Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Best Hard Hunks
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
Well, technically, since you aren't paying, they're not giving you bad customer service for your money.
But I do agree about there being a large amount of websites out there that need better previews.
|
12-17-12 05:10pm
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No, because I don't need a physical DVD to be able to watch things on my TV, and I'd rather have portable hard drives as backups.
|
12-16-12 02:58am
|
Reply
103
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Money rules everything. If enough people are still joining from the affected countries, then it doesn't matter if a few people are complaining.
|
12-15-12 10:36am
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
That depends entirely on how old you are and the type of people you associate with. A 22 year old living in a college/university town is much more likely to run into a teen than they are a MILF.
That being said, I feel like this poll, more than almost any other that isn't explicitly asking how old everyone is, shows that that the members tend to be on the older side (not that that's a bad thing at all). While I'm not young enough that the girls playing teenagers in porn (who, while some are 18-19, are usually around 20-23) would be my contemporaries, I'm nowhere near old enough that it would be unlikely that a woman that old would want to sleep with me. For me, it's about watching attractive women, no matter what age they are or what age I am.
|
12-14-12 09:15pm
|
Reply
105
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
The name is Lesbian Girl on Girl, not 1 on 1. It's a fairly bad name, if I'm being honest, but the content looks okay.
|
12-13-12 07:43pm
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never have, never will.
|
12-10-12 08:51am
|
Reply
107
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
Working alright for me, though it takes a minute to get used to it.
|
12-08-12 11:34am
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
alexbrawn's Poll
3 days of streaming but no downloads (for video sites). That sounds about right.
|
12-08-12 01:33am
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I would argue that having it password encrypted makes it hidden, as you'd have to know the password to see it.
|
12-06-12 12:28pm
|
Comment
110
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
|
12-04-12 06:49pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
111
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
Belthazar's Reply
You know, that's not a bad idea at all.
|
12-04-12 06:44pm
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
There's definitely some very good porn coming out of Europe, but I don't think anywhere beats the variety of women I can find in American porn.
|
12-02-12 12:08am
|
Reply
113
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I want to say it's a combination of quality of content, amount of content, and frequency of content. And the truth is that I haven't yet found more than 1 site that makes me want to stay a member for more than one month. The sites that have come closest, though, only missed on the frequency part.
|
11-30-12 08:08am
|
Reply
114
|
My Sister's Hot Friend
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I've been a member for about 4 years now (it's my only standing membership to any site), so I've come to know a lot about it. I'm probably a bigger fan of them than anyone that posts here. And I know they have their flaws (and quite a few of them), but I tend to want to correct people when they post things that are flat out not correct.
And if you look, while 1800 are tagged as natural, only 1781 are tagged as fake, so there's obviously a bunch of scenes that aren't tagged as either one. And going by the tags, like I said, it's about 50/50.
|
11-29-12 05:15pm
|
Reply
115
|
My Sister's Hot Friend
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
This isn't necessarily in regards to you, but something that bugs me about quite a few people on this site:
You say that "most of the girls have boob jobs". That's not true. It might be true for Naughty America as a whole (I'd argue that for the whole network it's fairly close to 50/50, but I can see how people would construe that as "most" since it's close to the majority). But for this site in particular, the balance shifts much more towards natural than it does fake. Of the last 20 updates, only 4 featured fake breasts. Of the last 100, only 22. That's not most at all.
|
11-28-12 08:32pm
|
Reply
116
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
As far as I know (and I know a couple people that have paid for videos), they are trustworthy with your info.
As for the prices, this is what videos cost if you want something specific that isn't necessarily "mainstream".
|
11-28-12 06:52pm
|
Reply
117
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
As for reasons for segmented downloads even today:
Some people might only want to watch a certain part of the scene (i.e. just the blowjob, or just the popshot, or just one sex position), and if that's all you want to see you can save bandwidth by just downloading one part of the scene.
|
11-25-12 10:36pm
|
Comment
118
|
Tonight's Girlfriend
(0)
|
|
11-22-12 06:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
119
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I joined this site a few months ago for a month (and even wrote a review on it).
As far as comparing the two sites, I think that Reality Kings has more variety (both ethnically with their Round and Brown site, and in the fact that they shoot in Europe, Florida, and California so they have a wider variety of women). But I generally preferred the navigation at Naughty America (I know some people have trouble with it, but if you know that many of the pages are controlled by JavaScript and that the back button will take you to the last page you loaded, and not the last page in the list you were thumbing through, then I find it really easy to get around), and I don't really like the pseudo-reality setups that many of RKs sites use. So I would say that I prefer Naughty America, but not by that much.
|
11-21-12 06:01pm
|
Reply
120
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
That would explain why I never hit it the day I downloaded about 20GB. It'd be interesting to see what the actual limit is (70GB per week? 50GB every 5 days?), but not interesting enough to make me pay for a membership to find out.
|
11-19-12 04:50pm
|
Reply
121
|
Diary Of A MILF
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
If I remember the incident you're talking about correctly, they didn't delete your comment. It may not have been showing up for an hour or two, but it's still there to this day.
|
11-17-12 09:24pm
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
By anywhere, do you just mean here, or anywhere on the internet?
For me, the answer is yes in both cases, as long as I feel I can trust the people that are running the site (usually because I've come in contact with them online before).
|
11-10-12 12:22am
|
Reply
123
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for the advice.
|
11-09-12 05:51pm
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
People steal cough syrup and many other drugs even though they're perfectly legal and everywhere. Whether of not a drug is illegal, legal, or decriminalized has nothing to do with whether or not someone will or won't steal it (and you bringing up cigarettes is a perfect example of that). People will steal anything if they think it's something they want/need and they can't afford it. If anything, this will probably increase the reporting of thefts, since now that it's legal people will actually tell the cops when it gets stolen, but not the amount of actual thefts that occur.
|
11-09-12 05:46pm
|
Reply
125
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Because people don't drive while high already?
And there's a reason the official crime is "driving under the influence" or "driving while intoxicated" instead of "drunk driving". Whether weed is legal or not, it's just as much of a crime to drive high as it is to drive drunk.
|
11-09-12 02:54pm
|