| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Private Society
(0)
|
Reply of
UMBA8's Reply
I'm sorry if you thought I was implying that you are trying to pull the wool over our eyes because that's not what I think. I think that your review lacked the important info to justify the score and seeing as the site design isn't just bad but it is horrible then how can we judge the value of the site if it isn't from an actual member.
Pointing their potential members to tube sites like they actually do on their twitter feed is a terrible business decision because if the people can get it for free then will they also want to pay for it. Especially when they don't know if what they are seeing is all there is.
P.S: The info in your reply would be great things to add to your review as this is what we want to see to know if the site has any worth.
|
04-09-20 09:48am
|
Reply
277
|
Private Society
(0)
|
Reply of
UMBA8's Review
You are entitled to your score but a site that has only one preview page and 8 tiny trailers should probably not get a score above 80 regardless that the content might be good because all potential customer should not have to fork over 25$ to discover if it is or it isn't and that is exactly what you have to do with this site.
You couple that with the fact that one of the available trailer is for an Heidi Cummins video that has been on her MV account for a year and that adds to the problem. Granted there is no date associated with the trailer but one would assume that if it's there then it's a recent one.
We're in 2020 and that site looks like the kind of stuff I used to see in the late 90's and early 2000's.
We all have our favorite and you can be forgiven for looking at the site with rose colored glasses but giving the site a score in the 90's tends to make your review less believable than if it had been scored closer to previous ones.
Things not necessarily a must in a review but really help to flesh out what potential customers will get are things like.
-How many videos are there?
-Are they dated?
-What are the available resolutions?
-How many Models?
-Can you search for content?
|
04-09-20 08:07am
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Loki's Reply
Age has a lot to do with it because if you are an old fart like me than you remember when a bush wasn't an oddity but the norm in porn and every performer had one.
Now I don't want to start a major debate but is it possible that on some level the reason why the bare look appears more popular is that some fans associate that with age?
|
04-07-20 06:34am
|
Reply
279
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
It's your money and you can do what you want with it but I think you would be better served in joining a different site because you were a member in December so the most you can hope for is about half a dozen extra videos.
Have you checked ATK Girlfriends because they seem to have about the same models and it has similar type of content? It's a lot more expensive but at least it would be a lot more content for your money.
|
04-05-20 03:32pm
|
Reply
280
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
I'm not a member but in this case I think I can speak from experience and tell you that if they don't show you any updates after January then that means they stopped adding content in January.
If you check TBP's review (which you should always do) then you will see that it was created by the folks at Nubile. If you visit any of the Nubile sites then that will be even more obvious because they share the same site design. It should also be obvious that a site that scores in the 70's is one that you should only join after some careful considerations and never for a long term.
My advice is that you check out the various Nubile sites because it's quite possible that HCM did not produce any of it's own content but bought it from a third party and that third party might be Nubile.
|
04-05-20 05:58am
|
Reply
281
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Loki's Reply
I can't disagree because that's the line I normally use. I will just say that one of the reasons why I prefer to see a bush as opposed to the all shaved is that too often there are significant razor burns and pimples visible on women who shave it all off and I find that very distracting in a porn shot. In fact I have said it before that more than one scene has been ruined by those skin blemishes.
|
04-02-20 06:50am
|
Reply
282
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I love the bush. The hairier the better.
|
03-30-20 06:25am
|
Reply
283
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I picked 25$ but there's a caveat to that amount. I have bought minutes multiple time on Hot Movies and AEBN so streaming only isn't the stciking point but the content you get when you buy those minutes. In may case the content I usually stream is older porn that as no other sources than streaming sites and that's why I'm willing to pay a decent amount but I wouldn't want to do that for most stand alone sites.
|
03-16-20 03:29pm
|
Reply
284
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
It's not that I don't think you are correct but more that these aren't necessarily good examples to use to compare with other porn sites. I mean Zishy is a site dedicated to fans of non-nude and semi-nude only models. That isn't porn to me and while FTV is a site that is pornographic in nature. It is still a primarily solo model site where the models basically masturbate.
