Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Oh, that's an easy one, both work for me big time. Either the transition between nylon and skin at the top of the thigh with stockings, or the view of a girls' pussy with sheer mesh of pantyhose pressed against it... I'll stop here before I write a dissertation on it.
|
03-19-11 12:23am
|
Reply
327
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just the built-in one on Firefox. It doesn't catch everything - some sites are very crafty in triggering them - but I've never bothered to specifically install something extra to block ads or popups.
|
03-17-11 01:36am
|
Reply
328
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Unshod, but nyloned, works for me.
|
03-16-11 08:29am
|
Reply
329
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's not something I openly admit to... but I do find myself increasingly hinting at it in polite company - probably to do with getting older and caring less about raising the odd eyebrow...
|
03-13-11 03:00am
|
Reply
330
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I'm with BadMrFrosty, agree there's a distinction! :D
I like and enjoy regular (whatever that means) porn, but I'm not sure I'd consider myself a collector of it. But where it falls in my area of interest - pinups, erotica, nylon/latex fetish - then I do keep (and revisit) any good material I find.
|
03-12-11 05:38am
|
Reply
331
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Pretty much concur with messmer - this is a tricky one to vote on.
If I'm a long-term member of a site that updates daily, I might visit a couple of times a week to see what's new.
On the other hand, if I'm subscribing for a month, I might visit every day for a week or so and work my way through the site, downloading what I like - then visit back a couple of times a week for the remainder of the subscription to pick up any new stuff.
|
03-12-11 04:40am
|
Reply
332
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Anal doesn't really work for me in general, so I'd have to say no on this one.
|
03-08-11 08:01am
|
Reply
333
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just getting a new one, the last couple lasting me 3 years apiece. I work in IT and like to keep reasonably current... but I have a lot of stuff set up on my computer and its a PITA to do it again, so I try not to upgrade too often!
|
03-05-11 01:21am
|
Reply
334
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I like interviews, but as others have said, it depends on the interviewer. If it's a girl, cool; but many of the guys just ask really inane stuff.
On sites that post multiple videos of any given model, I like to see one that's just an interview - it then makes their other videos and/or photo sets that bit sexier to know a bit about what she's like.
|
03-04-11 02:29am
|
Reply
335
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I really like the fact that nowadays, it can be more of a personal choice with more things being web-based, and less reliance on OS-specific applications.
10 years ago, I was building GUI software that had to be run on Mac or Windows. Now, with very few exceptions, I'm building web apps instead - I only care where and what my server is, but users can be Mac/Windows/Linux/Android/iOS - anything with browser.
|
02-25-11 08:59am
|
Reply
336
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Well, I have, on a number of PCs, downloaded and burned a Ubuntu/UNR ISO, started from the CD, said yes to everything in the GUI install, and ended up with a good, working computer for browsing and other typical tasks - with no tweaking or configuring. I guess I've just been lucky!
However, I'm not willing to bet any organs, let alone the reproductive ones... so by that measure, you win :)
|
02-25-11 06:36am
|
Reply
337
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I'd argue that Windows is more of a tax - if I want a Linux computer, chances are I have to pay for Windows anyway as part of the price, and then get rid of it. Whereas anyone paying the - admittedly steep - premium for a Mac is doing so because they want Mac OS in the first place.
Anyway, agree that Linux can be fiddly, and if I was doing all my usual stuff on it (I'm also working in IT), it would drive me nuts - but Ubuntu has installed and worked well on any old PC I've tried it on without any tinkering and I'd still recommend if it you use a PC largely for web browsing (and especially UNR, which I far prefer to Windows on a netbook).
|
02-25-11 04:37am
|
Reply
338
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
BadMrFrosty, stop being pedantic :) The question is, after all, which OS do you use... did it start out as which computer do you use?
