Sometimes there is a "gateway" ad that you have to pass through to enter the main member's area.
Today, I find a "gateway" ad for other sites, that is so large it covers the entire web page.
I can't find a hot link to leave the "gateway" ad page, to enter the member's area, where all the content (videos and photo sets) is.
Makes me wonder why I signed up for this site/network.
Edit: My apologies.
There is a tiny box that says something like "Enter the member's area."
I hit the box/link, and am passed through to the member's area.
Make sure you search the entire page, to get inside.
This is a full-fledged glamour site.
So they offer all the trimmings.
A zip file for the photo sets in low, medium and high definition.
A recent set:
low is 1.8 Megapixels
medium 10 Megapixels
high 36 Megapixels
They also offer the streaming for videos in
360p, 720p, 1080p.
The videos have a choice for download of:
360p, 540p, HD (which I assume is 720p), full HD (which I assume is 1080p).
Sorry, I am not going to download each file definition, because I'm not feeling well, and don't have the energy to verify the file sizes on my PC, at the moment.
But Tony Murano was a MetArt contributor for many years at MetArt, and if you have a MetArt membership, you can find many examples of his work (mainly photo sets).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A very low membership price:
$15/month - rebills
$30/6 months - one time purchase
$50/year - rebills
$65/year - one time purchase
-Content is exclusive.
-Up to 4k and 80mpx photos and videos.
-Can choose your own login details: username and password.
-Secure join page.
-CCBill is the default biller. A trusted biller: easy to use, to cancel membership, to get details on the CCBill website about your membership status, etc.
-Tony Murano is the main photographer. He used to contribute to MetArt. He has an eye for beautiful models, and I personally think he is a great photographer, that showcases the beauty of his models.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Not only do they offer a low membership price, but they also don't try to trick you with a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page, a rarity for porn sites.
-No ads. This is amazing. The first porn site I've seen that doesn't put ads on its pages. Makes the pages almost seem naked without any ads for other porn sites.
Cons:
-There is a notice at TBP that TBP no longer does business with this site. No reason given (as per PU/TBP guidelines for this type of situation).
So I joined this site through a link from Rabbit's Reviews (a sister site for PU/TBP).
My hope is that PU/Rabbit sites will get some credit for my join.
-Poor public preview pages.
You get a model list of the models, with small thumbnails of their sets.
-The significance of the posting date: this is the date the set/video was posted to the site.
But the set/video might have been photographed years earlier.
So when the age of the model is listed, that might refer to her age when the set was photographed,
and probably not when the set was posted to the site.
I've found some sets that were shot years ago, but have a recent posting date.
-Basic navigation: even though this is a fairly small site compared to mega-sites, the navigation is basic and could be improved. No search engine on the site. No search by tags or other criteria.
Bottom Line:
The site features the work of Tony Murano. He was a long-time contributor to MetArt.
The site is basically softcore, but it does have a harder edge than MetArt: the models are allowed to masturbate, have toys, and sometimes have girl-on-girl scenes that go beyond MetArt's very softcore content.
The photography is excellent.
The girls are mainly gorgeous.
Bottom line:
This is not a mega-site. It's mainly the work of a single photographer, Tony Murano. I enjoy his style: Clear photographs of beautiful models.
The style is slightly more hardcore than MetArt, but still considered softcore: there are sets/scenes of a girl masturbating, masturbating with a toy, slightly more explicit lesbian sets than MetArt allows. But the site would probably be considered softcore glamour: the distinction between softcore glamour and midcore glamour seems blurry to me.
Anyway, the main attraction is the low price: $50 yearly (with rebills).
Many of the models are lovely to gorgeous (I'm not sure what the difference is between lovely and gorgeous: many of the models are fucking attractive).
This is not a mega-site like MetArt or Femjoy or even MPL Studios. But the site has been around for years, and it has more than enough content to spend months going through all the beauties at this site.
