| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I would just for the amusing idea of having a supply of porn on my person at all times, however I have been unsuccessful in my attempts to import any video, let alone porn. BitPim has been great for ringtones, but it crashes everytime it try to upload video. (Got an LG Chocolate VX8550.) Oh well, maybe in the future.
|
03-24-08 10:08am
|
Reply
377
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Comment
Excellent - thanks for the update! The Flash streaming is wonderful, I first ran across that recently with All Internal and loved it, a great double check before downloading a video.
|
03-22-08 12:48am
|
Reply
378
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I have never really hid my interest in porn or my participation in this site. In fact I quite enjoyed telling people last x-mas: "Porn paid for Christmas this year!" Then of course I had to explain a bit, but it still amused me. None-the-less, I'm picky about t-shirts and so the design definitely would have to be quite nifty if I were to wear it about. A real good example of simple, site specific t-shirt designs are the ones made for Newgrounds. You can check out their shirts here:
http://www.newgrounds.com/store/
I'd probably wear any of those shirts excluding the basic logo shirts.
Maybe if the front of the shirt was the giant phallic pencil and then on the back simply had the text: "Porn reviews by the people." That would be pretty cool and would definitely start some interesting conversations. Beyond that, cool graphical designs that simply had some connection to the site or perhaps so sort of sponsorship parody shirt with a billion different porn sites and their logos - that might be good for a laugh.
Anyway, I'm open to the idea for sure, but most of the shirts would have to be pretty PG and leave a good bit of mystery to make it fun to explain.
|
03-22-08 12:39am
|
Reply
379
|
Fucked Up Facials
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Review
Hmmm, it looks like they took Freaks Of Cock and realized that the fake penises should be used only for the facial. Looks like its worth checking out.
|
03-21-08 10:05am
|
Reply
380
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
Simply put: No.
However, for those who are curious, and as I am a current member (and will be adding an updated review sometime in the future), here are the full system specs:
Operating System:
Microsoft™ Windows 98 SE / ME / NT4 (Service Pack 3 or higher) / 2000 / XP / Vista
Minimum Requirements:
* Intel™ Pentium 4 or compatible (AMD, ...)
* Clock rate 1 Ghz or better
* 64 MB 3D Graphics accelerator, resolution 800*600 or higher
* OpenGL 1.1 (or higher; 1.5 recommended) or DirectX 8.1 (or higher; 9.0c recommended)
* 512MB RAM or more
* Active internet connection when playing
As a side note - be a bit careful, when I was popping on to their site to check the specs just now, I got hit by a Trojan. It seems their server has come down with a bit of cold. As always when explorer the unbridled frontier of the internet, make sure your virus scanner is up-to-date.
|
03-20-08 02:14am
|
Reply
381
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
For me this is a null question as any person with at least moderate common-sense will know not to browse porn sites at work with the volume knob at 10. Frankly you never know when you'll stumble across a pop-up with groaning farm animals and midgets slapping large women with marinated hams (for example). So if the videos autoplay - that really isn't a problem, unless your computer is rubbish and slows everything down, but then who's fault is that?
What I would say though - is I rather love Flash based video previews, they are fast, easy for the computer to handle (even running multiple videos simultaneously) and most of them offer full screen these days as well. I must say that Flash has really come into its own in the past few years and frankly has become quite a dominate force in streaming video. It has even trumped the mighty Windows Media Player - it loads faster, it can look just as good (assuming you are watching videos that don't require your own personal T3 line) and it will even let you skip to whatever part of the video you are interested in and begin buffering there - it's brilliant!
|
03-20-08 12:36am
|
Reply
382
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Ah, that final sentence is one to live by!
That batch downloading feature is certainly a powerful tool - but it brings up an important question about really any content site: Do you really want it all?
What we really need is an A.I. Porn Butler that you can teach your preferences and then quietly finds only the porn you want and presents it to you after you've settled into the study, wearing your smoking jacket and just finished a cigar.
|
03-18-08 10:37pm
|
Reply
383
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
It seems today's progressive porn surfer really does need quite the arsenal of download managers at their finger tips. I must say I'll have to keep IDM in mind for the next time I run into trouble with dTa, which undoubtedly will happen as the internet seems to loathe consistency and complying to standards. I mean Firefox and Internet Explorer can't even agree on how much of CSS 2 they want to support. They even require different commands for some of the same functions - it is bloody ridiculous.
