| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
I just hope that SD himself isn't included in 'the guys'... although shaggy definitely would be :)
|
07-20-11 01:37am
|
Reply
277
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like regular, non-porn animation - and if, as anime often has - it features the odd panty shot, then all the better :) But hentai or other porn animation has never really appealed to me - shan't say never, though!
|
07-19-11 12:49am
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Only by default, by virtue of having a PS3. I do now buy (non-porn) Blu Rays when they are not too expensive, and rent Blu Rays when available. But to be honest, I don't find it a big deal; you notice the difference if you specifically look for it, but it has little or no impact on my enjoyment of a film.
|
07-17-11 12:27am
|
Reply
279
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm with pat362 on this - most sites I've joined use CCbill, but there have been a few others and I've yet to have any trouble cancelling. So I guess rarely; although with a different biller I'll check cancellation procedures beforehand and skip it if anything seems fishy.
|
07-17-11 12:24am
|
Reply
280
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Absolutely; granted there are some sites out to rip you off, but for $30 or less, there's no comparison in the, er, entertainment available from the good ones.
|
07-13-11 11:02am
|
Reply
281
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have mixed feelings about Japanese porn; I like the girls, but the content is often harder (bukkake, multiple guys, etc) than I'd prefer - so my views on the censorship follow that. Ie the stuff that suffers most from being censored isn't my main area of interest.
But I do like more explicit softcore content, and the censorship can detract from that a bit; I've seen a few Japanese sites lately that I quite like, but when the teasing finishes and the panties come off, it is a bit annoying. For some reason I find this less of an issue with video content than with pictures.
In some ways it's a moot point; a lot of the material I'd like to see is on Japanese only sites that aren't friendly even to foreign cards. But there are some sites - Tokyo Hot, Pacific Girls, Gachinco and more, probably technically based outside Japan - that produce uncensored content, but it leans a bit towards the gynaecological for me.
I have actually seen a few Chinese sites cropping up; they are very softcore, and those with any nudity often hide the face of the model, but with so many cute girls there, it's encouraging to know they are trying ;)
|
07-13-11 11:01am
|
Reply
282
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
tangub, re the .mov files from Petites Parisiennes - I think they are h264s, but the .mov container probably means that you need QT player as opposed to WM player on Windows.
However, if you download VLC, I find that it plays pretty much everything, including these, so you may want to try that. (The only exception is that this month's PP videos lose their sound in VLC, but the webmaster is rectifying this.)
|
07-09-11 05:02am
|
Reply
283
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually watch videos with VLC, which seems to show anything I throw at it, so I'm not too worried about formats. MPG is probably the most open standard though, so given a choice, I guess I'd choose that.
|
07-09-11 12:09am
|
Reply
284
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually find something to edit after posting it; just a typo or a grammatical issue - so I guess I'm anal enough to do so :)
|
07-07-11 11:30pm
|
Reply
285
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Again, widescreen - you'd pay over the odds now to get anything else, you can get eg a 22" widescreen for very little.
Agree with Cap'n - a shame we don't see more landscape orientation pics - when looking at a set in full screen, they are twice as large as portrait!
|
07-05-11 11:44pm
|
Reply
286
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As with manholelover, I don't think a discount would put a site on my radar; but a discount on one that is would definitely bump it up my list - and has done a couple of times.
And whereas I tend to join via the TBP/PU link where possible, I also sign up for site newsletters; sometimes you'll get an email from the site itself with a discounted link, which again makes it more likely to join.
|
07-03-11 05:05am
|
Reply
287
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've always liked dogs, had dogs when I was growing up, and will probably get one sometime. Never so keen on cats... although I was persuaded to get one and he's actually quite grown on me. Not quite as low-maintenance, since he lives indoors - I live near a main road and cats aren't that good at roads - but still fairly easy to keep.
|
07-02-11 11:07pm
|
Reply
288
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely not enough options to choose from :)
I'd go for anything full-back; ideally lacy and sophisticated. Granny panties work if they are sheer... although actually, anything works if it's sheer. I don't mind cotton either; even a pair of white cotton briefs are sexy if a hand is slipped under them. My favourite is probably the boyshort - either plain cotton or fancier in lace; I think the hip-hugging shape is very flattering.
