| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I've put "other" because I'd say the majority of the time I've had a good fast response, occasionally I don't. Depends on the site, but most are OK.
It tends to help if you join well-regarded sites using sites like PU as a guide of course.
|
04-27-13 03:35am
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
plan b's Poll
None of them... and I had to Google "hackey sack"! I voted for that though because it looks kinda fun!
|
04-23-13 03:21pm
|
Reply
103
|
Twink BF Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
mikala's Review
Hey mate good to see a review from you, we need more gay reviewers on this site. Welcome to my Trust List!
|
04-23-13 03:01pm
|
Reply
104
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
Reply of
Crispin's Review
Welcome to the site! Sorry about your bad experience with this site but I hope you'll stick around - it's always good to warn your fellow users against sites like this that would rip us off - I HATE site which don't respond to support e-mails!
|
04-22-13 04:52pm
|
Reply
105
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Shame the site isn't up to standard - I admire the lady for still being active in her sixties!
|
04-22-13 04:49pm
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Much the same as now I think. I can't see them trying to tighten them up in most countries as it's largely fruitless, but I can't see them taking the time and effort to make them more relaxed either - generally unless there's a big demand for something these things get ignored.
If existing laws are unenforceable they tend to just leave them on the books and pretend they're not there!
|
04-21-13 05:29am
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yeah, as long as it uses a trustworthy biller and there looks to be good content.
If I liked the content it would be a shame there's no more to come, but it's still there to enjoy what there is.
|
04-19-13 05:08pm
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Sometimes I'll take the plunge - I'd be cautious but if the preview is really good it's hard to resist sometimes.
If the site is new then it's understandable if there's no reviews, but if it's an older site I'd be more suspicious I guess.
I have submitted a few sites to TBP/PU and nominated them for reviews... but ultimately the first review has to come from someone - I've benefited from reviews from others so I have to return the favour!
|
04-17-13 04:42pm
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like to see flaws - all humans have them! I hate porn which is over-produced and seems airbrushed - to me the sexiness of porn is in its gritty reality. I want to see real people having passionate sex, not flawless models worrying about camera angles and their best side!
|
04-15-13 12:15pm
|
Reply
110
|
Absolute Cruelty
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Thank you!!
I'll give it some serious thought! Really appreciate you going to so much trouble to help me.
|
04-15-13 12:13pm
|
Reply
111
|
Absolute Cruelty
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Hey thanks for the advice. I was put off using VPNs though as I read that using them to access websites where you needed passwords and especially credit card details was unsafe, as some of them are disreputable and can access the details you transmit over the VPN?
I also tried a few free ones to try and access regular US TV content and most of them didn't seem to work - the content was still blocked for me.
Also I thought as soon as they get by credit card details they'll be able to figure out it's a UK-based card and block me anyway.
Any advice? I've had credit card fraud twice in the past so extra cautious about this stuff.
|
04-15-13 09:22am
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not my cup of tea, never seen the appeal.
It's actually quite rare in gay porn - bit of a niche I guess.
|
04-13-13 08:05am
|
Reply
113
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I suppose quality of the videos and the freqency of updates. I don't care about pictures.
They basically have to show me enough of a preview to give me a "feel" for the site and leave me wanting more!
|
04-12-13 01:11pm
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
That's an excellent point Jay G - I too have often found the most expensive sites are disappointing. It's certainly no guarantee of quality - but I'd never really thought about why. Your explanation make a whole lot of sense!
|
04-09-13 03:42pm
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, always.
It's a part of the whole package after all, you can't ignore it in your overall rating in my opinion. If two sites are identical in quality but one costs double the other, then it would seem odd to give them an equal score to me.
|
04-09-13 03:32pm
|
Reply
116
|
Juicy Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
Rockhardslc's Reply
Thanks dude and welcome to the site! Always great to have users of gay sites here, as we're pretty thin on the ground.
I hope you check out the site and stick around - maybe write some reviews of your own?
|
04-08-13 08:15pm
|
Reply
117
|
Latinos Fun
(0)
|
Reply of
SFguy's Comment
Hey man, fantastic to see you back! Really hope you stick around and maybe do a few new reviews?
|
04-08-13 10:28am
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
It'll happen, but not in the next 10 years.
Hell, some people are prepared to have sex with plastic dolls already!
Personally, I'd rather use porn and take matters into my own hands!
|
04-07-13 02:42pm
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I picked "know they don't tell all". Most sites I've joined the content is accurately reflected by the previews, but you have to be careful.
It's often more the technical things which are debatable - the definition of "HD", for example.
Of course, restrictions like slow downloads, no download managers etc. are rarely mentioned.
I think the most outright dishonesty concerns things like frequency of updates, which often isn't as much as claimed, or the definition of "new" content, which can actually just be rotated old content.
Sometimes the previews showing highlights can be accompanied by text which suggests there's rather more to the video than there actually is.
Certainly the tour is important but I use it in conjunction with reviews wherever possible and take what it says with a pinch of salt!
That's why sites like this are so important - you get the view of an ordinary porn user who has actually got past the advertised, handed over their hard-earned and can tell you the whole unvarnished truth!
|
04-05-13 12:56am
|
Reply
120
|
Twink BF Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
mikala's Review
Welcome to the site - there are very few gay reviewers here so it's always great to see another join.
Sorry you had a bad experience with this site - I hope you'll find other better sites and give us a more detailed review of your experiences with those.
|
04-04-13 11:55am
|
Reply
121
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I usually send it to sleep, occasionally I'll power it off.
|
04-03-13 01:11pm
|
Reply
122
|
Cuckold My Husband
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
A pity... I guess you get what you pay for!
|
04-01-13 12:22pm
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I'm not quite sure...
|
04-01-13 12:20pm
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I tried one but guess I'm dumb because I couldn't figure it out at all!
|
03-30-13 04:12pm
|
Reply
125
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
About 17Mb/sec for me.
|
03-28-13 11:50am
|
