I'm looking at this "interactive" micro-site on 21s called "21role.com" It is a POV choose your option game-like video stream reminiscent of Bob Guccione's "Penthouse Interactive Photo Shoot" from 1987 or so. In 21role, the first few choices (i.e. let Kimmy Granger sleep or wake her up) are free but then you have to PAY CREDITS (at 10 cents a credit) to continue to progress to the actual sex scenes. You have no idea going in how much one scene is going to cost you. Has anyone actually tried this? Anyone have anything good to say about it?
I joined 21Naturals from one of those "deals" pages that comes up on another site. It was $9.95 "for the next 12 hours!" I had never been to a 21 site so, thinking I was getting access to the entire network, I joined.
When you get to the main page, which is called 21members, 95% of the videos are locked! Across the top are 21Sextury, 21Sextreme and 21Naturals with a lock next to the first two. Turns out, the landing page for 21Naturals is sort of a bait page to get you to join the other two networks. (I'll bet the other sites land here, too.) The cost to join either of the other networks from here? $19.95 a month, the price I would have paid anyway. The videos here on 21Naturals are good, with a lot of SLOW sex and some foot fetish stuff, but I gladly would have paid the extra $10 to join the entire network. You should pay the extra $10, too. Eventually, when I fork out the $20, I will probably say it is worth it.
When looking at the "special deals" links, remember that if they look too good to be true, they are.
Thought I'd mention two things here. First, the VR porn videos are generally pretty good. I did a separate review of TMWVR here on PU if you are interested. Second, all of the recent videos that are shot for VR are ALSO available in non-VR. That is really pretty smart for a site like this. So if you are reading the prior comments about frequent VR updates at the expense of non-VR updates, don't worry about it. All of the newer sets are available in non-VR.
I just rejoined Twisty's using the TBP/PU discount and when I went to download my first video, the damn site is telling me I have to pay $10 more a month? That REALLY sucks! So they basically are saying FUCK YOU to the Porn User discount. Nowhere when I signed up did it say that this was a limited membership or provide any information about a required upgrade to download videos. (There was an option for Twisty's premium for $39 extra a month, but no explanation so I unchecked it.)
The TBP review over here at "Twisty's Network" mentions it, but my prior review and my link to the site was from the twistys.com review page. (TBP/PU folks, don't move reviews to a new page, merge them! It is not a new site.)
I spent a few minutes chatting with support and they said it was "because there was a lot of piracy." Really? How does paying an extra $10 eliminate piracy? There didn't seem to be any other options, so I cancelled while I had the guy connected.
I went back into the site and discovered that there are no options to download images either. Apparently that also requires the upgrade. What a sleazy, sleazy way to screw your customer base for a few extra bucks.
Sorry, you just lost me as a subscriber, Twistys. I've joined pretty much every year since 2000 and have written pretty good reviews. Looks like that will be ending this month.
I think I will write a review based on the value I get with the non-VIP membership compared to the 30 or so other sites I've been a member of within the last year. High score? I think not.
I just rejoined Twisty's using the TBP/PU discount and when I went to download my first video, the damn site is telling me I have to pay $10 more a month? That REALLY sucks! So they basically are saying FUCK YOU to the Porn User discount. Nowhere when I signed up did it say that this was a limited membership or provide any information about a required upgrade to download videos. (There was a cross check to Twisty's VIP for an extra $39 a month (really??) which I unchecked since there was no information about it anywhere.)
I spent a few minutes chatting with support and they said it was "because there was a lot of piracy." Really? How does paying an extra $10 eliminate piracy? There didn't seem to be any other options, so I cancelled while I had the guy connected.
I went back into the site and discovered that there are no options to download images either. Apparently that also requires the upgrade. What a sleazy, sleazy way to screw your returning customer base for a few extra bucks. Why would anyone want a membership to a site full of videos and images that they can't download? Oh, wait. Your not telling anybody that until after they sign up! Wow. Clearly something thought up by Dr. E-vil to make...hundreds of dollars.
