| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm not worried as to whether or not it'll be a positive experience since I've never been a member here before. So without a doubt, there will be enough content there to keep me entertained for at least a month, but probably 2 or 3. That, and I tend not to care as much about things like breast size (or implants), age, or the type of scene it is (anal, vaginal, DP, etc). I just want to see a woman I find attractive having orgasms, which makes me pretty easy to please. I don't even mind lower quality (640x480 or so) if it's from a scene old enough that I know that there isn't any better quality of it out there/possible. I'm much more worried about the multiple comments about crappy navigation than I am about not liking the content. Because what good is having good content if it takes me forever to find it?
|
11-08-12 06:35pm
|
Comment
127
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
11-08-12 06:01pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
128
|
N/A
|
Reply of
bestimmt's Reply
Then your issue is with the director, not the act. It is possible to film a DP without making it a constant close-up of the penetration.
|
11-06-12 01:12am
|
Reply
129
|
My First Sex Teacher
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
Yes, they are.
|
11-06-12 01:11am
|
Reply
130
|
Emily Addison.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I would think so. They already technically have 2 solo girl subsites (Nicole Graves and Anette Dawn), with the Annette one looking like it's not updating at all anymore. So I would think they would/could just open up a site for her like those two.
|
11-05-12 03:34pm
|
Reply
131
|
Emily Addison.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
I do know that Emily signed some sort of exclusive contract with Twistys in June of this year. So there's a chance that that exclusive contract prevented her from updating this site, even though it bears her name specifically. Or that she abandoned this site because part of her contract is to have her own official site under the Manwin/Twistys brand.
Twistys-Names-Trio-of-Exclusive-Contract-Stars-480515.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">
Twistys-Names-Trio-of-Exclusive-Contract-Stars-480515.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://business.avn.com/articles/technol...ct-Stars-480515.html
|
11-05-12 02:40pm
|
Reply
132
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Once I actually called them, cancelling took no more than 2-3 minutes (I just gave some info, they quickly offered me a discounted rate which I turned down, and it was done), but the fact that I couldn't complete it with their web form or online chat was slightly troubling. And this wasn't just a one-time thing, either, as I tried both the form and the chat on two separate days and it didn't work either time.
|
11-05-12 02:33pm
|
Reply
133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Word does a good job with basic spelling and grammar typos, but I always find at least a couple times where I type in a word that may be grammatically correct, but was not the word I meant to say in that place at all. Which is why even with that I have to read my reviews three or four times, and at least once a day or two after I originally wrote it.
|
11-05-12 10:16am
|
Reply
134
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I doubt there's much of a benefit to being headquartered in Southern California, but when it comes to them as a corporation, I don't really see much of a benefit to them being headquartered in Europe, either. This site seems like the people that run the site from a business perspective are completely removed from the people that run the site from a content perspective, so I don't think having the headquarters closer to where they get their talent from would make any difference.
|
11-05-12 10:14am
|
Reply
135
|
N/A
|
Reply of
oldfizzywig's Reply
Well, 3 votes and it's still 100%.
Seriously, I actually read my review at least 3-4 times before I submit it (and I usually type it in a word processor before I put it here), but I still always find typos that I need to correct. Which is why I've asked for a preview button, because somehow reading it on the page always lets me find one or two of them that I've missed.
|
11-04-12 01:47am
|
Reply
136
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
All the major American ones at the very least, with a passing interest in soccer as well.
|
10-29-12 01:38am
|
Reply
137
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
To me, as far as sites are concerned, they usually either do it to all their models (see sites like Facial Abuse and the like) or none of them. So the girls that shoot for these sites, generally speaking, know what they're getting into as far as that is concerned, and by shooting for them (and going through with the shoot), they're implicitly complying with it. And, like Toadsmith said, some girls actually like it as part of the roleplay and it can enhance the experience.
As far as my opinion when I see/hear it, it doesn't subtract from the scene unless it's clear that the model doesn't enjoy it. But it can add to the scene unless she's getting off on it. So I guess I'm neutral about it.
|
10-27-12 01:19pm
|
Reply
138
|
Sara Swirls
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Let me just say that I totally appreciate all the effort you guys (and girls) seem to have gone through in this instance just to make sure your data is correct and non-conflicting.
|
10-27-12 01:14pm
|
Reply
139
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
No need to be particularly rude. Carry out the date, state I'm not interested at the end, and that's the end of that. No need to end the date at that exact moment.
|
10-25-12 12:15am
|
Reply
140
|
Naughty Bookworms
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I'd start with the shows featuring Allie Haze and Monique Alexander, as they seemed to be pretty receptive to our efforts. It's gonna take me a while to remember any specific ones to recommend.
|
10-24-12 11:25am
|
Reply
141
|
Naughty Bookworms
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I loved those shows, and I was one of the reasons they deviated from the "formula". Me and a few other people would basically make it our job to engage the models and have them do anything other than sexual things (until near the end of the show, so people could get their payoffs). When it worked well, it was some of the most fun I've had on the internet.
|
10-21-12 05:13pm
|
Reply
142
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just once this year. It was fun for what it was, but kinda expensive.
|
10-21-12 08:41am
|
Reply
143
|
Naughty Bookworms
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
You're right, they stopped doing their specific ones a while ago.
|
10-20-12 09:36am
|
Reply
144
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
The 'F' stands for Flash downloads (flv file format, which is just mp4 inside a different wrapper). The HD symbol is for straight mp4 downloads.
As for the download manager, I don't use one, so I can't help you there. I do know that their links time out after about 10 minutes or so, so you can't really queue downloads in a download manager.
|
10-20-12 08:03am
|
Reply
145
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
If that's what it is, then not only am I all for it, then I volunteer to do it.
|
10-19-12 08:11pm
|
Reply
146
|
Naughty America Mobile
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
That sucks. That's one thing I'm gonna have to remember when people ask me about switching from Android to Apple, so thanks for telling me.
|
10-19-12 05:36pm
|
Reply
147
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm still trying to parse the word PUerviews. I think it is the views of a persons that browses PU. Is that it?
|
10-19-12 01:40am
|
Reply
148
|
Naughty America Mobile
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Technically, the site isn't stream-only, even though all the downloads say "stream". It's just that because it's a phone, when you click the mp4 link it automatically tries to stream it instead of downloading it. If you long-press the link from your regular browser, you should be given the opportunity to download it. At least that works on Android.
|
10-18-12 10:49pm
|
Reply
149
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I completely understand preferring girls without implants. I disagree, but my opinion is no more or less valid than yours, so I don't have any issue with your preference. It was just the phrasing of "I hope they are in trouble", like you wanted them to go under because you don't like their content, as opposed to being ambivalent about it because it's a site that you normally wouldn't join, that got me a little upset. Especially since I know some of the people that work there from having been a member so long, and you would have been effectively wishing they were out of a job.
|
10-16-12 03:46pm
|
Reply
150
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
You hope they're in trouble? Really? You hope a web site goes out of business because of your personal preference? That just seems cruel.
Edit: And there are thousands of scenes on the site of girls with natural breasts (at least 1700 by the easiest way to find them), and couple hundred scenes on the site of MILFs with natural breasts. I can't see how it wouldn't be worth $5 just to check out those couple hundred scenes.
|
10-15-12 10:54pm
|
