| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Satine's Reply
Satine, thanks for elucidating your thought process on the In The Crack score. I've loved their content, but cannot justify the prices anymore. A shame. I think it's perfectly reasonable to drop their score because of price, but I'm not sure about TBP's rules regarding that issue. I've reread the grading criteria and didn't see price mentioned.
Still, I think it's justified to drop their score because of the exorbitant prices.
|
10-15-19 03:56pm
|
Reply
27
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
It's the risk with review sites. A particular reviewer may find content you love subpar or not appealing, so will review a site much lower than you would. That's the great thing about PU. We all have our own biases and opinions and that makes the reviews different and, in my opinion, a little more valuable than the reviews on The Best Porn.
|
10-07-19 09:37pm
|
Reply
28
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Maybe Satine took into account the incredibly expensive prices at In The Crack in their score?
I love this site, but it's gotten too expensive to join anymore.
|
10-05-19 04:00am
|
Reply
29
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
I don't like to join a site without a clear idea of what's inside. That pretty much means if the Preview button takes me to the Sign Up page, I just leave the site and ignore it.
Is it me, or is this phenomenon becoming more common?
|
08-22-19 02:05am
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
There are a few scenes of girls with stunning eyes. I really relish them. Pretty much every Lana Rhoades scene is in this category.
|
08-19-19 04:31pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
Though I have a few good Mia Malkova scenes, I prefer Lana Rhoades. Maybe it's her eyes.
|
08-15-19 05:37pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
Though I have a few good Mia Malkova scenes, I prefer Lana Rhoades. Maybe it's her eyes.
|
08-15-19 05:37pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Poll
Maybe a middle ground: grad students. :)
|
08-09-19 04:04pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
I loved August Ames, and have many of her scenes, but since her suicide, I've had some hesitation watching her scenes. I won't erase them because I think she's gorgeous and talented and erotic, but I'm hoping some distance from her passing will let me enjoy the scenes as I used to.
It's kind of odd because I'm a big fan of black and white classic movies, and most of those stars are dead. I don't feel any hesitation watching those films. I think there's an important distinction though: Porn is a much more intimate form of entertainment than regular films. Watching Katherine Hepburn doesn't bother me, but sharing an intimate moment with August Ames does.
|
08-09-19 03:59pm
|
Reply
35
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I originally scored Adult Time a 99. I lowered the score after quitting due to a few post-membership factors (they're much more expensive to rejoin than initially join) and the fact that they have advertised gay content and didn't have much (or any).
|
07-08-19 08:52pm
|
Reply
36
|
Adult Time
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Comment
I tried to take advantage of Adult Time's advertised Free Week. When I accepted, I was taken to a page where I was asked to resume my membership with either one month Streaming only, a two-month membership, or a yearly membership. Nothing about a one-week free trial, or any option for a one month full (streaming and downloads) membership.
Sadly disappointed in what I considered a first-class site.
|
07-05-19 09:41pm
|
Reply
37
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
It's beginning to seem that by chasing technical "upgrades" a lot of sites are making their interfaces more and more difficult to use. It's a bad business model to piss off your loyal and repeat customers.
|
06-06-19 06:24pm
|
Reply
38
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
kutloch's Reply
Thanks for the response kuloch. But I will remind you that not all progress is positive, but the changes you mention are welcome.
I welcome changes to W4B that make the site more easily accessible to all but stand by my initial comments. I recently had a membership to W4B, and didn't access the site for at least 20 days of my membership because I loathed the site design. Thanks to W4B for taking our comments seriously and making changes. I look forward to visiting your site again in the future to see the changes for myself.
|
06-06-19 05:58pm
|
Reply
39
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
LOLZ. Very good.
|
05-30-19 02:58pm
|
Reply
40
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I got an update notice from W4B that their new site design was geared toward making use by tablets and phones the priority. I never use anything but a desktop to access porn, so don't care. I saw a way to access the old interface, but you have to log in to it separately and do so every time.
As to the "dig in and enjoy the experience" advice, I joined specifically to find a few models and their sets. Now I need to spend extra time looking for them. If I was just a casual member, I might accept their philosophy, but I want specific things, and their design is a major hindrance.
Thanks for the discussion, pinkpanther. You make some good points.
|
04-26-19 05:30pm
|
Reply
41
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
To each their own. I hate their site design. Point in case from last night--I wanted to search models, but there is no feature for it. I wanted to organize models alphabetically, but there is only one way to do it, by popularity. You literally have to scroll down one very long page to see the models, and point the mouse on the model to see their name (otherwise it's hidden). There's no way to search their site at all, not by model, not by content, no way at all. It annoyed me to no end.
|
04-24-19 12:44am
|
Reply
42
|
Nubiles Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Shasta90418's Comment
I too have never had any trouble with downloads from Nubiles.net or Nubiles Porn.