Anyway, I use everything for work but am largely a Mac user - I'm not the zealot I once was, and it's not perfect, but it is stable and secure. lk2fireone, you are right in that Mac OS is easier to use - that's subjective but I've never had any malware issues and don't even use any AV software.
I'd definitely recommend Mac OS, but you do pay quite a premium for it - I'm looking at £1000 for a new laptop, vs £600 for a similar spec Windows machine (albeit not as svelte).
What I really wish, though is that more folk were aware of Linux - it's free and some versions of it now are very user friendly, more secure, and IMHO a better fit for many folk than Windows. Unfortunately PC makers are heavily incentivised by Microsoft not to offer Linux pre-installed, hence you always end up paying for Windows.
|
02-25-11 03:00am
|
Reply
339
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Is anyone really going to own up to anything other than 'as long as it takes'? Which does apply to me, really :)
|
02-15-11 04:45am
|
Reply
340
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'll take a job as a scriptwriter, if there's one going... :)
|
02-12-11 10:27am
|
Reply
341
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ThePornoisseur's Reply
Aha! Makes a bit more sense now - thanks for the clarification, ThePornoisseur.
In which case... I suspect I wouldn't bother to redownload, although I might if I found a higher res set.
|
02-07-11 06:01am
|
Reply
342
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I must be missing something, I'm not sure what situation would start with me having a watermarked gallery, and then finding one without...?
|
02-07-11 01:35am
|
Reply
343
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
TheSquirrel - given that you are a little older than me, out of interest - were you looking at porn, say, maybe 20 years or so ago, when it was the norm to be unshaved? If so, was shaved your preference then, or has it become so with the shift in the industry?
|
02-01-11 07:57am
|
Reply
344
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
As you say, graymane, almost a moot question as we don't often get the chance to see unshaved girls.
I'm obviously missing a point, because I don't really understand why my preference for seeing a girl with a natural and unshaved pussy is considered a fetish...
|
02-01-11 02:13am
|
Reply
345
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
Although I'm a bit old-fashioned in referring to all models, regardless of age, as girls - seeing some pubic hair is what makes a girl a woman - and therefore sexy.
I don't mind if it's trimmed or just a strip, but being there at all makes a big difference... just getting a glimpse as the model tugs her panties down over her hips is exciting.
I don't really mind shaved either - but if so, there needs to be another hook or angle in it - a simple nude shot with a shaved girl does little for me.
|
02-01-11 12:58am
|
Reply
346
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mbaya's Poll
I think it's a nice idea, perhaps - but I doubt I'd bother to use it. Disk space is cheap, I'd rather just download the whole set and prune later if I need to.
|
01-28-11 11:13pm
|
Reply
347
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
This prompts a potentially ewww link - I apologise in advance. http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/natural-harvest/5198959
|
01-26-11 11:26am
|
Reply
348
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I can put it no better than Jay G :)
But I'll add that - at the risk of a dreadful pun - since my wife seems to sleep later, I've become an early riser since discovering this interest.
|
01-18-11 03:13pm
|
Reply
349
|
18 And Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
Another good reviews, Brad - and I agree about zips, why do so few sites not simply include the name of the model and the set name in the zip? I'm not sure if I'd give an instant 100 to one that does :| but still, simply having the model name and set name in the zip would make things much easier. I deal with it by downloading with DownThemAll (a free download manager for Firefox) that lets you change the names of files as you download them.
|
09-20-11 11:23pm
|
Reply
350
|
1Pondo.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
Some time ago, I subscribed to a site in the same network and found the same issue - probably in common with some other folk here, I have a separate webmail address (gmail in this case) for, er, extra-curricular activities.
I got round it by setting up a dummy address on one of my personal domains and forwarding it to my gmail account. Works fine, but obviously only if you have a domain you can play with.
Depending on your ISP, you may be able to play around with their email setup? Eg some ISPs may give you an address of anything@slutty.isp.com and give you the tools to forward varations of the anything@ etc.
|
03-04-11 12:57am
|