| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I was one of the people "meh-ing" for the new sites :) I do like nude wrestling from time to time, but I don't know if I would join a site that is wholy devoted to it; as for Aletta, she is just not my type of model, I prefer the petit, slimmy, natural breasted ones.
Anyway, I am also willing to know how the new site packages will be designed -and also, I am willing to see if Blue Angel Live comes back to being really alive!
|
10-30-10 02:19am
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I think it's up to the reviewers to set the score they consider more accurate. I also think that I would never rate a site with a 100% (well, never say never) because even my favorite porn sites have things to improve...
|
10-30-10 01:55am
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
It's funny, I don't really remember how I got to know what I know about sex. In school I received the classical extremely limited phisiological information; I never really talked about sex with my parents (no regrets there) so I guess most of what I knew came from books, magazines and movies.
I don't think porn is a good "educational tool" for beginners, really: the comparison between what you see in a porn movie and what really happens in your bed the first time you try to emulate it can be sooooooo frustrating...
|
10-26-10 12:33am
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It depends on the nature of the comment, for example you could say things like "this site includes content from X", "I had problems joining", "I won't join this site because X", etc. Other kinds of comments (on quality of quantity of content, for instance) would not be acceptable if they are based solely on the tour, I would say.
|
10-24-10 06:47am
|
Reply
80
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks a lot for that, Messmer. Aletta Ocean and Kathia Nobili are not particularly my type of model, so these new sites are not specially atractive for me. I've checked what they say are their "newest sites", and apart from those two, apparently they are "Nude Fight Club" y "Cheating Whore Wives". Meh.
In any case, I would say that 21st Sextury would do better to maintain in good shape the sites they already have, instead of trying to open new ones. But probably they want to attract new customers, as a commercial strategy...
|
10-24-10 06:43am
|
Reply
81
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
And have you been able to identify the two new sites added to your membership? :)
|
10-23-10 11:31am
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Maybe it's just me, but when I am "at it", I don't need to "think" much... :P
|
10-23-10 02:11am
|
Reply
83
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
I am also a big (huge!) fan of Sophie Moone: when I started watching porn in the internet she immediately caught my eye (and everything else) and I've followed her work since, being a member of all her "official sites" and most of the other sites that offer her content.
For me the worst thing about "Sweet Sophie Moone II: the return of Sophie" is the excessive ammount of bonus and backstage content they offer. With only 4 updates a month, I feel that they should make sure that at least 3 of them are real action sets. In fact, I think it would be more fair if all 4 sets were real action, and the bonus sets came, well, as real bonuses inbetween.
As for the other "complaints", it's true that Sophie is not a teenager any more, but I think she still looks gorgeus (I wouldn't kick her out of my bed, for sure :P), and I don't really miss her b/g scenes. But I do have a sense of inauthenticity in most of her most recent sets, like she is just going through the moves and not really interested in what she is doing.
In any case, I know that I will at least once more join this site sometime next year...
|
10-23-10 02:10am
|
Reply
84
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
I am also in the line of those who feel that a 50 is maybe too harsh a score for a site with one of the biggest and best archives of European gorgeus models, doing solo, g/g and b/g. Pix and Video was one of the first sites that I joined, usually combined with ClubSandy, and it almost never dissapointed me.
This said, I also agree with you, and with the other users, that the new design for the whole network is messy, it has less options than the original designs for individual sites, and it sometimes crashes on specific sets or videos. However, this never prevented me from getting the content that I wanted; just asked for a little more patience or skills (like the "open in new tab" trick they just mentioned)
|
10-23-10 02:02am
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
As others have already stated, the thrill about porn for me seems to be more about the hunt and finding new pictures and videos, than about watching them :D
I've deleted my collection two or three times, when I realized that I once when I started a new relationship and was worried that I might "get caught", and other times because I was just not watching those files any more, or because I needed the disk space (I don't have an external drive for porn and really I don't think I will ever do). I've also lost some files in disk failures and forced PC re-formatting...
