| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
ThatSwede's Comment
That is called regional marketing aka "currency screwing" and it happens a lot any more. Basically what they do is charge $17 of what ever currency you have. So if you currency is worth more than a USD than you end up paying more. It is their way of saying "screw you for having stronger currency" and it allows them to get more for nothing.
There are a number of sites doing this now. But dont worry, not all of them are. If this happen you will usually find someone on her from Europe who already got mad about it.
|
07-22-09 06:05pm
|
Comment
252
|
The Hardcore Network
(0)
|
|
07-21-09 03:02am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I always look at TBP facts pages. These tell me a lot of what I need to know. After that I will look for PU reviews if I have doubts still. The main stream sites are easy and there are a lot of reviews. The trouble is with the lesser known sites because there may not be any reviews and it is someone that does not have reputation. This always makes me a little more worrisome at first. But if you want something different you have to look elsewhere than the usually high profile sites that have all the reviews and information.
|
07-21-09 02:20am
|
Reply
254
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Lets also hope that when they say HD they do not mean up-converting what they shoot on the same old cameras they have been using to higher resolution and bit rates. We have seen some people do what seems to be exactly that. We get higher resolutions and larger file sizes with no increase in quality.
On the hopeful side of things, HD has been out there for a little while now so hopefully they can see how to do it right. It is only a shame this could not have been done long before, and the same goes for Brazzers.
|
07-20-09 03:10am
|
Reply
255
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Maybe some do, but I think over all most do not. This stuff might not be mentioned explicitly in the contract. After all it is the woman's body and I have no problem with her deciding that something is too much. We can tell if a woman feels forced into doing something because it shows in the way she does it and the absolute lack of enthusiasm.
|
07-17-09 01:04pm
|
Reply
256
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dingle's Reply
I hate when that happens. Redownloading everything is a shame. My ISP has no cap that I know of, they are Embarq DSL which I believe is a nationwide company. AbbyWInters has a download cap or at least used to. The way it was set up is it did not limit daily access or anything but rather total bandwidth usage of a user. They did not want your usage to exceed the size of the site. Mine did not but they for some reason were worried it would.
What they do not want is people downloading the site more than once because they are using site cloners, which would grab all the video options and grab the reposts in later updates. Also, this happens when people share or hack user names.
I was not kicked off or anything, I was more or less just asked to "slow down and stay a while" I believe was their exact words.
|
07-16-09 12:49pm
|
Reply
257
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dingle's Reply
Hum....the only email I ever got from them was them crying about how fast I was downloading everything. This was about 2 years ago though and I have never intended on rejoining this site. I did not look but I do not remember rating it all that high either.
|
07-16-09 12:30pm
|
Reply
258
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I have 11 right now. Mostly stuff I am interested in subscribing to in the future. I use that so I do not forget about them like I so frequently do. If I see a site that is getting good reviews from the rest of you or seem interesting somehow I put it there,
|
07-15-09 01:06am
|
Reply
259
|
Beach Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
polacrilex's Comment
I have been to this site before and even before reading this posting I had not intended on ever returning. The point is that everything you say is correct. Their videos do lack quality. Many look like they where shoot with an 8mm video camera.
|
07-13-09 12:21pm
|
Comment
260
|
Lezboland
(0)
|
|
07-13-09 01:53am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I really do not know if there is any truth there or not. The only woman I was with that was older than me was terrible in the sack.
|
07-13-09 12:59am
|
Comment
262
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
|
07-12-09 02:08am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
263
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
Usually you can figure it would from looking at replies to your reviews. The person that seems hostile towards your comments is usually the person it ends up being.
Without doing some creative digging, and a lot of it, I do not think even the staff can tell you who it was. If I recall correctly I believe they said some time ago that the anonymous ID is saved in a one way encryption to protect the privacy. I believe it was the trusts they were talking about.
In any event, it does not hurt to guess who it was and send a reply to them. Even if they have not been around for a while they could still get the notice email for receiving a reply. This might bring them back, you never know and it certainly does not hurt. Besides, who wants that one bad trust thing floating around.
|
07-11-09 11:12pm
|
Reply
264
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
Okay, I just really wanted to be sure about this. Thanks for the reply. Do you have any idea who the "NO' trust came from. One of the things a few of us have been trying to do lately is getting people who voted no a while back to reconsider in the even the user has improved reviews since the NO trust and is still around. Anyway, you may want to add an extra reply to that trust just to make it clear.
|
07-11-09 07:14pm
|
Reply
265
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
This may or may not pertain to this review, but I need to ask you something.
I was just looking around and for no reason clicked on your name. I noticed you had a single "NO" trust and I was curious as to what it was for. The person believed you did not join some of the sites you had reviewed. You replied saying "I joined seven of the nine sites mentioned for at least one month. No review based on a trial m'ship."
Is this statement implying that you had not joined them two of them, or simply that you joined and left before a second month. The distinction is very important. If you had not joined them how could you review them? Also, which of the nine sites DID you join? At this point I think it is just poor choice of wording, but it is unclear.
