I say hand over with lots of blushing, but I am not sure what I would really do. Would anyone ever share with a parent? Say, a father-son bonding experience, like learning to shave, drive a car, use a download manager?
Generally no, but it's not "ordinary-looking" that is the problem, but "less creative." Hot looks don't guarantee hot sex, or anything else for that matter. Many of my favorite porn stars are not my favorites simply because of looks, but more of their onscreen personalities and open-mindedness.
It's not just the women, but many other elements of porn that are far from reality. The men, for example, are (often) in better shape than I am, with lots more tattoos and piercings, plus they act in a lot of ways that I could not see myself repeating.
If you go in with no extreme expectations -- that is, total slut or total prude -- you may be pleasantly surprised.
I always thought fluffers were pretty much nonexistent, especially today with the advent of Viagra, and I think they would fall more in the general category of the body fluid cleanup crew. It seems like most hardcore movies they tend to make quite a mess, so they have to have people to decontaminate the set afterward.
As enticing as fluffer sounds, I'd have to say director. I am sure it is a lot more frustration than fun, unless you are lucky and everything goes right and everyone is happy, but it would still be interesting to try.
I would actually love to edit porn movies, that way I could see all the raw footage and finally cut out all that extra shit they leave in that adds nothing to the videos we see.
Very unique looking site that doesn't seem to take itself too seriously, though I guess that's required given the genre. Actually looks quite similar to the little anime I have seen, except for all the western girls.
I would say musicians, but that's probably because I can't stand mainstream music, so to me all my favorite artists do not get enough recognition, or even enough money, especially when compared to most of those we like to consider "great."
Too many from the first five choices get weird crossover appeal that I hate. Actors and porn stars who think they are politicians; musicians gloating over their fleets of luxury cars and decadent homes; sports stars with their own clothing lines; and reality stars...well, their recognition is what is wrong with them.
I think I should have picked "Other" for none of the above, since I am only starting to rant on this one.
Yeah, the other "review" is extremely similar to this one, except the score is 95 instead of 100...
Didn't we just have this problem a few months ago? If peterhd (and/or caperuzo) is just spamming or promoting for this site, then just take this suggestion: don't! The members hate it, and the staff will just disable your accounts and restrict reviews for the site.
I am not a fan of seafood, and that's an understatement, but to each his own, especially if you thought the flavor was nice. : )
It only stands to reason that what we put into our bodies influences what comes out, right? All the times we (guys) have waxed endlessly, if never eloquently, about the diet-to-flavor relationship we have heard at least a little truth, just how much truth is anyone's guess.
The first three choices don't sound too appetizing for a flavor you might taste on a partner's most sought after parts. Chocolate sounds kind of good, but is probably too sweetened and processed to have much benefit. For me, fruits and vegetables are the only ones that naturally have a palatable flavor, or even smell, to them. Plus, with all the botanical flavors and scents added to many of the hygiene products that women buy, they must like them anyways.
I understand 4000 px is huge today...but in the future it could simply be standard, even if the displays really don't get any bigger. I am talking more from a collector's point of view, so I want my smut to age like a fine wine, except you get to drink it over and over again for as long as you have it!
As I said in my original reply, I remember a time when 800 x 600 was big, screen-filling beauty, but now it simply is not. I still have the majority of my '90s photos, they just have not withstood the test of time in terms of size as much as I would like them have to.
I sometimes get greedy about photo and monitor sizes -- especially when someone uses the term beast to describe either one -- so I can't wait for the day that a standard display will practically support 4000 px photos, I just may have to put some of my oldest photos out to pasture.
I wish webmasters would understand that many of their members download photos to keep. I remember back in the '90s when 800 x 600 was a big photo and it took up the entire screen, or most of it. Of course, with higher res monitors being offered with better quality at lower prices, this "Why would anyone want pictures that are bigger than the screen?" argument goes out the window (or out with the smaller monitor).
I love it when material is higher quality, not simply because of better details and it shows people care about what they create, but the material can have a much longer life, even with the inevitable introduction of newer equipment. I think the "Why would anyone want more?" question is always regretted given enough time, especially with technology.
Though I do wish quite a few sites would improve photos, as well as videos (and I am not talking purely about technical aspects or either category), I would like to see some more innovation. This partially crosses over with the exclusivity choice, but I am so tired of seeing the same models on multiple sites doing pretty much the same thing, in the same settings, and often captured with the same equipment. For me this leaves the first four choices properly satisfied to the point where I hope for some creativity and unique content on the part of the webmasters and producers -- and they don't even have to risk breaking the laws or hurting some poor model's feelings to do it.
