| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
This will sound weird, but with the hi-res photos I notice a lot teeth decay!
|
12-02-07 04:03am
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
I like the average site rating.
|
11-26-07 02:14pm
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TheViking's Reply
I'll tell you that that being American, I don't appreciate at all what some of these companies are doing, especially since they gear all their sites toward the American consumer (such as naming Olga "Betty"), and I am not patronizing the sites that are doing this.
|
11-26-07 01:29am
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Reply
Most billing companies no longer accept the anonymous pre-paid credit cards any longer, for obvious reasons.
|
11-26-07 01:26am
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I don't like circus porn.
|
11-23-07 10:45am
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I like the screenshots myself. One addition I would ask would be photo samples from the various sites.
|
11-21-07 10:56am
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
Thanks for implementing this!
|
11-19-07 11:33am
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Google k-lite codec pack. It's safe, and you never have to worry about a codec.
|
11-17-07 10:47am
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Getreal's Poll
I'm a great believer that in porn males are merely props, so I choose the POV niche. The problem is that most of the morons that produce these sites have no clue as to how to do it. A girl, a penis, and a camera!
|
11-15-07 11:29am
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
With a hi-res image, you can enlarge without dimishiment of quality. For instance, if there is a long range view of a model, you can enlarge it to show her completely in the frame without her getting fuzzy! Of course, other people use this technique for more devious reasons! BTW, this is why body part close ups in high-res photography is so dumb. For those gynecologically inclined, the zoom suffices. But we are way off subject here.
|
11-14-07 08:04pm
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I love downloading. And then I watch it. And then the male in it ruins it and I delete it Lol!
|
11-14-07 07:59pm
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Getreal's Poll
Psychiatrists say that men who enjoy watching women engage in lesbianism do so because of latent homosexuality in themselves. In other words, they can't express it because of fear, so they use the viewing of lesbianism as a sort of proxy. Funny how the human mind works.
|
11-10-07 11:13pm
|
Reply
113
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Poll
Funny---Rodney Moore has a humorous approach.
|
11-06-07 06:19pm
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I'm happy with 400. But I also check multiple download speed. And how many downloads a site will allow at once. If I have 4 going @ 200 per DL, that's fine too.
|
11-04-07 05:34am
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
I like it! I hope no one abuses the hotlink feature, like say...."this site would be even better if EVE ANGEL were in it!"
|
11-01-07 07:50pm
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I study TBP with all it's information very carefully before deciding.
|
10-28-07 05:16pm
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
One good reason is free porn!
|
10-26-07 06:16am
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I only read the non advertising blogs. There are a lot of good ones out there. The blogs that are redirecting ad sites----never.
|
10-26-07 06:15am
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Poll
Watch it, delete it immediately if I don't like it.
|
10-22-07 12:16am
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
For me, it's the top sites. TBP basically gets it right, IMO. Once you get to the 3rd or 4th page, it's mostly low grade stuff.
|
10-17-07 10:51pm
|
Reply
121
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I'm still waiting for the site so great that I would spend $30-$40 month after month on it. I haven't found it yet.
|
10-06-07 08:47pm
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Bela's News
Complaining to Yahell is like slamming one's head into a brick wall. They simply don't care. I know they have been having serious email problems lately. Gmail is far more dependable, and offers unlimited space.
|
10-03-07 08:50am
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
Last week I wrote as many reviews as I could (not casually, I put effort into it) just to see if I could win. I did. I think the prizes should be a random drawing that includes everyone that participated in some way that week.
|
09-26-07 06:26am
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
You should be happy with your 1 "no" rating Drooler...it's the exception that proves the rule!
|
09-23-07 03:54pm
|
Reply
125
|
N/A
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Poll
Yes, but giving a reason for a "no" rating should be mandatory in order to help the honest reviewers.
|
09-22-07 02:08pm
|