Years ago, I was burned by a softcore site that had a low yearly price, from another photographer who contributed to MetArt. I joined that site for a year, and during my membership, there was not a single update. And that site had maintenance problems. That site went out of business, thank God, because even though it was not a sham, it seemed like a rip-off to me, because there were zero updates, and many times I could not log in to the site even though I had a paid, active membership
Getting back to the My Naked Dolls review:
The site has an irregular update rate.
New photo sets might be posted anywhere from 2 days to 12 days apart.
New videos might be posted once or twice a month, but some months have no new video.
The photosets and videos are professionally shot: clear, well-focused sets and videos of attractive young women: mostly late teens to early twenties. Slender white Eastern European models (Russia and surrounding areas).
The main attraction is the price: for $50 per year, it's a worthwhile join for viewing these lovely girls.
You need to know who your primary billing agent is.
You also need to know at least some of the details/records for when you joined: username, password, sometimes the credit card used (or however you paid), sometimes the membership number.
When I joined the site, it was Epoch.
If you joined through Epoch, you are probably in luck.
They are easy to deal with, reliable.
Go to the Epoch site: https://www.epoch.com/
That is a secure site (https):
Enter 2 pieces of your membership:
member id
email
username
card number
(You should have gotten a confirming email when you joined.)
Or, you should have written down these details when you joined.
I try to keep a record of these details when I join a site.
Once you enter 2 of the membership details at the Epoch site, it will bring up your membership.
Cancelling is then easy.
Hope this helps.
Note: if the Epoch web site is not working, call them on the phone. They are very responsive and willing to help.
Excellent review.
Especially helpful is the recent update rate, that warns against the slowdown in new sets for the site.
But glad that MetArt support is so helpful.
What confuses me is that MetArt support states they do not own the site.
But I guess that's a legal structure, since the site is included in the MetArt network.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-First month is $14.95 with PU discount. Recurs at $29.95 for future months.
-Join page is secure.
-Login page is secure.
-Member pages are secure.
-Can choose your own login details: username and password.
-Daily scene and photo set updates to the network.
-Access to the Devils Film network of around 28 sites included with membership. I call it the Devils Film network, since that is the site I use the most. But it's also called Fame Digital network, which is part of Gamma Entertainment.
-The same login details work to enter each site in the network.
-But once you are inside the member's area of any site, you can switch to another site in the network without re-entering your login details.
-Files download with the video title, model name, file definition, file type.
-Unlimited downloads.
Cons:
-FAMEHELP.COM is the billing agent. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are reliable, easy to use.
But I've been a member of this network several times, and never had a billing problem.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The last network update they did in 2017 provided a brighter, fresher look.
At the same time, it made navigating the sites and network harder and more time-consuming.
Instead of a simple drop-down menu to switch between sites, you now have a clunkier version of a drop-down menu that makes you search for some of the sites you have access to, because those sites are hidden on a second level of q drop-down menu.
Also, searching the content of each site is more difficult after the network update.
-The search is site-specific: you do a search on a model's name, it only returns her content at the site you are currently logged in to, instead of the whole network. This makes finding the network content of a model difficult and time-consuming.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: girls who squirt when they reach orgasm.
Squirting is a niche that is not well served.
There is a squirting site at Teen Mega World (Squirting Virgin), that hasn't updated in almost 7 years.
And there is this squirting site at Fame Digital (Squirtalicious), whose last update was 08/25/2017,
and this site had an irregular update schedule before then: posting 3 or 4 videos in a single month, then going for months without an update, then posting a few videos in a month, then another dry spell for months.
The videos are unusual: they put a back story in the video, to make the scene more meaningful and intense, the videos are professionally shot: good focus, good lighting, good sound control.
Some of the plots are amazing.
The last video, posted 08/25/2017, is about a woman who squirted so much the first time, that her husband freaked out, and fell through a glass door; the husband then required 250 stiches to sew him back up.
