Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : dracken (0)  

Feedback:   All (678)  |   Reviews (143)  |   Comments (107)  |   Replies (428)

Other:   Replies Received (318)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 251-275 of 690 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
251
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Perfectly agree with Messmer. I never give a site 100 and try to never give a site the lowest score either, I also try to wait a week or two before rating a site so my opinion is a bit more objective and not influenced by how excited I was to enter a new network. I think snap decisions (positive or not) motivate a ton of reviews and you end up with skewed opinions (not only on PU but on other sites that allow reviews as well)

11-01-10  09:00pm

Reply
252
Visit Old Young Lesbian Love

Old Young Lesbian Love
(0)
Reply of messmer's Reply

Thanks for the quick reply. I keep meaning to re-join this network, it sounds better and better each time I read about it :)

Also thanks for the additions, I think this makes my decision for this network a lot easier.


11-01-10  08:57pm

Reply
253
Visit Torbe Network

Torbe Network
(0)
Reply of ace of aces's Comment

Well this discussion went down in flames. I just wanted to say that I had no problem signing up and canceling. Just be careful what you select in the options and contact epoch for billing issues.

11-01-10  08:56pm

Reply
254
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I my personal life I don't enjoy seeing the wife swallow...by that point I'm done and don't care anymore. In porn scenes I enjoy seeing the girls face for some reason, but only the girl I have no interest in guys swallowing anything...then again I prefer my male models silent and invisible...

11-01-10  07:45pm

Review
255
Visit Torbe Network

Torbe Network
(0)

80.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - A fairly large network which offers 34 sites (although several only have around 20-40 videos). Overall you should get 800 scenes, most of them available in various formats (including a PSP and Ipod format which I took full advantage off)

- Most scenes are decent quality (as usual older ones are lower quality and as you get newer stuff it goes up to around 1280x720)

- Some sites have zipped photos, some don't. The ones that did have images were decent quality at 1200x 800.

- The big draw of the site are the amateur models which are mostly Spanish. A lot of them are very cute and they seem to really have fun. Almost all the network has a light-hearted feel and the girls giggle and seem relaxed. Also there is very little of the classic porn modeling where the girl looks turned-on but everyone can tell she's not.

- Downloads worked flawlessly and streaming was perfect.

- I had no trouble signing up or canceling, despite what everyone else on here mentioned.
Cons: - More scenes would have been nice, especially in the bukkake site.

- Several sites in the network are dedicated to only one model, which is fine as long as you like that model. It can be a hit or miss.

- Sometimes you get too much of the male models, their interaction with the girls is funny, but when the guys wear masks or make funny faces...it can get distracting.

- Some download managers have problems with this site( I recommend the firefox download them all extension. It has yet to fail me)
Bottom Line: Overall this network was a pleasant surprise, but I am very interested in teen and amateur porn. As such I tend to easily forgive a site is they make silly mistakes or if the male models are too in your face, hell I'll even accept a somewhat funky guy introducing almost all videos as long as I get a feeling of "this is unscripted, real sex with girls that are having fun." Which is what this site is all about.

Like I said you have very little of that glamour, airbrushed, playboy feel to the models, they don't open their mouths slightly, looking "sexy." they laugh and gag on too much semen and run to the bathroom and genuinely look cute and nervous. This feel made the site unique for me, now many people will find this boring or annoying and you have to be sure you like the models before joining.

Another point you should be aware off is that there are only a few anal scenes and overall the girls are treated very politely, there is no abuse or humiliation even in a mild form. Of course this is a double edged sword and as a person who liked a little rough sex I was a bit disappointed...but you can't always have your cake and eat it too.

For me the highlights of the network were TORBE COUPLES and the Freak Bukkake site as well as the dream teens. In all three the focus really seems to be on the girls and there are a ton of cute models who do hardcore (again, so anal or deep-throating, but we do get oral and regular sex in various positions)

The conclusion? I personally will keep an eye on this network and I hope they will continue uploading (they now have a nifty preview section so you know what's coming), but I am also a person that enjoyed Pierre Woodman tremendously and one of my top sites is Nubiles.com, because of the interview videos they have with the girls.

