| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I agree, Capn. I have downgraded the site, because of this horrible way of treating the customers. I really hope more people will see this review and stay away from this site, because right now I feel cheated and frustrated.
|
08-13-10 03:54am
|
Review
127
|
Euro Girls On Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Good picture and video quality
-Different streaming and download options
-Good picture and video archive
-zip file for picture sets
-Gorgeus European models including Eve Angel, Blue Angel, Eufrat...
-Good lighting, directing, editing, etc.
-Included in the DDFProd deal, or accesible as an independent site
-Quite a few lesbian foot fetish sets |
| Cons: |
-Not all content is exclusive to this site (but all content is exclusive to DDFProd)
-Some sets are photos only: to access the video you have to join Sapphic Erotica and pay a different membership there
-Action can get a bit repetitive after a while, since there is no "plot" or dialogue in the scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
I have rejoined (once again) the DDF Productions network, and when I do so, I do mainly because of Hot Legs and Feet: the first site that I ever payed for, and probably my favorite one, ever. However, among the other sites that are included in the network, Euro Girls on Girls is, I would say, the best one and the one that is closest to my taste.
As the name indicates, it's a site devoted almost exclusively to lesbian action. The quality of pictures and videos is the usual in DDF, and for most of the sets you will find different download options (wmw, qt, mpg...) and streaming qualities. The girls are also the usuals in this network: cute European models, including personal favorites such as Blue Angel, Eve Angel or Eufrat.
The cons are quite small compared with the pros: for example, I don't like that marketing strategy in which they offer you a picture set (most of Nelly's sets, for instance), and when you try to watch the video you get a message saying: "This is a photo set cortesy of Sapphic Erotica, please join, etc.". It's quite frustrating, and although I may join Sapphic Erotica in the future, right now I am tempted to stay away because of this not so elegant way of advertising.
Also, the content of this site is not completely exclusive, although it is all DDF Prod stuff. Some sets are published simultaneously in other sites of the network. This may be a small nuisance because you may download the same set or video more than once from different sites.
The reason why I gave this site an 85 and not higher is because I find that, as an individual site, it is a bit pricy. On the other hand, as a part of the DDF Prod network, it is a great and welcome addition to the other sites and niches, even if it wasn't the reason you joined it in the first place. |
|
08-13-10 03:49am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
128
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mistresskent's Poll
Same here. I don't want to read the classic "oh, I am alone at home so horny" entries, which are so obviously fake. I prefer reading about what they really do and think.
|
08-13-10 03:30am
|
Reply
129
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks, tangub. Yes, not having zip files is a big mistake from their part.
Also, their customer support system could be much, much improved: I tried to cancel my membership three times, emailed them asking for help, never got an answer, my membership got effectively cancelled, yet apparently they charged my credit card for next month's fee!!! I am really pissed off about this right now...
|
08-09-10 11:26pm
|
Reply
130
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think it is for their own good that they need to adapt themselves for IE, although the effort to adapt to IE6 probably is not worth it any more. But all the rest, including newer versions of our beloved explorer, yes, they should work with every porn website.
|
08-09-10 11:00pm
|
Reply
131
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
Thank you both.
I am still worried right now about my membership: I have cancelled it not once but twice, and I still I haven't received the "confirmation email" from them. I am fearing that they will try to charge me for next month's membership. I have emailed their customer support, will see what happens next...
|
08-08-10 09:01am
|
Reply
132
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No, never, but I must say I also regret it to some extent. I am not talking hardcore or anything, I would just like to have some sexy semi-nude posing pictures, to look at them once in a while with horny nostalgia :D
|
08-08-10 08:52am
|
Review
133
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
08-13-10 03:53am (Update History)
Reason: Horrible customer service
|
| Pros: |
-Very professional-looking site, with a personal touch
-Very artistic pictures
-Some really cute girls
-Around 480 video scenes and many more picture sets
-Full trial |
| Cons: |
-Very few search options
-No zip files for pictures
-Some models are just not that hot
-Extremely softcore content: solo scenes, sometimes not even nude scenes
-Most videos are backstage clips, which are really not that hot |
| Bottom Line: |
I have to say that I joined this site with a trial membership of just 1$ for 2 days, as an ex-member of Twistys. And it's a good thing that I did, because if I had paid the whole 14.95$ to join it, I would probably be very dissapointed right now (and most probably, my rating for this site would have been lower too).
