Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Toadsith (0)  

Feedback:   All (524)  |   Reviews (24)  |   Comments (24)  |   Replies (476)

Other:   Replies Received (273)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 524 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of Khan's Reply

Oh! Oh! Please do Bigfoot next!

11-06-12  02:50pm

Reply
27
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not that I've posted a review recently, but my method was to write the review in Word and edit it there so I wouldn't have to edit on the site for typos. However, occasionally a few would slip through and I'd still have to edit the review directly on the site. I absolutely loath typos.

11-04-12  06:26am

Reply
28
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Occasionally, but not too often. Usually it happens when I talk to support about some random bug and it evolves into a greater conversation about the site.

11-02-12  09:52am

Reply
29
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Professional Cycling, to a small degree.

I lost a lot of interest when they banned almost all of my favorite riders. So I'm having to play catch up to learn the new breed of riders. The drugs fiasco has been ridiculous and the witch hunt has been very damaging to the image of the sport, I wish they had simply applied the Asterisk to the winners that were deemed to be using drugs, like they did in baseball, but it is basically done now, so I don't hugely care.

I still consider Armstrong a champion because nearly everybody in the sport during his era were using drugs. Hence why his titles were simply awarded to nobody. He was the best in all regards, even in doping. There is something to be said for that.

I will say that the most recent Tour de France was a lot of fun because it was far more chaotic and unpredictable than previous years. A lot of that is probably because the vast majority of the riders are finally not doping. So the future looks bright, but it is still tough to be a fan and know so few riders right now. The sport is recovering though, and my enthusiasm as a fan is too.


10-29-12  01:45am

Reply
30
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It really depends on the performers and how they react and sell their roles. Some performers seem to really get off on either dominating or being dominated, and so their enthusiasm in every aspect of the scene is enhanced by the vulgar word play. Others seem to be distracted and occasionally, genuinely upset by the verbal onslaught - those cases would definitely detract from enjoyment of the scene. The sheer taboo nature of the behavior occasionally can be appealing itself, for example Ghetto Gaggers and associated sites basically thrive on that concept. It has, however, a rather narrow appeal. While I personally can appreciate it, it is far from my favorite content.

On a side note: Would anyone honestly pick the first choice? It seems like that one could have been removed and "Like it if it is part of consensual roleplay" would have been a better choice. I think a number of us would have chosen that as it covers much of Kink.com who frequently uses aggressive dialogue but goes out of their way to show it is consensual. Frankly, Brazzers also does a good job of this with their Pornstar Punishment series, featuring a similar after scene interview.


10-27-12  10:46am

Reply
31
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Thanks for the clarification about the intent of the original remark - I misinterpreted it as not only incredulous but also somewhat accusatory. Therein lies the occasional failings of communicating strictly through a written medium. Btw, here is a study in the British Journal of Urology International (a peer reviewed journal) that linked masturbation as a means for lowering the chance of prostate cancer. I really should have done a better search the first time. (All I had to do was check in with my favorite science rag, The New Scientist.)

I'm always amazed to hear about people's experiences with X-Rays because the technology was used so liberally that it was silly. My absolute favorite is the absurd X-Ray Shoe Fitting machines. These days your experience would be easy grounds for a lawsuit.

I should note that I assumed you had nothing against masturbation for anyone - I can't imagine any contributing member of this site having such opinions. I do hope that some quality science in the near future will help you with the ED as it has so many others, but I commend you for persevering despite it - so many don't even bother trying.


10-25-12  03:59pm

Reply
32
N/A Reply of gaypornolover's Reply

The appeal of the exotic is very strong, no matter what style it comes in.

10-25-12  07:55am

Reply
33
N/A Reply of gaypornolover's Reply

You know, if there was more money in it - I think they'd have cracked that problem by now. I think the M-t-F side of the industry has got all the cash right now. Some day perhaps; maybe if science can learn to grow arteries and veins...

10-25-12  07:54am

Reply
34
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

True, "need" might be an overly strong word, but I don't believe it is hugely debated that masturbation (keeping in mind the whole all things in moderation adage) is generally beneficial.

In regards to "no physician I have ever talked to" - again, yes, I doubt you'd ever get something so specific like the recommendation of changing a car's oil every 5k miles, but lack of being informed by a doctor doesn't negate somethings validity as a health recommendation. Frankly, there's a lot that doctors don't get around to recommending. I think it is because they are too busy going to the bank, but who knows? So - does one "need" to masturbate? Probably not. Should one with certain, if not exactly specified, regularity? Probably, yes.

Of course, it has to be recognized how little we (humans) know about our physiology. It has oft been cited (I read it in Mary Roach's Stiff) that a visit to the doctor's office didn't achieve a measured chance of actually improving a patient's health until the 1920s. Thousands of years of health care and before then, you were basically guaranteed to be worse off after visiting a doctor until the 1920s. So, despite all the strength given to doctors' opinions, they've really only been marginally good at this for about 90 years.

So, the whole medical opinion regarding masturbation could change again, perhaps not back to the "it's the work of the devil" era, but maybe in the future humans will be living in some monkish realm of abstinence. Who knows? My point was simply, that there has been some science supporting the claim of masturbation being good for the body, and shouldn't so quickly be dismissed with a sarcastic "Seriously?".


