| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
926
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Thanks for a great, well written review. I'm with you on the 3 month "foreplay" issue. I'm like you. When my engine's running full throttle, I don't want to wait 3 months; I just want to max out immediately.
And the download issues you mention are, for me, a major concern. It drives me nuts when a download cannot be fast forwarded (or downloaded into a video editor) and when a download moves at a snail's pace or stalls because the site is worried about download manager abuse.
This site has been on my wish list for a long time but is staying there because I've already got enough good stuff that I've signed up for. But when I tire of one of the current sites this one will be next up.
Again thanks for your review.
|
08-12-10 08:50am
|
Reply
927
|
Reality Gang
(0)
|
Reply of
Robbi81's Reply
You can get the site at $14.99 if you click on the PU link, then go to the sign up page, then X out of the site. The site comes back with a "special deal" at $14.99 which you then can accept. It does not say whether that price is just for the first month or if it's good for all renewals.
|
08-07-10 10:36am
|
Reply
928
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The trial site is supposed to encourage signups. If the site won't let a prospective member see what he/she is going to get then what's the point?
|
08-05-10 09:47am
|
Reply
929
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Frankly it's difficult for me to enjoy watching a babe going at it mechanically with no emotion even if she's endowed with the perfect body and face.
I want the babe to be fully engaged in the sex. A good example is Gianna Michaels. She's always totally engaged and turns me on both with that fantastic body and with her enthusiasm. I just can't imagine spending more than 15 seconds watching her if she was just going through the motions.
|
08-03-10 01:24pm
|
Reply
930
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
nymano's Review
I've commented on the sloppiness of model identification and on the lousy search function in previous reviews. Unfortunately both aspects have gotten worse despite promises by the webmaster to correct the problem.
This failure is a real shame because the site is, by far, the richest site on the web with an unimaginably huge amount of content growing at the rate of 1800+ DVD's per year.
Without a decent model identification process and with a less than adequate search capability, it's virtually impossible to find all the scenes containing a specific model.
|
08-02-10 11:13pm
|
Reply
931
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
nymano's Review
What does "no action" in your con list mean? The emphasis is on "softcore" but Twistys has a lot of hardcore "action" available in both its photo and video offerings.
|
07-31-10 11:29am
|
Reply
932
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
The characterization of toys and finger play as "midcore" is associated with the pornography standards of magazines over the latter part of the 20th Century.
Playboy was the first mainstream porn mag to show muff back in the late 1960's, creating a mild firestorm. Penthouse grabbed the momentum by showing modest amounts of genitalia, usually somewhat hidden by bush and, by today's standards, very mild.
Content in mainstream porn mags with any form of insertion arrived in the late 1990's in Hustler who toyed with the process earlier with solo labia lip activity.
We old farts look at insertions as going more hardcore than the PG (pretty girl) genre we grew up with where all there was was babes showing their bodies with no overt sexuality.
That's a long way of saying I understand where Capn is coming from and agree completely.
|
07-31-10 11:26am
|
Reply
933
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I answered "sometimes." Not because I have a problem watching porn, but because the money I spend might have been better used on something else.
I tend to compare the cost aspect to something else, like if the cost of joining a site is $29.99, that's about 10 gallons of gas, a dinner for one at a decent restaurant, a good bottle of wine or a lap dance at the local gentlemens' club.
That method of rationalization works well on individual choices, but I feel guilty when the credit card bill comes with the full range of charges for a month that now must be paid.
On the other hand, I enjoy the porn and have a superb collection, so unlike the alternatives I listed above, I have some future value remaining in what I spend on pornography.
|
07-31-10 10:57am
|
Reply
934
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I have a few grainy episodes of Suzanne Brecht from the late 1980's. She didn't make too many videos and the WMV stuff is quite rare.
But it takes so little room I have all her stuff on an old 640 Mb flash drive.
Bottom line is my hard drives are jammed with these close to 1.0Gb HD videos with only about 20% worth keeping and 80% crapola. Problem is that I have found no video editing software offerings that can be used to trim off the garbage without degrading the picture quality.