Sorry you're having problems, Shasta90418. Have you tried contacting member support to see if they can help resolve the issue?
|
03-30-19 12:19pm
|
Reply
43
|
Adult Time
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks. I'd never joined any of the networks that make up Adult Time before, so I didn't know it was a standard feature for them.
A decade is a long time on the interwebs. I remember those days. But I also remember downloading individual pictures from sites before zipfiles were common, too.
|
03-29-19 11:03pm
|
Reply
44
|
Swallow Salon
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I loved Amateur Allure, and have been hoping to join Swallow Salon soon. But with the price hike (yeah, they upped the price $10/mo) I will probably never join now.
|
03-26-19 10:07am
|
Reply
45
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
In The Crack used to be one of my very favorite sites, but a while back I noticed that I would be auto logged out by the site every 20 minutes. I went to customer service and asked what was going on. ITC responded that it was a security feature that couldn't be bypassed and was no big deal. I strongly disagree.
I don't use a download manager. So I typically sit at the computer and download a few dozen sets at a time. This will take a few hours. Having to re-enter my login credentials after downloading one video ad nauseum was so infuriating, I gave up on the site despite the fact that it is one of my absolute favorites.
I would still rank ITC very high in score, but would lop off probably 5-10 points from a score for the hassles of having to constantly having to re-enter my credentials.
|
03-06-19 12:59pm
|
Reply
46
|
AT Kingdom Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for the review. I've been a member of AT Kingdom Network a few times. It has nice content, but the lack of an overarching software platform for the individual six networks is a huge disappointment. You outline the problem well.
AT Kingdom Network is ridiculously overpriced for what you get. It's cheaper to join four sites individually. There's also so much content that you can't really get your money's worth in one month.
I respectfully disagree about ATK Natural & Hairy, as I find pubic hair extremely sexy, but to each their own.
|
03-04-19 05:36pm
|
Reply
47
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
PJGirls is a one-trick pony. It focuses on very explicit gynecological views. I rated it based on how well it does on that basis. You come at the site with different criteria and explained your rating well. I liked your review a lot, and the differing criteria we use to judge the same site is what makes PU so valuable. You pointed out some really cogent points in your review that I hadn't thought about (like the camera angles), and I value seeing other opinions.
You wrote a good review. You might differ with me on how good PJGirls is, but that's what makes horse races, politics, and porn reviews. :)
|
03-03-19 08:32pm
|
Reply
48
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I just spent a few minutes reviewing the webmaster rules for PU. I hadn't looked at them for the simple reason that I don't have any affiliation with any website.
It appears that there are two infractions meriting suspension, (1) that no incentives be given for reviews, and (2) any added text to a site must not ask or influence users to submit a review or comment with a specific agenda.
If PJGirls' webmaster violated either of these, they merit suspension, as without honest, impartial reviews PU is useless.
|
03-03-19 06:44pm
|
Reply
49
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
I'm a big fan of pubic hair on girls, and Love Hairy is a decent site for that. But most of the models have a pretty sparse bush. It's a matter of degree I guess.
I do think that your suggestion for a MetArt site devoted to tanlines is a fantastic idea. I'd certainly check it out.
|
03-03-19 06:33pm
|
Reply
50
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
mbaya, thanks for the review. I too noticed the new download limit at PJGirls. I'm not terribly thrilled with it, but don't find it restrictive at all because I never use a download manager. It's not a limit on how much content you can download, but rather on how many connections you can make to the PJGirls servers in an hour. If you rely on a download manager, you'll find it restrictive, but if not, you'll literally never notice.
PJGirls staff wrote a post to all members explaining the issue, and laid out that too many connections from users were overloading the servers. They implemented the policy of 100 downloads in a hour to balance server usage for everyone on the site. I give kudos to PJGirls for good communications.
I don't have a very fast internet connection, and have never experienced timing out on PJGirls. It has at times been slow, but since the implementation of the download limit, it has been less likely to be slow.
I find it unusual that their webmaster was suspended from PU. Can anyone clarify why this occurred? I'm not familiar for what offences you can be suspended. They were suspended, but the site is still listed. Is that a reasonable reason to criticize the site? You obviously think so, but I cannot say because of lack of information.
Thanks for the good review. We differ in regards to the site's quality and you make a good case for your point of view in your review. Good job.
|
03-03-19 06:15pm
|