Smell-o-vision or 3-D sound cool, but if you think about how they would apply to a lot of porn you might wish otherwise. There have been quite a few videos where I thought "it's probably good I can't smell the action, only see and hear it."
3D is making its way into some big Hollywood blockbusters but it is still a gimmick designed to generate a bigger profit with every ticket sold, not a genuine attempt to increase quality.
It would be nice if they tried to eventually increase quality beyond HD (higher definition? super high definition?) but people would probably have to own bigger displays and possess strong vision in order to even tell the difference.
I joined In The Crack at $35 -- but I felt it was well worth the price for one great month of downloading. : ) They are the kind of site I join no more than once a year, so one month at that price is not too bad.
Normally I max out around $25 or $30 for a month's membership, and usually do not have the urge to rejoin either, even with lower offers.
"Community standards" can be an extremely dangerous defense, and it can also be blamed for making a lot of American porn only come from one or two places in the entire country (southern Florida being one of them).
These sacred "standards" -- if that even means anything -- could vary greatly from community to community, and could apply to all sorts of material in porn. What if interracial is frowned upon? How about MILF porn, or anything that involves models that vary greatly in age? Hell, why not ban material if the producers don't use energy efficient lighting or recycle properly? If anything might possibly offend anyone at anytime for any reason whatsoever just make it illegal!
Lol. Yeah, I am not exactly sure why they are singled out, but there are probably a few offended members.
I would love to visit Australia; warm weather and lots to see, plus being a dumb monolingual American I would not have to learn another language, though I am sure I would stick out like a sore thumb regardless. Maybe I should join Abbywinters a few times and learn about their women?
After Australia I would visit the Scandinavian countries just to see the natural beauty of the land. They seem to be one of the last places on Earth where humans are not coexisting with the land simply by destroying it.
I was checking out the price of those premium channels -- $18! Considering a regular membership, with its access to so many DVDs, starts at $10, I cannot believe that people would really want an extra channel for that much cash. Does Evil Angel = evil price?
Normal movies because they keep re-releasing them in infinite editions, plus all the times they show them on TV, whereas porn seems to be too often limited; miss something and you might never see it again!
I have not been a member of ALS since late 2008 (I know, blasphemy!) so I was wondering if they have any hot new models for this year? Especially any that aren't Eastern European or already on three dozen other sites.
Oh, and have they gone on their tropical trip for the year? Those are usually incredibly hot and very entertaining with tons of footage, though personally I think last year's was a step down from their one in 2007, so I am hoping they improved a little this year.
I spent 3 1/2 years in the military and saying that they have some antiquated and intolerant policies is a considerable understatement.
Because of my job, I was in a combat unit (all male), and, yes, you could say being straight was a requirement. In fact, being outright homophobic, misogynistic, racist, and just generally intolerant were all pretty standard. I understand people when they say "well, that's just the culture" or "it's to be expected," but there is simply no excuse for intolerant policies in what we so loudly like to tout as a "free" country.
I think part of the problem is people confuse sexual identity for sexual aggression; that is, someone who is gay is supposedly more sexual than someone who is straight. It is sort of like how some fear Islam is more violent than Christianity, but today many of the barriers to religious tolerance have come down, or are at least much lower than, say, during WWII or even Vietnam.
I am afraid I don't know what the best solution is, though getting rid of the stopgap non-solution of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy is a good start. The military has been ahead of civilian changes in social policy in the U.S. in the past -- like starting desegregation before civilian institutions did -- but sexuality, and our obsession with it, has a long way to go.
I have to say Europe after having lived there for a few years...the porn is not just the "hottest," but some of the most different as well. It is not just the depth, but the breadth of material that is amazing, and how relatively equally distributed it is compared to North America. We have loads of "mainstream" mass-produced porn available here in the U.S., much of which is professionally shot and captured, but not necessarily the hottest.
I would say Asia (or just Japan) is second only because it is a single country and it is censored.
Though they don't really offer a lot to sample, I love how you can browse through their whole collection for free and read the video descriptions. I still check their site to see which videos have certain material when I am about to watch them. I just wish they would say what is also included in the photoshoot section (might entice me to join again, since I do love their photography).
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
