Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
lk2fireone,
Yes, I use the master pull down to access everything, too. That is where the problems occur as I can get into some sites and not others. Whenever I add a site or change my Password, the problems begin.
The support staff is usually very helpful when I contact them but occasionally, they will automatically reset my password even when I ask them not to.
But the problem goes a little deeper than that. I know I'm bringing some of this on myself, but I'm guessing you have experienced the same thing. I have had a Met Art membership for over 10 years now. Occasionally, I will get a discount offer for one of the MA sites from some other source. But when I try to take advantage of the discount, the MA network recognizes my email and presents me with an undiscounted rate. The only way around this is to use a different browser and a different email. So I have 6 subscriptions under 2 different email addresses. Even worse, the subscriptions are supported by 3 different billers (ccbill, epoch and rocketpay). A few years ago, I pointed all of this out to the support folks and they consolidated all of my accounts under one email address and user name....until I add a subscription or change my password. When that happens, some kind of reset occurs and a bunch of my sites are still linked in the master menu, but when I access them, I'm told the subscription has expired. The bottom line is that Met Art policy, created by some executive who never has to deal with customers, treats customers the same way a cell phone company or Comcast treats customers. They create all kinds of incentives for new customers, but don't want existing customers to take advantage of those incentives. This is obvious even within the Met Art Network, where if you click on a link directly, say...of a model that has other sets on other sites listed at the bottom of the page, the sign up is $29 a month for that site, but if you go through the pull down menu, the same sign up is $19 a month. And when you find a promotion for, say, $9 a month or $79 a year, the system does everything possible to ensure that you can't get it because you are an existing customer. To be fair, you can't really blame them for doing this, but you can't really blame me for wanting to take advantage of the best discounts either. I know the support people spend a LOT of time fixing things when people work the system to get better rates. I am a shining example of that.
|
11-03-18 12:20pm
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Loki's Reply
You could not have sex with a woman because she was shaved? Seriously? I'm sure there were a few other things going on there that you are not mentioning.....right???
|
10-31-18 02:08pm
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I grew up in south Florida where they had every type of porn/sex/strip outlet and I had sampled most of them by the time I left for college. I tried a theater once but it was pretty boring considering how lax the rules were back then at some of the strip clubs.
|
05-08-18 07:50pm
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Too many options. The question should be what is the best music you've ever gotten busy to.
|
04-26-18 02:57pm
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
These days, a lot of the latex pocket-pussy things are made in the likeness of many porn stars. I probably have a couple, but I can't recall which porn stars they are. I don't buy those things because they are in somebody's likeness....
|
04-17-18 06:15am
|
Reply
56
|
Daring Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
tilcyrella's Review
I'm not sure I understand. You gave the site a 95 but didn't really explain why. Are you really saying this is one of the best porn sites on the Internet, which is what 95 means?
Also, what is daring about the sex? Is it in public? Is it in dangerous places? Looking at the images, I don't see anything particularly daring.
|
04-02-18 06:15pm
|
Reply
57
|
My Free Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
perversecult's Review
I visit MFC and chaturbate moderately often, but I do not look for privatge shows there. There are other sites that are set up for private shows, like metcams. With MFC and Chaturbate, mostly Chaturbate, I'll give tokens to the girls that are particularly impressive so they do things in thier public room. I don't care if somebody else is geting off on my dime. I'm not really there for the conversation anyway.
Just look at the numbers of viewers in each girl's room on these sites and you will see that for every one person paying tokens, there are hundreds just watching.
Don't expect a first class private experience on these sites. Just go to one that specializes in private if that is what you want.
|
04-02-18 06:10pm
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Call them up and telling them you are moving to a competitor. (Check to make sure you have a competitor first) They will connect you to the "customer retention" department. Those people are authorized to negotiate a better deal and will usually offer a pretty nice package for 6 months or so.
|
04-02-18 06:00pm
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I cull on a regular basis. Non-HD videos are pretty unwatchable these days. I also have an archive of stuff that I might want to look at but is more than 10 years old.
|
03-30-18 05:12pm
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What merc77 said.
|
03-30-18 05:06pm
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Did you really think anyone on this site was going to say Porn? :-)
|
03-30-18 05:05pm
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Loki's Poll
I'm thinking maybe this question could have been phrased differently....