In general, I would say that this site has more cons than pros: although the photography and video direction are good, and the clips and pics look classy enough, they are just too softcore for my taste, being all solo sets, and not even masturbation sets: just the girls posing and teasing, sometimes without even taking all their clothes off.
Also, the navigation of the site could use some improvement, by adding some search options or classifying the sets by category (posing, teasing, stripping, backstage, for example), or offering the girls in alfabethical order, as well as in order of preference and order of appearance.
Another major con for this site, as other reviewers have pointed out already, is that they don't offer .zip files for pictures. I am not a picture fan myself, but for a site that, like this one, seems to depend so much on pictures, it's a really big mistake.
The girls featured in this site are, generally speaking, quite regular, and most of them are complete strangers to me (the only exception being Sunny Leone, who in any case is not one of my favorites). Some girls are really cute; others are not. I feel as if the site was missing at least half a dozen extra-hot models (American or European) to make up for a complete catalogue: the famous ones, the cute unknown ones and the fillers.
All in all, I am not truly satisfied with this site: although the photographer and director does a good, professional job, I don't feel like this site excels at anything in particular. Only if you are into softcore (and I mean, really soft), you may enjoy the treats that this site has to offer.
Update: I have downgraded this site from 78 to 70 due to their horrible (and I mean abysmal) customer support. I joined with a trial membership, and cancelled it (three times!!!)during the first two days; however, I was charged for the whole next month. I have emailed them four or five times, and still no response. I am wondering if this is just a coincidence, or if it's a premeditated strategy to lure you with the trial membership and then charge you the whole month no matter what... Anyway, I would recommend staying away for this site unless you really, really don't mind paying for a one month membership. |
|
08-06-10 07:20am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
For me, it doesn't really matter if they censor the genitals or the tits in the preview. I understand that they may do it for legal reasons, to avoid minors from watching them for example, and I have seen the censored parts a gazillion times before, so it is not like if I am going to be dissapointed or surprised if I join that site...
|
08-05-10 01:56am
|
Comment
135
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
|
08-02-10 02:24am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
136
|
GameLink Video On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Thanks for your review, rearadmiral. I used to be a client of Gamelink (and if I think of it, I spent really a LOT of money here... so I try not to think of it :) But then I discovered Hotmovies.com, and I almost completely abandonned Gamelink: I only go back when there is a movie that I cannot find elsewhere, and which I really, really want to see.
But I suppose that's because I don't mind streaming videos (in fact, I would say I prefer it...); if I wanted to download them, I would compare prices and options between Gamelink, Hotmovies and Videobox, I suppose...
|
08-01-10 01:35pm
|
Reply
137
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Mmmmmh, it looks like I am the only one who said "feet" (so far, at least)... Of course I like all parts of the female body, and a beautiful face is specially important for me in a porn actress, but I am always looking for those little sexy feet to be shown in every scene, and if possible, licked, worshipped and used in every imaginable way. I get turned on by scenes with no feet in them, but feet are just the final touch to crown it all...
|
08-01-10 01:30pm
|
Comment
138
|
Viv Thomas Video
(0)
|
|
07-30-10 09:40am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
139
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I used to, when I started watching it, and specially when I started paying for it. But that was a long time ago :D
|
07-30-10 01:31am
|
Reply
140
|
Blue Angel Live
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Hi, Exotics! Well, in this case I think we have different tastes about fisting, because, if it is well done and the girl seems to be enjoying it, it's a turn on for me. For example ALS tend to do fisting videos, and they are really hot (in my opinion). I didn't have that sensation of Blue Angel being too extreme, although she is obviously more into midcore/hardcore than Sophie Moone or Eve Angel currently are...
I hadn't paid too much atention to Black Angelica until you mentioned her. I knew her scene with Sophie Moone, and very little else. Now that I take a good look at here... well, she is ok, but I wouldn't put her in the same category as Sophie, Eve or Blue Angel... :D
|
07-29-10 03:05am
|
Reply
141
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Ok, it could be a useful distinction. For me, almost any solo action is softcore; most lesbian action (specially kinky stuff excluded) could be midcore; and any boy/girl action with penetration etc., hardcore; anyway, thanks for commenting :D
|
07-28-10 12:50pm
|
Reply
142
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As usual, most of us only contact people to complain or to ask for help :D
I have contacted some webmasters of porn-related sites (Kahn included, obviously) and I got a helpful answer most of the times (I would say, around 75-80% of the times.
|
07-28-10 11:48am
|
Review
143
|
Twistys
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Amazing ammount of content: many more pictures than videos, but that's quite usual, isn't it...