|
10-08-10 10:01am
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't. There are many different non-sexual situations in which one could be naked -or see other people naked. We have a strong tabboo associated with nakedness, but that's not necesarilly the most natural approach...
|
09-26-10 07:25am
|
Reply
87
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Well, it's funny that this network is able to dissapoint its members for absolutely opposite reasons :)
BTW, just in case an explanation is needed, there was no judgement intended when I talked about "disturbing or uninteresting" niches. Some things that I find erotic (for example, foot fetish or hypnofetish) may be "disturbing and uninteresting" for other people; it's just that sites like "Grandpas fuck teens", "Lusty grandmas" or "Bootyfull Babes" are, well, not exactly my cup of tea.
|
09-23-10 02:46pm
|
Reply
88
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Reply
Thanks, nostromo. It's good to know it's not just me getting older or bored of this stuff :)
Note for other possible users reading this: don't get me wrong, if you have never joined 21Sextury before, its archive offers a great deal of great stuff, and for a great price. It's the new updates that are a bit dissapointing.
|
09-23-10 08:57am
|
Comment
89
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
|
09-23-10 04:09am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I think we may be talking about two different kind of "gay bars" here: one that is just like a regular bar, with the difference that it "gay-friendly" and is frequented by more gay than heterosexual people, and another type which is more like a gay-sex-encounter kind of bar. Maybe the first type is more common in Europe than in the US, I don't know. In Madrid or Lisbon, for example, you can find both type of gay bars.
I think I wouldn't feel confortable in the second kind of bar, and I would probably leave it quickly enough; but in the first type of gay bar you can just hang around just like in any other bar, so I wouldn't have any problem staying for a drink or two.
|
09-23-10 03:49am
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I've been to gay bars in my home city in some occasions just for a drink with some friends (they are just bars like all the rest, with music and alcohol and all) and I've been approach by some guy once or twice. I think the best strategy is to be polite but direct: "thank you very much, I am flattered, but I am not interested, thanks". And that's that.
|
09-22-10 01:20am
|
Reply
92
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks, lk2fireone :)
|
09-21-10 11:27am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I don't normally download pictures, but when I did, I was extremely lazy about them: I took the whole gallery as it came and rarely devoted any time to deleting or editing the images...
|
09-21-10 11:21am
|
Review
94
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Huge archive
-Updated regularly (a new video every 2/3 days; new pictures every other day)
-Gorgeus models (mostly Eastern European, I would say)
-Beatifully shot pics and videos
-In new videos you have different video qualities and formats
-Zip archive for picture sets |
| Cons: |
-Navigation and search options are minimal
-Yes, it's only g/g action, so it can get repetitive
-Some models appear under strange, unusual names
-Bonus content is minimal or non-existent
-Silent sex means less narrative or fantasy involved
-Almost no preview before joining the site (bad marketing strategy, in my opinion) |
| Bottom Line: |
I finally decided to join this site, which had been for a long time on my "to do" list, and I have to say that I am not dissapointed. Of course, you have to know what you'll get when you join, but I knew it, I was expecting it and I got just exactly that: all girl-girl, classy, mid-core (if you get what I mean) action.
The picture and video sets all have more or less the same style and structure: a very quick and unimportant segment were the girls interact and decide to get into action, and then a few minutes of licking, kissing, scissoring and some light fisting. The girls are generally very hot, mostly in a European, thin and athletic way.
From the technical point of view, newer video sets offer three different download options (HDV - 1280 x 720 @ 4Mbit; HDV - 852 x 480 @ 2Mbit and HDV - 448 x 256 @ 1Mbit); older sites have less options and poorer quality, as could be expected. Updates come quite regularly (one video every 2/3 days and a new picture set every other day or so), and most of them -although not all- are paired picture/video sets.
Now, let's get with the cons: the most important one, yes, is that there are only so many things girls can do to each other without getting too kinky or hardcore (and you won't find any of that kind of stuff here), and most of the girls don't speak English, so scenes tend to look a bit repetitive after a while. There are variations, of course (location, number of girls, positions), but it all has the same style and kinf of look to it.