The wife feels remorse: the sex was so great, so intense, that she started gushing all over her husband, which led to the accident, and now the wife feels like a mutant in the X-Men series.
A male friend tells the wife this is amazing, and she has to harness the power of the squirt.
(Maybe they could make a comic book and movie adaptation from the video.)
The wife is full of grief, that she almost killed her husband because of her powerful squirting.
(I know this is amazing, but no less amazing than the comic books-movies that are being made.)
The male friend says her squirting should be a joyful moment, that she should embrace this powerful gift;
the male friend says he had a girlfriend that was a powerful squirter: the first time the ex-girlfriend squirted during sex, her fluids ran out until they covered the entire second floor of their dormitory.
(You see why this scene could be part of the X-Men series: the power of a woman-squirter, combined with the power of the Me-Too Movement, could boost the X-Men series into the heights of Black Panther and Avengers: Infinity War.)
Not only does this scene have a powerful woman, exploring her sexuality, but it also has sex, which the Marvel Comic movies lack: maybe you get a kiss or two, but those movies are basically sex-less heroes who have not yet discovered the joys of raw sex.
The site offers multiple choices in video definition downloads:
160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
The same video definitions are offered for streaming.
160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
The videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good focus, good sound control.
The videos are clear and crisp: even the 540p definition looks good on a 14" laptop monitor.
The site will appeal to fans of squirting and peeing.
Squirting, because this is what the videos are classified as.
Peeing, because the distinction between squirting and peeing is blurred: some people consider squirting as separate from peeing, other people think squirting is a form of peeing.
The site is a worthwhile addition to the Devils Film network.
But what gives it even more value is the access to the entire Devils Film network of about 28 sites, covering a variety of hardcore niches.
Giving the site (and network) a score of 85. The 85 is more for network access, than a reflection of the site-only value.
If you email customer support at MetArt or SexArt, they should give you a refund on your SexArt membership fee.
Just tell them that you unchecked the pre-checked offer to join SexArt, but was charged for the site anyway, by mistake.
MetArt customer service is first rate, and you should get a response to your email very soon.
And the customer service is helpful, and willing to reverse any charges that were made by mistake.
Customer service makes it easy to get your money back, if there was a mistake.
Post a note on this comment, to let us know how things turn out.
(I'm not associated with MetArt staff, except I do have active memberships with some of their sites.)
Excellent review.
Good overview, good site details.
Also good to see you writing new reviews.
It's been a while since your last one.
And you picked a site with a positive score, which is slightly better than a site to avoid, although both types of reviews are helpful.
Completely bald is rare.
Very short hair is less rare, depending on how short.
Buzz cut hair actually has several styles, and can look good on a teen.
If the teen is cute to begin with.
Some boob jobs are done so well you can't tell if the boobs are real or fake: even in a video, which is the best way to see if the boobs move naturally when the model is in motion.
But other boob jobs are so obviously fake, that is a real turn-off for me.
However, it depends on the viewer's preferences: some people don't care if the boobs are real or not, or maybe even prefer fake boobs.
Hugh Hefner seemed to prefer fake boobs, as far as I can tell.
And Barbi Benton, one of his early long-time girlfriends, had a boob job that was great: though I can't recall any nude videos of her: almost all her stuff was photos, back in the day (1960s and 1970s).
This was before the internet.
From the photos, you could not tell Barbi had a boob job.
Cute face, lovely body, bubbly personality, she was definitely a favorite of mine.
The people running the software are not aware of the price discrepancies.
And this one particular site has been allowed to run down:
You can no longer stream many of the videos.
A lot of the thumbnails for the videos (showing what the model looks like) have disappeared.
A lot of the photo sets for the videos have disappeared.
Many years ago, when they started this site, it was a separate join from the Teen Mega World network: You did not automatically gain access to all the sites in the network, which sites you got access to depended on which particular site you joined.
And the actual number of sites, and specific sites in your membership, was unknown.
