| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's a common element of most websites these days and have become a whole lot less annoying these days. But too many kills my tolerance.
|
05-11-13 11:20am
|
Reply
327
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
With some girls glasses are a nice enhancement. On others they are a distraction.
|
05-07-13 08:52am
|
Reply
328
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Absopositively do. I want to know what the site was like two or more years ago and what PU member replies were back then...then compare those observations to the current ones.
Some (a few) sites actually show some improvement but most seem like nothing has changed.
|
05-05-13 09:13am
|
Reply
329
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Bottom line, based on this series of experiences, and my own, signing up for any site is a gamble and requires the new member to be willing to lose their investment because most support functions are incompetent at best, and a pure fiction at worst.
The sites that have a responsive and effective support function (and are user friendly) will maintain a loyal fan base and will thrive.
|
04-28-13 08:13am
|
Reply
330
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
My experience with tech support for sites ranges from abysmal (21 extury, Danni.com, DDF Network, Hustler, Reality Kings, Bang Bros., for example) to wonderful (VideoBox, Score, Naughty America, for example), so I answered "other."
I would say any site that provides an answer to a support issue within 24 hours and the answer actually makes sense and is responsive to the issue qualifies as "wonderful." "Abysmal" means no response at all, or a canned response such as "we received your ticket and will get back to you with a response within ...(period of time) an no response ever shows up.
Not the question, but CCBill is always superb and Epoch is a very close second for billing services.
|
04-27-13 11:43am
|
Reply
331
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I completely agree. Some sites give you the whole magilla (just short of actual downloadable content) so you can test navigation, check out the babes and get familiar with their content and quality. Right away that makes the site a great shot at getting my money.
|
04-11-13 06:58am
|
Reply
332
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I usually switch it off (power off) because that clears almost everything and secures my computer (requires a password to start up. However occasionally I'll leave it on, but only when I have a large set of D/L's working.
|
04-03-13 09:35am
|
Reply
333
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I enjoy the interviews if the questions are well thought out and not mad up as the interviewer goes along. Otherwise a waste of time.
|
03-23-13 09:53am
|
Reply
334
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Normally only the "best stuff" but on a few smaller single girl sites or genre specific sites, I might try for a total drain of everything.
|
03-18-13 08:51am
|
Reply
335
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I usually have the sound switched off when watching the babes because for some strange reason I'm more interested in the visual stimulation and not whatever dialog might be associated with the scene. However when I do switch on the audio, I go nuts over any accent. Even a Brooklyn accent.
One exception. For some reason, when Gianna Michaels laughs, which is often, it's very distracting. So I switch it off and enjoy her best feature, those absolutely fabulous fun bags.
|
03-15-13 08:21am
|
Reply
336
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Provided they all have PTA, I'm good.
PTA = Pussy, Tits and Ass
|
03-12-13 09:31am
|
Reply
337
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Ditto RB's comments. There is one site I really like with assholes in charge of the service function.
But apart from that, I will stay with a site that provides good support/webmaster interest and will drop a site after one month with a shitty webmaster when I have a need to contact him/her.
|
03-08-13 09:28am
|
Reply
338
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Ditto. I have "favorited" some sites that I forget about. Looking through the list I have checked em out again and actually signed up as a result.
|
03-05-13 08:31am
|
Reply
339
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Dracula's Poll
Doc says no. So it's no.
|
03-03-13 07:55am
|
Reply
340
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Ditto.
Captcha make no sense at all and all that the assignment of a random p/w and user name serves no real benefit to the site.
|
02-20-13 11:52pm
|
Reply
341
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Agreed.
Two years ago I had two 500Gb hard drives and lots of space. Today I have one 3Tb drive, two 2Tb drives and two 1Tb drive, plus the two older 500 Gb's. Let's see. That's about 10Tb of space. I'd guess that I have about 6 Tb stored so far.
I don't purge very much old stuff but I do have a deduplicator that cleans out dupes.
Question. When the fuck will I have time to watch all the videos? I guess I'm a PPR (Porno Pack Rat).
|
02-10-13 10:15am
|
Reply
342
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I'm a long term member of VideoBox (seven + years), FTV Girls, Brazzers and Naughty America...if those count as "going back again and again." (All are with the TBP discount.)