That doesn't mean that producers shouldn't try to emulate them as much as possible because I often complain that a scene was made unwatchable because they didn't properly use makeup on the model.
|
02-25-20 06:08am
|
Reply
285
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
Patrik4's Comment
Maybe You were under the misconception that he didn't but I've been a fan of Pierre going back to his days at Private and it was common to see condoms and I don't believe that he has made it a secret that he often wears one with the women he shoots. In fact I would argue that he would be a moron of unbelievable size if he didn't wear one seeing as the bulk of the women he shoots are complete unknown and therefore have no tract record to use as reference.
|
12-17-19 03:20pm
|
Reply
286
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
It may be but here's what I know. He uploads a new scene every seven days so even if he takes a couple of days off. That still leaves him 5 days to book talent, shoot a video, edit said video(I don't think there is a lot of editing in his videos) and interact with his fans.
|
12-10-19 05:00am
|
Reply
287
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
Maybe Bryan forgot to renew his domain but the strange part is that he still hasn't mentioned anything about it on his twitter feed or the one associated with HUHS and I would assume that he would try to calm things down by telling members that the site should be back up within a certain amount of time. In fact if you were to only follow him on Twitter than you would think that everything is great because he is currently promoting a recent shoot.
I've also noticed that he doesn't shoot that much anal content anymore and I wonder if it's because of money which doesn't bode well for his fans or his fans prefer to see less anal and more piss.
|
12-08-19 10:32am
|
Reply
288
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Shen's Poll
Definitely Abella because she has been bolder and has a much longer career path than Emily is likely to have.
|
11-11-19 08:29am
|
Reply
289
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
Mia who? I know who she is less for her doing porn than she doing so little of it.
|
08-06-19 10:31am
|
Reply
290
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
Let me first preface that it is unfair to compare to women who worked in an industry that was very different for each of them. The one Jenna worked in allowed for a performer to be a huge contract star ultimately making millions and the other never had the chance to make anything close to that.
That said I pick Lana only because she at least did far more different things than Jenna ever did.
|
08-03-19 03:19pm
|
Reply
291
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
In this instance consenting would kill the vibe they are trying to create but I agree that it's icky.
Mind you it's a moot point for me because I don't understand how this type of porn is even fun to watch when you little of the action and what you do see if badly shot because they are basically doing the kind of hidden camera type of porn that died about a decade ago.
|
07-27-19 09:17am
|
Reply
292
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
I have bought clips4sales videos because one of my favorite did something that I enjoyed so I would join a site for a single video if it starred one of my favorite who happened to do what I wanted to see.
|
05-30-19 07:05am
|
Reply
293
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Poll
Most of the performers that I avoid is due to their appearance and less for any other reason.
|
05-30-19 07:04am
|
Reply
294
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
The only thing I will say on Playboy is that I once joined and when I wanted to cancel then I had to call an operator to cancel something I had signed up online so while that may no longer be the case. I'm not going to sign up to any Playboy related site until I have that carved in stone.
|
04-25-19 06:50am
|
Reply
295
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
I like them all. I don't seek performers based on their age but the kind of porn they do. That said while I watch teen performers. I often find that it would be better for everyone if they were older.
|
02-28-19 03:50pm
|
Reply
296
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
No and never will. My relationship with performers is that I use my money to buy the porn they appear in and not where I give them money directly so that they can buy stuff that they should be able to do with the money they earn from porn.
|
02-04-19 03:02pm
|
Reply
297
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
While I dislike them. Many of my all time favorite models happen to have at least one tattoo but if they didn't have any then I would still like them and in some cases. I might like them more.
Unless you happen to be someone who loves tattoos on women then I suspect most of you would prefer not to see any ink on your favorite model.
|
01-10-19 03:52pm
|
Reply
298
|
Girlsway
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I have been a member multiple times and while they do produce some good lesbian porn. Too many of their scenarios are ultra-repetitive which can get annoying over time. They almost never flesh out their scenarios so that you are basically left with watching an average lesbian scene starring porn performers. I also can't help but point out that they use some filter that makes most things that a red look pink.
That said it's impossible to complain if you are paying 10$ a month for a ton of lesbian porn.
|
01-09-19 04:02pm
|
Reply
299
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Poll
I'm not picky. I have plenty of 480p videos and I am quite happy with the quality but I usually look for 540p or 720p. I avoid high definition stuff as I honestly don't see the point. In fact HD has in many ways made scenes that I'm sure I would have once enjoyed unwatchable because all the various skin imperfections that were easy to overlook in lower resolution are front in center in HD.
|
12-05-18 01:55pm
|
Reply
300
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I'd rather they didn't have any but I'm fine with small ones. especially if they aren't in very hard to miss.
|
11-10-18 10:30am
|
