| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Net Video Girls
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A nice clean site that is easy to navigate with icons that quickly get you where you want to be.
-Each video is tagged with multiple keywords but you can only search by one keyword at a time.
-There are over 1300 videos to choose from that go back as far as 2001. (Needless to say quality is quite poor on those early videos.
-Their video resolution has followed technology so that they have added from their original SD to now include HD as well as 4K for any video produced from 2016 to now.
-They update on average with 10 to 14 new videos each month and each video is dated.
-They have a wide selection of models to choose from with an emphasis on natural looking women and surprisingly a few of them even became top performers in the industry.
-They offer cam content but I'm not a fan of that type of porn so can't add anything. |
| Cons: |
-The site is a bandwidth hog that rarely allow you to do more than download one video at a time or navigate the site itself. Let alone the net. Trying to download more than one video is not recommended.
-Videos start automatically instead of waiting for the user to click on the start button.
-Obviously the further back you go. The worse the video resolution gets. The early stuff is 320p.
-Not necessarily a con but their 4K videos are huge files that are above 4G and some go as high a 6.5G.
-The video are all handheld and Tripod shot so it's a mix of eclectic and static. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I have had my eye on this site for years but I was always nervous to join because they have such a piss poor preview section and needless to say I was really nervous to invest money for fear I would regret it but boy was I wrong. This is one of those rare sites that you should not judge by it's cover.
*Granted if you aren't into POV/Handheld porn than don't bother to go any further but if you can live with it than you will find that the guys knows their stuff.
*I really like the fact that most of the models are natural looking. I would prefer to see less ink on some of them but they aren't the more common and you can often overlook it. There are a few older women but the vast majority are late teens to primarily 20 year olds.
*The sex is pretty hot and the women really look into it. There is a mix of vaginal with quite a few anal videos as well(80 at last count). You also get a nice mix of g/g with b/g.
*The only major negative is the bandwith the site eats and you are talking to a guy that as ultra-high speed internet. I can normally download huge video files from other sites while still surfing the net but you can't do that here and if you are into 4k videos than be prepared to wait at least 20 minutes for the file to download before you can download another one or surf the net.
*It's also very annoying that the videos start automatically because that means that once you select a scene than you will wait a few seconds for the player to buffer the video before it starts.
*The guys talking can be annoying to some but it didn't bother me and he mostly does it in the beginning when he is doing this pseudo-interview.
*Now this is supposed to be a network of sites but seeing as they all seem to be shot from the same locations and the action is about the same in all of them then I wouldn't necessarily call it a network but I also don't care because it's the content that's important and it's amazing.
If you don't care that it's handheld/tripod porn than this is an excellent site to join. |
|
04-04-20 11:16am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Loki's Reply
I can't disagree because that's the line I normally use. I will just say that one of the reasons why I prefer to see a bush as opposed to the all shaved is that too often there are significant razor burns and pimples visible on women who shave it all off and I find that very distracting in a porn shot. In fact I have said it before that more than one scene has been ruined by those skin blemishes.
|
04-02-20 06:50am
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I love the bush. The hairier the better.
|
03-30-20 06:25am
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I picked 25$ but there's a caveat to that amount. I have bought minutes multiple time on Hot Movies and AEBN so streaming only isn't the stciking point but the content you get when you buy those minutes. In may case the content I usually stream is older porn that as no other sources than streaming sites and that's why I'm willing to pay a decent amount but I wouldn't want to do that for most stand alone sites.
|
03-16-20 03:29pm
|
Reply
55
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
It's not that I don't think you are correct but more that these aren't necessarily good examples to use to compare with other porn sites. I mean Zishy is a site dedicated to fans of non-nude and semi-nude only models. That isn't porn to me and while FTV is a site that is pornographic in nature. It is still a primarily solo model site where the models basically masturbate.
That doesn't mean that producers shouldn't try to emulate them as much as possible because I often complain that a scene was made unwatchable because they didn't properly use makeup on the model.
|
02-25-20 06:08am
|
Reply
56
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
Patrik4's Comment
Maybe You were under the misconception that he didn't but I've been a fan of Pierre going back to his days at Private and it was common to see condoms and I don't believe that he has made it a secret that he often wears one with the women he shoots. In fact I would argue that he would be a moron of unbelievable size if he didn't wear one seeing as the bulk of the women he shoots are complete unknown and therefore have no tract record to use as reference.
|
12-17-19 03:20pm
|
Reply
57
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
It may be but here's what I know. He uploads a new scene every seven days so even if he takes a couple of days off. That still leaves him 5 days to book talent, shoot a video, edit said video(I don't think there is a lot of editing in his videos) and interact with his fans.
|
12-10-19 05:00am
|
Reply
58
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
Maybe Bryan forgot to renew his domain but the strange part is that he still hasn't mentioned anything about it on his twitter feed or the one associated with HUHS and I would assume that he would try to calm things down by telling members that the site should be back up within a certain amount of time. In fact if you were to only follow him on Twitter than you would think that everything is great because he is currently promoting a recent shoot.