Since then, they have improved the network immensely, making it easier to use, improving the quality of the videos and photo sets.
But the most recent network update was a step back.
They made navigation harder and more time consuming, to access the content at the different sites, to search the content at the different sites.
I still like the network, but not as much as I used to.
And they raised the yearly membership fee: I've bought year-long memberships several times.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Note: this is not a PRO, but it's definitely worth noting: If you join ExGfBox directly, you are charged $29.95/month recurring. But if you join through Teen Mega World, you are charged $14.95 (with a PU discount).
-ExGfBox is included in the Teen Mega World (TMW) network.
Membership in any one of the Teen Mega World sites gives you access to all the sites in the network.
There are no premium sites that you have to pay extra for.
-Can somewhat switch between different sites in the network without having to re-enter your login details. The switching process is sloppy--see details in the con section.
-Can use download managers.
-Unlimited downloads.
-TMW has over 30 sites in the network.
-Daily updates to the TMW network.
Cons:
-Do not join this site directly. Instead, join TMW or one of the other TMW sites for a cheaper price of $14.95/month instead of $29.95/month.
-The last site/network software update they did made using the site and network more difficult and time-consuming.
Now a search for a model is site-specific. That means you are only returned the hits at one site, instead of the entire network. So you need to know which sites the model appears at, to find her content, instead of doing a simple search for the model which would formerly show all the sites she appears at, with links to her content.
-Because of the recent structure update, when you switch between sites, the switch is incomplete. You do not enter the next site completely, but are still logged in to your membership-join site, which makes searching and using the next site content more difficult.
-Archive site. Has not updated since November 1, 2011.
CONS CONTINUE IN THE NEXT SECTION:
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-Many videos do not have a thumbnail, so you don't know what the model looks like until you watch her video.
-Many videos can not be streamed online. Have to download the video to play it.
-Many of the videos do not have an accompanying photo set.
-The quality of the videos is poor: they were shot when the site and network was making low-grade sex videos: the settings were cheap, the costumes were cheap (low-cost street clothes, etc.), the visuals were poor (poor lighting, girls were put into a cheap room and told to fuck, without dressing them up to look attractive, no makeup, no special costumes, just a low-grade fuck session).
-The default biller is FXBilling. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are reliable, easy to use billers.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Many of the network sites do not update. Or update very infrequently. But the network as a whole updates daily.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
The ExGfBox site is one of the poorest sites in the TMW network.
And if you join the site directly, you will pay a higher membership price than joining TMW directly, or by joining most of the other sites in TMW.
The reasons ExGfBox site is poor:
-It's an archive site, has not been updated since November 1, 2011.
-The videos are poor quality: low quality sets, cheap costumes, poor lighting, low definition.
-The site, in addition to poor navigation issues, has been allowed to degrade over time: many thumbnails of the model listing are missing, you can't stream many of the videos but have to download them instead, many of the photosets appear to have disappeared.
-Overall, the network would present a better overall experience if they just deleted the site.
(In spite of the fact that I personally like to have access to all the models that appeared at the network, the quality of this site is so poor, it just drags down the quality of the network.)
TMW is one of my favorite Teen Hardcore networks.
Over the years, they have put time and money into improving the quality of the network, and it really shows, if you compare today's network to the network of years ago.
The network is mainly far easier to use.
(Except the most recent update to the structure made navigation harder, harder to find the content of different models, harder to search the content of each site, and you no longer fully enter the different sites, but are still logged into the site you joined through, with only partial entry to the other sites--which makes navigation and searching the other sites more difficult.
The main strengths of the network:
-Good looking, mostly young European models.
They have over 1,800 models.
-Daily updates.
-They introduced UHD (Ultra High Definition) videos years ago. Even have a site dedicated to UHD videos.
-They introduced VR videos years ago. Even have a VR site.
