| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
For me the answer is all of them. I've never liked any performer just because of their looks. It's far more important that they be believable at what they are doing. That's why it's impossible for me to have a list of the most attractive performers of all time because it would take me forever to write it.
|
09-15-18 01:15pm
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
No but technically speaking you are not legally allowed to trade/share digital copies of anything. The law is flexible on hard copies like dvd and Bluray but it isn't on downloaded material.
|
09-10-18 05:40pm
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
You don't need to look at 4K because HD has already made every pimple, razor burn, skin rash the star attraction in modern porn. Those skin blemishes have always existed in porn because porn performers are human and if they shave their pubic hairs then they will get razor burns/pimples and if they do the same thing on their butts then the same will happen but in lower resolutions those things tended to be a lot easier to overlook but for me it's now impossible to miss. What's worse is that I can enjoy every thing about a video from the action, camera shots and performances and still I will not enjoy the final product because I can't overlook all the skin blemishes.
|
08-26-18 09:42am
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I don't follow the private lives of performers so their marital status rarely comes up. About the only time when I know that a performer is in a new relationship is when she stops doing porn or starts to only do solo and g/g.
Ultimately I'm indifferent on the subject because if she comes into the industry already married then all the porn that she does will be as a married woman and if she decides to date/marry and then stops doing porn then I will still have the stuff she did before that.
|
08-26-18 09:30am
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I would never do it.
|
05-25-18 05:25pm
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's probably 10% or less but much longer if I add the amount of time I post on porn forums but I don't consider talking about porn the same thing as surfing for it.
|
05-18-18 06:22pm
|
Reply
82
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
Reply of
Kody's Review
Thanks for the review.
My biggest issue with the site is that the producers in their quest to create the illusion that what we are watching is somehow real have either by conscious decision or omission missed the key element that is a must for me (and I suspect many others)to enjoy a porn video. I need to see the action and not just from one camera angle so badly placed that you honestly don't know what is happening half the time and the other half you don't care but from multiple camera angles that show the women enjoying themselves.
The content feels a lot like those Eastern European hidden camera videos that were popular in the late 90's early 2000 but no one would care to watch now because quality was horrible and you couldn't see what is happening. The only difference is that you know the women in the videos and there is a little scenario but that's about it.
|
05-16-18 06:18pm
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Poll
Ron Jeremy has acquired some major detractors over the years and a few women have accused him of rape or at the very least doing some sexually predatory activities. Same thing for James Deen.
|
05-15-18 03:28pm
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I think anyone who engages in that kind of evil endeavour should go to prison for a very long time.
|
05-09-18 06:04pm
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
It's not tricky for me because the health of the performer is paramount to my enjoyment of porn and that's why I am pro-condom. A guy wearing rubber doesn't affect my enjoyment and I would rather have guys wear condoms and ejaculate in the women than have them be bareback and ejaculate anywhere but where it would normally be.
|
05-04-18 03:12pm
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It is very important to me because otherwise what's the point. In a similar way. I prefer that the performer not exaggerate either because then it also becomes nearly unwatchable.
|
05-04-18 01:33pm
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
I like scenario porn and only speak/understand French and English so that basically means that my favorite type of porn can only be produced in two Countries. France and the US. I could add Canada but we aren't a very big porn producing Country.
|
04-26-18 06:24pm
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I can easily spot about 95% of all implants and while about 4% of the last portion aren't so easy to spot. I still to hit the mark more often than not with those as well. That basically leaves 1% of implants that are so perfectly done and matched to the woman's body type that it is impossible for me to know if they are real.
|
04-20-18 07:23pm
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
I had to pick fellatio for the simple reason that guys no longer perform cunnilingus in porn so it's useless to pick it. That said I would much prefer seeing a guy go down on his girl before she returns the favor.
|
04-10-18 07:47am
|
Reply
90
|
Cathy's Craving
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Reply
If you think that calling me names is somehow a productive thing to do than go ahead but please don't think that I am some kind of idiot who post things just for the hell of it without any data to back up his claim because I clearly am not. To prove it. All I had to do is click on the TBP link and visit the site and within about 30 seconds I knew the site hadn't updated since February of 2017 because there as always been an update button on their site for such a purpose and guess what. The last update is Feb 2017.
|
04-08-18 11:38am
|
Reply
91
|
Cathy's Craving
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
While I think it nice that you are warning possible customers. I am curious to know why you are still talking about a site that has been dead for a long time. Their last official update was in Feb 2017 and frankly I am pretty sure it was either recycled older material or remastered older material. The last time you posted a comment it was regarding them rebuilding the site and you know that never came to pass.
|
04-07-18 11:29am
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I bought one about 15-20 years ago ago and it was so memorable that I don't remember whose pussy it was. I don't know how the new models are designed and feel VS my older model but mine was really only cosmetically identical to the performers pussy/ass with nothing inside to stimulate the penis.
|
04-07-18 11:14am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I do but since most male performers are usually at least a decade older than most performers than it's possible to argue that everyone has to some degree enjoy watching much older male performers with much younger women. Erik Everhard is 41 and he probably wors with women that are at least half is age. I have one even better. Mark Wood is 49 so he that means that he probably works with women that are sometimes 30 years younger than him.
|
03-28-18 08:08am
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I've only had to call once and it was to cancel my Playboy membership. A membership that I joined online but could not cancel online but had to call. Needless to say that was the last time I thought of joining a Playboy site.
|
03-26-18 06:42pm
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
While I am certain that many of the other drugs named in the poll are as addictive if not more than cigarettes. In my opinion cigarettes are still by a huge margin the most addictive drug today for a few reasons.
1-They are easy to buy.
2-They are reasonably cheap.
3-They are legal.
4-They still get regularly promoted on TV and in movies to the point where I think it's time that someone look into it because for a time you stopped seeing gratuitous smoking on TV and in movies but I have seen a significant increase of it in those two types of media.
|
03-25-18 11:28am
|
Reply
96
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
As far as I know the vast majority of performer who were known with only one name precede the internet and that may be why they were able to do that and still have great porn careers and yet the actual number is still quite small. I can add to exotics list the names of Seka, Serena, Tigr(although she used many more stage names) and Angel but that last one is very tricky because she may have used only one name. There have been many other performers to use that name and the only real way to know which Angel I'm referring to require that you are familiar with early 80's porn movies.
|
03-25-18 11:20am
|
Reply
97
|
Hanna's Honeypot
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Their preview section is on the poor side of things so I can't be 100% certain but my gut feeling is that the bulk of their content is neither new or exclusive. As for Zafira. It's probably at least 2 years old but could be much older.
If their join price was a lot lower than I might not find the site to be a kind of scam but it's a 30$ site. Now it's true that you get access to Only Cuties but unless there is a huge amount of new stuff than you are motly paying for a library of content and not one that has necessarily exclusive content.
|
03-15-18 06:23pm
|
Reply
98
|
Hanna's Honeypot
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Not sure if you are aware but as far as I know she left the industry years ago. She was a cutie but she is easily in her 30's now and had at least one child 7 or 8 years ago. It's not a cheap site or cheap network and unless I am wrong than most of the content is old now.
It doesn't help that they don't have true preview section.
|
03-11-18 06:03pm
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It depends on the reputation of the site and the quantity of broken links. Ultimately broken links tend to point to a lack of professionalism on the part of the webmaster and that can easily translate to a lack of professionalism in the content on thw site.
|
03-05-18 02:55pm
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's a scam but it's not one that gets me riled up because if you believe that you are going to get access to something that normally cost at least 15 times that amount than you deserve to lose that $1.
|
03-03-18 10:19am
|