I've never watched porn in public or on a smart phone.
I do, however, have several iPads including one I keep next to my bed and one that I travel with. So I will, occasionally, watch porn on an iPad in a hotel room. Considering there was once an entire industry focused on getting you to buy expensive Spectravision movies in hotel rooms, I don't consider this a big deal.
|
03-30-18 05:02pm
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Ok, four things (started out as two but then I started thinking about it...). First, if I'm watching a sex scene by myself, I want the male to be as non-descript as possible. If the fantasy is supposed to be that the guy is me, then I don't really want the video to emphaisize him at all and he can NOT be distinctive in any way. I am older but, as long as I'm fantasizing anyway, I may as well fantasize that I am 20-35 and I certainly don't really want to see a 60+ guy in a sex scene. it is too distracting.
Second, the same thing applies to POV and VR videos. If the guy is a surrogate me, he should be as generic as possible. "Hey! Look at my giant chest tattoo!" or "Hey look! I'm Black!" is not really something I enjoy be distracted with in VR or POV.
Third, there are some male actors that are so incredibly sleazy looking, I have a hard time watching the video. These are not necessarily older guys but guys who look like they just crawled out from under a bridge. Fetish Network has a prominant male who falls into this category. He is perfect for the "home invasion", "hitchhiker" and older bondage videos on that site, but after a while, I found I just could not watch him.
And fourth, if my wife and I are watching porn, the male needs to be the best looking guy on the planet and he needs to be...capable in many ways. The idea of the two of us watching an older guy bang a younger girl in a video does nothing for her, so it sort of defeats the purpose of watching the video in scene in the first place.
Those are my 4 thoughts on the subject!
|
03-30-18 04:55pm
|
Reply
64
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
kutloch's Reply
Hi,
Thanks for the update. It is always nice to see the webmasters checking sites like this for reviews and comments. It shows that they care and are attentive to their subscriber's comments. I have seen the mobile option on the site lately, but I am old-school with a PC and giant monitor. Overall a terrific site!
|
02-26-18 12:07pm
|
Reply
65
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
I recall reading that he passed away but thought somebody else had taken over at the site. His stuff was amazing, though.
|
02-26-18 11:46am
|
Reply
66
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
I'll add that I've never seen a site that only provides images in landscape-only or portrait-only format. And if you want some GREAT wallpapers, go check out Digital Desire. J. Stephen Hicks is an awesome photographer and, in addition to regular photo shoots, he provides one nude and one beautiful landscape scene a day (often it is a great landscape with an ungodly beautiful girl someplace in the image, often clothing optional.)
I was last a member of Digital Desire in 2017 and and can say it is medium-core old-school glamour. Good stuff if you haven't been there before.
|
02-25-18 07:43pm
|
Reply
67
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
Sonofzog,
OK, first off, About half of the images are landscape. I prefer landscape images and I can tell you that there are some mind-blowing ones here.
Second, Amour Angels is not affiliated with W4B or any other popular site that I know of. I was a last a member of that site in 2014 or 2015, although for some reason it looks like I did not write a review for it. The site uses several of the same models that Met Art, Fem Joy and W4B uses, (Like Emily Bloom and Serena Wood) but they also have several models that I have not seen elsewhere. I would define Amour Angels as a professional site, but with more of a buble-gum kind of flavor. (Big flowers, hats, lots of props, etc.) Almost all solo and girl-girl posing, strictly softcore. Videos are just posing, laying around, female form stuff with some close-ups. The models are mostly cute, young, slender, petite...really young. (All ofthe girls are 18+.) The sets I have of popular models are from when thyey were just starting out. I just looked and I saved 229 sets and 29 videos, mostly because of the exclusive models not seen elsewhere. To answer your orientation question, there is also a good balance of landscape and portrait images here. The site may have changed a little since 2014-15, but this is what I have from then.