The design of the site could also get some improvement. It's easy to navigate, but has too few search options. Models are only displayed alphabetically (more on that later) and the description of the scenes doesn't let you, for example, to look for all the sets involving foot fetish action (which is something that I, as a foot lover, would have liked to see).
About the model archive, it was very frustrating for me to see that many of the best known European models are listed here under different and completely unrelated names. For example, Eve Angel is Daphne; Blue Angel is Beatrice; Eufrat is Juliette; Sophie Moone is Sophie M. (well, that one was easy), etc. I don't know the reason for this, but it makes it very difficult to find those models, specially since there is no "alias" or "aka" index anywhere in the site.
Bottom line: I really like the site. It has its cons, but it is probably one of the best g/g sites you will find. Obviously, if you are looking for something more hardcore or with more variety, you will get dissapointed; but then again, why did you join a site called Sapphic Erotica if that's not what you are lookin for? :P |
|
09-21-10 10:10am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks, Denner :)
The reason I proposed this poll is because some time ago I discovered, with some surprise, that I was sharing in PU things about my sexual life and fantasies that not even my closest friends know, only my sexual/romantic partners (and sometimes, not even that). And I was curious to know if I was the only one or if this was a common thing. And I am partly relieved to see that it's common for almost everybody :)
|
09-18-10 11:50am
|
Reply
96
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yes, I suppose you are right, probably Sophie Moone doesn't have the implication (or the energy) she had 10 years ago when she started; but I did expect to get at least 1 good (and by good I mean "exclusive" and "not-backstage") video per week featuring her. I think that is the minimum that you can expect from a site like this.
Anyway, answering your question, even if this site wasn't part of the 21st Sextury network, I think I would probably have joined for at least 1 month at some point, because I would hate to feel that I may be missing some great new sets of Sophie, even if I also knew that I would probably be dissapointed by the actual sets... :P
|
09-04-10 06:47am
|
Review
97
|
Club Sandy
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Sandy is still hot
-Huge archive (1400+ videos) with some very hot models
-Good video quality in new sets
-zip file for pictures
-Updated regularly (a new set every 2 days)
-Included in the 21st Sextury pack |
| Cons: |
-Has lost much of its personal touch
-Some occasional download problems (common to all 21Sextury sites)
-Site design is poor (it was much better before they pushed all the sites together) |
| Bottom Line: |
I thought I should write a new review of this site, seeing that the last one I wrote was so long ago, and the site has changed quite a bit since then. For one thing, the site has lost a lot of the personal touch which made it different from other 21st Sextury sites. One of the things that I loved about this site was that once a month you got the chance to chat with Sandy herself; that's gone now, and there is also no bio or blog from Sandy, so it's really a weird "model-centered" site. The only thing that makes this site different from Pix and Video is that from time to time you get a site featuring Sandy, who, by the way, is still hot no matter what other users say :)
Don't get me wrong, this is a good site, just as Pix and Video or Lezcuties are good sites too; but it doesn't have the extras or bonus that you would expect from a site focused on one single model, specially considering that it did have those extras in the past.
Still, you get good content for your money, regular updates, good video quality, a huge archive with gorgeus models (quite a few sets from Sophie Moone, since her and Sandy used to work a lot together) so I think you won't complain if you get this site in the 21st Sextury combo. It's just, well, it could be better, and it HAS been better in the past... |
|
09-04-10 03:50am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
98
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
|
09-04-10 02:35am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
This is a weirdly specific poll, isn't it? :DDD Has anyone ever been in this situation, or any other situation remotely similar to this?
|
09-04-10 01:24am
|
Reply
100
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
underArthur's Comment
Well, I suppose it's a matter of taste. I am a great female foot lover, and I like DDF more than 21Sextury. They both offer great sites and great looking models (some of them are the same, actually), but for me nobody beats DDF at capturing hot foot fetish action -except maybe Viv Thomas :)
|
09-03-10 05:35am
|
|
