| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I honestly don't visit any other sites besides TBP and PU. I don't have to! :)
|
08-21-07 06:37pm
|
Reply
177
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think I tend to have really high expectations for sites and very often become dissappointed once I've joined. That's especially true when a site is more expensive, but I think that's understandable. I've definitely learned my lesson with more expensive sites that what you see in a tour isn't always what you really get. I think that's why I've stuck to cheaper sites recently, especially networks, so I don't feel stiffed. However, that can keep me from finding real gems.
|
08-21-07 06:36pm
|
Comment
178
|
Sport Babes
(0)
|
|
08-14-07 08:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
179
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
I just visit a lot of sites is all. :) Plus, I really enjoy writing the reviews! I've been doing them since January, but sometimes it surprises me I've done so many. I really want that last badge, so that keeps me going.
Thanks for the comments! Make sure to check out my reviews!
-SD
|
08-14-07 07:24pm
|
Reply
180
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
My average day is probably less than an hour, but there will be some days where it's over 2. So, I selected less than an hour, but average might be higher than that.
|
08-14-07 07:18pm
|
Reply
181
|
N/A
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Poll
I would join a site that didn't use the better known billers, but I always feel better about joining a site when they use such services. It's easy to log in and check your subscription info, which is a big plus. Just a nice safety net.
|
08-14-07 07:14pm
|
Reply
182
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Price is always one of my top considerations and I'm definitely more lenient on a site that charges a low membership fee unless it offers nothing. Right now I have NetworkPass and it's main sites aren't that great, but does offer some quality feeds. If they chraged $20 or more I wouldn't give it the time of day, but for $10 a month and signs of trying to improve it will definitely earn a respectable score.
|
08-14-07 07:10pm
|
Reply
183
|
Elise Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
He's back!!! ;) Great review as always!
|
08-14-07 07:01pm
|
Reply
184
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Hey Jay dude!
Thanks for the support and I'm glad to hear someone else agree with me. To go around crapping on sites just because you aren't into the type of fetish is not being responsible. Finding a site with a cover that doesn't mach the contents is one thing, but there's no need to be a jerk just for the sake of being a jerk.
Anyway, thanks for the comment!
-SD
|
08-07-07 06:50pm
|
Reply
185
|
Michelle Aston
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the info exotics dude! It's a pretty common thing for short haired girls to be less than "chesty", but sometimes that's probably why a girl with smaller boobs goes for the short haircut. In general I like bigger breasts, although it really depends on the girl.
Anyway, thanks for all the info! :)
|
08-07-07 06:42pm
|
Reply
186
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I haven't had any problems, but I try to stick with sites that use reputable billing companies. I think it can be a real issue though and can have dire consequences. I think the pre-paid debit card approach is a good idea that I hadn't thought of.
|
08-07-07 05:00pm
|
Reply
187
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Can't say my porn habits have ever taken it that far, but I could see adjusting one's schedule to catch a particularly good cam show. I think if you missed work more than a handful of times you might want to re-evaluate your habits, but of course everyone is different.
|
08-07-07 04:40pm
|
Reply
188
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I use Norton weekly and assume it works. Probably a really stupid thing to do, but who has time to check for viruses? It's not like I work for the CDC or anything. ;)
|
08-07-07 04:34pm
|
Reply
189
|
Michelle Aston
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I wasn't planning to hit SF anytime soon, but might have to check it out. I'll just have to win the raffle about 50 times! ;)
Thanks for the info and the comment!
|
08-01-07 08:31pm
|
Reply
190
|
Michelle Aston
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Hey exotics dude!
Thanks for the comment. I haven't heard of Lucy Lux, so I will definitely have to look her up! I think a lot of the reason that there aren't many short haired girls is because women in porn expect men to like long hair and overall they are right. But when I have been on sites with interaction, the girl is almost always shocked to discover that a guy likes short hair. I most definitely see more girls on the street with short hair than I see on porn websites, so I guess they just present themselves the way that the majority of their fans will like.
