| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
901
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Ditto that. I enjoy porn for the babes, not to watch some guy having his sausage slobbered over. If a BJ is really necessary, then make sure the babe's body parts are on view.
Worse than BJ's however are teabagging closeups and asshole licking by the babe.
|
09-11-10 01:11pm
|
Reply
902
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Too many.
The result is that the competition for recognition is messing things up with absolutely gorgeous ladies screwing with their God-given beauty by ill-advised breast enhancements, ridiculous tattoos and excessive piercings.
Another problem. I'm running out of space on my hard drives with all of the talent out there.
On second thought there can never be too many hot babes willing to show their PTA* to us horndogs.
*PTA = Pussy Tits and Ass
|
09-08-10 08:43am
|
Reply
903
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Now that you mention it, I recall they did the same with me. It'll be a one month signup followed by a cancellation two weeks later...then wait for the email barrage.
|
09-06-10 07:40pm
|
Reply
904
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I just checked the preview site and see what you mean. However I did find a few babes who have "enhanced" tits in the "natural" tits listing, but it's quite possible the content for them is pre-enhancement.
Another question. Are you a multi-month member? If so are you being billed at $17.99 for later months(the TBP special rate for new members) or at $26.91 as stated in the latest review?
|
09-06-10 03:11pm
|
Reply
905
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
BZ is loaded with aftermarket enhancements to the point that I'm ready to cancel after over a year.
RK, on the other hand, still has enough naturals to keep me around.
BB, I'm back. BZ, nice knowing you but it's time to move on guys.
|
09-06-10 10:48am
|
Reply
906
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
It's been about 2 years since BB got any of my hard earned money. I like their style but the aftermarket tits showed up way too often. I'll go for amonth or two to update my collection and see if they warrant a longer term "loyalty." Thanks.
|
09-06-10 10:45am
|
Reply
907
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I hear you and may switch back to Bang Brothers simply because they have added the natural breasts search function after I drop Brazzers and Reality Kings.
|
09-05-10 11:43pm
|
Reply
908
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I've had some (few) d/l issues but not many. I also use DTA. But one thing I found is that the file extensions are incorrect on occasion. When I can't get a d/l to play properly, I check the extension and change it to *.wmv even if it already is *.wmv. That has worked.
|
09-05-10 12:15pm
|
Reply
909
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I dropped Bang Bros two years ago because I really tired of the excessive number of aftermarket mammaries they provided. I'm getting very close to dropping both Brazzers and Reality Kings for the same reason.
It's to a point that, if a site doesn't have a genre search function that includes "natural tits," or at least a designation tag that says enhanced or natural titties, I'm not signing up.
|
09-05-10 12:08pm
|
Reply
910
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Having had an attractive neighbor approach me in a very suggestive manner I reacted with a lot of caution. Her husband was a coworker of mine (and the Mayor of our little town) who was away on a business trip and she was clearly in need of a little action.
On the one hand, I would have enjoyed parking my pork in her pussy, on the other the consequences could have been severe. On the other hand I didn't want to piss her off or have her think that I found her unattractive, so I simply played the "bumpkin" who didn't seem to catch what she was throwing.
In response to this poll, NFW. (No Fucking Way.) Option 5 for sure.
|
09-05-10 12:03pm
|
Reply
911
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Agree with Denner. I'm a video guy and quit Met-Art after about 3 months. The photo sets are good with a lot of full spreads and excellent angles. But I agree; no heat at all, no insertions and very little eroticism.
|
09-03-10 11:46pm
|
Comment
912
|
Retro Raw
(0)
|
|
08-29-10 09:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
913
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
I und3erstand the argument completely, but if the site wants to limit the d/l's to 14, then it should say so BEFORE, not after someone signs up.
It's like going to a restaurant offering a second meal free with the purchase of a meal, and once you order, they give you half portions because they can't stay in business if they actually honor their advertised offer.
The rip off is false advertising.
|
08-29-10 05:29pm
|
Reply
914
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
It's shit like this that make me avoid sites that might otherwise get some of my hard earned money.
