Very nice! I want to add though that this video is at 8 MBit/s, so dont try to have bunch of other stuff running when you watch it. I will have to watch it in my other computer, mine has trouble with 8 MBit videos when it is downloading at the same time.
The HD looks promising, I will have to rejoin in the near future to check it out. Nothing like crystal clear big natural boobs! :)
Has anyone downloaded the new HD movies in 1080 yet? If so, let us know how they look, are they worth 2 GB file size, or are they just filled in to look bigger?
If that is the case than I stand corrected! However, I will mention that I was never able to get more than four and typically I got three. My download manager is set to only use 1 connection. The merging process for the parts takes too much system resources when I have it use multiple connections per file. Perhaps this was changed since December, or I was unlucky, but truly I was only getting three most of the time.
It is worth mentioning though that the site did not kick me off for exceeding the limits, whatever they are. My browsing and downloading on the fourth or fifth connection was simply paused until on of the other finished. I have been to sites there they will freeze your account if you exceed their limits.
I will confirm the GB limit, it took very little time do download the site. That is not in any way to mean there is little content!!! This is definitely a site I will visit again!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Good looking women
Good deal of content
Images are nice, high res
Videos look very nice
Fast download SPEED
Webmaster monitors what people says on here, shows they care!
Cons:
Limit connection numbers during downloads
Price a little high
Could use more Girl/Girl
Bottom Line:
I will wait a while before updating from them again because of the price, but the content is nice. They limit the number of simultaneous connections, to 10 according to the webmaster. I was able to get three to four, please read replies for more details! A good site to use a downloader on that can limit number of connections. Content is worth the cost, but not for several months at a time.
Also, I raised my score 5 points because the webmaster actually checks out what people are saying about the site. I wish every webmaster followed this example!
Perhaps they want to keep there collection private. DRM is a great way to end up having your sign up page far the most part private. Better off to go to a titty bar than a DRM site. Both make you rely on memory, but at least at the titty bar they were real.
Good question. I would love to hear from the site on this one.
The only thing I can think of is have you every tried download 1 GB of pictures manually? It takes a while and is a pain. Download manager use is always appreciated. But I agree the limit has to go.
I received a direct email from the customer service, which seems to be queensnake herself...kinda cool. She apologized for the confusion, but they had mixed me up with someone that had asked for a refund.
I had intended to write up a review on this site, just had not got there yet. She did seem a little offended, which I can understand, I would be a little too if it was my personal site. Plus, it looked like I had tried to get a refund and complained after getting 97% through my one month subscription. I do not ask for refunds after staying around that long. If I ask for a refund it is 90% of the time within minutes of getting access to the site, we all know those kind of sites.
Now my access was terminated right away after canceling. She claims it should not. Perhaps something got messed up, but I was not complaining about one day. I just wanted my friends here at PU to be aware. Either way, play it safe, set an alarm on your calender and cancel one day before the renew if that is you plan to do.
If you cancel this site be prepared. It does not give you until the end of your month if you try to cancel a few days early just to be safe. It shuts you out instantly.
Use a download manager that uses only one connection and limit it to one at a time. I have done with for sites that limit downloads similarly with good results. This way it is one at a time so they are happy, and you can go to bed while downloading their site.
That is too bad. I wonder if any other members are having issues. This is one of the nicer sites out there and I am sure they would not allow anything like this on purpose. Perhaps they should investigate and if there is an issue take the site down for a day to fix. Sending members any sort of malware is obviously bad for business.
Look, I am 23 and I love the look of nice tight teens with ripe, firm racks.
BUT...something about this woman really does the trick. I wish more women looked like her as they aged. She really does have an amazing ability to age....or perhaps an anti-aging machine! :)
A 50 will not hold much merit here with out a lot of logical, intelligent argument to why it deserves to be knock off. Which hopefully we will see.
But as it stands right now it does not matter much to scoring.
As always, we welcome new members and try to help them on there way a bit.
My friendly advise is when whenever someone give a low 50s or high 90s score there needs to be very valid reasoning. it is going to be hard enough to convince people here that this site deserves such a low score, but it will not happen if you leave out details on the reason why.