10-25-12  07:50am

Reply
35
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

He is right. Seriously.

Men's Health Magazine: Health and Sexual Benefits of Masturbation

I know that isn't the most reputable source, but it was the first one I found after a quick search. I've seen similar stories reported in more reputable publications.


10-25-12  12:49am

Reply
36
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Transvestite / Pre-Op Transgender: I'd try to finish the date and part amicably, if possible. It isn't a relationship I'd particularly pursue, however.

Post-Op Transgender: Why would I care? I don't particularly want kids anyway. I'd progress as normal. If I'm attracted to someone now, I don't really care what they looked like in the past. That would be like dumping a supermodel because she was fat when she was in high school.

* For these examples, I'm assuming the transgendered date in question is Male-to-Female.


10-25-12  12:43am

Reply
37
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I would say "no" under the assumption that the poll is discussing women and men living in Western culture. Masturbation is practically expected for men, though still shunned by some groups. Masturbation for women is viewed with much, much more stigma. There may also be some biological factors - there is a biological benefit for men to try to be polygamous (trying to pass along their genes as best as possible) while simultaneously requiring women to be monogamous (males that did this are more likely to pass along their genes as well if their mates are mating with only them). So biologically it would make some sense for males to be more sex obsessed, however a species where the females were entirely uninterested in sex probably would survive.

I think lower percentages of women masturbating is most influenced by our culture, but also somewhat impacted by biology. Of course, every human behavior can basically be described this way.

For a small sampling of how much culture has scared some of the fun out of masturbation for women, check out all the comments on this article on women masturbating (apparently 92% of 23-30 y/o women did in 2008, n = 1000): http://jezebel.com/5107639/92-of-women-m...-often-do-they-do-it


10-23-12  09:21pm

Reply
38
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Ah, so in that example the "worst place to shoot porn" would be: "About my mother's person." lol

10-19-12  01:41pm

Reply
39
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

As the first PUerviewee, I officially endorse the return of the PUerview.

10-19-12  09:05am

Reply
40
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

lol - "oogie", I'm so going to add that to my repertoire of synonyms for sex.

10-18-12  05:56pm

Reply
41
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Please refer to Drooler's and my answers.

The sheer fatality rate amongst most of the our suggestions would pretty much guarantee an unsuccessful porn scene. Yay for logical extremes!


10-18-12  12:52pm

Reply
42
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

Ohhh, good one. Antarctica would fit in too as it is the driest continent, and coldest for that matter.

10-18-12  12:51pm

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Challenge Accepted.*

*Please note all recommended candidates presume actual locations, not stand-in studio sets.

Candidates for "Worst Place to Shoot Porn" in no particular order:

Location 1: Westminster Abbey, during a coronation... that was already interrupted by a wolverine attack.

Location 2: Ypres, Belgium in early May of 1915.

Location 3: The O.R. of a Maternity Ward while an emergency pregnancy is being performed. (Example Ambiance: Watch the only memorable scene from Prometheus, aka. alien abortion scene.)

Location 4: On the surface of the Moon, without space suits. (Similarly, many leagues under the sea, Jupiter, the Sun, Venus, Mercury, Saturn, Uranus, and Pluto or any of its dwarf planet kin.)

Location 5: In Sergeant Stacey Koon's patrol car in the very early hours of March 3rd, 1991.

Location 6: Bouncy Castle, during a 5th Birthday Party.

Location 7: Nursing Home Cafeteria, during Bingo Night.

That's enough for now...


10-17-12  12:34am

Reply
44
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

Yes they could. True Crypt only makes it near impossible to access the data, protecting the drive from destruction would be best done by storing it in a lockable fire safe. You can use True Crypt to make the drive look empty. It is called a "hidden volume", basically you have a secret format underneath the format, it hides in the empty space on the drive. As long as you don't fill the drive up, the hidden data is safe. It is a pretty impressive program.

10-16-12  03:35am

Reply
45
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm the only person that uses my rig, why bother having to enter a password every time I log in or install something?

10-15-12  05:08am

Reply
46
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It seems a rather small percentage of female stars actually enjoy it, so it would be better if it wasn't so expected of them. Lets bring anal back to being a rare bird rather than a common pigeon. I think we'll all appreciate it more.

10-05-12  12:59am

Reply
47
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

6.5% Free, a.k.a. 114.9 GB Free out of 1774 GB Total.

In short: I need to do some house cleaning.


10-03-12  11:17am

Reply
48
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I'll take the position if I at least get authority over the Porn Users Army, Navy & Air Force. I'm not sure what that would mean, but I'm pretty sure it would constitute some sort of invasion force... Excellent...

09-27-12  07:11pm

Reply
49
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

If their tour has broken images, it shows a carelessness toward their business in one of the most crucial aspects of their business (attracting new customers) so I expect that the same carelessness will carry over to other parts of their business, like regular updates, support, et cetera. Just like how you can judge a Brick & Mortar store's quality with a quick look at the cleanliness / quality of their bathroom (note: this doesn't apply to businesses that are owned by non-Westerners), you can judge the quality of a porn site by the time and thought put into their tour pages.

09-27-12  12:17am

Reply
50
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I prefer to pick my own as I can make it ridiculously secure if I so wish.

09-25-12  12:47am


Shown : 26-50 of 524 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.38 seconds.