| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
It shows us to be very stern critics!!!
|
09-20-07 05:48am
|
Reply
127
|
N/A
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Reply
Maybe it'll be a landslide, but I've grown to hate trials. You have to remember to cancel, some sites charge an outrageous recurring charge. I'd rather have a very good site preview, like FTV Girls. I've given up on trials.
|
09-16-07 04:28am
|
Reply
128
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Early on I made the mistake of reviewing a site without being in long enough. Now I generally wait a month, or earlier if i was a member there before. But after comparing it later on to similar sites, sometimes an adjustment is necessary.
|
09-12-07 11:25pm
|
Reply
129
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I agree about DDF in the "Hall Of Fame". I once had a problem with one of their sites that took a few days to correct, and they gave me a free month membership to the DDF site of my choice!
|
09-10-07 10:09pm
|
Reply
130
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I had a comment about this---the Suzedotnet customer service contacted me very quickly in the middle of the night. I once had one tell me if I didn't like it, i could cancel my membership, which i promptly did!
|
09-10-07 12:33am
|
Reply
131
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I cancel immediately to avoid the chance that I'll forget!
|
09-05-07 08:56pm
|
Reply
132
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I think the change in the rankings brought about by this policy shows that it seems to work quite well. The previous rankings, marred IMO by shills, seemed bizarre to me.
|
08-23-07 02:50am
|
Reply
133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
This is great! You'll notice that the rankings have changed RADICALLY, and now reflect reality more closely. The shills will have to do a lot of hard work now to distort the rankings!
|
08-22-07 07:49pm
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
The thing is there is so much potential for good porn. I almost hate the HC videos nowadays. it's always the same...the cameraman (it's always a man) will pan up from the floor. Then he'll say something stupid, like "show us your tits". Then he'll cop a feel---I hate that! I wish one of these girls would tell him to fuck off. And then the cameraman will say something stupid like "show us your ass" and then it wil be a micro closeup, and he'll cop another feel. Then comes the male actor, stroking himself again on camera. Then the idiot male actor acts out his rape fantasy, with the stupid hair pulling and the stupid ass slapping, and the disgusting spitting. And the circus positions, and the scene always ending with the jerk masturbating himself, as if we must see that. Blah! And all the companies do it exactly this way. John Root and Suze Randall are outstanding erotic photographers, but most of the rest are just some schmo with a digital camera. Don't get me wrong---the girls are great, and actually understand the concept of relating to the viewer. But the idiotes running most of these sites don't have a clue. Not a clue!
|
08-22-07 07:36pm
|
Reply
135
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
To be honest, most porn isn't very good, because the guys making it don't have an inkling of what's erotic, this includes the porn valley people as well as websites.With hardcore video, it seems to be made for the male actor's pleasure, which ruins the effect. They're always ruining the shot, and who here really enjoys watching these guys pull their own puds????? And yet it's in every damn HC video. As for the "softcore" photo sites, how many gynecological closeups do you need in a single set?? Sometimes there are are like 20! And all the circus poses! I don't want to see a contortionest, i want to see a hot girl! My point? They all copy one another, and when i take material from a site, i always have to edit it. Most sites don't deliver very well, IMO.
|
08-21-07 08:09pm
|
Reply
136
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
That's why I always wait a few months to update....wait for the inevitable patches, especially the dreaded IE !
|
08-19-07 10:57pm
|
Reply
137
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If Videobox charged premium prices, my rating for them would be about 75. So the cheap price is a factor in giving them a higher score.
|
08-13-07 07:47pm
|
Reply
138
|
N/A
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Reply
SnowDude, I trashed Norton a long time ago. A system hog. When I uninstalled it, my start up registry shrunk to almost nothing. It puts so much junk on your pc. I use AVG free, it's great, and doesn't conflict with anything else. Norton is a bully !
|
08-07-07 10:15pm
|
Reply
139
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I don't use my credit card----I use a prepaid debit card, totally safe, and you don't even have to use your real name or address.
|
08-03-07 01:53am
|
Reply
140
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
And do you notice a lot of modern porn refuses to use attractive sex positions? When was the last time you saw the "missionary position"? Not what they call the missionary position, but the actual position. I think 1987 was the last time i saw that one. And the stupid ass slapping, and the disgusting spitting on girls genitals, like some pervert in an adult store peepshow! No wonder there aren't any attractive girls left in American porn!
|
08-03-07 01:51am
|
Reply
141
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I hate circus porn!
|
08-02-07 12:39am
|
Reply
142
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Poll
Forget limited trials. All I want to see when I peek into a site is a photo list of the models with perhaps one sample for each. Teen Dreams does that, and it's good business sense. Limited trials make a site look unappealing, especially if they are giving away cheesy free samples.
|
07-30-07 04:24am
|
Reply
143
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I would date Traci Lords, she's about my age !
|
07-28-07 04:45am
|
Reply
144
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The people who spend cash on these sites are going to write exactly what they think. The shills are easy to spot, the real reviewers will let you know if they were happy they spent the money, or disappointed. It's as simple as that. I think they are right on the money.
|
07-21-07 01:27am
|
Reply
145
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Douggie's Reply
I use Nero to burn DVD's. The videos downloaded from sites need to be converted before burning. Nero will convert and burn. Here are Nero tutorials for you: http://www.nero.com/nero6/eng/Tutorial_Photo_Video.html
|
07-19-07 07:24pm
|
Reply
146
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Anonymous no comment negative ratings make me want to NOT submit reviews.
|
07-15-07 04:47pm
|
Reply
147
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I read them all very carefully
|
07-05-07 08:06pm
|
Reply
148
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Well, I made a bit of a negative comment concerning a site i recently joined, and that webmaster was on my comment like a fly on sh1t! In other words, they are keeping a very close eye on this site. I think the trust ratings need to be moderated. Trust ratings without a reasonable explanation should be deleted, in the same way you don't give points for reviews that are too simple. Just giving an anonymous no explanation trust rating is too tempting for the abusers.
|
06-30-07 07:44pm
|
Reply
149
|
N/A
|
Reply of
djwolf's Poll
The "trust" ratings make me NOT want to post reviews. How you can permit anonymous no explanation "trust" ratings is beyond me. I look for someone who has obviously been to the site, and is obviously not a shill.
|
06-28-07 08:56pm
|
Reply
150
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Not as webmasters they aren't...but as Joe Blow they most certainly are permitted and most likely do.
|
06-28-07 08:43pm
|
