| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Amen brother!
|
03-27-09 03:02pm
|
Reply
252
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I have three views on this. First, the military is rejecting a bunch of potential recruits because they're too damn fat !!! At least 25% of American youth got too many cheeseburgers hanging off their butt cheeks to even meet the military's weight criteria. So, by expanding to gays you're opening up your recruiting base by about 6% (about the national average of gay people in society) to help offset against the lard butts.
Second, I've never really bought into the whole concept that you got to watch your behind in the foxhole or the shower mentality. There were gays at the gym I used to go to and frankly I didn't really care if they saw me naked or not. Hey, if they're interested in my bod then I figured I mut be hot to trot for the ladies too. Ultimately, when you go to war it's trust that your fellow grunt won't let you down that counts. Whether or not that fellow grunt rubs loins with the ladies or the guys makes no difference to me when you're staring the wrong end of an RPG.
Lastly, there seem to be a lot of women in the military now in front line support positions yet somehow it seems our military continue to function with the female equation added in. I guess what I'm getting at with the last 2 points is that the modern military takes young people from all walks of life and molds them into a professional fighting machine. I think it's sort of silly to think that the machine is going to break down because of someone's sexual preference.
|
03-25-09 11:58am
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Ah yes, the old J. Giles Band classic "Angel Was A Centerfold" comes to mind. Of course, that song in itself is about as old as any ex I'd be interested in seeing in a porno ;)
|
03-23-09 09:42pm
|
Reply
254
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Well, I'm to crush everyone's little fantasy trip here with a dose of reality. Let's face, when you start getting older, you really don't want to be seeing your ex's, friends or high school heart throbs doing the whole over-the-hill MILF thing. Man, getting older sucks. That and my neighbors are fat asses. That pretty much leaves me with the celebrity picks. Somebody just shoot me now.
|
03-23-09 11:43am
|
Reply
255
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I put that it's nice but not that important. I agree with Drooler that a good search function makes rejoins a lot easier. Most of the sites that I do rejoin have a simple and clear update schedule or good search that makes this easy. As you might expect, they tend to be the higher scoring sites (not that amazing that good quality porn and good site design and search seem to go hand in hand).
However, for most sites that I don't plan on going back to or rarely go back to, it's not that important. If I pick up a few duplicates so be it. I'd rather have the quality over the search capabilities.
It is frustrating that a lot of sites can't seem to figure out the search thing. It's pretty easy, put some hidden tags on a scene or set and enter it into the data base and put a date on the update. However, this takes work and too many sites, even decent ones, seem to skimp on this aspect.
Large sites that don't have good search like Teendreams get knocked a couple of points in my reviews for crappy search. For smaller sights, it doesn't really hurt their scoring for me.
|
03-21-09 12:16pm
|
Reply
256
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Uhhh, how about on a sweet set with a hot babe and with good photography and editing skills. Once I find this fantasy land I'll let you know.
|
03-19-09 12:19am
|
Reply
257
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I prefer to think of it as bad porn. They sucker you in, rip you off and take your money to pay royalties to the producers who left long ago after turning in their worthless turd productions.
|
03-18-09 10:22pm
|
Reply
258
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Oh, I like the idea of the PU board game. You get penalty cards that say you didn't read the reviews before joining a site or get sent to "PU Jail" by Khan for being a nasty poster in the forum. I assume the ultimate goal would be to amass the most points and win big raffle money and trust scores?
|
03-11-09 11:44am
|
Reply
259
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
It all depends on how it's done. If it's some gross looking Ron Jeremy wanna be tossin' some young girls salad it really doesn't do anything for me. If they guy is still in decent shape and the production value is good I really don't care. Too often though it's just some old farts porn fantasy that he's trying to peddle on the web or it's just some gonzo angle that they're using to push a niche site.
|
03-11-09 12:33am
|
Reply
260
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Yeah, this has come up in the forum before so I thought I'd toss it out as a poll question. I would buy stuff it was tasteful in regards to clothing. If there was something like a coffee mug or something similar that you don't tote around in public everyday I'd probably snap it right up.
|
03-11-09 12:27am
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
Since I happen to have seen more than 1 or 2 porn vids in my lifetime I'd have to say that it's nice to see some variety in the shoots and that goes for the scenery as well. There are times when the photographer gets carried away trying to emphasize that they're shooting on location someplace exotice. However, when looking at scenes from a particular production company it gets pretty generic when every scene is shot on the same couch or same hotel room, etc. Everything starts bleeding together.
So, I guess variety is good, just don't go overboard trying to emphasize variety for its own sake.
|
03-09-09 11:57am
|
Reply
262
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I have a few times, mostly before I started relying on PU and review sites to help guide me. Since then it's mostly been because of a fracked up sign-up process that left me wondering who the hell the billing processor is or wondering if I might have been cross sold because I wasn't careful enough in making sure the pre-checked boxes were unchecked. It's been a while since I've felt shafted by the content after a few minutes. A few hours or days? That's a different story.
|
02-25-09 12:04am
|
Reply
263
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Now that I reflect on it for a moment I guess I primarly use tgp's to look at niches that I happen to like. With so many tgp sites out there it's not too difficult to find one that suits what you're looking for.