Either way, you should check out their tour page, because I find it's very descriptive of what you get inside (even if the view more buttons for each site doesn't work, at least you'll get a feel for the network)

11-01-10  07:40pm

Replies (1)
Reply
256
Visit Old Young Lesbian Love

Old Young Lesbian Love
(0)
Reply of messmer's Review

Very nice review, mature women are not really my cup of tea, but what caught my eyes was your comment that most scenes have a feeling of next door neighbor. I am constantly searching for scenes that feel amateurish...which kinda brings me to a question I have, how are the scenes set up? do we get a quick interview or a story line or is it just BAM two girls having sex... Also from the tour I see there is a lot of strap-on action, is that the norm, any anal?

Thanks,


11-01-10  07:04pm

Reply
257
Visit Pink Visual Pass

Pink Visual Pass
(0)
Reply of Shasta90418's Comment

Thanks for the heads up. I joined this site on and off for various periods of time and I always thought it was going to get better, each time realizing that videobox is a much better deal.

I can only recommend you write a review and share your feelings in more detail.


10-25-10  07:44pm

Review
258
Visit Freak Bukkake

Freak Bukkake
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - About 18 videos, although new stuff is supposedly updated monthly (they seem to have an on/off calendar whit some years only having a handful of scenes.

- The scenes are in Spanish with subtitles, there is a brief intro/ interview and a massive bukkake.

- One huge bonus is that almost all of the girls are laughing and seem to be enjoying the experience without the classic porn moans or the fake "look I'm sexy" look. As far as I can tell this trend is true for most of the network, making this a nice place to visit if you're tired of the classic Playboy looking models.

- Some very cute girls, and they talk through the performance joking with the guys and the camera man, a very distinct "feel" from other bukkake or oral sex sites (basically this site is the exact opposite of facial abuse or teencoreclub, the girl seems into it or at least she's making the best out of the situation and everyone is having a good time with no humiliation present)
Cons: - For some reason streaming was a bit problematic for me and as noted before download managers didn't work well. I used Download them all the add-on for firefox and that seemed to work fine.

- Some of the scenes are focused too much on the guys in my opinion, I remember one video where the camera dude goes interviewing the men, which would be fine and all but some of them were really funky looking and some wear masks (which kinda killed it for me...a man in a pig mask should never be present at a bukkake)

- I have the same complaints as mbaya, the photos are pretty much useless, and the updates are way too few. The site has great potential and although there is no penetration the scenes are fun to watch and interesting.
Bottom Line: For some reason this site felt like the porn website that Kevin Smith would do... maybe it was the fact that a bunch of the videos are introduced by the chubby camera man/ director; maybe it was the fact that I saw a dude in a star wars mask and another in spiderman get-up...maybe the humor and good-natured feel of the scenes just reminded me too much of Jay and Silent Bob. Overall the whole site just felt "right" the perfect combination of disgusting, hot and weird to make me extremely interested, while never crossing into abuse or humiliation.

It was a very different site and I am glad I stumbled unto it, after seeing all sorts of abuse and disgusting cum shots I was certain oral sex in porn wasn't my thing. I usually skip the cum as much as possible, especially since the girl looks uncomfortable waiting for that load, trying to be sexy and not look at the camera too much, however this site proved that you can do good semen related porn.

I guess I would have enjoyed more scenes, easier navigation (there are adds for reviews and friendly sites crowding my main page) but overall the network felt decent if you like amateurs and a non-standard kind of porn. Considering the discounted price this was simply a deal too good to pass up (again as long as you like amateur girls that talk during the scene, giggle and sometimes look ridiculous)

P.S. The reason the site doesn't get an 80 is because of the few scenes 20 porn videos are really not enough for a modern site, although the network makes up for that I still wanted to see more freak-ish bukkake action :)

10-25-10  07:37pm

Replies (0)
Reply
259
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

This is precisely why I am married to a girl that is hornier than I am :)

my only concern in life is to last as long and as often as she wants to.


10-25-10  07:01pm

Reply
260
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

I think messmer hit it straight on, I love my wife, but sometimes it's hard not to imagine some other girl. If I didn't have this fantasy I wouldn't have over 500gb of hand-selected porn :)

10-25-10  06:33pm

Reply
261
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Hmm... I can usually see the preview page myself, unless you tell me something I wouldn't have noticed (the site is a rip of a different site or something like that) a comment is unnecessary, IMO.

