZZZ@hotmail.com, but should use only XXXYYYZZZ in "login/e-mail" field). It's not just ridiculous, it's outrageously ridiculous.
Prior to this I used to think that kink.com's sites login is the worst in adult industry, but now BigSister shown that it can challenge kink.com's leadership :-).
Still, it's not THAT bad as support answers promptly and specifically. Stay tuned for upcoming review (will be available in a few days) :-).
Regardless of what I will find inside, I really appreciate that these guys went great lengths to make sure that the potential customer will be able to see their translations BEFORE PAYING. They have "connection test" as well as free stream to see it. Quality of stream isn't really high for me, but I'm still thinking of giving it a try.
It would be nice if other sites follow this practice and show at least some samples in exactly the same encoding and quality as they have inside (most important for webcam sites, but won't hurt for other sites too).
BigSister claims to offer very unique thing - live translations from real brothel in Prague (with guests supposedly using girl services for free); did anybody try this site?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ unique idea (live cams in real brothel)
+ it seems to really work as advertised
+ choice of monthly subscription or pay per minute
+ with monthly subscription there are no extra charges
+ quality is very good for webcam
+ video archives of past encounters
+ events (like "live gangbang")
Cons:
- horrible login system (see my comment)
- "hot time" is about midday EST only
- video archives are streaming-only
- no subtitles so conversation is unclear
Bottom Line:
It is a very unique site effectively creating a very new niche. They say it is a real brothel (in Prague) with live webcams there, and I beleive it. For me just a notion that it happens for real and I can go there and be one of those guys is a turn-on (not that I'm going to do it :-)).
As they say, it works quite simple - it is a real brothel, where guys come and have sex with girls for free in exchange for right to translate it over the Internet worldwide. They have lobby with customers choosing the girls and some strip dancing going on (ranging from "very boring" to "just boring"), and several webcams there. When customer chooses the girl, they come to one of private rooms (there are several) where they have several webcams too, so the whole encounter is translated 'live'.
Quality is decent for webcam (they can stream from 500kbit/s down to 100kbit/s). As with any brothel, it is pretty deserted except for "hot time" (like 6PM to 10PM local time in Prague, or 11AM to 3PM EST). For those who cannot see it live because of timing, there are archives (with surprisingly wide range of activities - from anal/DP to SM - it seems they're doing just everything in Prague brothels). Archives are streaming-only :-(.
Bottom line: very innovative idea and very good execution of the idea. If you're turned on by the very idea of spying the real brothel (or turned on by the idea you can fuck the same girl for real), this site is definitely worth a try IMHO.
These guys, as well as BigSister, claim to provide live translations from a brothel in Prague. With the concept being very unique, I have certain doubts that these sites aren't related (despite TBP listing different owners for them).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ hardcore action (multiple penetrations including double anal), as advertised
+ interracial content in every episode, as advertised
+ the girl usually undresses before action starts, adding some additional twist
+ lots of bonus sites (FilthFreaks network)
Cons:
-- about the same thing in every episode
-- too often girls are ugly
-- girls don't like it
- no attention to settings
- poor lighting
-- only 400x300 clips
- pictures are 640x480, probably video screencaps
-- PRE_CHECKED cross-sales when purchasing
- cross-sales within member area
- technical problems with the site
Bottom Line:
Coming back from oblivion :-), I've recently subscribed to a new (for me) Filth Freak network. Unfortunately, so far it disappoints me.
At the first glance, BlackGangWhiteBang has everything it advertises - white girls taking four big guys in every hole, sometimes with double anal. So far so good. But then a few things start to annoy. First of all, videos with 400x300 resolution? I've double-checked my calendar, and found that it's 2009 out there, so these 400x300 clips look a bit out of date. Sorry guys, it's not what most people expect, even if it is crystal clear 400x300 at 1500kBit/s. I'm not asking for 1080i or something, but these days everything below 768 or so is way too small.