Can I come and check out the girls at your office? ;)
-SD
|
08-01-07 08:27pm
|
Reply
191
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
It would totally depemd on the person and the circumstances, but as a general rule I would. As always there could be things that change my view of the otehr person, but many pornstars probably take more precautions than the average person anyway. Put another way, would I refuse to date someone solely because they are an adult performer? No.
|
08-01-07 08:18pm
|
Reply
192
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Poll
I'm very much against limited trials, but understand webmasters trying to protect their comment. One idea I have always had is that you could have the entire site DRM protected fir teh trial side so you can see everything but not download. I have a feeling though that such a process would be difficult if not impossible. What I want to see is how the site is constructed to get a full view of how big it is.
|
08-01-07 08:14pm
|
Reply
193
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I just think it's disgusting since the girl can't be enjoying it very much, but then again I'd hazard a guess that most of them wouldn't like to be fisted either. In the end, it's just not something I find very erotic.
|
08-01-07 08:09pm
|
Review
194
|
Cock Loving Moms
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-You get nearly 150 "episodes" and while some of the performers are older pornstars, there are a good number of amateur types as well
-I'm definitely going to be keeping more than a few of the scenes, which is saying something when you consider I haven't kept much from other sites lately
-You get full access to around three dozen sites on the All Pass Network all for under $10 a month, which is very good in terms of the volume of content you get in return |
| Cons: |
-Video quality is rather poor with even the newest of videos being 352 x 240 which is very substandard compared to other similar sites
-The site doesn't include any pictures except for about half a dozen very small vidcaps that are only there to identify each "mom"
-None of the episodes are dated, so it's impossible to tell how often the site is updated or how long it's been running
-The simple setup and questionable quality is more suggestive of a bonus feed than a standalone site |
| Bottom Line: |
This is first site I've reviewed on the All Pass Network and my hope going in was that the small price for joining ($10) didn't result in a lack of quality. While the site does offer some different "moms" along with the traditional aging pornstars, this site doesn't offer much and is more like a bonus feed than it's own website.
The setup of the site is very simple and not hard to navigate, but if there was ever a site crying out for options of any kind this is the one. Although the vids are downloadable, it's only at one speed and format (MPEG) with no zip options. You do get 4 or 5 vidcaps for your trouble, but they are only there to identify the particular woman in the scene.
One of the only pluses I could identify was that I hadn't seen many of the women before, but I'd hazard a guess that a very low percentage of them are anyone's mother. I had seen sites that changed the names of the featured pornstars, but never one where the girl's real name was still used in the actual video. The entire site feels like it was thrown together from various scenes and exclusivity seems incredibly unlikely, although that's just my opinion and hard to confirm.
In the end, the only reason to join this site is for the network access. At $10 a month, the network rivals other major networks for volume, but in just about every other respect its lagging far behind. The vids are short and there aren't any real pics, so only full network access keeps this one from being a complete dud. |
|
07-30-07 07:52pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
195
|
Nikky Cassidy
(0)
|
|
07-29-07 10:02am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
196
|
Michelle Aston
(0)
|
|
07-27-07 04:55pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
197
|
Regan Reese
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-You get a ton of pictures including boy/girl and girl/girl sets that are able to be downloaded at two different resolutions, some as high as 700x1000
-The site's navigation is simplistic but easy to navigate and provides quick access the content
-Within a few hours of joining I received a reply to a message I sent her, so interaction appears to be possible through the site
-The site clearly needs some growth, but according to Regan there will be a major overhaul within the next month or two |
| Cons: |
-The members "website" is really just a gallery lister that organizes the picture sets and videos into categories, leaving other features like her journal and biographical info accessible only through the free side of the site
-You only get 6 videos in all that run at an average speed of 700kbps in WMV format
-There isn't a set update schedule and there are only 3 posts in the news section, although the site has been active for over 6 months
-None of the site's content seems to be exclusive |
| Bottom Line: |
Awhile ago I left a comment that sparked some spirited debate on if you should expect interaction on a solo site. I had emailed Regan using the email address on her free side and commented on my disappointment in not receiving a reply. However, afterwards I agreed with some criticism that while interaction is a nice bonus, it's probably not realistic or fair to expect it.