I sign up for one month bites about once a year of DDF, Twistys, Bang Bros and Met Art when I have the urge, if that's what you meant. These are also good sites especially with the TBP discount.
|
01-27-13 12:12am
|
Reply
343
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Piledriver? No way. Can you imagine how your partner would like being upside down, neck twisted, getting porked while balancing? Fun to watch if the videographer does his job well, but it does nothing for me in my own life. (In fact I tried it once and spent too much time trying to balance both of us and not keeping it up. Limp ain't good.
Reverse cowgirl? No way. I like tits. I really like tits. I want to watch them bounce. I want those pillows on my face. RCG is my favorite position in a porn flick but my least favorite in my own life.
Etc.
As a porn lover, I enjoy scenes with both positions because my primary interests in porn is the display of female body parts engaged in a very erotic activity.
ps, not quite on topic but think about it. Does a pornstar start her day thinking how great it will be to pee on demand on camera? How about the terrific experience jamming bottles, baseball bats or high heels up her twat when there are more traditional objects like an erect penis that she would probably prefer?
|
01-13-13 08:24am
|
Reply
344
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No chance. I like Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck cartoons but the real thing beats the hell out of line drawings.
|
01-06-13 09:46am
|
Reply
345
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The crap available on US TV has caused me to reduce my viewing, but I still watch a lot of it:
News shows (real news, not the silly news on many stations)
Sports (Baseball, American Football, some basketball)
That's about it.
|
12-28-12 10:46am
|
Reply
346
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
When Jennifer Avalon, who refused to do any B/G, started into extremely graphic BJ's and Cunt Munching, I expected the B/G hardcore to be coming soon. It finally came, but rather late in her career, and yet I still felt a "tinge" of dismay.
Then along came Andie Valentino (Andrea on FTV) with her perfect body and munchable cunt who showed up on most of the softcore sites. She did mostly solo stuff and some routine lesbo stuff but not really heavy duty. She loved showing off her perfect body (narcissistic, perhaps?) and I enjoyed watching her do it. I recently found one scene where she's boinking some middle aged dude which seems to be her only fuck scene...at least as far as I can tell. I felt more sadness than dismay b/c I'm sure she fucked plenty in her off screen life.
Finally is Jana Jordan (Jana Foxy) with the (formerly) tiny puffy tits, great ass and perfect pussy. I don't know is she's done any fuck scenes but the boob job, although reasonably well done, ruined it for me. Her total Texas face, attitude and accent were all I needed to get a big rise. That tit job was much more dismaying than Andie and Jennifer getting porked on screen.
|
12-26-12 09:02am
|
Reply
347
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Totally agree. The info is useful for evaluating other sites, good and bad. Sometimes when I find a great site I have found other great sites that I might have missed.
|
12-19-12 11:21pm
|
Reply
348
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
640 is usually OK but there's just enough extra sharpness to 1280x720 that I usually go for that. I agree with otoh that it's really tough to see what 1080 brings to the party especially when the files are huge and the download time, even with fast d/l speeds, is just not worth it.
When I watch some of the 320 stuff in my stash, there is enough discernable difference to even 640 to warrant the larger file sizes; but the difference to 1080 is minimal.
|
12-12-12 08:17am
|
Reply
349
|
N/A
|
Reply of
alexbrawn's Poll
I fully support the idea of trials. Yes, the per day price of a trial may be higher than the cost of full membership, but if the trial provides full access it's the best way for a site to demonstrate its quality.
It's kind of like taking a car out for a test drive before buying it.
|
12-09-12 09:50am
|
Reply
350
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
gaypornlover, "I can only assume the major studios will relocate and some of the smaller ones will ignore the law - I mean how can you prove where a movie was filmed really?"
The proposition calls for all porn production companies to notify a new bureaucracy whenever they start a production so that the bureau can send an inspector* to the site. Failure to do so will result in serious penalties.
Because this was a ballot proposition and not a city ordinance, it cannot be ignored, but if they choose to, the producers can take the proposition through a court process which will delay implementation at worst, and possibly cause the law to be thrown out..
My guess is that the serious economic consequences to the City will result in a future proposition reversing this one. Soon. (The porn industry is located in the San Fernando Valley which is part of the City of LA. There are small towns and unincorporated areas that are not part of the proposition spotted throughout the city but none of them are near Chatsworth or Canoga Park where most of the big producers are located.
* This would be my kinda job!
|
11-22-12 09:17am
|