Further, some of the girls are outright ugly, and out of the rest most don't even pretend they're enjoying it. I know, it's difficult to find girls who enjoy this kind of stuff, but it's a job of any good site to find such girls, and I've seen sites with girls who seem to enjoy it.
From minor annoyances I shall mention poor (or non-existent?) lighting and quite poor settings, on the plus side - a bit of striptease before the action starts.
Site has about 25 episodes, each consisting of 5-8 clips 5 minutes each. Pictures are 640x480, most likely screencaps. Updates are not dated and most likely are infrequent. I've experienced several minor technical problems, like some "Cannot find server" errors and some links leading nowhere, nothing too bad but still annoying.
Bottom line: I don't think that this site will be of interest to anybody except for fans of interracial gangbangs, and even for them the value is significantly reduced by poor video quality and ugly girls disliking what they are doing. While the rest of the network MIGHT have some value, but if all the sites are like this one, the whole network won't IMHO be worth even PU special price.
When unsubscribing, got an "offer you can't refuse" - $29.99 monthly instead of $34.95. Not exactly and "offer you can't refuse" IMHO, but if somebody keeps membership anyway, it still can be useful to save $5/month.
Thanks. Sure, it's always a good idea to check everything before final click, but it's sooooo boring. Unfortunately, it seems that there is no way around :-(.
By any chance, do you have some observations where it happens more often (for example, it might be a 'feature' of some processors like Epoch)? If we would know where to look for it, it would be easier to avoid.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ black guys and blondes, as advertised :-)
+ guys have impressive dicks too
+ huge amount of content
+ decent video quality (though, guys, with 1500kBit/s you can do better than 640x480)
Cons:
- swindling attempt (see my comment)
- recent videos have strong 'seen one of them - seen them all' subjective feeling
- models are not exactly gorgeous
- very inconvenient navigation
- no way to see what the video is about without going to pictures (which is a separate section) or home page
- cameraguy work and lighting could be better
- $35/mon price is above average
Bottom Line:
After escaping (as I hope) swindling attempt described in my earlier comment, I signed in with Blacks on Blondes.
At first, I was surprised how inconvenient their navigation is; to see what video is about before downloading I needed to go both to pictures section and home page, and look for the same clip pictures and description.
Second impression was that video quality is not bad, though cameraguy work and lighting could be improved; models aren't exactly top models but mostly are ok.
The third impression was that 'seen one of them - seen them all', which is especially true for the recent clips. After reading positive reviews here on PU I've tried a few clips from the middle, and I should agree with other reviewers that earlier videos were indeed more interesting.
And that was the fourth and final impression of the site: they do have a huge collection, but recently started to move down the hill.
Bottom line: if you're into black guys with big dicks on white girls, and you don't mind high price, it can easily be the site for you.
> I hate those pre checked boxes
Do you mean that you did run into such 'free-trial-renewed-at-price' pre-checked boxes when subscribing before? Are they common now? (this was my first time running into such thing, so I was really upset with it).
When trying to subscribe to Blacks On Blondes, I've got a form with name, card number and expiration date (as usual), which also had 2 checkboxes pre-checked (!) - each one for 1-day trial auto-renewable at $20-something each. If this is not an attempt to swindle, what is?
Not sure whether it was done by site itself or Epoch (it was on Epoch page), or both; still - BEWARE and read carefully the whole form before submitting, or you can end up paying $50/month more than expected.
Thanks, calculation follows:
51min 16sec = 3076 sec
4,675,992,829 bytes = 4,675,992,829 * 8 bits = 37,407,942,632 bits
So we have average bitrate = 37,407,942,632 / 3076 = 12,161,230 bits/sec, or approximately 12MBit/s . It is indeed HUGE (Asstraffic has about 8MBit/s); on the other hand, higher bitrate does not always guarantee higher quality, so it's a pity that Brazzers don't have an HD sample for public download, so everybody could compare their quality.
If you can tell me (for the same file) it's size in bytes (megabytes, gigabytes) AND it's length in minutes, I can easily calculate it's bitrate. Thanks in advance.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