So, recently I decided to give the site a try with an open mind. When I entered the members section for the first time, I was greeted by a list of picture and video galleries that gave me direct access to the content. On one hand it was nice to get right to the meat of the site, but on the other I found that the list was pretty much the entire site! That left many features like a calendar and journal on the free side inaccessible from the members side.
The quality of the pics and vids is decent and average compared to other personal sites, although I'm sure that 75% or more isn't exclusive and at least one set is available on her agent's site free. There are only 6 videos and 15 pic sets, but some include hundreds of shots totalling over 3,000 pics.
Overall I wasn't very impressed, but do give it some leeway since she's relatively new on the scene and through an email was told by her directly that more was coming soon. So, for now my score will represent the site as is, but will be revised if she delivers. If you find her incredibly hot & sexy, give it a try for a month, otherwise definitely pass. |
|
07-26-07 09:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
198
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Great review NYG dude!
You seemed to enjoy the fact that the models are big chested and have small waists, but I'm on the other side there since I only like big chested girls who have average to large waists. One isn't better than the other since it's just a matter of taste. However, since it can be hard to know which sites offer what type, can you recommend a site more towards my preferences? I figure you must have run across some if you like this niche and I'm definitely looking for naturals, not ones with implants.
Regardless, excellent review! Thanks!
-SD
|
07-26-07 04:23pm
|
Reply
199
|
Action Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Reply
Hey Boobs Dude!
That's a valid point, but I think it's the same quality for the full subscription since TBP reviewers said something similar. It's a real shame since the concept is pretty original.
-SD
|
07-25-07 01:49pm
|
Review
200
|
Action Girls
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The site offers a unique niche that you won't find anywhere else, not even close
-Although the site started with a "post-apocalyptic" theme, the creators have branched out into new ones including a fitness fetish and a series set in the old west
-The production values are extremely high for a porn site, with lots of action, realistic props and sets, and a really smooth feel to all of the content
-While many sites might eventually rotate out some series or videos, it's all still included |
| Cons: |
-The quality of the videos on the site is downright awful and picture quality is only average at best
-Navigating the site is like touring a disaster area with different sorting methods but no real order to the site overall
-The site mostly exists as a teaser for the DVDs that they make, which is the only way to get the content at high quality
-The price is far too much for what you get in return and you are paying for the high cost of production which has risen numerous times over the years. |
| Bottom Line: |
Before diving into my review, I must admit that I signed up for the trial membership without any intention of joining for a full month. For me, there isn't any porn site that's worth over $25 a month and that's including multi-site networks. What I found in the site didn't change my mind on the price, but I felt it was only fair to admit I went into the trial already holding a bias.
The navigation for the site is downright awful, although it does allow you to sort the content according to the plot, date, or girl you want to find. Despite this, I found it very confusing and basically thrown together each time new content is added. When looking for content including Veronika Vanoza, for example, a couple of her videos were noted but it directs you to other girls' pages where she isn't the feature star.
Just about all of the content produced for the site is still there and you can view it chronologically so you can catch up. However, all of it plays at very low quality (less than 300kbps in most cases) and although the picture quality is average, both seem very substandard for this type of site.
In my opinion, the high price is due to the high cost associated with the prodcution of Action Girls, which would be perfectly fine if you got to see it in HD. However, what you end up with is a test drive of the lowest level ride in the place along with a hefty bill for your trouble. Join the trial for a look if the niche interests you in the least, but for me that's the end. |
|
07-24-07 07:20pm
Replies (4)
|
