I've only directly submitted to ALS Scan, but they are about the only site I trust, plus it's not as if they are some overseas "company" thousands of miles away that you may never be able to contact.
No, but I hope I do in the future: that is, seeing someone I know personally on the web and getting to personally know someone I have seen on the web (but preferably the girls).
Uh, sometimes...but I am sure if I was running a porn site (if would be girls only material) I would be getting so "involved" in my work that I am sure I would frequently lose pics and videos.
Most of the time though I think it is a bunch of hype; just like all the other so-called limited time/collector's edition/previously unreleased junk that gets promoted. Come on, why would all these guys (and girls) shoot stuff just to never release it or "lose" it?
I generally like things outside the mainstream, though that's not my sole reason for enjoying porn, but it's still a nice aspect. The more mainstream it gets, the less I tend to like it. That's why people like Jenna Jameson, or things like Playboy (if you consider it porn), just don't appeal to me. They are too popular to have much meaning or pleasure.
Two? Probably a lot more, unfortunately. I would consider the lifestyle, or lack thereof, that Playboy has tried to effect -- from the breasts, to the materialism, and beyond -- all worse than the "harder" porn that I enjoy over their magazine.
I lived in Germany for a few years as well, and saw quite a bit of nudity displayed: billboards, weekly magazines, TV, film. But it was almost always for the purpose of selling some product or another, so it wasn't really sexual, just purely commercial.
Here we use sex, implied or otherwise, to sell just about everything, all without the benefit of full nudity. It gets ridiculous how we will be up in arms, in a sort of Puritan way, about how something goes a little too far with the sex or the nudity. No one cares about being enslaved to a product or company, but hint at a little nudity and suddenly the apocalypse is nigh!
I would have to disagree with Denner here; I like a lot of solo porn -- focusing on one model at a time -- and it is intended to be porn and nothing else.
Even though Playboy may be seen as nudity and nothing more, its intent still seems very sexual in nature, and not "art." I doubt many subscribe to or read it simply because it has good photography, or care deeply about what the models say. Yes, it is very mild by what creative perverts dream up today, but I don't think that suddenly makes it much more than good ol' smut.
The problem, of course, is that they publish a lot more than just a few photos of nude women every month, but whole articles, interviews, etc, very unrelated to porn. Honestly, I can remember more of what I read than what girls I saw last time I looked at a Playboy.
Recently, I had a 2 day trial and forgot what time I had originally signed up at and canceled with about 30 minutes left until a rebill.
If a site ends the membership when it would have run out (like they all should) and not the second you cancel it, then I will try and cancel early so I don't put it off and forget. How convenient that so many sites offer instantaneous access, but it can take days to "process" a cancellation!
I have bought a few in the past that came with full length DVDs with them, though these are quite rare. They are good for computer-free situations when you need a quick fix.
I hate fake breasts and too much make-up equally, but pretty much all porn stars are wearing too much once they step in front of a camera.
But fake breasts really get too me because I might see a beautiful girl...then I see her breasts -- d'oh! I think I "got over" breasts about ten years ago because of this. We are so hung up on them that women end up thinking an A or B is a failing grade when it comes to size and see unnecessary surgery as the solution. Now, if I even have a preference, it's on the smaller size, since it almost guarantees the real thing.
I don't have much of a problem with tattoos, but they definitely have become way too trendy to considered anywhere close to "unique" -- today it's the rare model that doesn't have any. Plus, after a while they all end up looking the same: butterfly, flower, Chinese lettering; same handful of designs, different person.
No, I think it's about the girl not the guys, even if there are a lot of them (or there is claimed to be). It's about what she wants or is willing to do, which in this case is multiple men.
Do we really care about the sex toys as much as the model who is using them, the cars they pose in, or the furniture they use? It's always about the girl(s) for me. If you really prefer, even "regular" guy-girl content usually shows more than enough of the male talent to suffice.
Yes, but it's really been more frustration and boredom with the unenthusiastic, cookie cutter crap being mass produced every hour of every day...
There will always be the good (rare), bad (most stuff), and ugly (the “sick,” but at least it’s different), and especially with the increasing availability of technology to allow any horn dog with a camera and some skills on this interweb thing, there will be more than enough to choose from.
