| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
No to phone sex - I quite like the idea of it, but I suspect I'm too shy to, er, pull it off successfully. OTOH, I do quite like racy IM chat, it can be quite exciting.
|
09-08-11 10:35pm
|
Reply
252
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Likewise! I can (very) arguably see the appeal to some folk given that perhaps it's even more of an intimate/private activity than sex.
But not for me :) I'll tolerate the odd episode in sites I like, but where it's featured prominently it would be a turnoff.
Not even going to where Denner mentioned...
|
09-05-11 05:13am
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not for me at all :| I can understand that it works for some people, and perhaps even some girls may like it (?) But although I don't idolise or put on pedestals, I do respect the models we see and like to see them treated with the same respect.
|
09-03-11 05:30am
|
Reply
254
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Some sites like Petites Parisiennes are very open to input and ideas for the sets, so I communicate regularly with the webmaster there. And similarly, eg FigureBaby and Holly Randall accept comments on sets, which I also see as feedback - and if the webmaster is engaged, I'm more likely to be.
But a couple of times I've emailed and got nothing back; in which case I just give up, got better things to do than flog a dead horse.
But as tangub said, being able to vet sites here cuts down on any really bad sites that specifically need complaining about.
|
09-02-11 03:50am
|
Reply
255
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
As with most others, I like a mix. I do indeed prefer a smile, but it has to be loaded with a suggestiveness; what I'm looking for is the allure, the devilish smile, the 'smoulder' that Capn suggests... this is probably why I don't, largely, go for the younger models because, beautiful as they are, they rarely have it.
So it's very specific to the model. Eg I don't generally like the pout, since it tends to be fake; but having said that it's common from my favourite model, Mosh, who does glamour/fetish/pinup stuff.
|
08-30-11 11:46pm
|
Reply
256
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't use the same password on every site, but there is a pattern of sorts; if I choose my own I can generally remember it!
|
08-28-11 12:31am
|
Reply
257
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I may watch stuff like gymnastics, athletics etc when the Olympics runs... but other than that have pretty much zero interest. Eg I wouldn't watch the World Cup final if England were playing.
|
08-26-11 01:31am
|
Reply
258
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Assume this means PPV - in which case no; seems pointless when for the price of maybe 2 or 3 PPVs you could buy a monthly subscription.
|
08-26-11 01:29am
|
Reply
259
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Poll
I like to weigh up pros and cons and keep a balanced view on things (and play devil's advocate more often than other folk like) so OTOH seemed appropriate.
OTOH, it could, of course, just indicate a preoccupation with what's in my hands...
|
08-22-11 12:20am
|
Reply
260
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely - members' areas are often the poor cousin of the shopfront anyway, so if the tour is broken, it doesn't bode well for the standard of what you see when signed up.
|
08-20-11 12:13am
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As per RustyJ - I've never been in a relationship, or know of anyone, with that kind of creative passion/vitriol! Maybe I should have been...
|
08-18-11 12:53am
|
Reply
262
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As per Denner - doesn't usually occur to me, but if it's a reviewer I'm not yet familiar with, it helps to put it context.
|
08-16-11 12:53pm
|
Reply
263
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think the .xxx is overall a good idea, but it should be voluntary.
If it's mandated, then we'd get into all manner of wrangles about what is/isn't explicit/pornographic; most of the sites we discuss here are clear-cut, but some blogs or free sites aren't so much; we'd have folk having their sites blocked or mislabelled just for slipping a naughty word in :|
|
08-14-11 12:09am
|
Reply
264
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I use Safari on the Mac for my regular and work stuff; Firefox for porn, as it's set on permanent private mode, and DownThemAll can be a lifesaver.
Sometimes Chrome for either - it's good, but I'm inherently suspicious of Google :|
|
08-12-11 06:28am
|
Reply
265
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Have almost no interest in massage stuff - but have seen a few clips from Soapy Massage, and they definitely have some appeal; possibly the focus on asian girls gives it more of an angle?
|
08-10-11 03:15pm
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'll echo what most other folk have said - I would do so on a site that offered regular updates, eg a few per week, and a good discount. I've got one annual at the moment, and may spring for another; but I doubt I'd go for anything more than $100.
|
08-06-11 11:33am
|
Reply
267
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Although I run various servers for my day job, keeping one at home purely for smut a la BadMrFrosty is tempting but would be a bit too overt for me :| Hence I use external drives - they are such a mass-market item now I tend to find little difference in price between internal and external.
I've got quite a few knocking around but just use 2 for porn; actually really only 1, but the other is a backup. (Drives can and do fail, sot can't stress enough the need for backup of something that has taken time and money to collect).
I'm mainly pics, but even so my 320gb is getting tight; will have to get a new pair of 1TB soon.
|
08-04-11 01:46am
|
Reply
268
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Agree with slutty. TBP reviews are, almost by definition, objective - I suspect they have a quite well defined list of what contributes to the score in terms of updates, picture quality, size of archive etc.
Which is a good thing, and leaves subjective reviews - focusing more on the content - to us at PU. I've subscribed to a couple of sites which would get a bad TBP review because they are, well, disastrous :) but I've still enjoyed them because the material is up my street. The same applies in reverse; some top TBP sites wouldn't appeal to me at all, since I'm not interested in the material.
|
08-02-11 01:28am
|
Reply
269
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Maybe on average, an hour or an hour and a half a day. Documentaries, a few sitcoms and US crime drama mainly.
Share pat362's distaste for reality TV; it's cheap, easy, lowest-common-denominator exploitation; far more so than most folk assume porn to be.
|
07-31-11 11:17pm
|
Reply
270
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've said somewhat important. Of course it's very handy to have zips and luckily most sites do; but tastes are sometimes a little esoteric and as such I can't be quite so choosy as to discount any sites that don't have zips.
However, this is only with the caveat of using a download manager; where no zips are available, it's usually short work to set DTA to grab the whole set. If I did find a site that I truly could not batch download from, then I'd be unlikely to bother grabbing pics one by one.
As with Drooler, I've found one site so far that prevents any downloading - very not impressed, but with a bit of lateral thinking I managed to find a way to grab even those.
|
07-30-11 12:32am
|
Reply
271
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I don't think it matters too much as long as it's not too large or intrusive. Some sites vary it per-picture, so as not to intrude on any, er, key parts; but I imagine it's too much of a hassle for most folk to bother with.
|
07-27-11 01:31am
|
Reply
272
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Have yet to see anything that's of any value or interest at all...
|
07-25-11 12:32am
|
Reply
273
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Yep, it seems to work - although because I'm at the desk more often than not, with the 22" screen, I opted for a 13" - I find 17" very unwieldy! (Insert random penis size gag here...)
Oh, and re Cap'n's comment about desktops being more powerful... true, but gladly nowadays, for most folk (serious gamers and the like aside) pretty much any computer you buy is easily enough for whatever you want to do with it.
|
07-25-11 12:28am
|
Reply
274
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Used to have both, but couldn't be bothered swapping files and emails etc around when I needed to work elsewhere. But when working from home (most of the time) I use it with a mouse, keyboard and monitor attached, so it's pretty desktop-ish.
|
07-23-11 11:31pm
|
Reply
275
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never given it any thought. Now I do... the answer is no.
OTOH if the right lady came along, and happened to be bald, I certainly wouldn't hold it against her :)
|
07-22-11 02:44am
|