10-25-10  06:25pm

Reply
262
Visit Zero Tolerance On Demand

Zero Tolerance On Demand
(0)
Reply of dextro's Review

Thanks for the review. I think what might make this an even better feedback would be if you talked a bit about what makes the site unique, what the majority of videos are like. From the tour page I can tell this is pretty hardcore and mainstream, but are there interviews with the girls, POV shots, anal scenes etc... I think having a little bit of "this is what the site is in a nutshell" helps reviews and helps people looking for new sites to visit.

That said, thanks for your contribution and I hope to read more of your stuff soon :)


10-25-10  06:23pm

Review
263
Visit Deep In Cream

Deep In Cream
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 98 videos and 44 photo sets (the videos are available as WMV and the more recent ones are also available as MPEG, most videos are available as 720x480, although the MPEG is a little smaller) each video has screencaps which are rather fuzzy and not worth it IMO

- Those 44 photo sets are separate photos available at 1600x1200 in zip files. They are very good clarity and you get about 100 or so per set.

- About 30 anal scenes, 3 ass to mouth, 7 DP... and I can tell because of the nice filter system which allows you to see each scene by category. Also each video tells you what model is in it and you can find her anywhere on the network or on DVD's (which you need to buy)

- Pretty energetic action and the creampies don't look fake. You don't get any story or interview just a chick who gets fucked, but it's pretty satisfying.

- A few cute girls and the network is a great bonus, I could find several cute girls on other sites.

- Steaming, download, canceling membership,
Cons: - Like I said most scenes can be a bit too standard, most girls look like average porn stars and in my opinion the best content is in other places on the network.

- The site loads another page in the background when you log in. It's just a porn review page, but it was a bit annoying. No trojans or viruses yet.

- Some videos didn't stream for me, but not sure if that was my issue or the site.
Bottom Line: Overall the site is decent, however I don't know if it's the best cumshot or creampie site out there or even close, in fact most of the scenes are kinda average, the girls look okay, but they could have better make-up or more interesting clothes or something...I just felt like other parts of the network were more interesting. After about 5 minutes of looking at girls on this site I found myself navigating away to first sex video or the hardcore site.

That being said if you like hardcore and cumshots you should probably check out this network, they have a surprising amount of anal and deep throat and most of their girls look very amateur, although there are a few professional beauties like Kara Mynor or Haley Paige.

Oh, before I leave two minor issues with the site are that after you have 3 videos downloading it slows down to a crawl and each video saves under the same name so you have to go back and re-name stuff. On the other hand the streaming works flawlessly.

Also the tour page is pretty reflective of what the network has to offer. A solid set of sites, with decent navigation, clear update schedule and solid tech side, although the content itself could be a bit better.

10-19-10  07:02pm

Replies (1)
Comment
264
Visit First Sex Video

First Sex Video
(0)

Updated to my review

I recently re-joined this network and I'd like to give a few quick updates as to what has changed. Not enough to warrant a second review, and many of my previous points about this particular site still stand. If you don't enjoy the Woodman style of video where most of the scene is spent talking, often in a foreign language, then this site is not for you (the rest of the network maybe but not this site)

-The number of videos has gone up to 271 and most of the new ones are available in a decent quality (most are 720x480)

-Some of the scene are also available on Woodman's site Woodmancastingx, but this site has more of the scenes with an interview and then a scene from a hardcore movie in one.

-Most videos still look like they were made in the 70's (the colors have a funky tint to them)

-Navigation still sucks except this time they also link you to videos that need an account upgrade to download...

So overall not much changed, but there is more of the good old stuff, cute girls (check out Jennifer Stone she is smoking hot) and anal hardcore scenes. A lot of talking and navigation issues still keep the site down, but overall it's still decent for fans of casting scenes

10-18-10  10:21pm

Replies (0)
Review
265
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Right now the site offers a deal where you can get 3 weeks for free, (in order to cancel you have to call them, but it was all pretty easy)

- A ton of playboy extras including montages from the photo-shots, extra pictures and access to old pictorials (Betty Paige, Marlyn and so on)

- The images are anywhere between 531px × 800px to 1600 x 1200 px. In other words you get decent quality.

