| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
It's not that bad out there. The alternative to your situation, though, would be you could sign up to any website, download everything you want for a day, then demand a full immediate no-hassle refund from ccbill. I'd probably estimate 1% of complaints & refund requests are for legitimate reasons, it's gotta be tough on the other end to spot the real ones to take care of.
|
12-05-10 03:52am
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Only once I had to get the credit card company involved to refute a charge - it was with some no-name B.S. biller, and if I can never sign up through them again I consider that a good thing for me!
I've gotten a refund twice from ccbill, once the login details never worked with the site. The second time the website went out of business, shut everything down just two days after me joining.
|
12-05-10 03:47am
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
You wouldn't want to be like Woodman, he's a guy who cares most about the act, the sales revenue & his self-image. The girls are little more than soulless props to him.
|
12-04-10 11:09am
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
The comments, "willing", "consensual", blah blah blah
When you realize/learn that girls who perform in such acts, pretty much across the board they all have either been (a) abused as a child, (b) abandoned as a child, or (c) abused and abandoned as a child...
Find me a pornstar who is performing in all these extreme acts who had a comfortable upbringing...
The other half is, porn thrives on misery. It's their bread & butter, how they make the big bucks. A girl gets attached to a healthy relationship with a boyfriend, she's most likely leaving the porn career. It is in pornographers' best interests to make her "undateable". It is also in pornographers' best interests to make porn buyers "undateable" also.
I say it is all abuse, and I don't like guys doing a single one of those things to girls on camera. Hence why I pretty much flat out refuse to watch any porn with a guy in the scene =D
|
11-30-10 11:35am
|
Reply
80
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Rotterdam854's Comment
Enjoy their content for the full month.
Their trial is legit, I've sign up for it before. I never had any hassles. Are you absolutely 100% positive the email said no reoccurring charges unless you cancel?
|
11-26-10 07:49pm
|
Reply
81
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Then don't resubscribe to the site.
No site is able to conform to all people's individual tastes 100% of the time.
|
11-23-10 03:36pm
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
This poll question is basically this question:
"Do you primarily value porn by the content of the scene, or by the price tag?"
|
11-17-10 11:22pm
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
"how are you going to look"?
You are going to look like a reviewer who gave your honest opinion on what the site was at the time you reviewed it. Look, no matter what updates come from there on forward, the site should still retain all the material that existed when you reviewed it. There is no reason at all to hold off a review based on how the site may adjust in the future.
|
11-17-10 10:37pm
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
I always find it amusing when people try to dictate what *other* people must think of a site, must rate a site.
If you like a site, and that site has a few scenes, score it however you want, and make a note in the comments the approx. number of scenes they have at the time of the review.
|
11-17-10 10:31pm
|
Reply
85
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
they're over on this site
parodypass.com
|
11-11-10 02:25am
|
Reply
86
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Seriously, users here are over-reacting way too much on this piddly stuff.
Look, either the site has good material, or the site does not have good material. If it has good material, is it that much of a crime to pay an extra fifty cents?
I'm still going on a year subscription to Sapphic Erotica, while the next guy waits the full year buys a 1-month subscription and does a site rip for much much less cost.
Should I go around this site writing how pissed off I am because I paid more money for the same amount of material for every site there is?
There comes a time to just accept that the world is not perfect and never will be.
|
10-24-10 02:14pm
|
Reply
87
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Little harsh?
The site just is not to your personal tastes.
"Severely ripped off"? They are still pushing out genuinely new exclusive updates each day that a great many people enjoy.
Don't like the current day's update? Then download the next day's update! This site does allow you to do that, you know.
|
10-19-10 11:39pm
|
Reply
88
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Super Glam was run by someone else originally, then about two years ago the site & content was sold to Silver Sinema. Teen Models was always funded through Silver Sinema.
|
10-12-10 07:17pm
|
Reply
89
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Curious on the super glam comment, there was a full dvd release through Silver Sinema called "Super Glam", well they had two dvds, volume one were scenes from superglam.com while volume two were scenes from teenmodels.com (both websites owned by silver sinema). Is that all, or are there more super glam videos found on videobox?
this comment makes sense to you, right?
|
10-11-10 11:20pm
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
every site is different. how is this poll supposed to be answered?
|
10-04-10 12:21am
|
Reply
91
|
Daring Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
ipg386's Comment
Daring! was a dvd-only production company to begin with.