Sorry, you just lost me as a subscriber, Twistys. I've joined pretty much every year since 2000 and have written pretty good reviews. Looks like that will be ending this month.
I think I will write a review based on the value I get with the non-VIP membership (read that as NONE) compared to the 30 or so other sites I've been a member of within the last year that allow unlimited downloads. High score? I think not.
I just spent $10 at Gamelink to download a VR video of Megan Rain. Looked OK so I thought I'd try it. (I do not normally buy pay-per-download services because they usually suck, but I thought I would try this one and write about it here.... Ha!) It took 3 HOURS for the 5 gig file to download and 2 hours along the download failed. I tried to restart it but could not so I started over. While waiting I decided to take a look at the piece that had already downloaded. Opening credits? BADOINK! It was a Badoink video! I went back and looked and there in tiny text one one of the pages it says studio: BadoinkVR. My Badoink subscription just expired and this video was new. So this file was either authorized by Badoink or stolen and loaded here so somebody could make some money. Either way, selling the video on a pay-per-download website is an INCREDIBLY SLEAZY thing to do. I'll be reaching out to the Badoink webmasters to let them know. Be very careful to check the attribution on these videos. You may be MUCH better off just going to the source web site.
Update: I heard back from support at Badoink that they use Gamelink VR to "market" some of their videos. Well, that really sucks and is incredibly disappointing. When a web site places their material on Pornhub, you can preview it and it is incredibly clear where the material is from. Here, there is no preview, you get a couple of pictures and it isn't really obvious where the material is from. And the download speeds are SO BAD. So I'm still saying don't waste your money here. If you can tell where a video is from, just go to that site.
Looking at the join pages and teaser videos, this seems like another site that doesn't quite get the true value of VR. Nearly all of the videos here are observation only. Observation videos are a dime a dozen, don't need to be in VR and some really, really good sites do them. The value of VR is in PARTICIPATION videos and the best VR sites have figured this out. Am I missing something here? Has anybody joined this site and can tell me there are some great videos here?
I'm looking at the teaser pages and this really looks a little rough to me. Seems like a collection of vids where the actresses and sets are from the champagne room of a Montreal strip club. A.K. giving this one a 78 seems very optimistic considering how he has scored some of the other better VR sites. Has anyone signed up?
I logged into my annual subscription and the format has changed! It is so much better that the old one! Big images, huge thumbnails, fewer clicks, very clean look. Rally nice!
....except file sizes are still 800,1200 and super large 5500. I hope they are listening!
Has anyone ever heard of ECHST? I just signed up for an additional site in the network and was charged to join the site and ALSO charged to join Met-Art again, even though I'm already an annual member. Unlike EPOCH and CCBill, I did not get any conformation emails from ECHST. The only way I knew about it was the credit card charge. I sent a note to Met Art Support, who is usually very good about this type of thing, but have not yet heard back.
I am an annual member on Met-Art and often join one or two of the other sites in their network or among their affiliates for a month or two. I've noticed that the prices will vary (i.e. $29 in most places, $19 in others) depending on where you look inside or outside of the network. Typically, though, The Porn Users site will have the best pricing other than the occasional $1-$5 teaser price for members of one site who never sign up for other sites. Personally, I think they should offer members long-term discounts to the other sites, especially the ones that don't update as often, but it is hard to blame them for not offering deep discounts given the perfection often found on their sites.
As much as I like this site, I am a little disappointed that there are no long term membership options. The price structure is set up for monthly only, so that means I have to join two or three times a year to "load up" and then quit. I would gladly pay the typical 3-months membership fee to have this site all year. Oh well.
I was searching for a particular model on indexx.com and, after seeing her in a a few light bondage roles here, decided to join. There is a lot of good content here but the videos are released in 2-minute increments (i.e. 4 releases a week = 8 MINUTES of video a week and downloads are excrutiatingly slow (10 minutes for 45 MB???). I had a 4 GB VR file from a different site download faster. There is no functioning streaming option that I can find. Fortunately, they do release complete scenes once they are doled out in pieces, but of course they take FOREVER to download. I like the content here, but be prepared to wait around a LOT for downloads. In this age where I can get a new 20 minute video every day from other sites, I will withhold judgement on whether this $30 a month site is worth it until I see a little more.
