| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Firstly quality but the ability to download is equally important. As a photo collector high quality photos are no good to me if they don't provide the option to download them in zips.
|
05-03-16 08:33am
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
By site name then model name within that site usually.
|
05-03-16 08:30am
|
Reply
203
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have 5 external drives totalling about 9 TB and almost running out of storage space. I have the photo collections of every site I've ever joined since 2003 stored on these drives and although I will probably never look at most of it again it's satisfying knowing I have the content of sites that are no longer around stashed away for posterity.
|
04-30-16 12:37am
|
Reply
204
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
raider55's Reply
I believe I was black listed by CC Bill once a long time ago because I kicked up a fuss about one site that I joined that I felt was a rip off and basically threatened them that if they refused to refund me I would contact my credit card company and ask for a charge back. This was within one hour of joining the site by the way and I didn't download a thing from it.
Anyway CC Bill refunded me but the next couple of times I went to join a site using CC Bill my card was declined so I guess they must have banned me. After a while though I discovered I was able to get round the ban by using a different credit card and email address so I think it must have been the actual credit card number that was black listed.
Have you tried using Epoch with a different credit card to see if you can get around the ban? Maybe you could try one of those prepaid credit cards?
|
04-30-16 12:30am
|
Reply
205
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
JamesDavid's Reply
Thanks for the information James, that's great news about the introduction of zips. I will look forward to adding Bryci to my photo collection in the near future. It's been a long time since I've found a solo model site or network of solo sites worth joining.
|
03-12-16 09:24am
|
Reply
206
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
ursaminor's Review
Thanks for the review ursaminor. I presume still no zips for the photos?
|
03-08-16 09:34am
|
Reply
207
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Unfortunately regional pricing regularly puts even $26-$30 sites up in to the next price bracket for me.
|
02-10-16 04:47am
|
Reply
208
|
Jess Davies
(0)
|
Reply of
frank79's Review
I nearly joined this network of solo sites around the xmas and new year holidays because there was a half price offer but I kept delaying and then the offer was gone and I missed out which was rather annoying. I still plan to join this network when I see another special offer.
|
01-14-16 02:33pm
|
Reply
209
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I think the current limits are fine. I've not had a problem with exceeding the character limits at this current level, I certainly did with the old lower limits as I wrote my reviews in a word processor then just copied and pasted into PU only to find I'd exceeded the character limits and had to go back and edit the review again.
|
01-12-16 12:54pm
|
Reply
210
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Reply
Yes there was still no sign of that image upgrade as of when my membership there finished early December.
|
01-12-16 12:49pm
|
Reply
211
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I pretty much stick to what I like, glamour or artistic nude photography based sites.
|
01-11-16 04:44pm
|
Reply
212
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I think it would be good if there was a "like" button for reviews and comments but not for forum posts.
|
01-08-16 01:04pm
|
Reply
213
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Comment
I've had several memberships over the years going back to when it was called DDGirls.com and I don't recall ever seeing any squirting content. I honestly can't remember now if the DDGXtreme content was included with the DDgirls membership.....if it was I probably didn't take much notice of it since I'm more interested in the solo stuff.
|
01-04-16 04:15pm
|
Reply
214
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I've just spent an hour trawling through the photos section of the tour and it seems to imply that they still have all the old stuff there going back as far as the old Babyface stuff from the late 90s. Now that I've had a closer look at the tour I would say they are probably not recycling content.
I'm quite tempted to sign up here again now that you've brought this classic site back to my attention but I have another membership going at the moment and don't really have the time for more than one so I'll have to put it on the back burner for a couple of weeks.
|
12-29-15 12:53pm
|
Reply
215
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
I would guess there's a good chance I would have that set too since I saved every Babyface set that was ever available on 18 Eighteen back then. I have often wondered if the old Babyface content is still available online or if it's a valuable part of my collection that would be lost forever should I ever have the misfortune to suffer the death of an external drive.
Rearadmiral's review stating the site goes back to 2007 would seem to suggest the classic stuff from the late 90s early 2000s has gone unless some of it has been recycled with later dates. Even though it's been over 10 years since I had a membership here I've never seen enough in the site tour to suggest that it would be worth spending money to go back again.
|
12-28-15 11:37pm
|
Reply
216
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
It's interesting that you say the site has been around since 2007, I've just checked my stash and I actually had a membership here back in early 2005 and even then they had several years content dating back as far as late 1998.
Looking at the tour I see a lot of models who I have in my collection from way back then so it makes me wonder if they are recycling content. Their early photo sets from the late 90s carried the site name Babyface Mag before changing the name to 18 Eighteen early 2001.
|
12-28-15 04:27pm
|
Reply
217
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
Since my main interest is photos it's highly unlikely I would hit 300gb in any month. Even as a collector I stay away from the super high resolution pics on sites like Met-Art where you have the option of a decent mid-sized resolution.
|
12-20-15 11:21am
|
Reply
218
|
All Gravure
(0)
|
Reply of
Twotails's Review
Thanks for this helpful review Twotails. This is a site I've been tempted to join for a long time but could never quite bring myself to shell out the $30 asking price. The chaotic members area you mention kind of puts me off joining as I don't really have the patience or time to waste these days searching through sites that make the content you want hard to find.
Anyway thanks for the hint about the special offer, I had a quick google and managed to locate it so that would definitely make the site a more appealing join if ever I get around to it.
|
12-01-15 03:39am
|
Reply
219
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I've tried a few different image viewers but the one I liked the best that I use all the time now is Xnview.
|
12-01-15 03:27am
|
Reply
220
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
A combination of the top two answers....if it was a big site and the price was right.
|
11-25-15 09:08am
|
Reply
221
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
Other....as in never heard of Reddit and never visited it.
|
11-25-15 09:02am
|
Reply
222
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Thanks Monahan, I hope you enjoy your subscription there.
|
11-18-15 09:30am
|
Reply
223
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Two or three years ago I would have answered 1 or 2 a month but now it's down to about 2 a year.
|
11-16-15 08:03am
|
Reply
224
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
Good comment skippy and I totally agree with you. I've never been a member of Femjoy and it is exactly for this reason that they don't offer a decent mid-sized photo size. I've been a member of all those other sites you mentioned in your post and have to agree that as a collector I find the 2000 photo size the perfect compromise between quality and file size. I would sign up straight away if they upgraded the medium sized photos.
|
10-29-15 11:41am
|
Reply
225
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I remember it well, the very first paysite I joined back in early 2003 was a site called Nasty Virgins which was one of those arty softcore photo sites featuring Russian/Ukrainian models. I remember I was still on a dial up connection that time and it used to take over an hour to save each photo set 1 picture at a time.
I don't think the site stayed around very long after I joined it but some of it's content showed up at another site called Pretty Virgins that I joined around 2007. Twelve years later and I still have all the photo sets I collected from my earliest subscriptions stashed away on my external drives.
|
10-10-15 05:28pm
|
