| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think if I had a chance between one or two CORRECT camera angles and multiple camera angles, I would choose correct angle. In most videos, changing the camera location is common as positions change, etc. But a lot of amateur-style videos really don't shoot from the correct location. Thank god the trend of stylized shooting in an all-white back-lit room seems to be waning.
Lately, I've been into VR videos and most of those are, of course, shot from one or two POV angles (i.e. girl on top, cowboy, or girl in front, missionary or doggie). Some shoots manage to screw this up, but you really start to appreciate how difficult it is to shoot everything from the correct POV.
|
01-23-17 07:41am
|
Reply
227
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
SelenaMetArt's Reply
SEE!!! THIS is what I mean by awesome customer service! Thank you!
|
01-22-17 07:47pm
|
Reply
228
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I just joined again to pull down their VR content and, yes, you are absolutely right. Lots and lots of body graffiti. Some of it is OK but most is over the top. I've said it before and I'll say it again, girls in porn that get tattoos absolutely don't understand why guys are watching them have sex. "Wow, I really love trying to read that poem on your shoulder while watching you give head" said no guy ever!
|
01-20-17 07:39pm
|
Reply
229
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
Personally, I think there is a limit to how much talking is good. I usually like the polite, come hither, asking and acceptance approach most. A girl tersely telling me exactly what to do or where to do it is not my style. But there are exceptions. Sasha Grey was a non-stop dirty-talk babbler. Sometimes, that were a turn-on, but only when you could understand her....sometimes, because she was just so incredibly hot.
|
01-20-17 08:19am
|
Reply
230
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
Hey, I was just reading this and wanted to mention that MPL Studios long ago resolved my issue and I am now a happy member there. I wrote a review of that site here on Porn Users.
|
01-18-17 07:41am
|
Reply
231
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I've been trying to convince FemJoy that their smaller image sizes (800,1200, with 5500 as the large size) are incredibly antiquated.....for about 4 years, I've been trying....
These days I like 2000-3000 pixel images thanks to faster graphics cards that can display them quickly. I will save the best images I find in the largest available resolution, but only the top .05 (one-half of a) percent of what is out there.
|
01-18-17 07:00am
|
Reply
232
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
This is a tough one. Technically, it is all acting but I'm not watching a particular video to hear the guy throw slurs at the girl. That and endless exaggerated moaning are good reasons to just turn off the sound.
|
01-16-17 07:47am
|
Reply
233
|
N/A
|
Reply of
machoman's Poll
Well, I have historically not been a big keeper of videos but I recently started keeping both "full experience" POV and high resolution VR videos. As a result, the collection is growing rather quickly now. I've also started culling/archiving all SD video and any images that are less than about 1600x1200 since they get blurry on larger monitors. It is amazing how some older sets that once were the best are now just barely OK because of image resolution and improvements in image quality.
|
01-15-17 03:12pm
|
Reply
234
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
On the list it is probably Piper Perri but if I can broaden the definition a little, my favorite petite nude model of all time is Lorena Garcia (Lorena B on Met Art) from Spain. She doesn't do B/G porn but has done a few things on other sites (like In-The-Crack) that could finish off any straight man.
|
01-14-17 09:09am
|
Reply
235
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Are we talking about watching a trailer to decide if we should download the video? The sites I subscribe to allow you to stream the entire video so I usually make my own trailer by skipping through the actual video. Once in a while I'll watch something on PornHub (or someplace like it)that ends up being a trailer, but not very often. In other words, I don't watch trailers.
|
01-12-17 09:46pm
|
Reply
236
|
N/A
|
Reply of
merc77's Poll
Most mainstream Hollywood movies cast porn in such a negative light, completely ignoring the fact that literally half of the modern world watches it. So, my favorite is a movie that uses it as a backdrop but doesn't make any judgement at all. The movie is "Love, Actually". In one of the many tangled segments of this movie, Martin Freeman (The Hobbit, Sherlock) and Joanna Page (From Hell, several British television shows) play nude camera/lighting stand-ins for porn movies. Now, I don't think there are really many lighting stand-ins in porn, but that's OK. The entertainment lies in the fact that their personal relationship develops so normally and naively in-spite of their professional relationships. If you have only seen the broadcast TV version of this movie, you need to watch the DVD or HBO versions because they totally cut this segment for TV. The movie has more A and A-B list actors in it than pretty much any movie I've aver seen and most of the intertwined segments are very entertaining. Tell your SO it is a check flick if you have to. It is really a "couples" flick so watch it with somebody special. You are groaning, I'm sure, but the question was "favorite" not most accurate or most arousing, so that is my answer.
|
01-08-17 10:41am
|
Reply
237
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Let's see.... My second "car" in high school was a custom 1976 Dodge Maxi-van. (Look it up on Pinterest if you are not familiar. maxi-vans are almost 3 feet longer than the long-wheelbase versions.) I spent a ton of money and an entire summer getting it painted (complete with graphics and airbrushed murals) and building the custom interior complete with a kick-ass stereo, suede and leather captains chairs, 2 sun roofs, a 12 volt fridge and keg cooler, comfortable built-in love-seat along the side, a raised queen bed in the back and plenty of stash spots for...stuff. I lived in south Florida, it was the middle of the disco era, the drinking age was 18 and recreational drugs of all types were abundant. I owned a genuine party and fuck-truck. I often had to borrow my mom's car just long enough to pick up dates because nice girls' dads did not approve of boys with vans. It had a padded sliding door to conceal the bed in the back and I would use that to sneak 5 or 10 of my closest friends into drive-ins. (Monahan hated my kind, I'll bet...) But the best thing about it was that when that little door was closed, you could not tell that there was anyone inside when looking through the front windshield. Unlike most vans of the era, mine had a custom air suspension so it did not rock much when in use. So that bed saw a LOT of activity in some ridiculously public places. That is part of what made it so much fun.
