| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
Blue Angel Live
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review as always, Exotics. Blue Angel is indeed really hoy: she is probably the most probable successor of Sophie Moone (and probably the people at 21st Sextury think the same). She is very cute, she has a killer body, perky tits, and she even seems nice in her interviews.
However, as you say, this site is only worth the money in the 21Sextury combo, not as a site on its own. In fact, if I did join this site right now, I would be really pissed: there is almost no bonus or personal content or contact with Blue Angel, the archive is not that huge and, as you say, too many of the recent updates have been backstage or fun videos.
As I said in a previous comment, I have the impression that the people at 21Sextury got stuck somewhere in the middle: they decided to give Blue Angel a solo site, but without making the time and money investment a good solo site would have needed (chats, interviews, more updates, bonus content...)
|
07-23-10 01:56am
|
Reply
152
|
Exclusive Foot Fetish
(0)
|
Reply of
rayone's Review
Thank you very much for this review. I am trying to find new foot fetish sites, apart from the classics (Hot legs and feet, Footsie Babes, Foot Fetish Daily), but for now all of them have been a dissapointment. I will keep looking, and avoid Exclusive Foot Fetish...
|
07-18-10 04:05am
|
Reply
153
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
As a Spaniard, I grew up with dubbed movies (including porn), and I have to say that Spanish dubbing is in general really good. But now, I cannot stand dubbing any more, it always sounds fake and out of sync. In porn, I would rather have a movie with subtitles, or even a movie in a language that I don't understand at all, than a poorly dubbed movie that seems fake...
|
07-18-10 03:38am
|
Reply
154
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Poll
I think I remember reading somewhere that smells can have sexual connotations for women, while men don't care much about them. I can say that, for me, "aromas" can be disgusting, or nothing at all. I don't think I could name an "arousing aroma", and specially not watch two girls talking about it on tape...
|
07-16-10 08:32am
|
Reply
155
|
Lesbian Foot Lover
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
Okay, maybe I wrote the comment in the heat of the moment, it might have been better to cool off before writing it; anyway, I do think it's a scam NOT to say it's a limited trial anywhere, and then offer such limited a content that it's plain ridiculous. Even if there are no laws about it, there are some conventions, and offering 10 incomplete, low-definition scenes for 2.95€, for me qualifies as scam...
Anyway, what I think is important is for other users to know that the trial membership is definitely NOT worth it. If they want to go for the complete 30€ membership, it's up to them, I can't say if the site is any good, because the trial membership didn't allow me to really try it.
Thanks for your views on my comment, anyway, I only hope it's useful for someone...
|
07-14-10 02:43pm
|
Reply
156
|
Lesbian Foot Lover
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
Hi, justme, how are you. Yes, I know, this is not the first time I get a trial suscription, and it's not the first time that I find them to be limited (21sextury also had these kind of trial memberships, if I remember correctly); limited trials are always dissapointing, but this is just plain absurd: I don't get to see the size of their archive; the real quality of the videos, or the real download speed. I don't even get to see the faces of the models that work for the site. I am only given access to ONE page with TEN incomplete scenes.
This is not only frustrating for users: it's also a very bad business tactic: if they allowed me to see the names and faces of all their models, a peek of all their scenes (just thumbnails if you want) and some real, complete samples of the scenes contained in the site, I may be tempted to expand or "upgrade" my membership. As it is, I only want to get away and never look back.
A crappy trial membership like this one gives me the impression that the content really is not that good, so they prefer to screw passers-by and get 2$-3$ from them instead of trying to secure long-term memberships from people who could be really interested...
|
07-14-10 09:42am
|
Comment
157
|
Lesbian Foot Lover
(0)
|
|
07-14-10 07:16am
Replies (4)
|
Review
158
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Gorgeous women
-Stylish and elegant movies
-Good archive size
-Most scenes are downloadable (contrarily to what some people, including myself, have said in the past)
-Very reasonable price, with the PU discount
-Easy to cancel
-Some moderately interesting extras (behind the scenes, Wicked Tube...)
-Movies directed by David Stanley (he is one of my favorite directors...) |
| Cons: |
-Site is really slow
-Search options could be improved
-Site navigation also could be much better
-All movies look a bit too much alike after a while (they do look great, just a little too similar)
-Not too much foot fetish centered content (a pity for foot fans like myself) |
| Bottom Line: |
So, I joined the site to take a peek, seeing that with the PU discount the price was really reasonable (although it was 9.95€ for me, which is a little more than $9.95). And at first I was really dissapointed, because of the painfully slow pace at which the site charges. It's true that it has improved a little since: it comes and goes, but it always is too slow compared with other similar sites. It may be that they have too much traffic for their connection, or that the dozens of thumbnails that appear with each movie take too much time, I don'w know. It's really frustrating, that I do know.