I just joined this site and will try to write a review soon. It looks like it might be a WowGirls spin-off or something similar. Layout and color scheme is the same. About 40 videos, most are participatory. Video quality is the best VR I've seen so far. Really well done! The scene with Nancy A is so good I swear I can smell her.
I was about to join this site when I realized this is an all-girls site that offers scenes where you observe masturbation or non-participatory lesbian sex only. Although that might be great for some, the whole idea behind VR is that it can be a visually participatory experience. For this site, apparently, you get to watch in VR. Also, $39.95 a month is pretty pricey for any site but waaaay up there for a small VR site. As a straight guy looking for VR sex, I don't think I'm the audience they are looking for.
I visited this site a couple of months ago on an intro offer from Met-Art. The site is very small and includes masturbation videos of many of the girls you see on Met-Art. These are a little more interesting than the videos found on Met-Art, but not much. If you like the girls on Met-Art and can't find them doing harder stuff on other sites, then this might be a good place to find them.
This site has grown pretty significantly (200 videos) and the network has matured also. I rejoined this site and then added the $69 option to join all of the network sites and there is a ton of good content here. Lubed and Tiny4K are also good. I wrote a review about Tiny4K that is a more current impression.
I just joined this site for the first time and initially it looked like there are no updates since 2015. How does that happen? Well, the webmasters are posting updates on the updates page, but they are not updating their update log page or model info. So it looks like the site is not updating until you scroll down on the specific updates page.
Earliest sets are from 2007 and there are quite a few videos and photo sets of some popular Eastern European models from years past. I'll try to write a review later.
I joined this site and instead of finding girls ready to go to private chats, I find kind of a carnival of spin games and similar antics. Most of the girls are clothed or partially nude, mostly just talking or chatting with their viewers. Guys are throwing tokens at them and there is NOTHING HAPPENING... The girls sell things like snapchats and videos and have posted lists for things like flashing and other activities. It really seems like this site is set up to sort of milk money from viewers who are very hard pressed to "make friends" with the girls. There are a few active "shows" and lesbian things going on, but it doesn't really seem that exciting. What am I missing here?
After realizing I usually have a membership to one of the sites on this network, I went ahead and bought the upgrade for permanent access to the entire network for $69. Unfortunately, the upgrade does not provide me with the ability download many of the top rated set videos or images, just watch them...not really what I signed up for. I tried contacting thier tech support about this, but got no response back from anybody.
I'll follow up and let you know if it ever gets resolved.
Follow-Up - 10-18-16:
The limited download option has been resolved somehow. I can now download any video within the network.
I signed up for naked gymnast and was surprised to see watermarks that said flexyteen. So I went to Flexyteen and was able to log in with me NG account info. EXACT same site! The only difference was the text across the top of the 1999 web page. I would have been really pissed if I had signed up for both. See my review under Naked Gymnast.
I just followed the link to this site and am wondering what is wrong with this site;s webmasters. My first clue is that nearly all of the "top models" are from 2010 and before. Then when I clicked on model of the month, January and February 2016 are blank...then when I clicked on "all models of the month", it shows 2009, 2010 and then skips to an all-blank 2016. 5 years missing? And links to "more about this model" are broken. This is on the model teaser page? Really? This is not the type of thing that inspires me to join.
I just signed up again with a $75 annual subscription. This is one of 4 or 5 soft-core modeling sites that are always worth getting a long term subscription to.
So all this time I've been thinking In the Crack was an ANAL site! I'm not really into that, so I stayed away. Wow was I wrong. The name of the site should really be In your Face because there are a lot of terrific, popular US and European models spreading lips and getting within a few inches of the camera. There is some anal, but the videos are broken up in a way that provides the view of your choice.
Yes, it is a video site, but generally there is one image set per video. Yes, the images could be larger. Yes, there are some odd download issues occasionally. But there is a TON of material here. Absolutely worth your $
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