- The videos are anywhere from blurry cut into pieces 2 minute segments to beautiful HD more recent shots. Most of the scene can be seen as quick time or WMV and are anywhere between 320p to 720p resolution and then quicktime HD, which I didn't figure out how to download.

- You get access to videos from casting calls, amateurs, coeds, classic pictorials, playmates, some 2 girl shots, a decent forum, interviews, a how-they made the covers and a few extra bells and whistles.

- The girls look really good, which is to be expected and if you like the magazine you're almost guaranteed to like this
Cons: - Inconsistency. The whole site is extremely confusing at times. Each girl (even in the same category) has different types of content, most of the older ones only have photos, others have a short interview, others have just a video. Some you can download, many you can't. Sometimes when you click on a gallery you're taken to a little editorial before you get to the good stuff, other times you don't.

- The search function is a bit funky and navigation can get confusing.

- A lot of the content cannot be downloaded.

- Not as many interviews with the girls as I expected, most of the videos are of the girls posing for the photos, only some playmates get an interview.

- Often the site re-directs you to buy a DVD or an older magazine, a bit disappointing as I expected full access to the contents.

- Most videos feel like something you'd see on TV, not like a porn video. You get music and cut-aways which are not always necessary
Bottom Line: First of all this is a Playboy product, don't expect any type of hardcore (or even softcore touching or masturbation) going into this site. Hell even in the fre photos they have with two two girls the models barely touch, it's all very artsy and classy.

This comes with a bonus and a downside. On one hand most of the girls are absolutely gorgeous much better looking that most sites, on the other hand they all seem to have that Playboy look (no small titties, almost always shaved and very skinny, etc.)

What was also interesting was that many of the videos felt like a reality show, more than a porn video...I am still not sure if I like this or not. For now I left it under cons because when you have a 3-5 minute video, which a lot of these are, I'd rather see more naked girl and less pan around the room or have a nice intro and outro.

Most of the older content is a bit outdated with lower resolutions for both videos and images and no option to download. However the streaming option worked flawlessly and the inbuilt image navigator is perfect, it allows you to set a slide or navigate manually and you can save the photos.

For new content you get a lot more bonus with the most recent playmates having a longer (20 min or so) video which contains an interview as well as a sort of story- strip video... I remember for one girl she follows a rabbit around until she ends up naked then we cut to some interview with her, then back to the nakedness, then some more questions and so on.

For the rest of the girls you usually just get her stripping naked to music, a few giggles some funny faces and it's a wrap.

At the end of it all the site feels like the extras on a DVD, more than the main feature. I mean, don't get me wrong I saved a ton of stuff (since each video is so small they are easy to store and so many of the amateurs and co-eds are adorable) but I don't think I was "really" turned on by any particular video.

Here's how I feel about the site by way of analogy: most of the scenes I felt very comfortable reviewing in the middle of my living-room with friends and wife nearby, if you get my drift...it's like the playboy magazine, I'm not embarrassed of having it on my desk and I'll check out the girls, but I probably won't jack-off to it.

That being said, as a fan of behind the scenes, seeing some of the girls I saw long ago in the magazine actually talking and moving around was very interesting. I appreciate the very high quality of the images and the videos and while they feel to TV for my taste I wish more porn sites would use well chosen songs and work with the models at least half as well as Playboy does.

So, the conclusion? If you are subscribed to the magazine (which is about the same cost like the site) you will probably enjoy the extra content of the site, if the magazine seems like waste of time and money the site will probably do little to change your opinion.

10-16-10  11:47am

Replies (0)
Reply
266
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I love hoe many points of view are displayed here :) nothing like nudity to spark a good debate.

My view is that we are indeed too lenient with corporations who use nudity as a way to exploit us (I'm thinking marketing corporations)and too strict with people who want to be naked in order to enjoy each other in a mature fashion (the whole ban on topless women and the rarity of nude beaches)

I also don't think children are as affected by sexuality as they are by violence, which we have plenty of on TV and every other media.