Tell us why the issues you had were such a big deal to you. Saying "it is what it is because it is what it is" will not do the trick either, not that you have done that but it happens more often than we like.
Remember, the reviews we right are not for our own benefit, rather they are to help others. We all have different tastes. You have an issue with the shape of her tits which is fine, but I personally like them. But I can tell without paying whether or not I like how she looks by simply looking at a homepage or tour page. What is important in scoring is everything else. The model not having the features you are looking for does not constitute a 50! That would be like me doing to a solo site about a guy and giving it a 50 because I did not like the shape of his ass. Of course I would not like the shape of his ass, i am not into that sort of thing! So rating the site as a 50 would not be fair simply because it did not stand a chance with me, but someone else might come along and absolutely love the way the guy looks.
What would then be fair is for me to say I did not like his ass, then rate the site based on other features. Price, updates, videos and picture quality, amount of content, and so one.
Not liking a models tits is only worth a few points. There is much more to the site than that, and as I said, that taste will vary with each person that looks at your review. A good way to handle that is to say that you did not like them and to encourage the reader to check out the tour page first to make sure they have no issues with them. That would be a helpful suggestion to the reader and make you sound good. :)
Now about the guys dick. Many people going model sites because they are simply interested in the specific model. The dick she is sitting on becomes a little less of a concern. However, I will agree that an ugly guy can ruin a great scene as it can be distracting. Besides, small cocks make me feel better about myself!! :)
Just try to be as objective about your reviews as you can and load them with information. Your review is barely 12 lines, so it is more of a comment than a review. 12 lines simply is not enough content to convey your message. As for 50s, try not to write reviews while you are pissed off at a site about something. When a review is all negative people tend to not look at them because it is painfully obvious the person just wants to vent.
The bottom line here is: don not be talked out of your opinions about sites you like or dislike, just tell us exactly what puts them on your porntacular list or your shit list.
In that case I can not share a respect you might feel you have earned. Ace of Aces is a valued PU and he has my respect. His "childish" statement was in fact very valid. You can not vote on his trust rating because you have not done any reviews yourself to see the other side of the fence here. Pointing out a fact does not make him childish?
I would like to add that we are not necessarily paid for doing these reviews. What monies we do by chance get through the raffle does not even come close to covering all the costs of going through all these websites. Hell the $400 I have gotten so far does not even pay for the hard drives I have used since I began reviewing. But I am greatful for it all the same, everything helps. Besides, there are those of us who do post here simply to help out another PU to make informed decisions and avoid being ripped off and get a lot from the work of other PUs that have taken the time and effort to post.
Also, sometimes sites lack in certain areas but go well beyond in others and it can make up the slack produced elsewhere. Videobox does post some lame videos, but they make up for it in their absolute size and that if you do not like a few videos there are plenty others to move on to. When reading a reviewers reviews you have to look at a few of their others to get a feel for that reviewers style and taste. If a reviewer has a taste for blonde teens he might give a blonde teen site a little higher score than you might feel is warranted simply because he got what he wanted.
About Videobox, how would a site make a video truly in HD if it was actually filmed in standard quality? That would be cheating. Videobox does have speed as well. I have spent countless hours downloading at 40 MBit/s and a fair amount of time even faster. I can not comment about customer service either way, I have never needed to contact them.
I believe the Xmovies score difference compared to Videobox is justified. They are basically the same site fundamentally. However, Videobox has more videos, more options for download, higher bit rates, and costs less especially to users who do not join trough TBP. Therefore, Videobox in fundamental areas is superior thus warranting a higher score. Analogy: If you compare a Camaro to a Firebird one might get a 98 while the other gets a 95 since they are about the same in many respects, now compare that Camaro to Saleen S7 TT and now the S7 gets a 99 and the Camaro gets a 80 simply because of what it is being compared to. Videobox gets its score because no other site in that genre has touched them on fundamental issues and because many people simply like it better.
As for Rachel Aziani, there is some hardcore content. Admittedly there is not a lot but it certainly does exist. Solo sites can be repetitive on what goes on, but that is understood when joining. If someone joins a site that features one model they typically have a keen interest in that model and want to see her in as much as they can get their hands on. I for example I am huge Amy Reid fan and would download 100 scenes of her doing about the same thing with out thinking twice about it. Many times the only true difference is a change in setting and clothing, which is enough. I love seeing the same model in different outfits. Solo masturbation is usually about the same across any site, some sites show many different models, but they are doing about the same thing. On a solo site you get the same model which can be nice because you are familiar with her and do not have to wonder if the scene is worth downloading and watching because you do not know if you will like the model or not.
