| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
951
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
That would be me as well.
I let my fellow PUers' comments guide me whenever my libido is exercised by a site that is new to me but looks appealing.
The old reviews, when followed by new reviews that tell a different (better?) story tell me whether or not the webmaster really gives a shit about improving the site or is just interested in the revenue stream from porndogs who sign up without doing any research.
|
05-31-10 10:17am
|
Comment
952
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
|
05-31-10 09:58am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
953
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Downloading HD video is no problem, finding space to store it is the issue; I'm constantly adding hard drives to my servers.
Welcome to my world.
Just bought a Hitachi 2.0 Tb ($129.99) to add to my two Seagate 1.5 Tb's and a maze of smaller ones. I remember only 3 years ago being "sure" that my HUGE 500Gb would be enough. Wrong.
|
05-30-10 01:34pm
|
Reply
954
|
N/A
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
My ISP says 1.5Mb but I've actually exceeded 1.0Mb only a few times and only by a small amount. The speed is usually limited by the site's servers and not by my ISP's offered speed.
|
05-29-10 09:32am
|
Reply
955
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The economics of online porn are huge. And as we see every day big money rules and influences all government policy setting.
That said, and given the fact that the Obama administration is following the European model of secular policies, I don't really see them putting religious morality ahead of their interest in continuing to attract big campaign contributions from the porn biz.
Porn producers always win when we have Democrats in charge and when the Republicans are on top, the best they will ever do is to maintain the status quo. They'll never be able to reverse policies that are already in place.
|
05-27-10 08:54am
|
Reply
956
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
1618to1's Reply
I agree with you about shady practices, but I've always had honest dealings with Paycom/Epoch and no problems. And based on the positive new review by exotics4me, I'm ready to pop with this site.
|
05-23-10 01:20pm
|
Reply
957
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ditto, that. I may want to chat her up as well, but that's about it. Now if she wants to engage in something deeper...that's another story.
I recently ran into a porn star in a Target store in Woodland Hills CA (just south of Chatsworth) and just said "I really enjoy your work." She said thanks and that was it. BTW, she was modestly dressed with her nice mammaries packaged properly and looked like a sweet but gorgeous babe. She turned a lot of heads.
A while back I was in an Orthopedic doctor's waiting room when Randy West came in looking like the total stud. Tempted as I was I left him totally alone, as did everyone else. I still wonder why I never said anything to him.
|
05-23-10 01:13pm
|
Reply
958
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
I'm curious. Now that the site is back up on PU, can we assume that whatever they were doing that caused you to "de-list" the site have stopped and they are now playing it straight?
I'm a bit leery about trying again, but at the special price and with PU/TBP's restored listing, I may just go ahead and try it for a month.
|
05-22-10 08:49am
|
Reply
959
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Interesting. Glamour Models Gon bad is $25 per month and Shay Laren is $30 per month. So it looks like I can save $5 just by selecting the Glamour Models Gone Bad site.
Sloppy management, but if they have good stuff on their sites, then I'm in.
|
05-09-10 10:32am
|
Reply
960
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
I'm really happy seeing this review. I keep thinking about joining but $30 is a high price to take a chance on this being just another lousy one girl site.
And I like Aria and Jessie a bunch so I may be able to cobble up some new stuff there as well.
Looks like I'll be spending some time checking the various connections out there before signing up. [I have a lot of Shay's stuff, but if this site has assembled most of what's available elsewhere, chances are good there will be new stuff for my collection.)
A one month sign-up to one of the "partner sites" may be in my future.
|
05-08-10 08:54am
|
Reply
961
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Let's face it. The majority of us Porndogs are into porn because we love to check out the body parts of gorgeous ladies. While the preferred activities may vary among us pornoficionadoes, it's the babes we enjoy.
I personally like solo, no toys; solo,toys; two girls, "lez lite"; two girls, "hard lez; AND anything girls only, so an "all of the above" option would be my choice.
And I agree with Denner. The one important element is the quality of the camera operations; good lighting, good angles, good focus and full shots, not just shots that let you count the hairs on the babe's pussy.
|
04-17-10 07:57am
|
Reply
962
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
goatyboy's Review
I'm with Badandy on this.
I've been a member for a year now and am very happy with the site. Very fast download speeds, great quality videos, a lot of variety and plenty of imagination that sets the site apart from the Brazzers/Bang Brothers kind of sites.
Scoring a site is a subjective process, of course, but in my view this site is at least an 85 and probably is worth a lot more if cost is added as a consideration.
|
04-01-10 10:00am
|
Reply
963
|
All Internal
(0)
|
Reply of
shinobi's Review
Outstanding review.
The sad part is that DEV8, the producer of this and several other equally stunning sites, apparently has gone dormant. I would think that, with no money being spent on new content, these guys would either reduce the high price of $30 per site per month, or go network to attract horndogs like me who would jump at the chance.
Sadly, the one site they had that I sprung for was MoreGonzo.com, a site that grabbed several clips from each of their ten regular sites, and rotated the content monthly.
When I win the lottery I plan to sign up for all ten sites at a total cost of $299.50 per month.
Until then I'll wait for some good business sense to creep in and see them get smart (the way DDF Prods did last summer when they networked all of their outstanding sites).
|
04-01-10 09:56am
|
Reply
964
|
N/A
|
Reply of
larss's Reply
Ditto. But for me it's not a big deal because I'm more a video fan. Back about 10 years ago when web porn was in its infancy, I grabbed all the pics I could find because the video stuff was just plain garbage.