Since I'm more of a pic guy, I also use them to look at sets from sites that I might be interested in joining to find out what their pic size is like although this can sometimes be misleading.
|
02-23-09 06:25pm
|
Reply
264
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I have several that I visit a several times a week (ones that don't keep taking you to other tgp sites). I find them useful to see what new sites come up from time to time and what kind of content they have. If there is something that looks interesting I'll then check it out here. I've also found a few membership deals from the links on them.
In all honesty, I think TGP sites are mostly good for people trolling for free porn and porn newbies who occasionally get suckered into misleading promos.
|
02-23-09 11:47am
|
Reply
265
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I've only paid more than $30 for a site once and was only partially satisfied with the content. Sine then I've tended to shy away from the pricey stuff mostly on the idea that there are lots of sites for $30 or less that I would to join before. A rocking site with great reviews would be worth extra but until I exhaust myself, I'll wait.
|
02-22-09 06:55pm
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
If they were straight and if they ever went on a date with me, at that point they would become lesbians ;)
|
02-19-09 11:29am
|
Reply
267
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Since it's my poll I guess I'd better chime in and say that pretty much my cutoff line is 70 but realistically it's more in the mid to high 70's if there is a review. Knowing that I tend to be harsher than the TBP staff I generally only look at TPB sites rated in the mid 70's or up.
I'm sort of surprised that so few profess to have a cutoff line. Let's be real, how many people are signing up for or actively searching for sites that get scores in the 50's or 60's?
|
02-17-09 12:31pm
|
Reply
268
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
OSHA needs to get involved as more government regulation always makes things better ("We're from the government, we're here to help" .... NOT!) No government involvment on condoms but flying man goo must be regulated as an unauthorized use of air space or overseen by the medical boards as a Pink Eye Protein ProtEction Regulation so all the chicks can say "Don't PEPPER my face, dude!".
|
02-13-09 12:25pm
|
Reply
269
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I am never suprised at the ratings models get on sites becuase no one has as good of taste in women as I do and, as such, cannot possibly know what the heck they are doing when it comes to rating babes ;)
I really don't care or even look at the ratings that members give models on sites. The only thing that is annoying is when your search is limited to the internal ratings system which, thankfully, I have only come across once.
I like the fact that sites let users give ratings and comments as part of the experience but it doesn't do anything for me. Unlike PU you pretty much get a bunch of Neanderthal comments ... so easy a caveman can do it ....
|
02-11-09 11:09am
|
Reply
270
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I follow the old dogma that if it's new to me it still counts as new. Obviously, I would not go back to such a site and I probably wouldn't pay $30 for a monthly membership to get the content. If the price was lower than I would strongly consider it.
|
02-10-09 04:51pm
|
Reply
271
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Whichever color the voices in my head tell me too ... must do as they command ....
|
02-05-09 12:58pm
|
Reply
272
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Mmmm, I suppose "attractive" toys are better than unattractive toys but, as PinkPanther noted, it's more about the model and what she can do with various implements of satisfaction than a specific type of poon penetrator. Nothing takes the place of acting and no gold plated phallic device will ever make a wretched scene more entertaining.
|
02-04-09 04:28pm
|
Reply
273
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Like most, the uninteresting file labelling system is the way to go. Even staring directly at my folders and subfolders o' porn looks like a bad trip down work file lane ... just so long as no-one does a jpeg or wmv file search.
GO GROUNDHOG!!!
|
02-02-09 11:40am
|
Reply
274
|
N/A
|
Reply of
picdude's Poll
I said no but I worry about it. The only problem with sort of off-the-cuff saying porn doesn't cause problems is that if you have a problem with it you probably won't be the first person to recognize you have a problem with it. In other words it sort of creeps up on you slowly pushing other things out of your life.
Personally, I think the addiction aspect needs to be taken a little more seriously because porn is a hobby most of us do alone and without others really knowing about it so we get good at hiding what we're doing. Given that porn is meant to stimulate your "base urges" it is something that can lead some to lose a handle on it as evidenced by fellow PUer's shutting down their accounts here. So I consume it but I'm also cautious about monitoring how much time I invest in it.
|
01-28-09 12:52pm
|
Reply
275
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Yeah, depending on where you live the cops can be pretty harsh when it comes to pursuing child porn cases against against kids who post their "boobie" shots. Always a great way to start off your career ... get convicted of child porn, can't expunge your record because the DA probably prosecuted you as an adult even though you were under 18 and then you might also have to register as a sex offender for years to come. I don't think enough parents give their kids a hard sit down talk, if that even matters, about that kind of stuff.
As for the myspace and other community sites? My only presence on the web is pretty much here. No nosey employers looking at me here ... I hope.
|
01-22-09 04:45pm
|