These are my 2 cents as an ignorant Romanian-American :P


09-12-10  10:40pm

Reply
267
Visit 18X Girls

18X Girls
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Good review, although I disagree about unknown models. Their names change on every site but at least five of those on the preview page have shot for teen core club or teen sex movs. Anyhow, if you're not a crazy fan you wouldn't know this so it doesn't matter...what I wanted to ask was what bonuses does the site offer? I see that they have an ipod on the previews and they advertise chats and stuff like that, do you actually get any of it while inside?

Thanks for your review and help.


09-12-10  10:35pm

Reply
268
Visit Exploited College Girls

Exploited College Girls
(0)
Reply of slutty's Review

Crap, another site with the whole lick the dude's ass niche?! I am getting pretty tired of that fetish and have yet to find someone who finds it hot.

Thanks for giving a heads-up that the content has a lot of that...might have to pass on this one.


09-06-10  10:24pm

Reply
269
Visit Ass Teen Mouth

Ass Teen Mouth
(0)
Reply of d1a2v3e4's Reply

Whenever people talk about the teen core club network the debate about whether the sites are abusive or not comes up. Some people say the sex is rough, but not degrading enough, others say they couldn't watch the videos, becuase the girls were abused to bad.

Personally, after watching almost all the scenes this network put out over the years, I feel like they have always been the site that gets gorgeous girls who have been in porn before (I don't think any one of their models is a first timer and this is an important point to remember, these are girls that should know what they are doing) and do true hardcore with them. For real abuse there are sites like facial abuse or some of the bondage sites...

Then again, each person feels differently about their porn.


09-06-10  10:21pm

Reply
270
Visit Backroom Casting Couch

Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

To be honest not that many girls do it and quite a few are just quick tries where the girl gets "pumped" once or twice and wants to change to something else. Since there is no search function you have to view each scene yourself to figure things out and sometimes the description is misleading (I partially joined becuase I wanted to see Chastity doing anal, she doesn't although the description hints at that)

I'd say there are maybe 10-15 anal scenes? maybe...but they are worth the watching if you like amateur porn. The guy usually films the girl's face as he penetrates her and that is something you don't find very often. You basically get a blend of anal penetration shot and face shot, instead of a focus on the but hole.


09-06-10  10:15pm

Reply
271
Visit Enslaved Gals

Enslaved Gals
(0)
Reply of RustyJ's Review

Nice reviews, thanks for sharing.

I am just curious how much of the content contains anal scenes?
I have been looking for a few good clothed sex scenes and this site seems an interesting bonus.


09-06-10  10:12pm

Reply
272
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(0)
Reply of BadMrFrosty's Review

Thanks for the review. It reflects a lot of my feelings on he site. First anal quest is definitely the flagship site here and double view doesn't even come close to the quality, however in my opinion the first anal quest site does make it a good deal.

09-06-10  10:10pm

Reply
273
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I see how almost everyone agrees that this sucks. Not much debate, really...why does any site need to mess with my browser is beyond me.

09-06-10  10:07pm

Comment
274
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(0)

First Impression

I joined first anal quest a while back and just realized that this site comes as a bonus. I'll probably review it after I watch a few more clips and they update their database a bit more. Right now there are only 30 or so videos and they update about twice a month.

The two camera gimmick is nice and I installed and uninstalled the thing without a problem (no viruses yet :) It's basically a pov and a wide angle shot of the action. Personally I just left it in the wide angle, but it was nice to be able to switch around if I wanted. The whole two angles, means that the videos are larger and for me the streaming was a bit funky (slowed down, sound jumped around nothing too major)

Also don't expect amateur castings like Woodman, these girls have appeared on many other sites and a few of them are even on the FAQ site. There is a very brief interview dubbed in English and then the usual hardcore action, with a lot of anal.

Overall a decent site, but FAQ is definitely the site you should check out first. Together they are a great deal for fans of anal sex (you also get some DVD scenes so triple the fun :)

08-30-10  09:35pm

Replies (1)
Reply
275
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Wow, I spent years watching all sorts of strange porn and never heard of this one. Now I want to see a video...it's off to the good old search engines for me :)

Although a stripper that does it live would be much more interesting...


08-30-10  09:15pm


Shown : 251-275 of 690 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.4 seconds.