None-the-less, there is a larger field of download managers than ever. So with the wealth of options out there the top tip is to simply keep trying them until you find one that works for whatever problem-child site your trying to wrangle in this week.
|
03-18-08 09:28pm
|
Reply
384
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
You are indeed right, I hadn't noticed that - it appears to only provide file name filters. Well that is certainly a bit of an oversight on their part. Perhaps a later version will remedy that.
Well I'm glad at least Sapphic Erotica isn't intentionally blocking download resume - perhaps there is some odd incompatibility with the download manager. That was the original reason I switched over to DownThemAll! I was getting movies from German Goo Girls and they used one of those annoying "type the characters from this picture" security doodads which meant I couldn't simply give the program the username and password. Since DownThemAll! was within the browser it used the same session id and so on, solved the whole problem. On the same note, I've had some mangers bollocks up the resume ability on certain sites while other mangers would work fine on the same site. It seems like a crapshoot sometimes as to which will work.
|
03-18-08 08:05pm
|
Reply
385
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I use the Firefox add-on "DownThemAll!" - it is completely integrated with Firefox, so I've found it to be more reliable at catching downloads than other programs like GetSmart or Download Accelerator. It is fully customizable - you can tell it the number of connections, the number of chunks for acceleration, max speeds, file filters and so on. Plus if you end up in the unfortunate situation of a site with thumbnail galleries but no zip files, you can quickly page through the gallery and have DownThemAll! rip the image URLs automatically and pop them in whatever folder you picked. All-in-all it is the best download manager I've used - it is free (though they accept PayPal donations if you are feeling generous) and it is updated pretty regularly.
|
03-18-08 06:33pm
|
Reply
386
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I usually limit my manager to two simultaneous downloads and only 2 or 3 chunks per download max - some sites can't even manage that... But no resuming, yeesh, that would be rough. Oh well, I hope they get you a useful response.
Cheers.
|
03-18-08 05:24pm
|
Reply
387
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Have you point-blank asked the support people about it? Usually there is some little trick to allow resuming that they'll know - because not being able to resume a download would really suck for those of us that want to be able to pause a download to free up some bandwidth for a while. (Like for online gaming, for instance.)
|
03-18-08 02:13pm
|
Reply
388
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Indeed that is what I said: Being that the free stuff wasn't worth the time required to find anything of interest and I couldn't afford what I would be interested in, I didn't partake in porn for that period.
|
03-18-08 11:01am
|
Reply
389
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I took a year hiatus from porn for funding reasons - the so called "free" porn is just too much bloody work to find anything of interest and at the time I couldn't justify the monthly fees, so I basically didn't watch porn for that time period. Once the funds started returning, so did the porn.
|
03-18-08 09:31am
|
Reply
390
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Comment
That is wonderful news indeed! Please let us know if (or when) the full-featured search goes live :-)
Thanks!
|
03-17-08 02:51pm
|
Reply
391
|
Cougars In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
Did you mean Naughty America's quantity of content is more than Cougars In Heat? Because you said the opposite - which to me would be all the reason in the world to charge more. As per my review I'm sure you know that I'm quite fond of Cougars In Heat. Granted there are other sites with more content per dollar, but this site delivers what it promises and messes about with different scenarios and models to keep the content fresh and interesting while staying within their niche. That is a tough feat to pull off.
I recently reviewed All Internal which is a very comparable site as it doesn't grant you access to its network of sites, is a quite specific niche and for all intents and purposes is a better site - especially technology wise (wonderful search engine, review system, et cetera). However that site gets a bit boring after awhile. As Cougars In Heat continues to grow and if they add a search engine and such - I could see rating it higher than All Internal in the future because it changes its scenarios and adds a bit of fantasy to the porn.