On the plus side, Wicked Pictures is one of the best porn studios in the world: they have some of the hottests actresses (Jessica Drake, Jenna Jameson, Keri Sable...), and their movies always look great: classy, well lit, with a plot and characters... The only proble, for my taste, is that the sex scenes always look a bit too similar: the same positions, the same order, the same ooohs and aaaaahs...
Also, when I first joined this site some years ago, there was no download option (other users have said the same in their reviews). Now, you have the option of downloading almost every scene in DVD quality (although some scenes have broken links, like scene 3 of All About Keri, which I haven't been able to download). The download speed, however, is also another issue: it's also quite slow, and I have "lost" some downloads because the connection was broken before they finished.
All in all, and especially considering the low PU price, I think this site is really worh it, at least for a while. If they rearranged the site and solved those problems with download speeds, it would surely get to the lower 90s in my score. |
|
07-12-10 04:12pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
159
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
|
07-08-10 07:53am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
160
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hi, Ace. They are not exclusive videos: they are movies produced by several porn studios, mostly American. For example, here you will find Vivid, New Sensations or Kick Ass Picutres movies, which probably can be found in other sites, but probably not this cheap :)
As I said in the review, I usually stream the movies, I don't "rent", "buy" or "download" them. It's much cheaper and the quality, in recent movies, is extremely good. If you want information about downloads, here you have what the page itself has to say: http://www.hotmovies.com/downloads.php?language=english
|
07-05-10 10:29am
|
Review
161
|
Hot Movies
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Huge ammount of videos (and growing): literally thousands
-Several streaming options and qualities (from Low to Mega)
-Price is very reasonable (for streaming: 200 minutes for 19.95$, for example)
-Improved scene description and interface
-All kinds of niches and fetishes
-Includes movies ome of the best studios and directors (Vivid, New Sensations, Viv Thomas) |
| Cons: |
-Not all movies are available for streaming
-If you want to "rent" movies, it's much more expensive
-Older movies have worse video quality (and worse scene tagging and description)
-Sometimes (very, very few times) a movie won't stream as expected
-No pictures (that's not really a con for me, but it may be for some people) |
| Bottom Line: |
So, I just realized that my last review for Hot Movies "expired", so, since this is one of my favorite classics, I decided to write a new one. The fact that I am still a member of this site after more than two years should tell you that I am quite satisfied.
Basically, I think this is a site for movie streaming. You don't have pictures, and renting options are much more expensive. So you should accept the idea of watching porn online, and not "owning" it in your PC. If you can do that, this is the site for you. You have an enormous archive with tons of movies with many of the hottest actresses and from some of the best studios (Wicked Pictures being the most notable exception). And new movies are added daily (I am talking around 25 new movies a day, aprox.)
I really recommend this site, specially since it has no monthly rate: you can buy your streaming minutes and use them whenever you feel like it. Or even pay-per-view (an option I haven't used because it's more expensive). I only wouldn't recommend this site for people who want to download movies, or people who like pictures better than videos. |
|
06-29-10 01:51am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
162
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Poll
The answer would be the classic "it depends". Sometimes I see a site (often one that I've already joined in the past) and I feel like I have to join it immediately, like a fever or a hunger for it, and I join. Other times (specially with new sites) I am more rational: I take the tour, look in PU, consider the price, the time I will have to watch and download porn in the following month, and then I decide wether to join or not...
|
06-28-10 01:11am
|
Comment
163
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
|
06-23-10 03:45am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
164
|
Hypno Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
Thanks for your review, Graymane1777. I was also a member of this site some years ago, and my experience was similar to yours. It's a pity that one of the only hypno-fetish sites is run so poorly. However, as you say, some of the videos are quite erotic, if you get to them...
|
06-23-10 12:51am
|
Reply
165
|
Blue Angel Live
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
I agree with both. For me it's quite obvious that they were thinking of making Blue Angel the new Sophie Moone. And indeed, Blue Angel is absolutely gorgeus (she is now one of my favorite models) and had the potential in her. However, maybe at some point they decided that it wasn't really worth the effort of creating all the extra material (bonus content, chat, inerview, bio, whatever else) if it was going to be just included in the network of sites as the others...