But I'm with messmer on the thong. I can perhaps understand (although still not share) the appeal in real life, eg girls on the beach etc; getting to see parts that you wouldn't see otherwise. But a thong basically isn't there; so in porn, I don't see the point - might as well start naked anyway.
|
06-30-11 01:02am
|
Reply
289
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Toned and muscular up to a point works for me - like Toadsith, I don't even mind a 6-pack, as long as a girl still has boobs and curves. Actual hardcore bodybuilders, though, with big veiny muscles, isn't appealing at all. Unlike turboshaft, it doesn't bother me that a girl could kick my ass; it's arguably even a turn-on, although not so much that I'd call myself submissive...
|
06-28-11 11:21pm
|
Reply
290
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I make the same assumption as tangub, ie that it refers to public wifi as opposed to at home - I guess most folk would be using a wireless connection at home.
Either way, the answer for me is no; I'm not brazen enough to look at smut in public :) And at home, wifi never works well for me - too many neighbouring networks, I guess - so the half dozen computers, consoles etc I have are all wired.
|
06-25-11 06:31am
|
Reply
291
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Depends on the definition; to me, search means able to type in something, or perhaps list based on multiple criteria.
As others have said, the model index is the most useful. But I do like some facility to browse by some other criteria; eg photographer, setting (indoor/outdoor), body type etc. I find that going through the site again from a different angle often reveals stuff I wouldn't have found just from the model list.
But I haven't really joined any sites that are so big to make anything other than a model index strictly necessary.
|
06-23-11 11:45pm
|
Reply
292
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Agree with Capn - a win is appreciated, and perhaps raffle tickets are an extra motivation to get involved more; but certainly not the main reason. I'm not checking at raffle time; but when I have won (twice so far!) it's been a pleasant surprise via email.
|
06-21-11 09:46pm
|
Reply
293
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Possibly from time to time; but more out of obscure fascination than specifically titillation; and probably moreso in my youth, which brings back a memory from the days of downloading from Usenet.
For the uninitiated, this involved having to scan the subject lines for something interesting; then waiting ages to download an image in multiple parts and join them... before finally being able to see what depravity the nascent internet had served up.
Anyway, in this case, a friend and I spied the subject 'Woman pissing into other woman's ass via bag'. That's exactly what we got.
|
06-20-11 01:43am
|
Reply
294
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, arguably, most of us could choose 'pull on it regularly'; but as Drooler alluded to, that's really only for temporary enlargement, not permanent.
Anyway, despite being probably fairly average in that department, I've never felt a need/desire for anything to be larger.
|
06-17-11 05:46am
|
Reply
295
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Email for me. On a couple of occasions I've not received a a reply, but only when it wasn't that important... as such, didn't chase it up, and just made a mental note about unresponsiveness.
If I had a billing query that I really couldn't resolve, I guess I'd phone... and probably be quite sheepish about it!
|
06-17-11 12:49am
|
Reply
296
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
I don't mind the odd cut or fade, but unrealistic oohs and aahs, and music are definitely a turn-off. I've seen just a couple of sites with acceptable BGM; but mostly it's shockingly corny stuff and makes the whole scene farcical rather than arousing...
|
06-13-11 05:14am
|
Reply
297
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never appealed to me... I guess I'm content with perusing smut in the comfort and safety zone of my own home. If I'm not here, then I've generally got more pressing things to do than watch porn!
|
06-11-11 03:34pm
|
Reply
298
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've been singularly unimpressed by 3D films I've seen at the cinema, so I can imagine porn would be even more of a letdown, possibly literally...
|
06-09-11 12:57pm
|
Reply
299
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Agree with Tangub, I find them boring - one site I really like has a few sets and the yoga ones are some of the very few that I skip over there.
Although perhaps it's not specifically the yoga thing, since the I find the superset of totally-nude-from-start-to-finish art-nude sets rather dull. There's little excitement without the anticipation of seeing what you haven't yet!
I suppose with the right frame of mind, the yoga can inspire thoughts of what acrobatic feats the models may be capable of? But it's a bit too much of a, er, stretch for me.
|
06-05-11 02:15am
|
Reply
300
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As others have said, design and navigation are quite linked, so a bad design often = difficult to navigate = less likely to join.
But on it's own, an ugly site is a turn-off, I'd really have to know what the material is like to get past it.
Good designs have the opposite effect - eg I will visit FigureBaby again sometime, partly because the layout and navigation of it is so exemplary.
|
06-04-11 12:54am
|