If anyone knows of a good software WMV editing software product that holds original quality, please post a reply.
|
07-11-10 12:23pm
|
Reply
935
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Sevrin's Poll
I always read the comments on the VideoBox scenes. Frequently guys post corrections to babe names and identify duplicated postings. Very useful stuff.
|
07-05-10 10:09am
|
Reply
936
|
Stuffed Petite
(0)
|
Reply of
blazing's Reply
That is good news...but can you give us some idea of when you'll be back up to your previous standard?
|
07-03-10 08:17am
|
Reply
937
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
On the rare occasion that this occurs, I call the billers immediately. The issue has always been resolved very quickly/accurately.
|
06-30-10 11:41am
|
Reply
938
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If a site is great in terms of quality, content, navigation, etc., then it should be rated high even if it's expensive.
If a site is lousy in the same sense, then it should be rated low even if it is cheap.
Human nature being what it is, it'd difficult to leave price out of the evaluative process, but it shouldn't be the primary determinant in a score.
|
06-26-10 01:05pm
|
Reply
939
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
A few are OK.
Sometimes a site is offered at a better price than even PU offers. Sometimes a site I'd never heard of shows up.
But what really irrigates me (pisses me off) is when an ad is disguised as part of the content and sends me to a signup page.
|
06-24-10 07:43am
|
Reply
940
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
kyote1's Review
OK, I've been a regular member for about a week now. The quality of the videos is generally superb with lower quality for the older ones. But so far the babes are, by and large, spectacular. The scenes, however, range from non-nude to hardcore DP. The only hint about the amount of skin shown is the brief Solo or Hardcore tag put on each video.
But the really awful download speed (max is 90Kbs with typical rates of 70Kbs) and the constant repeat logins and truncated downloads are really pissing me off. A large download of a 700 Mb video takes hours, literally, to d/l even with my 1.5Mbps modem.
And the site's technical support is non-responsive.
As a big natural tit lover, the site is loaded with enough gorgeous babes with original equipment that I really want it to work well. Sadly it does not.
|
06-21-10 06:50pm
|
Reply
941
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Looks like they heard you. The tag is now "hardcore sex."
|
06-14-10 10:20pm
|
Reply
942
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Sorry. I agree that paying for a limited access trial is nuts. I have done it where the charge is $1 or so just to see what's there, because the webmaster wouldn't make much money if the teaser is crap. But with prices like $9.95b for a limited access trial, they can keep their site.
|
06-14-10 08:24am
|
Reply
943
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
It's a full trial, not a limited trial.
It's 4.95 Euro for the mandatory 3 day full access trial, and 19.95 Euro for each subsequent 30 days.
|
06-13-10 08:59pm
|
Reply
944
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
The sign on and d/l speed sucks big time so far but the babes are totally outstanding. So far I've struggled through downloading three models and 12 videos, and the quality of the video content is consistently excellent.
But the frustration of multiple logons and 70-90 Kbs download speeds is really pissing me off.
My libido will win the war because there's so much good stuff and new talent...at least what I've seen so far so I'll be letting it auto-renew.
Way too early for a review, but I'm sensing a mid 90's for the content and low 60's for the mechanical stuff. I'll post one once it's had the full stress test.
|
06-13-10 08:56pm
|
Reply
945
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
kyote1's Review
I just signed up and am intrigued with the babes and the quality (see TBP review for details) but am very unimpressed with the download speed (70-90Kbs) whether for s single D/L or several D/L's at a time.
I will write a full review once I go into full monthly mode to see if the very slow D/L speed is just for "trial" members.
|
06-13-10 11:29am
|
Reply
946
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
magrury's Reply
I just signed up (and will be writing a review after I've given it a full shot.
But my first experiences are that it will now do multiple d/l's but the fastest d/l speed is between 70 and 90 Kbs/sec. It takes forever for a larger file (some approach 1.0 Gb) so a member needs to be very patient.
|
06-13-10 11:26am
|
Reply
947
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I just enrolled in YoungBusty.com which requires that you buy a 3 day trial before being permitted to buy the full month.
Interesting method.
|
06-13-10 11:15am
|
Reply
948
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm different. When I find a site that looks good I buy a trial membership where PU says it's full access to see how I like the site, and if there's enough GOOD content to sign up for a full month.
In some cases I've actually been able to drain all the good stuff in the time permitted in the trial membership that I didn't need a full month.
|
06-12-10 02:15pm
|
Reply
949
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Ditto what Jay G said. I don't get the appeal of pissing in someone's mouth or of extreme bondage/humiliation, but it must work for some because there's so much of it out there.
|
06-10-10 07:48am
|
Reply
950
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Creampie. No interest in either a spitter or swallower.
|
06-04-10 11:52pm
|