But today with all the photoshopping and with the superb quality and quantity of HD videos, I use the photos more for preview purposes than for collecting.
|
04-01-10 08:09am
|
Reply
965
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Ditto that. In fact Netflix is going the online route. I anticipate that most entertainment will be delivered that way in the near future.
I still have my "last century" technology (unused) and really don't need to spend any more money on that stuff.
|
03-20-10 09:22am
|
Reply
966
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I have no idea what the attraction could possibly be to a handjob video. What's to like about watching some anonymous dude getting jacked?
The only socially redeeming value that would make me watch a handjob video is if the babe doing the work is gorgeous and shows off her body parts in the process.
Almost the same for BJ's except that there are the occasional sensual BJ's undertaken by a babe who does the weenie slurping with a special artistic touch.
|
03-18-10 08:05am
|
Reply
967
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
mikebarrx's Review
Agree completely with this review.
Normally I would stick around at $10 a month just in case a good video pops up, but the frustration trying just to download one video convinced me that life is too short to bother with porn.com.
|
03-15-10 10:34pm
|
Comment
968
|
Just Nude
(0)
|
|
03-14-10 11:29am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
969
|
Just Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Can you make a comparison between Just Nudes and Met Art?
The photo quality and variety of Met Art makes it a superb site, but I'm always looking for the new site that can outdo the established sites.
|
03-14-10 11:27am
|
Reply
970
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I chose "other" because I reeeally don't like the night club scenes where there is no structure or organization. One babe is getting boinked whilst another is giving a blow job to some other dude and the camera man is bouncing from one action to another.
I love looking at a really gorgeous babe from head to toe going from the foreplay through to the splat shot at the end.
As for the settings listed in the poll, I'm good with any setting where the lighting is good and the cameraman is a dedicated horndog who knows what we porn fans really like.
When the lighting is right and the cameraman knows how to compensate for white balance and sun glare I tend to like outdoors scenes just because it seems more real. But what is really bad is where the cameraman is oblivious to the light balancing problems that occur when he shoots into the sun.
|
03-14-10 11:20am
|
Reply
971
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Ditto.
By and large it's difficult to imagine that a babe can have a real orgasm under the circumstances with the heavy lighting and all the camera men, directors, "grips" and so on all around her as the stunt cock is being told to adjust position for better camera angles and so forth.
Orgasms are a product of several factors occurring at the same time and usually when the couple is into the act in an intimate and non-distracting environment, which is just not very likely whilst "performing" on command in front of an audience.
That said, I've seen some scenes where the babe is rather convincing that she's achieving an orgasm, which, after all, is what the fantasy requires. I'm good with a babe who can give a realistic and convincing orgasmic performance
|
03-06-10 10:16am
|
Reply
972
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
dogspoon's Review
Good site but I am more interested in watching babes whose tits move a little whilst they are boinking the dudes. I swear that Brazzers girls have arranged for a group discount on aftermarket breast enhancements. The silicone market soared when they created this site.
|
02-28-10 10:28am
|
Reply
973
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I like 'em all.
But my all time favorite, Jennifer Avalon, was into rather hard core lezzie stuff with a lot of strap ons involved and also did some BJ's but I never saw her doing BG hardcore. And I like it that way.
Then there's Danielle from FTV who has established a no BG standard since Rob made her a feature on FTV, then created her own site where there's also no BG.
But she did some BG stuff before Rob made her rich that was ho-hum stuff compared to her erotic solo and GG.
Then there's Jana Jordan (aka Jana Foxy, aka Yana) who currently does hard core lezzie as well, including in group scenes. She works on the babes while others are working on guys, but I've never seen her boinking guys at all.)
So my answer is yes, if they move toward BG hardcore, I'd prefer gradual. But the fantasy is better for me if they stay away from BG.
But once a babe succumbs to BG, then I want them to go for it all, like Jessica Moore, who will do anything at all no matter how perverted.
|
02-28-10 10:24am
|
Reply
974
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Just saw an ad for a 4 Terabyte external hard drive for $398.00. That's about 10 cents per GIG and 1 tenth of a cent for one meg. External drives were about $1 a gig just 4 years ago.
At this rate of deflation, I'll be in the market for a 10 Tb hard drive for $100 in the next two years. That would just about cover my total stash right now and would free up all my current external drives.
|
02-27-10 09:31am
|
Reply
975
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
I signed up in August when they offered a three month "one time" network deal for $25.00 per month. Since then they've set that as the standard price and I've now re-upped twice.
I, too, love the site for its high standards of both videography and models.
I am planning to write a review shortly but just a few observations.
CONS:
They regularly post updates on the home page that have either not been loaded on their servers yet, I assume so they can say they stay on their schedule (1 By Day means just that...one update per day.) They eventually show up, sometimes the next day, sometimes a week later.
Eve Angel headlines updates are posted on DDFNet but the content is not available unless you also sign up for EveAngel.com for an extra membership fee.
They post something they call "Joke" headlines that are single photos with no video or photo content...and no explanation. I don't get the joke.
PROS:
A major pro, beside the absolutely outstanding quality of the videography and photography is the search feature that offers almost every possible theme a dedicated horndog would want to find.
Another one is a feature on one site, House of Taboo, where they actually provide segments of full video content that feature a single element of kink. Example, if you like pissing scenes, H. O. T. has a full summary (with screen shots) of all pissing segments in the H. O. T. site.
Don't get me wrong. I have renewed twice and am now in my 7th month as a member and will probably stick around until I can drain off all tghe good stuff in their huse base of delicious babes (if I live long enough).
|
02-24-10 08:16am
|