They do not create full photosets like say 21Sextury does, Daring! shoots photos to use to promote their dvds.
It wasn't until much later that they began this pay-site. So take it for what it is, dvd scenes with promotional photos attached.
Daring! has a style that some people love, other people hate, they are who they are.
|
10-03-10 10:38am
|
Reply
92
|
Her First Punishment
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
I believe inet-cash is a legitimate 3rd party biller, the cancellation instructions should come along with the subscription. The billing is done inside a frame, it is a 3rd party biller. There is a separate link on the page "direct ssl join page" which will remove the frame and have you completely within the 3rd party biller's site.
Most banks offer virtual credit card numbers along with your main account, which will always prevent additional charges being placed against the provided number, no matter what situation you get yourself into.
|
10-01-10 09:05pm
|
Reply
93
|
Bikini Pleasure
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
They have preview galleries for just about every set they have:
http://preview.bikini-pleasure.com
|
09-24-10 08:34pm
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
How 'bout woman performing cunnilingus?
|
09-24-10 10:12am
|
Reply
95
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Reply
Regional pricing also lets sites do other things, like you know how in stores someone is more likely to buy something that is 99 cents versus $1. Same thing with sites at $29.99 versus a conversion rate of say $30.27 or $29.61.
Not to mention every time I buy a subscription through ccbill that is charged in Euros I get hit with an additional fee from my credit card company for a purchase in a foreign currency, that does not exist when subscribing to sites through ccbill that do use Regional Pricing.
|
09-23-10 12:33pm
|
Reply
96
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Reply
Where did I say that everyone who gets charged fluctuating prices complains? Where did I say that all sites which don't use regional prices go under?
"Regional pricing" is not an euphemism for looting. It's all in what the website decides. CCBill allows for different charges for U.S. versus European users, a site could set up, say 25 euros for European residents, and $35 for U.S. residents, and some do. That is regional pricing, it is close to fair enough for everyone, CCBill allows it, it's the website's choice to make use of it or not.
There are advantages to regional pricing, it is just up to the site owner to use his own judgment of what he wants to do.
|
09-23-10 12:03pm
|
Reply
97
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Reply
One of the advantages of regional pricings are that the prices are fixed.
If a site is 30 euros/month, in Dollars one month it's $45, next month $47, next month $40, next month $50. I'm sure that fluctuation pisses off a whole other set of subscribers too - "Why am I being forced to pay $50 when last month it was $40???!!!"
Regional pricings are not inherently evil, it's just a tool for the site owner to use at his own discretion. It's not "an euphemism for looting".
|
09-23-10 11:13am
|
Reply
98
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
All the Met-Art videos I have seen are just recordings of the photography shoots, I wouldn't include those types of videos in this type of a discussion.
Think of, say, the videos on Only-Tease/Art-Lingerie much much better.
Basically it seems to comes down to, if the video stars a girl who is great at her work, any type of softcore video is amazing. If the video stars a girl who is not as suited for this line of work, then most of the above options don't help.
Take a great girl, and have her in lingerie movie around, is tops.
|
09-14-10 09:51pm
|
Reply
99
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Germ's Comment
Good to know about a limit. Though 50gb is quite a lot, I have to understand on their end bandwidth does cost a lot more than on our end, and they do want to pull in some revenues to create more content for us.
50gb per day is 1.5tb per month, and about 3,000 scenes - for $20, yea they offer it, but I mean, that's less than one penny per scene.
|
09-13-10 06:45pm
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
"What we really need are more cute and adorable softcore models."
It starts with more consumers willing to spend more on soft content. After that the material will follow.
|
09-09-10 06:59pm
|