-Good update rythm: two-three picture sets and two videos a day
-Really beautiful girls (mostly American big-titted actresses, but also some European cuties)
-Easy navigation and different search options
-Good picture and video quality, specially in recent sets
-No download limits
-Good pricing, considering the content they offer
-Full trial membership (I received a special 1$ discount for "old customers: best deal ever). |
| Cons: |
-Downloads are at times a bit slow
-Content may be too softcore for some viewers, specillay after a while (and the hardcore part of the site is really minimal)
-Not all content is exclusive
-Some company ads, not too annoying though |
| Bottom Line: |
I rejoined this site thanks to a trial membership offer that I received in my email, for being and "old customer": 1$ for three days, renewable at 14.95$ a month. Probably the best invested buck in my whole life.
The archive is huge. That's probably Twisty's most salient quality. Being one of internet's "classics", it has so much content (more picture sets than vids, but that's quite usual, isn't it) that you would need months to download and browse it all -specially considering that download speeds aren't always the best. The quality of the videos varies depending on their release date, newer videos being offered in three different qualities.
The models/actresses are mostly American girls with huge tits -a lot of them, fake-, but you will also find a handful of sets by some of our favorite European models, such as Sophie Moone, Eufrat, Eve Angel or Nella (here as Nellie Hunter). Most girls are absolutely stunning, so no complains there.
The only possible dissapointment about Twistys is that it is too softcore, or too regularly softcore: most sets and vids are solo masturbation sets, very beautifully lit, acted, filmed and edited. This is great, but it can get a little too repetitive once you've watched it a dozen times with a dozen different girls, and the bunch of lesbian or hardcore videos available are just not enough to balance this feeling.
But this is just to say something bad about a good site: good in ammount of content, in quality of pics and videos, in model selection and even in price, if you are lucky enough to get a discount (PU's offer or other one). It could be a good holiday idea, to get a Twistys one month membership and download as much as you can... |
|
07-28-10 11:43am
Replies (7)
|
Reply
144
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mistresskent's Poll
Agree with most of the above. It's easy to say, in theory, that we would all jump in and join whatever our favorite model/actress asks us to do in front of a camera. But then again, everybody has a family, a job, friends, maybe a partner, and if that material is going to be floating in the internet, chances are, somebody will find it and haunt you with it :P
|
07-27-10 09:25am
|
Review
145
|
Foot Factory
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Clean and efficient navigation
-All exclusive content
-Classy, artistic pictures and videos
-Acceptable archive size (+300 videos, +3000 picture sets)
-Beautiful models (including Valentina Vaughn, Justine Joli or Dita von Teese, for example)
-Full trial membership
-Pictures are downloadable in .zip format |
| Cons: |
-Mostly solo, softcore content
-Very irregular updates
-Somewhat dark in style and lighting
-Videos with music (I hate that)
-Not a wide choice of formats and qualities for video download |
| Bottom Line: |
So, following my quest for new and exciting foot fetish sites, I joined this site, which I knew mostly because they released a couple of videos as movies in Hotmovies.com. To join, I used a "trial membership" option that appears as an "easter egg" if you try to surf away from their Join page: for 2.95€, I got complete access to the site for three days. Great deal, I am really thankful after my extremely dissapointing experiences with other trial memberships recently.
As for the site itself, well, to enjoy it you have to know what you are going to get, and you have to like that kind of stuff: it's mainly artistic, classy, elegant, somewhat dark foot fetish solo/masturbation pictures and videos. It has an Andrew Blake ring to it, although without the BDSM.
Among the models who work(ed) for this site, you will find some of my personal favorites, such as Justine Joli or Valentina Vaughn, but also a lot of unknown actresses who are just ok. One thing that I hate is that most videos -not all- include a music soundtrack, which silences the moans and groans of the actresses. I really don't like that, it's a complete turn off for me...
