| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
I'd give it about a month or so before it shows up. Looking at their DVD schedule, they only have about 3 or 4 other movies to upload before that one, and two of them are already on the schedule for the next 2 weeks (Let Me Swallow and Massive Anal Booty 2). After that all they have left is Best New Starlets 2013 and possibly Anal Workout 2.
|
01-27-13 11:36am
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
bibo's Poll
If the Kink.com sites count as fetish sites, then yes.
|
01-25-13 09:12pm
|
Comment
78
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
|
01-25-13 05:36pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Kink is probably the most dissimilar site/network that I join on a semi-consistent basic, and even then I only do that once a year. For the most part, I stick to mainstream boy/girl videos, and there's still a ton of sites in that area that I haven't joined yet that I want to.
|
01-21-13 01:00am
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Generally speaking, no it isn't. It can become something akin to cheating if you (and they) let it (basically a long-distance relationship), but the generaly act of interacting with a cam model isn't cheating.
|
01-20-13 09:17pm
|
Reply
81
|
Sunny Lane Live
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
It stopped updating last year because she stopped performing last year. Not an excuse, just an explanation.
|
01-18-13 09:45pm
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Face first, T&A second. But I only need one of the two to be desirable.
|
01-17-13 08:52am
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No. Sometimes I'll delete and redownload a smaller version if I determine it's not worth the space, but I never straight out refuse to download the file.
|
01-15-13 07:03pm
|
Reply
84
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I hadn't really thought about it like that, and you're probably right in wondering that.
|
01-13-13 06:13pm
|
Reply
85
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
As far as I know, the whole reason that Hardcore Gang Bang exists is because they're not going to be shooting any more updates for Bound Gangbangs (as in, future releases will be the scenes that they'd already had shot when they made the switch). So while both sites are up, they aren't really separate, which is why they include it.
|
01-13-13 01:31pm
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
Mine tended to be older women on TV and in movies, though not that much older than me (generally about 18-20 when I was 12-14). Most of my teachers growing up weren't that young, and the few that were weren't really my type.
|
01-11-13 11:12pm
|
Reply
87
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
marvin's Reply
I'll third(?) the applause of the removal of the pre-checked cross-sale. I understand why sites do it, and I'm not at the point where I don't subscribe to a site because of it, but I still think it's a shady practice. I don't mind upsells and cross-sells in general, you just have to give me (the user) the initial choice in whether or not I want to do it. I'll say right now that most of the time I'll say no, but sometimes, sometimes I won't.
|
01-10-13 09:22pm
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
Nope. I think people of a reasonable mind should be able to, but I don't have any plans to.
|
01-09-13 06:43am
|
Comment
89
|
Tonight's Girlfriend
(0)
|
|
01-07-13 10:10pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
4. Two versions of Firefox (one for general browsing, the other for development), Chrome, and IE.
|
12-30-12 09:14am
|
Reply
91
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Reply
Yup. No one has said how long the contract is supposed to last, but I believe it's been in effect for about the past 3-4 months. She still has scenes she shot for other companies that haven't been released yet, though, so you'll probably still see some of her in other places for the next few months.
|
12-29-12 12:27am
|
Reply
92
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Review
Good review. To add a little bit of info, Holly Michaels is signed an exclusive contract with them a few months ago, which is why she appears so much on the site.
|
12-28-12 07:52pm
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Tons. I have a decent amount of free time and a large amount of channels, so I can usually find something to watch.
|
12-28-12 07:47am
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
You're all a bunch of Scrooges.
|
12-25-12 06:32pm
|
Reply
95
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
It might have something to do with when you signed up, because over the past month they've had a $5.00 special (right now, but just started), a $7.95 special(over the US Thanksgiving holiday weekend), and a $9.99 special(last week). So it could be that the PU discount wasn't working and they gave you their special price instead (as opposed to purely regional pricing).
|
12-22-12 12:11pm
|
Reply
96
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
For many people here, I can see how it would feel like a large percentage. But the more I look around at other sites, the more I don't think it's seems like that much to a majority of the market. And, like you said, compared to most American porn sites that aren't specifically trying to focus on young and/or natural girls, it really isn't. They all seem to live somewhere between 30/70 and 70/30, as far as the fake to natural ratio goes, and the bigger the site, the more likely it is to fall on the 70/30 side of that spectrum. And if you stick to just the young sites on this network (for example, just My Sister's Hot Friend/Naughty Bookworms/Fast Times), you end up with a ratio around 85/15 natural to fake, and about 2-3 scenes a week (120 so far this year over 50 weeks). And for the most part, even if you completely ignored the updates with implants and pretended they didn't exist, you'd still have a site that posts somewhere between 4-8 updates every week.
I can definitely understand someone like messmer's issue, where he's specifically looking for older natural women and the majority of the most popular American mature models have implants, so he's not gonna be able to find much that he likes. But, like I was kind of trying to say, to say something along the lines of it being difficult to find natural models at all almost goes beyond hyperbole into saying something that is flat out incorrect.
Also, as an aside, why did you bring up the large breasted natural women? I don't understand it in the context of this discussion.
|
12-21-12 10:01pm
|
Reply
97
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I apologize for going a little overboard. It's just a pet peeve of mine when people say things that can be proven incorrect with a little bit of research (and not just here, anywhere). When I first read your post, because you included Faye Reagan, I assumed that the post was talking about all women, and not just the older ones. Because the older ones skew fake, and the younger ones skew natural, if you look at the whole site, it does end up being about 50/50. And that's not an assumption, you can see it using their tagging system (click the porn finder link at the top of the page, and on the right hand side is a list of all the tags they use and the numbers across all the sites).
|
12-20-12 09:33pm
|
Reply
98
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
It looks like it re-bills at a price higher than the normal subscription price, though, so if someone's going to do this, they're gonna want to make sure they cancel after before the next billing cycle.
|
12-20-12 02:55pm
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The slightly more of having days off is negated by the slightly less of having more people around, so about the same.
|
12-20-12 01:21pm
|
Reply
100
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I said this to someone else, and I'll say it again: Half. They're basically half-natural and half-fake as a whole.
I realize that may not be enough for your tastes, but to act like natural breasts are a rare occurrence just isn't correct.
Edit: unless you're talking about ONLY mature models, and even then it's rare but not impossible to find.
|
12-20-12 01:04pm
|