-Over the years, they have spent time and money improving the quality of their videos: higher definition videos, better lighting, more professional camera-work, better sets, better costumes, more attention paid to making the models more attractive (most of the models are young teens who are naturally attractive, but sets, costumes, makeup, etc. all help in the presentation).
Higher quality photo sets. Many photo sets are worth collecting, because of the attractiveness of the models and the upgraded quality of the photos.
-The recent network update was a step back: the changes make accessing the content harder and more time-consuming.
-They raised the membership price recently. So it's more expensive. But based on access to over 30 sites, it's still a worthwhile join.
TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks.
Along with Diesel Access network.
Lovely teen models.
High quality videos and photos.
Some scenes can be really hot.
It doesn't get much better than that.
The ExGfBox site is poor.
And only deserves a score of 70 or less.
(Which is earned by access to the TMW network, which is worth far more than the ExGfBox site.)
Femjoy, along with many other porn sites, often have holiday special discounts.
So I would assume you can find a discounted rate during one of the holiday discounts.
But I think it's a stupid movie on Femjoy's part. Because as you mentioned, MetArt, Hegre, MPL Studios are strong competitors, and any one of them would be a better join because of the price difference.
(I'm a lifetime member of some of the MetArt sites--because it was just cheaper to pay a lifetime fee, instead of joining again and again.)
The non-secure login and site pages is a common problem across the entire network.
However, this is a common problem with many porn sites.
There is a small chance your login details (username and password) could be hacked.
And your ISP will keep a record of your visits to the porn sites, because the pages are non secure. So the US government can access a record of your visits to those porn sites.
The poor connection speeds have been reported by several PU members.
But other PU members do not have those problems.
It seems to be hit or miss.
If you do join the site/network, I recommend getting a refund on your membership fee if you experience poor connection speeds.
At least one member stated he asked for, and received a refund on his membership fee.
As I wrote, some PU members love the network.
Others hate it, mainly because of the poor connection speeds, which makes viewing or downloading the content difficult.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount $17.87/month (recurring).
-Part of the Team Skeet network. Membership in the site gives you access to the basic Team Skeet network of over 20 sites.
(There are a number of premium sites that each have a separate membership price--but they are outside of the basic Team Skeet network.)
-Can choose your own username and password.
-Team Skeet has put a lot of effort into giving the user options of viewing the content in different ways.
You can stream or download the videos in low, medium or high definition.
Each photo set has a zip file. But only one definition for download.
You can slide show the photo sets online, in a simple, easy to use software.
(However, some members have reported such bad connection speeds to the site/network, that they can't load pages, stream the videos, download the videos, etc.)
Cons:
-Non-secure login (login details could be hacked).
-Non-secure member pages. You ISP will keep a record of your page visits.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Be sure to look for it, because it's almost hidden in tiny print near the payment processor.
-Segpay is the default payment processor. I prefer CCBill and Epoch, because they are easy to use and reliable.
-To enter the site, have to pass through an ad page offering site memberships.
-Although there are a number of attractive models at the site and network, not much effort is put into making the models attractive. If you see a model at most of the team skeet sites, and compare her appearance at the diesel access network, the model will look better at the diesel access network.
And if you compare her appearance at blacked, tushy, vixen or x-art, the model will appear even more attractive still, because these sites focus on making the model as attractive as possible.
(CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION):
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
Those sites use makeup, costumes, and settings, to showcase the model's appearance in a glamour oriented style.
Whereas the team skeet style is much more bread and butter, plain sex without a lot of dressing up.
-Several PU members have reported site and network connection problems: horrible connection speeds, site pages will not load, problems downloading videos or photo sets.
I personally have experienced very few problems with the site/network. If I had had problems, I would not have remained a member for over 12 months.
If you join this site/network, and experience connection problems, I suggest asking for a refund.
-Ads on every page.
-Teen Black site grows slowly. In Jan 2016 site had 58 videos.
It's now April 2018, site has 87 videos.