All in all, I honestly believe their price is justified and a good site shouldn't be put down for charging premium price when they provide premium, exclusive content.
|
03-17-08 02:05pm
|
Reply
392
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
No worries, here is the URL for the IRS's official page about it:
http://www.irs.gov/irs/article/0,,id=177937,00.html
|
03-17-08 10:25am
|
Reply
393
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
I'm happy to see this poll is sparking lots of commentary and still hoping to see someone choose "Oh yes! All of it!" - the stimulus package is such a silly idea. $300 or $600, dependent on if you are single or married, is just a measly sum. I certainly believe there are only a limited number of places the money is going to go; and fancy electronics or propane grills aren't any of those places. Some people will pay bills, some people will save it and most people will blow it on the same ol' crap they always spend money on: burgers, beer and cigarettes.
I wish I could say I was going to drop $300 into porn just because it would be wildly amusing for me that my money would be sent to some Eastern European or South American porn studio rather than pumping back into the U.S. economy as the idiot political backers want. What stemmed this of course was that I had just received a notice that I was for-the-love-of-god-not-to-throw-away-because-it-tells-you-vastly-important-information-about-the-economic-stimulus-payment!! It's important message for me? Do nothing. Payment should come sometime in May. I'm floored. My life would be in tatters had I not read that notice.
So to the question at hand - will I be spending the money on porn? Sadly no - it'll be running off to bills I'm sure. Do I think it is a good idea? No. Will I take the money? Yes - they take too much of my money anyway - fighting wars for petrol and such... Am I doing my best to not use too much petrol? Well... I do have a little electronic gauge in my car that tells me how much I'm using - but I'm still running a V6 just to get to work... Yeah, still an American - oh well, maybe I'll get that British sports car I fancy and waste a little less gasoline in the future. It only costs 30 grand... yeesh. All hail porn! (For it only costs 30 buckazoids.)
|
03-16-08 09:18pm
|
Reply
394
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
While granted I think eye contact (with either the other model or the camera) is more appealing than closed eyes - I think a proper facial is still quite good as long as the model opens her eyes after the treatment. Keeping the eyes closed even after the fact moves it from being sexy to being comical quite quickly. And while I'm all for a bit of comedy now and again - I find it isn't usually the goal of the content producers.
|
03-12-08 08:34am
|
Reply
395
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Haha - yeah, I can imagine the explanations might get interesting. I must admit the DRM is a big pain in the ass, I too would pay more for avoiding that hassle - I dunno about twice as much, but 10 bucks more for sure!
|
03-12-08 08:22am
|
Reply
396
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Their entire network was DRM based when I was a member, I'd be surprised if that changes anytime soon, but there are ways around it. My favorite is a program called TuneBite. It simply records the copy protected video while it is playing. Do be sure to have turned off your screen saver and any programs that might make noise - as it'll record those noises as well. Plus it is a super processor hog - but once its done, you've got yourself the content without the DRM. It can also queue up the video files - I generally would start it recording when I went to bed, easy way to convert 10 videos.
|
03-11-08 02:02pm
|
Reply
397
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
The DRM license on your computer will expire after awhile and it will ask you for the username/pass again - it usually happened to me about once a week - sometimes 2 weeks.
|
03-11-08 01:55pm
|
Reply
398
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Haha - well I just assumed everybody would know that the addition of another hard drive would be to house more porn. Plus with all the HD Porn sites out now - upgrading my display technology to HD would benefit that as well. On the surface - indeed the response wasn't porn related, but I think there was an understood subtext :-P
|
03-11-08 09:28am
|
Reply
399
|
Chanta's Bitches
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
In their own way, Kink actually does provide such a deal. If you subscribe to one Kink website, you can subscribe to another of their sites at a discounted price - I think it is 15% off or something like that. Granted it isn't as much of a deal but it is something. Looking at the two companies though, I personally feel Kink is producing far superior content, so it is worth the price.
|
03-10-08 10:11am
|
Reply
400
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My primary rig was built in August of '06. My secondary rig (which is operable but not in use right at the moment) is a mix of parts - one of the hard drives dates back to 2001 - the cpu, mobo, memory, psu, other hdd drive and the optical drives from 2002 and the case, video card, and liquid cooling components are all from 2005.
I'll probably be replacing the psu and case of the current rig soon and add a blu-ray drive and another hard drive.
|
03-10-08 10:05am
|
