| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Digital Playground
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
"When was the last time anyone saw a Stoya movie?"
A week or two ago. UnSEXpected. It just got released.
|
08-26-12 10:12am
|
Comment
177
|
Perfect Fucking Strangers
(0)
|
|
08-16-12 02:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
178
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mike11w's Comment
If there's one thing I've learned from joining sites for the past 3 or 4 years, it's that you should probably give them more than a day to fix things, because some sites just don't work that fast.
|
08-04-12 10:26pm
|
Reply
179
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
US born and raised. I struggle along in Spanish, though.
|
08-04-12 01:01am
|
Reply
180
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
This. I'm just not someone who holds a person's job (or their past) against them when it comes to love.
|
08-02-12 05:07pm
|
Reply
181
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The lack of camera angles is a definite negative, but it can be pretty good if done well. And it's the one genre of porn that I think will get better as technology advances over the next couple years (with interactive devices and workable 3D).
|
08-01-12 05:24pm
|
Reply
182
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
To me, C4S is basically the beauty of the internet coming to online porn. You can find nearly anything you want, and if you can't find it, you can probably ask someone else to make it. The problem, of course, is that it comes with "custom video" pricing, which is really, really expensive.
Basically, I love the idea of it, but the execution just isn't for me.
|
08-01-12 05:23pm
|
Reply
183
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I don't really hate it, but it does take a little something away from the scene.
|
07-29-12 09:33am
|
Reply
184
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I generally check out the TBP listing because I know their criteria better than I know the criteria of any particular user, so I have a better baseline to judge from.
And as far as the exclusive thing, it's easy for any of us to judge because we've all seen each site we've joined ourselves. But TBP has four different people reviewing sites, and can go years between review the same sites over again, so if a site advertises itself as exclusive, and that specific reviewer hasn't reviewed any of the sites that share the content, how would they know that it isn't exclusive?
|
07-28-12 08:20am
|
Reply
185
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Moleman2040's Comment
I know good and well that I went above 12 GB in a period of about 6 hours and never got cut off, so this is just really weird. I'm not sure I've ever seen a site impose a download limit on some members but not on others.
|
07-27-12 06:41pm
|
Reply
186
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I've used Freeones to check out girls, but only for their pictures. I find the 2-5 minute videos are generally too short for me to get a full idea of how I like them as performers. And Videobox could work for checking out studios, but I've never had a Videobox subscription.
|
07-26-12 09:58am
|
Reply
187
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I still watch Haley Paige scenes to this day, and I didn't really start following porn stars specifically until after she died. It doesn't effect me, really, just like it doesn't effect me watching Casablanca even though nearly everyone in it (if not everyone) is dead by now.
|
07-25-12 04:19pm
|
Reply
188
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
She's done a little work for other sites, but not very much. For example, she shot a Brazzers scene a couple years ago, and I know that there are a few other vids for other companies out there.
|
07-22-12 10:41am
|
Reply
189
|
N/A
|
Reply of
HeatherMcXxx's Reply
Well, it is the fabric of our lives.
|
07-22-12 08:49am
|
Reply
190
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Boy shorts for the win.
|
07-21-12 04:36pm
|
Reply
191
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Done it once or twice for quick previews of scenes, but it's not a common or regular thing.
|
07-20-12 04:10pm
|
Reply
192
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Gasperdian's Review
As far as your problem with male talent, the guys you listed, for the most part, aren't the latest and newest male talent. Anthony Rosano and Marco Banderas, for instance, has been around for longer than all of the guys that you listed that are "overused".
|
07-19-12 03:37pm
|
Reply
193
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
They stopped doing their own live shows almost 2 years ago and now they're done by some cam-modeling company. As to their old shows, many, but not all, of them are archived, and they can be either streamed or downloaded.
|
07-18-12 03:26am
|
Reply
194
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
I keep meaning to join this site, but never actually doing it, mostly because I know I'll probably be partially paralyzed by the choices and either not download anything for a few days or downloading so much that I need a brand new hard drive. But I think now is the time, especially so that I can see what the difference between the old and new versions of the site and see for myself if the new version is that bad.
|
07-15-12 10:49am
|
Reply
195
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This review seems pretty much in line with how I feel about this site from the previews I've seen. I believe that the person that runs this site also runs another site where the girls are the masseuses and the guy is the client, but it's on an entirely separate membership from this one.
|
07-13-12 07:33pm
|
Reply
196
|
Reality Junkies
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
This was a site that was on my list of future sites to join, but I'm seriously going to have to rethink that now. Thanks for the heads up.
|
07-13-12 05:49pm
|
Reply
197
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I like photos and videos of naked women almost no matter what they're doing. Whether it's yoga, having sex, or playing chess.
|
07-13-12 05:48pm
|
Reply
198
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely interested in the concept, but not in the current implementation. Head-tracking 3D POV porn videos? I'd sign up for that right now.
|
07-11-12 07:47pm
|
Comment
199
|
The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
|
|
06-29-12 08:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
200
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
The quality part I can understand. You can't magically make content shot in 2004 HD when no one was shooting in HD at the time. And most of the stuff that old is probably just ripped from the DVD. I'd just like to see it there. But as I stated in the review, I looked again this week and they were uploading a movie they released in like 2001, so it looks like they might be starting to go a little further back.
|
06-14-12 09:46pm
|