Hope that helps.
...Now I have to go back and join Amour Angels again. This time, I'll write a review!
|
02-25-18 07:34pm
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
I'm assuming yoiu are talking about listing scenes on the tour pages, correct?
A listing of scenes or a count of scenes?
Some sites have a lot of scenes, so listing them in the tour section would be pretty difficult, although some sites are set up so you can see thumbnails of scenes/sets but not watch them.
To me, the number of scenes and the frequency of scene release are pretty important stats.
I really think you can get a read on whether a site is honest or not by looking at the preview pages and reading reviews. If the informatio nyou want to see about the site is not there, move on.
|
02-23-18 04:07pm
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think most of the time the rule about topics at the diner table is SEX, politics and religion. Fortunately, PU covers the first item quite nicely. Facebook and Twitter seem to have a handle on the other two.
|
02-19-18 02:48pm
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Loki's Poll
Can we go macro for a minute? This is a great community, but sometimes there are bad players. PU has a "report" option in every thread but I'm guessing people don't use it very often. Like the "trust" ratings, there is also a potential for people to abuse the process "reporting" others who don't share their views on a particular site, etc.
PU members are a rare breed and it is refreshing being able to talk about so many un-PC things. I mean, just saying the letters BDSM in public these days is likely to get you arrested. (kidding...mostly.)
How do we develop a system where people are free to say what they want, but those who make particularly biased, racist or religously tainted comments are politely told that their comments are not appreciated? I honestly don't know.
Ultimately, like the Whopr discovered in the 80's movie War Games, perhaps the best way to win when people are trolling or presenting controvercial comments is NOT TO PLAY. Just don't respond to nonsense. If you do, you are only provoking more.
|
02-19-18 02:40pm
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I'm talking solo girl sets here, mostly....
I've come to appreciate...particular poses that, for the most part, have become part of the formula for most solo girl sets on many sites. It really surprises and amazes me when sets in several popular sites omit them. I have so much stuff now that most sets that don't include those poses don't make it onto my hard drive.
The other thing that is an absolutel requirement, regardless of anything else, is model eye contact with the camera.
|
02-16-18 05:29pm
|
Reply
72
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Onyx's Reply
Well, I've pulled down a couple and some are 3d and some are not. No logic to which is which since a few new ones are not. I have not had a chance to actually watch any of them iun VR yet. Will update when I do.
|
02-13-18 06:20pm
|
Reply
73
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Hi Amanda,
That is probably because it is not a full-fledged site. It is just a landing page within the DDF site. It also does not appear on their list of sites within the DDF main site. Odd. Clearly still in development.
|
02-13-18 06:09pm
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
Reply of
superjank's Poll
Wait, where are the "No" and "Hell NO!" options? There are maybe 3 women in all of porn that I would consider downloading a non HD video of and they would have to be doing something a-mazing (because I already have every released video ever produced of them...)! All of my non-HD porn has been relegated to an archive drive along with a few million images that are postage stamp sized on a modern monitor.
|
02-12-18 06:43pm
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Onyx's Poll
I bought a VR headset (HTC Vive) to play games over a year ago, but the gaming environment is still in a developmental stage...like the early days of apps for iPhones. I probably use the thing about 50% for VR porn, I've signed up to (and reviewed) most of the VR porn sites, I have a couple of annual subscriptions to get the weekly VR videos and I have about 5 terabytes of VR porn (just checked...waw!). It is completley immersive and very entertaining. I think Onyx and I are the flagbearers for VR porn here on PU and between us, we cover most of the VR sites and have slightly different perspectives.
If you are VR curious, I strongly recommend that you buy a cheap $20 cardboard or plastic headset for your smart phone and grab a free VR video from any one of a multitude of sites. This will not reflect the video quality of VR, but it will give you a pretty good idea of what it is like.
|
02-12-18 04:17pm
|
|
