| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
Ex GF Box
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
I'm not sure, I understand this right:
But if you join this (almost worthless, as you say) Ex GF Box - you get access to Teen Mega World and all the Royal Cash sites/network.
The same goes if you join Teen Mega World.
And: According to TBP joining this Ex GF Box you pay: $ 29.95.
If you join the network via Teen Mega World via TBP, you get the same deal for only: $ 19.95....
|
04-03-12 06:14am
|
Reply
427
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
66 Beauty ....thanks for that tip/update. Never been a member, but found material a looong time ago - it didn't seem like top q then - it looks better today, according to previews...
|
04-03-12 06:04am
|
Comment
428
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
|
04-01-12 08:32am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
429
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Hate is a strong word. But: I dislike it - much!
Armpits - guess all girls/women remove them.
Legs: About the same....btw: met a beautiful blond years ago - when we got down to business, I realized she got long, dark hairs up and down her legs - quite a special disappointment - never seen that before. So next morning...Good bye....just could not handle that in a possible future girlfriend.
|
03-31-12 07:11am
|
Reply
430
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Solo, no toys...
We've had the discussion about the vast use of toys in too many solo scenes....and I still believe most sites overdo that toy thing.
And why does almost every scene have to have a toy in at least the last 1/3 - and that goes for both sets and vids.
|
03-29-12 03:24am
|
Reply
431
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Mostly - I think - the quality of the preview/tour follows the quality of the site in general.
I've only come over a very few really good sites, that had a bad preview/offered a poor tour.
|
03-26-12 02:44pm
|
Reply
432
|
Orgasms.xxx
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
As close to clones as I've ever seen it....
Could be:
- If you don't get them on the hook here - you may get them on the hook there....customers, that is.
|
03-26-12 02:40pm
|
Reply
433
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Actually I started answer something like this: "Not able to come up with one answer....." - when I realized I suggested the poll myself - terrible memory...
Looking back there of course should have been at least "Other"....Sorry, guys
|
03-20-12 05:03am
|
Reply
434
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Probably less - former favorite sites are getting worse..
|
03-18-12 04:07am
|
Comment
435
|
Footsie Babes
(0)
|
|
03-12-12 03:48am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
436
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
Thanks for this info/update here, Monahan...
And I guess, if they really go for that $45 instead of the now $30 - they can probably count me out - hope they realize there are others in that same league...at the price of the $30 and less...
And than again: What says TBP? - any news of a radical more expensive DDF?????
|
03-11-12 09:12am
|
Reply
437
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
I understand the 93 from CT - in score.
And respect that.
Still: This user got some primary negative inputs about a site which in many ways do it so well - many ways:
1)Top,top,top quality vids/pixsets.
2)Fine selection of models.
3)Generally fine editing.
Still this user got some serious downers on this site after being here several times as a member:
I like, like it a lot: Full body views in vids.
But ITC pays less attention compared to earlier times. The full body scenes are now being downgraded compared to the meaning of the site: In The Crack - ok, but it's not a good development - compared to the past not good: Just look at the older vids of Lola/Dido Angel - her vids at the pool is just great - and the some years older Lexa vids walking around that swell and sunny place in the nude...
So please, give me back that ol' In The Crack deals...
Apart from the above: They still got that damn regional pricing!!!!
|
03-09-12 07:57am
|
Reply
438
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I said: poor quality - but it could be Low bandwidth/low download speed, I guess.
...and btw: also:
Non-exclusive content!
Still and bottom line: I'll go for: Poor Quality
But any of the others is a no-no!
|
03-09-12 07:44am
|
Reply
439
|
Diabolic
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Keep those warnings coming, pat - and agree 100 pct - fine reviews/recommendations are swell - but those serious warnings are even more - much - more important.
|
03-07-12 06:40am
|
Reply
440
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
2 days - fine. 3 days maximum - I'll miss getting new poll more often, if it went up to five days...
|
03-07-12 06:35am
|
Reply
441
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Fine, fine review here, honored rearadmiral...
Found some newer downloads - free ones - from the ol' Penthouse - which, btw - has not been too keen on giving us fine quality vids in the past.
It looks like, it's changed.
The quality and the style seems to have stepped up - and thanks to your review, I'll probably give this ol' site a try - thumbs up!
|
03-06-12 08:21am
|
Reply
442
|
Cara Brett
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Oh, oh....Melissa Debling is a looker, for sure. But your're right - it certainly looks like the same site set up and probably the same WM...
|
03-06-12 03:40am
|
Reply
443
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Did not know about those rumours - but that guy can really ruin my porn/avoid me downloading a scene with a sweet girl/model - and I just hate that.
If he's really such a jerk in general...why do the girls/models still say ok...well, it could be another thread....
|
03-05-12 07:34am
|
Reply
444
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Forgot one:
Don't know his name - and do not care much/want to go Google the name - but this in the US porn world well known over/extremely tattoed former "lover" of Tera Patrick - who went to the cute Little Lupe/Zuleidy..
Those scenes with this disgusting character that would make any Hells Angels, Bandidos, Outlaws ect.-biker blush with envy made me feel sorry for that petite Lupe... but like Willie and Waylon sings:
"Ladies love outlaws"....still: Jeeeeez - this/these scenes almost make my avoid the former great Lupe!
|
03-05-12 07:25am
|
Reply
445
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
When I stumbled across some scenes with faeces, I not only lost appetite for food, but also for porn - the rest of that day..
And I've been disgusted with some normally regular site scenes where the male part goes very brutal in anal porn. Think they're called gape-scenes - where this aversion of mine: the Russian male actor, Timo acts like a jerk...
Not into anal in general - but definitely not the brutal kinds - (and not talking about bondage/BDSM ect.)
|
03-05-12 05:29am
|
Reply
446
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Mostly/sometimes - depend: If it's one of the old, well known Top-sites where we all are aware of the price - a price that's been the same for years....then: normally not.
BUT: When encountering a new site, I definitely compare the content and the price - also in the score.
But bottom line: Capn is right - it's Value For Money...
|
03-02-12 08:37am
|
Reply
447
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Put this poll up for one main reason: The - sometimes - totally confused search for certain models...(we've had threads on this item several times).
And - as we've had some inputs from webmasters earlier - stating that some models insists on choosing their alias/"stagename".
Other webmasters have told me in mails, that it's not the question. Some sites choose the "stagename" in order to get some exclusive names...
And if that's really the case....some sites, some webmasters really keep us in a black hole in our ongoing search!!!!!
|
02-28-12 05:55am
|
Reply
448
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
Surprise, surprise....agree with Droolers input...
AND apart from the fake deals in body surgery - the "fake" deals in production, editing, stupid remarks ect. is taking over - generally to the worse...
A few - too few - sites are avoiding that negative development in porn.
|
02-26-12 08:15am
|
Reply
449
|
Creampie Thais
(0)
|
Reply of
Doctor Blues's Comment
You may want to take a looks at this little ol' link:
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=45906
|
02-24-12 12:25am
|
Reply
450
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
Maybe it's a question of the entire setup at this site - it may seem attractive to some - and it may be attractive when you join and get overwhelmed - by the amount. And then to some: A disapointment of quality in general.
Still it should come as no surprise with the very different scores - this site in particular has been debated over and over again - with all it's "plus and minus"
Will not go into details - the details have been around about Videobox as long as TBP/PU - but guess it still comes down to the gap between "the amount" and "the quality" - it does to this user, anyway.....
|
02-23-12 06:52am
|