I've also noticed that he doesn't shoot that much anal content anymore and I wonder if it's because of money which doesn't bode well for his fans or his fans prefer to see less anal and more piss.
|
12-08-19 10:32am
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Shen's Poll
Definitely Abella because she has been bolder and has a much longer career path than Emily is likely to have.
|
11-11-19 08:29am
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
Mia who? I know who she is less for her doing porn than she doing so little of it.
|
08-06-19 10:31am
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
Let me first preface that it is unfair to compare to women who worked in an industry that was very different for each of them. The one Jenna worked in allowed for a performer to be a huge contract star ultimately making millions and the other never had the chance to make anything close to that.
That said I pick Lana only because she at least did far more different things than Jenna ever did.
|
08-03-19 03:19pm
|
Reply
62
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
In this instance consenting would kill the vibe they are trying to create but I agree that it's icky.
Mind you it's a moot point for me because I don't understand how this type of porn is even fun to watch when you little of the action and what you do see if badly shot because they are basically doing the kind of hidden camera type of porn that died about a decade ago.
|
07-27-19 09:17am
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
I have bought clips4sales videos because one of my favorite did something that I enjoyed so I would join a site for a single video if it starred one of my favorite who happened to do what I wanted to see.
|
05-30-19 07:05am
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Poll
Most of the performers that I avoid is due to their appearance and less for any other reason.
|
05-30-19 07:04am
|
Reply
65
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
The only thing I will say on Playboy is that I once joined and when I wanted to cancel then I had to call an operator to cancel something I had signed up online so while that may no longer be the case. I'm not going to sign up to any Playboy related site until I have that carved in stone.
|
04-25-19 06:50am
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
I like them all. I don't seek performers based on their age but the kind of porn they do. That said while I watch teen performers. I often find that it would be better for everyone if they were older.
|
02-28-19 03:50pm
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
No and never will. My relationship with performers is that I use my money to buy the porn they appear in and not where I give them money directly so that they can buy stuff that they should be able to do with the money they earn from porn.
|
02-04-19 03:02pm
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
While I dislike them. Many of my all time favorite models happen to have at least one tattoo but if they didn't have any then I would still like them and in some cases. I might like them more.
Unless you happen to be someone who loves tattoos on women then I suspect most of you would prefer not to see any ink on your favorite model.
|
01-10-19 03:52pm
|
Reply
69
|
Girlsway
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I have been a member multiple times and while they do produce some good lesbian porn. Too many of their scenarios are ultra-repetitive which can get annoying over time. They almost never flesh out their scenarios so that you are basically left with watching an average lesbian scene starring porn performers. I also can't help but point out that they use some filter that makes most things that a red look pink.
That said it's impossible to complain if you are paying 10$ a month for a ton of lesbian porn.
|
01-09-19 04:02pm
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Poll
I'm not picky. I have plenty of 480p videos and I am quite happy with the quality but I usually look for 540p or 720p. I avoid high definition stuff as I honestly don't see the point. In fact HD has in many ways made scenes that I'm sure I would have once enjoyed unwatchable because all the various skin imperfections that were easy to overlook in lower resolution are front in center in HD.
|
12-05-18 01:55pm
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I'd rather they didn't have any but I'm fine with small ones. especially if they aren't in very hard to miss.
|
11-10-18 10:30am
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I picked it depends because I've seen a few Eastern European, German, Italian and Japanese videos where they speak a language that I don't understand and I enjoyed them but these are usually the exception.
For the most part if there is dialogue than I want it to be in one of the two languages that I speak and understand or I'm not going to enjoy it.
|
10-23-18 07:40am
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Poll
I second everything that Drooler wrote and add that I want to see the realness in their performance as well because you can be as natural as you want but if your porn performance over the top then I will skip the scene because I can't deal with it anymore.
|
10-23-18 07:24am
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Kody's Poll
I like to see toys used in lesbian porn but a strap-on is by far my favorite toy.
|
10-07-18 11:45am
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I prefer to watch it on my large screen TV but I often watch it on my computer screen because it's easier.
|
09-27-18 06:18pm
|