On the technical side, the navigation is just good (you can only access the pics and videos in inverse chronological order, with no search options or categories) and the choice of video qualities and formats is minimal -inexistant for older sets. Another big "con" is the low rate of updates in this site: they come irregularly, mostly once every week, but sometimes every two weeks, or every three or four days...
All in all, I was dissapointed with the site, mainly because I am not that much into solo action, and because, although I can enjoy a softcore video once in a while, I prefer it not to be SO softcore. This site is clearly devoted to showing the beauty of the female body, and more precisely female feet, but I also expected it to show some hot f/f or even m/f action. Obviously Ed Fox is a great photographer and a talented artistic director, but it's just not exactly my taste. |
|
07-27-10 02:44am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
146
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My ex-girlfriend knew, I think, that I watched and downloaded porn, but we never talked about it. It was one of those things that are taboo: everybody knows they are there, but they are never openly discussed. I tried to convince her a couple of times to watch porn together (I was thinking of something softcore, nothing too strong to start) but she always refused...
|
07-24-10 01:39pm
|
Reply
147
|
Footsie Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Exactly, Wittguy, I totally agree. It's really a shame that with models as gorgeus as those, and with the quality and resources 21st Sextury has, they still haven't got to the top top shelf in this niche. I think basically they lack a director like Denis de Francesco or Viv Thomas or whoever does the Barefoot Confidential series, who has a real understanding of how to film foot fetish sex. Anyway, I still rank it number 3 so far...
|
07-23-10 11:49am
|
Review
148
|
Footsie Babes
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
07-23-10 02:56am (Update History)
Reason: This is a new review, I don't know why it was catalogued as "expired review"...
|
| Pros: |
-The archive is not huge, but big enough (248 scenes)
-Exclusive sets, mostly
-Gorgeus European models (including Sophie Moone, Blue Angel or Eve Angel)
-Excellent video quality and different download options
-Reasonable price: 19.95$ with the PU offer, and you also get this site in the 21st Sextury pack (which is probably the best option)
-Good artistic look in all the videos
-All-in-one zips for pictures
-Some variety in the type of sets: mostly solo and b/g sets, with some g/g |
| Cons: |
-Only 1 update a week
-No bonus content
-The style in the videos is elegant, but a little repetitive at times
-Some models do not look like they are enjoying themselves too much |
| Bottom Line: |
I was totally convinced that at some point I had made a review of this site, but apparently, I hadn't. So here I go. I was a member of this site some years ago, when it first opened and it worked as an individual site, and I am now a member again, thanks to the 21st Sextury pack offer. When it was just the one site, I remember that I used to get a little frustrated, because the updates were too slow (they used to "slice up" the sets through a whole week) and I didn't get any extra content. Now, with it being a part of this site-pack, it's easier to be patient and wait for the updates to come.
After visitting other few sites in this same niche, I think Footsie Babes is up there with Hot Legs and Feet and Foot Fetish Daily, as one of the top foot fetish sites available anywhere, probably in a close third place (HL&F being my absoluto favorite). It has classy and sexy models with beautiful feet, the quality of the videos is great, and the size of the archive is acceptable.
The bigger problem with this site, as with most 21st Sextury sites, is that it updates quite slowly (at least for my standards): just one update a week is not enough, and it can be really frustrating if you opt for a short membership and you don't like one or two of the last updates, for whatever reason.
And I have to say, that although it is difficult to say why, Footsiebabes tend to dissapoint me a little with their scenes. They have gorgeus models, they have good material, and yet, they tend not to hit the exact spot when dealing with foot worship, footjobs or foot fucking. I think the directors and editors should take a look at DDF and Kick Ass for inspiration on how to treat feet in a video, and also on how to set the appropriate mood for the scene... Anyway, I am well aware that this is just my personal taste, and other users may love the 21st Sextury way of doing foot fetish videos...
My bottom line, to sum up, is quite simple: I like this site, but I recommend getting access to it by getting the whole 21st Sextury pass, not as an individual site. If you are a foot fetish man like myself, you will enjoy it. |
|
07-23-10 02:55am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
149
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I probably would join, as others have already said, if the site has a big enough archive, if I haven't joined it before and if I think it's really going to be worth it.
|
07-23-10 02:01am
|
Reply
150
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I don't remember exactly, but I think I was looking for a news about Eve Angel's old site when it wasn't updating any more, and so I got here, and started writing myself. And here we are now... :)
|
07-23-10 01:59am
|
|