The dean of students at the small private high school I attended hated that van and actually created a parking space he could see from his office specifically to keep an eye on it and me. He really hated it when I took a big group out to lunch at the local pub. Finally, he gave me an ultimatum: Either that van goes or he will make sure that I go. I took him at his word, so I sold my awesome van and ended up replacing it with a red 1976 Alfa Romeo convertible. Practically overnight I went from carrying a dozen friends around to only having room for one, or sometimes two very special passengers...but that is another chapter...
So, back to your question. I have seen some exceptionally hot solo photo sets in or on automobiles. Those seem pretty easy with the right car. Sex scenes are really difficult to shoot well because of the lack of room. Even sex in a convertible is a challenge if it isn't on the hood or across the trunk. Those inside a moving mini-van and "stranded/hitchhiker scenes are generally pretty lame and poorly shot. I can do without those. I did see one sex scene that took place in the back of a moving pick-up truck on CA state 101 south of Salinas, shot from a boom or something above the truck and from a semi driving along side that was hot as hell but that was a true rarity. for regular shoots, it is far more about the girl and the quality of the shoot than it is about the car.
|
01-07-17 10:02pm
|
Reply
238
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
A Christmas party is a great time to let loose a little, have a good time and enjoy the company of the people you work with that you might not otherwise relax with.
|
01-03-17 08:54pm
|
Reply
239
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I'm going to assume we are talking the actresses as they were at the time of the show. I'll be really difficult and say Shelley Hack.
|
01-03-17 08:50pm
|
Reply
240
|
Jerkoff Instructions
(0)
|
Reply of
Colm4's Reply
Hello Colm4,
OK, I can appreciate that the genre may be a little different and that this may be a fetish, of sorts, but I wrote a review based on my observations, expectations, etc. I expected the scenes to be more engaging. Yes, the scenes are longer than 30 seconds, but that includes the long, long set-ups and the close-outs that are not action related. Yes, there are many different types of scenarios, but the idea that ALL of them are telling somebody how to masturbate, as in for the first time, is a little excessive. There are many, many similar scenes on dozens of sites that are more engaging and a few sites/porn stars do an absolutely spectacular job of dirty talking. Having a physically and visually disengaged girl telling me how to masturbate just doesn't do it for me. Far worse than a pity fuck, this is dozens of re-enactments of the 40 year old virgin with a leading female who isn't even remotely interested in the guy and often time belittles him. In the world of show and tell porn, this site is almost entirely just tell. I can appreciate the niche, but it does nothing for me.
|
01-02-17 01:21pm
|
Reply
241
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Met Art and their related network is top notch in the solo model genre. I have to say that there should be and can easily be several categories corresponding to the major genres, plus newbies and "lifetime" awards. Be sure to invite me to the after-parties!
|
01-02-17 11:38am
|
Reply
242
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
So...We're talking "be there soon"?
|
12-15-16 09:47am
|
Reply
243
|
My Free Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
I hate to admit it, but I've been lurking around MFC and I know what you mean. There are a handful of girls who are basically naked all the time in the top couple of rows and they get money thrown at them, often without doing much of anything else. The new girls, who probably think in terms of a traditional one-on-one private experience, are at the very bottom of the list and when you peek into their rooms, they are just sitting there.
I also have to wonder if there is some Amazon.com-like marketing model where the models on the top row are paying extra to stay in those slots. That model works great for those top-row girls and for MFC, but not so much for the new models who aren't yet making enough money to buy a higher position. So they quit.
In the end, the psychology of it is very similar to stripping. Some girls try it, some girls enjoy the money for a while, but very few girls have the emotional fortitude or psychological make-up to stick with it and really excel.
OK, I'm headed over to Chaturbate now. :-)
|
12-14-16 10:30pm
|
Reply
244
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
That has to be the best webmaster response I've heard in a long, long time! Thanks, Captain!
|
12-14-16 10:15pm
|
Reply
245
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
Got an HTC Vive a few weeks ago. It is impossible to describe how impressive it is for gaming and...other things. I have written a few VR site reviews and will write a few more soon. From a technology perspective, VR is like having a camera on a cell phone. You have no idea that you even need it until you have one and start using it.
|
12-13-16 07:42am
|
Reply
246
|
N/A
|
Reply of
superjank's Poll
Very good question. The vast majority of sites don't update frequently enough to warrant a continuous subscription, but I do have annual subscriptions to a few sites that have one or more updates a day. The annual rate, especially when a special is offered, are often equal to 3 months or so and if I'm going to rejoin a site more than once or twice a year, I'll consider it. Right now I have 4 or 5 annual subscriptions....and waaaay to many monthly ones.
|
12-07-16 09:57am
|
Reply
247
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I download a lot of stuff and watch it once or twice before moving on to the next download. Sometimes I'll go back to look at old stuff and am pleasantly surprised when I find something good that I either downloaded and didn't watch or forgot about. I probably don't go through and get rid of old stuff often enough. As a result, I have several terabytes of video....
|
12-07-16 09:51am
|
Reply
248
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I currently have...5 annual subscriptions and I usually have 1 or 2 monthly ones that I change regularly. I bookmark them and go through them in a particular order. Once in a while, I will start with a video I downloaded during a previous session but didn't watch.
|
12-03-16 07:00pm
|
Reply
249
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler makes an excellent point. There are usually only a few things in a scene that interest me and a few that are totally deflating. Sadly, very few videos have more than a few minutes of the things I really like so I often find myself fast forwarding to the good stuff. I wonder if there has ever been a study on the formula for this....
|
12-02-16 06:18pm
|
Reply
250
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I won a leg-lamp once.....
|
12-01-16 08:56am
|