I am a little reluctant to throw out a "NO" trust on you because your more recent reviews seem much more in depth and honest. I would like some clarification on this just in case there is a misunderstanding. It was not that long ago a reviewer had all his review points removed and was semi-suspended for implying that he did not join sites he had reviewed. I do not want this to happen to you, but I (all of PU) need to know that you have actually joined all the sites you have reviewed.
|
07-11-09 12:45am
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Being 24 I am way outside the limits. I started looking at porn a little young but I was not even an itch in my dad's pants yet!
I could live with soundless, I usually watch it that way anyway, but black and white would annoy a me a little. I am sure at the time that was great stuff. But, after seeing the HD stuff of today it would be a little difficult for me to go for black and white porn for the sake of getting off. However, I am sure that if I needed to I could get off on that stuff.
|
07-11-09 12:22am
|
Reply
267
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I joined Twists a while back, several years actually. I am sure the site has improved some since then. I know they have merged with some other sites which is good and other PUs say they are doing well. I will be rejoining them soon though.
I like this poll because a first porn site is a little like a first car. No matter if the site is great or not so great it is the first and is liked and remembered anyway. The first kinda sets the bar for other sites. Also a first site can directly impact what a user looks for in other sites and whether or not they will join other sites. We have heard a few people come here with issues regarding their first site and are scared to pay to join another.
|
07-09-09 12:15am
|
Reply
268
|
Mature.nl
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
You are right, that is insane. The only way I can see paying anything remotely close to the price is if the site is covering a unique niche and doing a damn good job of it. For example something like "midget lesbians having sex while skydiving" niche and making a lot of great videos in HD. That might warrant the price because it is likely the only place it will ever be seen. But this site does not seem to have anything that other mature women sites would not have. Perhaps they feel that since we pay $20 to see 20 year olds and $30 for allover30 they feel they should follow the pattern and ask for $60 for 60 year olds! Or perhaps an escort come with the membership fee.
Seriously though, $60 a month is simply suicide. They could probably charge half that and get ten times the members. I guess someone was very, very high when deciding the price.
|
07-08-09 07:44pm
|
Reply
269
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Horstl's Review
Not be defensive of Videobox for their sake but I must point out that this review is very similar to the one you did for AbbyWinters. Not saying the reviews are the same or fake. The point is that the pros and cons are basically the same and the overall opinion is about the same, which is fine, but the score is very different. You have VideoBox as an 80 and AbbyWinters as a 95!
People having different opinions here is great and it is expected that people will score site differently. The problem is that it I can not figure out why these two sites were scored differently based off your reviews. I am hoping you can enlighten me on this, because right now it seemed like you felt about the same for both of them.
|
07-08-09 07:37pm
|
Reply
270
|
Housewife Gemma
(0)
|
Reply of
csbadger49's Review
I site that "had it all" other than recent updates is hardly worth being bashed with a 50. A site no longer updating can be worth a few points taken off and certainly worth a warning, but a 50 is usually reserved for those sites that are true rip offs and in no way meet any of the expectations they instill into the viewers. This is not the first site you have called a complete failure only for not have enough content. It is important to remember that no every site will be a mega site the instant it starts up. In to cases now you have said that a site has good content that you enjoyed and it what you were looking for but gave 50s to the sites.
While I am not going to be jumpy about giving a negative trust just yet, it would be a good idea to consider what make a site a failure. In most members of PU opinions a site having great content can out weight so some extent a lack of content. Also, a site that no longer update might be worth for some people to join if they never have before to see what was their before the site slowed down.
|
07-08-09 07:29pm
|
Reply
271
|
SF Bay Models
(0)
|
Reply of
oogles's Review
Nice warning about this one. Of course though do feel free to extend pros or cons into the bottom line area if you ever feel you need to. But on this one I think you got the point across just fine. :)
|
07-08-09 12:57am
|
Reply
272
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I do! I do! There do you feel better now?
This is the advantage of internet porn. No one has to know who is looking at what. People do not have to ask friends for it and worry if they will think they are strange for it. The privacy factor is huge.
Of course being younger my friends mostly freely admit looking at porn and we have no issue discussing it. But, we are not married and freshly out of college.
|
07-08-09 12:54am
|
Reply
273
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
Only on rare occasions with a friend. He does not get to keep anything, mostly just showing off what I have or if they want to see what a certain site has.
I have never uploaded anything onto any share site and really do not intend to. Seems like a lot of work to do just for the sake of ripping off the sites who provide us with our beloved porn.
I do not have so much issue with letting friends borrow DVDs though. As far as I know this is legal.
|
07-07-09 12:19am
|
Reply
274
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I never really got the point of an industry awarding itself, particularly as much as the entertainment industry. It is nothing more than an elaborate, expensive way of giving yourself a blowjob and making everyone else wish they could blow you too.
What is good and what is not is so subjective that it really does not matter what these people say. Just like here, some reviewers will view things much differently than others. So unless it is based on fact or you know the reviewer you may or may not truly trust it.
|
06-29-09 02:52am
|
Reply
275
|
Exploited Moms
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
Well some people tend to believe that everyone is still on dial up.
|
06-28-09 06:48pm
|
