| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm somewhere between I don't mind them and a few are okay. The truth is that I don't mind them because I turn my ad-blocker on for every porn site that I visit, so I almost never see them anymore. But even if I did, a few aren't too bad, as long as they're on the sides/bottom of the screen and they don't make any noise.
|
05-10-12 12:16am
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Every so often, someone makes a post that screams to me "Get off my lawn, you whippersnappers", so I'll check the age then.
|
05-02-12 11:13pm
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I just joined Elegant Angel about a week ago.
|
04-28-12 09:12am
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Never, because I've honestly never seen a porn scene where I legitimately questioned whether the girl is 18 or not. Maybe that's just because I only watch porn from higher-end companies, though.
|
04-26-12 09:22pm
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Bring back the old. For the people who's opinions have changed since they last posted in the thread, you can easily take the time to quote your post and state why your opinion has changed, if you'd like.
|
04-24-12 06:08pm
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Fast and helpful, but that's because I always make sure I know who I actually need to contact before I ever join, and I press the issue when I need to.
|
04-20-12 12:52pm
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
At least 3-4 a week, partially because I actually go looking for them.
|
04-15-12 01:08am
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Don't own one. Never fired one. Maybe touched one once, I don't remember.
|
04-12-12 12:11am
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Let's see:
While men don't get pregnant, nowadays if they end up fathering multiple children with different women, they end up with tons of child support payments, which isn't a small thing at all. So it's not like men can do whomever they want without any consequence. Not to mention that little thing called birth control, which makes it so that women can have all the sex that they want with very little chance of getting pregnant (which, while around in your formative years, has gotten much better since). And men are just as likely to catch an STD from having sex with an infected partner as women are.
And, really? Romance novels prove that women want to be loved? First of all, I'm going to completely ignore the fact that you just suggested that men don't want to loved, they just want to have sex with anything they find attractive. And present the counterpoint of "Sex in the City" and media of that ilk, which is basically centered around the fact that while, yes, women do want to be loved (just like everyone does), they don't consider themselves a slave to it, and are willing to go around having fun until that man shows up. As someone who watches a decent amount of porn, you should know that what you fantasize about and what you actually do in real life usually aren't the same thing.
|
04-11-12 11:08am
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
There is an inherent problem with a swinging life style when it comes to how the genders view sex in general. Guys can have sex without an emotional attachment but women tend to require a certain level of attachment. Incorporating swinging into the couples sex life can be a big problem in the long run because the woman can fall in love with one of her sex partner. Of course a guy could fall in love with one of his partner as well but I think the term love might be more like greta sex with said partner.
That is such a complete and total antiquated assumption based on a gender stereotype. Women are just as capable as men nowadays of having sex without the need to have a relationship. Hell, women have always been just as capable mentally, it's just that society tended to instill in them that love was required before sex. But society and cultural values have changed, and women aren't getting that idea drilled into their heads much anymore, so they go out and have hookups and one night stands whenever they want, just like men do.
|
04-10-12 05:08pm
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Works best: Bedroom.
Looks best: Outdoors.
|
04-06-12 07:09pm
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just read the news and you'll see the answer is clearly yes.
|
03-27-12 12:32am
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never seen the need. I don't rip an entire site at once, as I like to actually watch all the videos that I download, so I almost never do more than 2-3 at a time.
|
03-23-12 02:04am
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Price. Easily. I'd join a site with 12 updates if they were good updates and it was priced correctly.
|
03-19-12 10:49pm
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I think the tech details are getting better, of course, but unlike most here I will say that the quality is about the same. Mainly because I think the vast majority of people are just being too nostalgic about "the old times". They act like there wasn't any bad porn back then, that only the porn they remember and loved existed and that there wasn't nearly as much crap as there actually was. Or, to use an example mentioned here, like breast implants haven't existed since the 80s and been pretty prevalent since the mid-to-late 90s. There's good now, there was good then. There's crap now, there was crap then. And I really don't think the ratio has changed very much. If anything, it's just that you might have to look a little bit harder to find the quality in the crap.
|
02-26-12 10:02am
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I've never even subscribed to any of the sites listed above, so my answer is definitely other. I've been a member of Brazzers, and it has always just felt too corporate for me, with no, well, heart/passion. Meaning that everything is designed specifically to appeal to the masses, which is only fine if you like what the masses like (which I only occasionally do). To call them the McDonalds of porn would be a pretty apt description.
If I had to choose, I would say either Naughty America or Kink, with NA getting the edge because of how friendly their staff was to me when I first joined.
|
02-15-12 07:16pm
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Can I say that I'm pickier, smarter, and more lenient? I'm super-choosy about what sites I join, but I'm also very willing to forgive some things done wrong if other things are done right.
|
02-03-12 03:20am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
In place of normal content? No. In addition to normal content? Yes.
|
01-17-12 03:04pm
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd looked at it once or twice a few years ago, but completely forgot about it.
|
01-15-12 11:24am
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I used to, but it takes about a year and I just had to replace my card about 6 months ago.
|
01-13-12 03:23pm
|
Reply
96
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
To echo what's been said alot already, a negative experience with a webmaster makes me a lot less likely to join a site, while a positive one, while good, is what's to be expected and isn't going to have anywhere near as much of an effect on me rejoining as, say, the actual content.
|
01-10-12 10:41pm
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As long as I know there's content I want on the site, yes. Only for a month, but yes.
|
12-23-11 03:23pm
|
Reply
98
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
VLC all day, every day, sometimes twice a day.
|
12-21-11 02:15pm
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No more than watching porn should be.
|
12-18-11 02:02am
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I agree with this. Along as it is otherwise good content, it's fine, and it can be fun to watch during the holidays.
|
12-10-11 01:06am
|