Yes, absolutely. I don't have a gigantic screen and hate having images (or any other type of file) resized. Usually they have already been watermarked, airbrushed, and/or cropped so they don't need any more manipulation.
...it can be interesting and not too weird of a fetish, though it can be combined with some crazy ones -- lactation for example.
I agree with BostonPJR here; it's strange and sexy and I don't know why either. Like anything else it doesn't work equally well with all models, so just being pregnant doesn't work for me. Cute, petite teen models would be a good example: the knocked up high schooler look really isn't my thing (probably why I haven’t bothered seeing Juno).
I did like it when Belladonna was pregnant; she was still very sexy -- a lot better than her shaved head -- and it wasn't permanent, so no harm no foul.
I agree here: I don't consider oral + another orifice to be a true DP, a sort of false advertising. Even double anal and double vaginal don't strictly qualify as DP to me, even if "dual" is the same thing as "double."
I agree with this view here. If a shop wants to make a big deal about it then I figure they don't want your business. I wouldn't go to a shop to get lectured on "naughty stuff," so why do they do it anyway?
I would be more worried about personal information (non-porn) being found on my computer than what porn I had been surfing. Except for history and bookmarks I store the goods on an external HD, but real personal stuff, say online banking for example, would prevent me from taking my PC in for repair.
Celebrity sex videos are really more amusing than erotic. Any interest I have in them is purely voyeuristic, but non-sexual. It's really the upset celebrities’ reactions and their excuses of “I didn’t know a camera was there,” or “the tape was stolen” that can be quite funny.
The tapes themselves usually turn out to be quite boring, poorly shot wastes of time. As I remember the Pam Anderson/Tommy Lee tape was a dumb honeymoon video with some sex in it, and Paris Hilton's was a night vision-lit work of crap that could have barely passed for a mid '80s undercover prostitution sting video. People had already thought of Anderson as a sex symbol and Hilton as an idiotic slut anyway, so the videos were never that surprising.
Considering all the public nudity crap these companies like to shoot this has probably already happened...the "extras" are just not aware of it.
Personally I am surprised at the number of videos or scenes I have seen where an actor (rarely an actress) shows up, reads a line, and then leaves! You'd think if there was actual male talent he would be utilized, otherwise there's no point in having him in the scene.
Yeah, ALS is a good example. On one of their recent blogs they mentioned the rough cost of their latest Caribbean trip and I was shocked. It's usually a good thing when porn shocks me, but not this time -- the cost was around six figures for a weeklong trip! I admit I like those shoots –some of my favorite material so far – but I am not sure I would like paying for it.
I think if I had a lot of money, actually knew how business worked, and could easily afford to lose all of my investment in a new porn site, I would do it, but I am not sure about starting from scratch. I think just the fact that the bad sites far outnumber the good sites is a sign it probably would not be worth the effort.
It would probably be like owning a super expensive sports car: looks cool, lots of people like seeing it, I just wouldn't want to work on it or pay for it.
They are pretty annoying, especially considering that the newest videos max out at 1280 x 720, and the watermarks are not the smallest around. Older ones have that annoying crown logo, but newer ones have "DDFProd.com" in the lower right hand corner, with a small crown on it.
Yes, that's a good review. All the technical aspects organized and in easy to read formats really helps. I am afraid he's right about video quality and navigation too. :(
This sucks! ISPs can really ruin one's experience with a site, especially if far faster speeds are possible.
I also joined under the August 10th Anniversary deal but only for one month (I guess I have some sympathy for my hard drives), and my download speeds have been very decent, but I'm in the U.S., not Europe (which definitely beats Iraq in Internet access!). I have been get some pretty slow page loads, but that was expected with the warnings other members had given in last month's comments.
I am not sure if the "bonus" sites are completely non-exclusive. House of Taboo is definitely separate from 1BD, but aim of its content sort of demands that. Other sites it is hard to tell what is what, though the badandy-amount of content on 1BD can make it pretty difficult to tell, not to mention that models work across many of the sites doing similar acts. For example, the sizzling Zuzana Z. does fisting on three or four of the sites, but I haven't found all of it on 1BD.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