If you do not like the reviews and scores given to sites then you should consider writing some yourself. It is much easier to critic someone else's writing than to write your own, I noticed this myself quickly when I first started writing reviews here.
"The intelligent reader," I would like to point out that I do have a reasonably high IQ and I would be willing to bet than many of the top posters on this site are above average as well. We have managed to keep things fairly civilized around here, unlike many other forums which typically is a sign of intelligence.
Also, we do not appreciate insulting Ace of Aces. Intelligent people should be above that. Besides, I doubt that a 13 year old has signed up for and wrote reviews for 60 sites or so using mom's credit card while going unnoticed! These things tend to stand out. Ace of Aces has my respect.
First of all, you should bitch about Videobox on the Videobox page. Ace of Aces is experienced at reviewing yes, but not on the payroll.
You seem to have a real problem with this site, so what things about it do you not like? I have read your comment already, but their has to be more than that making you mad about it.
Admittedly I did not give the site a 99 either, but it certainly is not far from it in my eyes. There is a lot of good things going on here. Besides, it is not like you are a "one review wonder" here after all you are in the top 10 rank here at PU. Dont worry, they guy in 12th agrees with you!
You just cant make everyone happy. At least he cant vote against you yet...haha!
I would not get to rough on him though. He is right after all. I found that to be an extremely annoying part of this set of sites. Granted though it is worth the hassle to get the content. Besides, we were all "one post wonders" until we posted again. I am sure people thought the same of me when I made a big stink with my 100 score for Videobox, and look now, I have something like 300 posts. Gotta give people a chance, especially when they are right. Just do not be too blinded by the fact that you love a site to ignore flaws that other people might think is a big deal. I have been very irritated by things before and wanted to knock a site for it. I can understand him being mad because this site really does screw up download managers.
At the same time you guys are right as well. It is not something worth causing someone to overlook the site over. I loved the site and it is on my permanent rejoin list!
I agree. The woman is worth a little hassle for. But, they do need to reconsider the timeout and frequent relog in. As I have mentioned in my reviews, this is pretty annoying and screws up download managers.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very HOT woman!
Good download speed
Exclusive content
166 Videos
New videos look great 5 MBit/s, a few even higher
Old videos look good considering
Price decent, $25
Access to other sites, 7 total
Many extra features, blog, scrapbook and so on
Updates weekly
400 picture sets
Pictures look great, up to 1200x1800
Cons:
No zips for picture sets :(
Must log in too often
Only one download format, other than streaming
I was unable to resume downloads
Videos could use better names
Bottom Line:
If you like extremely hot, mature women then do not bother reading this because you are wasting good time. Just join this one now! It really is that damn good!
Rachel Aziani is drop dead beautiful. She has wonderfully large breasts, a great face, and awesome body, and a certain grace in movement.
There is some variety here, but it is mostly solo. You will find some G/B, but no real G/G. A lot of videos have dildos being used.
The newer videos look wonderful, at over 5 MBit/s and 960X540 they look great even full screen. There is about 21 hours worth at this point making 13.3 GB. The older ones do not look as good, obviously, but they are still worth downloading. They are 320x240 @ 398 KBit/s and increase with time. Also, there are small screen caps next to the video showing a little of what to expect in each video.
There are 166 even though the video names go up to 179. There was a few numbers skipped along the way. Not an issue, just wanted to clarify.
The photos increase with time as well. The start out small at 384x576 but end up a nice crisp 1200x1800. There is now 400 galleries, but no zips! GRRR!
Like the other sites here, you have to log in a lot and then go back through the whole site to find where you left off at, very annoying. This costs a few points along with the no Zips and G/G.
All around it is a great site with a few things that could be worked on, but nothing major. It is definitely worth trying out, I am happy it was recommended to me.
I am not logging in after every video, but it is rather frequent. It is less than three hours for me. I will try to see how long it takes before logging me out.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