However, the network adds one video daily, so the other sites make up for the lack of growth at this sites.
Site theme: young black teen girls having sex.
This is an underserved niche.
Most interracial sites feature a black man having sex with a white chick.
This site has attractive black teen girls.
Bottom line:
If you experience poor connection speeds and can't view the content or download the content, as some PU members report, then the site/network is best avoided.
This seems to be a problem that some members experience, and other members do not report a bad connection speed.
Beyond this problem, the site structure is designed to give members an excellent way to view online or download the content: videos and photo sets.
You can download the entire video, with no download limits or DRM issues.
Each photo set had a zip file.
The network covers a lot of different niches, with over 20 different sites.
As long as you like hardcore teen porn, there should be some content that will appeal to you.
But at competing hardcore teen sites, the same girls would appear to be more attractive. So the impact or value of the Team Skeet videos and photos might be far less.
I'm giving the site a score of 75. My personal experience with the site and network was good.
But I'me lowering the score because of complaints from other PU members about the network.
I like Teen Mega World and Diesel Access network as better networks for teen hardcore.
That's my personal opinion.
Some PU members really enjoy the Team Skeet network.
Others, really hate it (mainly because of the poor connection speeds they experience, but also the profusion of ads and other issues).
The same for me.
If I look at the non-member preview page for updates, there are no updates shown.
Poor web preview design.
Previously, they had a non-member update page, that was misleading:
They mixed thumbnails of videos from the 3 different sites together, but did not make it clear they were showing updates from all 3 sites.
Some PU members complained that was misleading, because they were expecting to find the videos when they joined one of the sites, and found out some of the videos were posted at one of the other sites, that they did not have access to (without paying for another membership).
My guess is that, in spite of running porn sites for many years, some of the staff still don't know what they are doing.
So they make simple mistakes.
That hurts the appeal and value of the sites.
But all 3 sites in the Diesel Access network do update daily.
(They recently added a 4th site to the network, but that requires a separate membership: UltraFilms.)
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Selection of models is among the best of any porn site. Mainly slender, white teens from Russia or Eastern Europe.
-If you join either Wow Girls or Wow Porn, the membership includes both sites.
-You have to pay extra for the All Fine Girls site. The All Fine Girls site is included free if you stay a member for X number of months.
I sent an email to support, and was told that because of my joining on a special rate, I would have to wait 12 months before I was upgraded to diamond status (to get All Fine Girls included).
Or you can pay a small fee. I got diamond status for a one-time payment of $19.95, which gave me access to All Fine Girls.
(Years ago, it cost around $70 to upgrade to diamond status. Which was a ridiculously expensive upgrade.)
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-You can stream or download the videos. In multiple resolutions (low, medium, high).
-You can stream the entire video, or selected clips from the video.
-All videos have a matching photo set.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-The photo sets can be downloaded in multiple resolutions (low, medium, high).
-You can view the photo set online, with a fast, easy to use software viewer that will slideshow the entire set.
-Logging in to the site is secure (https).
-The member pages are secure (https).
CONS (START OF):
-The cons are mainly minor. This is one of the better teen hardcore porn sites available.
-Cross-sales on the join page.
-Vendo is the default billing processor. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are easy to use and reliable.
But I've used Vendo many times, and never had a problem with them.
-If you don't have diamond status (diamond status means you have access to the 3 sites in Diesel Access (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), you get bombarded with advertisements to upgrade to diamond status on every page. Along with advertisements for other sites. The advertisements are not as bad as some other sites, which can take up a large portion of every page, but the ads are annoying.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-Years ago, each site had a blog (the same blog) where members could post questions and answers about the site. They dropped that blog years ago. So now, if you have questions, you have to email support.
-There's no FAQ that I could find. Years ago, they said they would post a FAQ to answer questions about membership prices and other issues. They never followed through.
-They used to have a free live cam show with some of their models. Then they said they would update the cam show shortly. They never did: instead, they just dropped the free cam show.