I would love to see Blue Angel Live grow in personality, and become as attractive as ClubSandy or Sweet Sophie Moone (which is still not updating, by the way), but it looks like it will never happen...
|
06-22-10 07:52am
|
Reply
166
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I don't think I could do that, even if the girl asked me to. The idea of domination, power or humiliation is not a turn on for me. At all. This doesn't mean that I find it immoral, if it's consensual for both parts, but for me it's just disturbing to watch.
|
06-16-10 03:55am
|
Reply
167
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I think Brazil has very good chances of winning: they don't play well, but they are really strong and difficult to beat. Argentina and Spain may have their chances, and Italy is always there, no matter how boring they are to watch. Also, in every World Cup there is an underdog, let's see who is it this time...
|
06-02-10 01:45am
|
Reply
168
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If I am thinking of joining a site that I don't know from previous experience, I always come to PU to see what people say; and I read the reviews, even older ones, because although some informations may be outdated, it also helps to get a general idea of the site...
|
05-31-10 12:39am
|
Reply
169
|
Foot Fetish Daily
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Reply
Hi, malikstarks, thank you very much for your reply. I suppose it is a matter of taste, and of what you are looking for in a site. I am not much of a "talker" or "contributor" in porn sites (PU excluded), and I base my judgement of a site, basically, in the quality of its videos (I almost don't look at pictures any more) and the hotness of the models they hire. I don't really care much about forums, news, extras or bonuses: give me good videos, and forget about the rest.
As for the models, for me, Eastern European models have no equal in the world, and I am a great fan of some of them (Sophie Moone, Blue Angel, Eve Angel...). I also like some American actresses, of course, but the average American actress doesn't do it for me.
Anyway, as I said, FFD is a good foot fetish site, and if somebody joins they won't be wasting their money; but Hot Legs and Feet will always (I think) will my personal favorite, also for "sentimental" reasons: it was the first adult site that I joined, when I had the money and the chance to do so...
|
05-30-10 03:41pm
|
Reply
170
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I think it would depend who I am with. If I am alone, I would be more active, probably doing as Jay G. says, nodding and recognizing her, or even asking for an autograph; if I am with other people who don't know about my liking porn, I would probably do nothing at all...
|
05-30-10 06:16am
|
Review
171
|
Foot Fetish Daily
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Medium-big size archive
-Good video quality (not great in older videos)
-Cute girls, some classics like Cytherea, Sunrise Adams or Jewel Valmont aka Ava Vincent.
-Easy navigation (by model, by type of action, by date...)
-Different styles and types of foot action (hardcore, lesbian, solo, etc.)
-Regular updates (they really do come daily) |
| Cons: |
-Very few download options
-Most models are just average, not ugly, not impressive
-A lot of the sets are solo action (Meet X, X self-sucking, X soles on glass, etc.)
-Best known actresses have very few sets or videos
-A bit high-priced (29.95$ a month) for this times of crisis. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was really hoping this to be a great, great site like Hot Legs and Feet (my all time foot fetish favorite, as some people at PU may know). And it wasn't. Foot Fetish Daily is not bad, but it's not great either. It offers a good number of pics and videos, with some really hot girls like Daisy Marie or Nicole Ray, for example, but you also get a huge amount of solo sets with anonymous models whose name, face and body you probably forget the next minute.
On the pro side, Foot Fetish Daily gets you access to at least a part of the Kick Ass Video archive (the ones who make Barefoot Confidential, the longest running and most awarded foot fetish video series, if I am not mistaken).
I don't see FFD as a long membership kind of site, even if it is true that it is updated daily. Unless, that is, that you like foot fetish solo videos, which are not my cup of tea: in that case, this may be the perfect site for you... |
|
05-30-10 05:16am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
172
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
Yeah, the same thing happens to me. I guess maybe when we get the loyalty bonus sites we will be able to download this sets. For now, I also don't get anything, nor pics nor videos, to watch or download. It's happened before with other sets, but I just assumed it was a problem with all this redesigning phase...
|
03-10-10 05:46am
|
Reply
173
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I answered "no", but not because of porn 'per se', but because if he/she is openly anti-porn he/she will most probably also be anti- al lot of other things and defend other values which I do not share. Let's be sincere, most people who oppose porn by principle, do so because they are right-wing extremely religious people, or left-wing extremely feminist people. And I am neither.
|
03-10-10 04:54am
|
Comment
174
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
|
03-10-10 04:49am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
175
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Reply
Thanks, Lionheart, I'm glad you found it helpful. I am almost completely sure that you won't be dissapointed if you join...
|
03-02-10 05:15am
|
|