Don't these dolts understand you don't piss off your potential customers before they spend their money?
|
08-29-10 02:14pm
|
Reply
915
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I wish. Nope. I was born in 1941 in the northeast and went to college in the south from 1960-64. Took the train from Penn Station and took advantage of the stopover opportunities at Baltimore both ways.
|
08-28-10 05:44pm
|
Reply
916
|
Big Tit Hooker
(0)
|
Reply of
Fat Tony's Review
Has something changed?
James reported in a comment last month that the site was not updating; just recycling the same 30 scenes.
|
08-28-10 12:08pm
|
Reply
917
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I absolutely love it. Seriously.
It started back in the early sixties (yup I was around back then) when "The Block" in Baltimore was in its glory.
The "home of traveling burlesque" was the good old Gaiety Theatre where they had 5 hours of stripping every afternoon.
The one rule (law?) that seemed to be in play was that the girls were prohibited from being totally naked and had to always wear their panties.
Usually the girls got around that rule by tying their panties around their ankles; but one creative and gorgeous babe stuffed her panties up her snatch instead and, with a little bit hanging out next to her gorgeously long labia lips, it was a total turn on for me.
It's probably that experience that, continuing today, I get a real "rise" out of panty stuffing.
|
08-28-10 11:07am
|
Reply
918
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
That is my answer, too, but with a slight variation.
I still d/l pictures in a few cases where the babe is especially gorgeous and the pix are high quality. I used to grab some screenshots of especially memorable scenes using VLC but now with most sites providing high quality pictures along with their videos, I stopped with the screenshots.
|
08-23-10 08:24am
|
Reply
919
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I'm a multimonth subscriber and am into large original mammary glands (that means big natural titties) as well as "soft core" (which seems to include penetration by anything other than a penis).
I agree that the heavy duty hardcore promised by House of Taboo is there but is a rather shallow assortment. In other words, if you are into bondage and similar stuff, RustyJ is right on. Sign up for one month every 6 months or so and drain off the new stuff.
On the other hand the DDF Prod site is loaded with fabulous babes, so if your taste is like mine go for a longer term membership. There is way more stuff than time to download it, even at their very fast d/l speeds.
I'm drafting up a review of the site and totally agree with RustyJ's 90-93 score. Stay tuned. I'll explain why in my review.
|
08-17-10 10:03am
|
Reply
920
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Reply
I received a reply within 24 hours by emailing: support@youngbusty.com .
The reply came from: admin@imco.nl
They responded to two questions:
1. Can the download speed be improved? ("The problem is caused by the connection from our system to your server in the USA. We are working on this problem but it can not be solved in short period.")
2. Will the photos be zipped? ("This is at this moment not available. This will be in the near future, but only by new updates in the beginning.")
Frankly, as I said they've got great content but a lousy interface. I will hang on for another month or two and hope they get these things resolved. If they do I'll give them a very high score.
|
08-17-10 08:35am
|
Comment
921
|
Lovely Vanessa
(0)
|
|
08-15-10 10:54pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
922
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Ditto. 2 'puters; one for serious and one for fun plus several external hard drives.
|
08-15-10 10:38pm
|
Reply
923
|
Kelly Madison
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
Any news yet? I'm ready to sign on but if there's a ridiculously low D/L limit, I will look elsewhere.
|
08-12-10 04:14pm
|
Reply
924
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
"...I have found a solution through Firefox. If you use DownThemAll just put the download in pause for a second and then click resume, then the download will complete."
Thanks. I use DTA but didn't know this little trick. I'll try it next time I get a hitch in the getalong.
|
08-12-10 10:03am
|
Reply
925
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
Had the same problem 2 weeks ago in a small but upscale hotel in Melbourne Australia. I got access from a big chain hotel in Sydney but at a sluggishly slow speed. But when I went on to Melbourne, I was able to access my email and basic g-rated sites but was unable to access my favorite porn sites.
I didn't follow up with the hotel so I don't know if it's selective blocking or something else.
Interestingly, however, I had superb access and speeds during a short stay in Singapore.
It would be interesting to see a survey of access issues like I experienced done by someone who is more technology savvy than I am.
|
08-12-10 09:02am
|