-Membership price is relatively high. Also, you need to check to see what the current prices are, and the types of membership offered.
For a while, they were offering memberships that were streaming only (no downloads), or streaming plus downloads at a higher price.
Currently, they only show memberships with streaming plus downloads.
Current prices are: $24.90/month for streaming and downloads.
$89.95 for 6 months for streaming and downloads.
-If they make a "news" announcement, post the date of the announcement, or update the announcement. For example, they posted they would update their free live cam shows, and never did.
Instead, they dropped the free live cam shows entirely.
They posted they would create a FAQ page to explain membership rules and prices and other issues.
Years go by, and I still can't find a FAQ page.
(But you can send an email to support, and should get an answer to any questions.)
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
In spite the relatively high price of membership, this is one of my favorite hardcore teen sites.
The selection of models is first-rate: pretty to lovely teen models, as good as it gets.
The videos and photo sets are first rate: the videos are crisp, good colors, good focus, good sound control, just good everything.
The teens are young and seem to enjoy the sex. No harsh treatment of the girls. Not really a heartcore site, more a lets-fuck-and enjoy-ourselves site. And the girls are so fucking attractive.
I believe most of the content is exclusive to the Diesel Access network.
However: most of the Tricky Masseur videos (from Teen Mega World) are also found at Diesel Access.
Most of the Tricky Masseur videos are also found at Team Skeet.
When I say videos, I mean the videos and the accompanying photo sets.
Bottom Line:
I've said this is one of my favorite teen hardcore sites/network. Along with Teen Mega World.
The reasons: the selection of attractive teen models (500+).
The good quality videos and photo sets.
The chemistry of the models: solo, lesbian, boy-girl, boy-girl-girl, some boy-girl-boy. A lot of these videos are hot. The girls are attractive, and seem to get off on the sex.
There is a large amount of content at all 3 sites.
So even though membership is expensive, because there's no PU disount, if you enjoy teen hardcore porn (with non-violent, non-harsh sex), then this site/network is worth joining.
Navigation could be made simpler. It takes more clicks than needed to navigate to the videos or photo sets you want to view.
I'm giving the site (and network) a score of 92.
It's not perfect. But the site (and network) is one of my favorites.
I answered "Yes".
But instead of calling (with phone), I've used emails and live chat, because they are easier for me to use.
Live chat is better, if available, because of faster response time.
A lot of times, emails to support are either ignored or lost in the ether.
I much prefer live chat, if that is available.
But a few sites (like the MetArt network), are fast to respond, and also helpful, with email.
40 years ago, or more, I went to a few strip clubs. But even then I didn't have much money to spend on them.
But I'm guessing, and I've said it in a few comments at PU, that chat rooms can be just as expensive as strip clubs.
More private, of course.
But one reason I don't like strip clubs, is I don't drink a lot of alcohol.
For one thing, it's expensive.
For another, it often gives me a headache.
For another, my alcohol tolerance is low: I take one drink, and I start to feel sleepy. Not high, just tired and want to lay down.
If alcohol made me happy, I would drink more.
But I can buy a six-pack of beer and have it last for months.
But if you can find some chat rooms that give you pleasure, and have the extra cash, then more power to you.
Smell the rose buds while you can.
Grab whatever pleasures you can find in this life.
(Hopefully, while not hurting others.)
I never wanted to deal with the expense or time to get a disposable credit card.
I also never wanted to join German Goo Girls.
That site would require massive fascination and quality for me to join, after I've read so many horror stories about the cancel process.
Some sites are better off avoided.
For shady billing practices, poor quality content (or content that does not appeal to me), site structural problems (connection speeds, navigation issues that make the site difficult to use).
But some people go where others fear to tread (in the star trek tradition of heroes and adventurers).
I hereby nominate Rear-Admiral as leader of the PU Fleet.
Are you willing to accept this honor and responsibility?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
