| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review! The girls are indeed SUUUUUPPPPPEEEEERRRRRR HOT! Thomas performs satisfactorily, but his humor and routine do get annoying, kinda like the exploitedteens.com guy.
That redhead Kayla is divine!
|
09-08-08 02:40pm
|
Reply
2
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Those per-gallery-page zip downloads are a real drag. Great review.
|
08-15-08 05:09am
|
Reply
3
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Comment
Yeah, this site is pretty dang reliable. For a while about a year ago they were way too heavy on the Euro-chicks, so I didn't subscribe for a while.
But now they've got some new American photographers to replace the ones they'd lost, and it's a little closer to where it was before.
|
08-15-08 05:03am
|
Reply
4
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
Thank you.
This is exactly what I was hoping to hear, and now I am 100% behind you guys.
Thanks for making this information available.
I wish you guys all the best throughout this hacking debacle, and I'll continue to be an ATK fan and supporter. Keep up the good work, and thanks for demonstrating integrity.
|
12-23-14 03:09pm
|
Reply
5
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
wishdj's Reply
I would be more openly supportive if they would address the money issue. That would be the honest thing to do.
I'm not saying they're explicitly trying to pocket the $, but how many days with no service before they acknowledge it.
People need to quit ignoring the big, white elephant in the room here.
* And for the record - the site is still having problems today. Tomorrow will be a week since my first comment. That's 1/4 of a month subscription.
Now tell me again, guys: why shouldn't potential customers know about this? Isn't that what Pornusers.com is all about - keeping customers from LOSING THEIR MONEY?
|
12-23-14 12:28am
|
Reply
6
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
greg909's Reply
How stupid is the analogy? Does it take billions of dollars to prevent this from happening? Wells Fargo and ATK both use CloudFlare, which probably doesn't cost a billion dollars. Reread the comment.
Also:
- ATK didn't even acknowledge the attacks in their news feed until Dec 20.
- ATK hasn't acknowledged the money customers have lost, which a responsible business should do.
- Why did I get an ATK promo email on Dec. 17, well into their DDoS problems?
Hacking sucks, and I don't want hackers to win. But none of that forces a company to keep revenue they didn't earn.
If you can't provide your product/service, you don't keep the money.
You guys seem ready to start a Kickstarter for ATK.
|
12-23-14 12:23am
|
Reply
7
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
2 Free K's Comment
Yeah, I hear ya. And guess what?
*Today, 12-20-2014, there is no ATK website at all. Not even the visitors homepage will load.*
On the plus side, at least people won't unknowingly subscribe to this mess. They way things have been going, it's best if ATK just vanishes for a while, provides prorated refunds, and returns once they've truly fixed the problem. As much as I've enjoyed ATK over the years, money is the bottom line: they don't give us free porn, so why should they get free money?
|
12-20-14 12:06am
|
Reply
8
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
I do appreciate your responsiveness. It is unfortunate that someone screwed up and has left you to stomp out the fires.
I think the biggest questions is: why weren't these high-quality safe guards and hardware there to begin with? You get what you pay for.
If cutting corners can hurt General Motors, I'm pretty sure it can destroy a company like ATK. Just do things right the first time.
Tell the people in charge that we customers aren't stupid.
|
12-19-14 12:29am
|
Reply
9
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
2 Free K's Comment
Seriously ATK, pardon my tone, but this is BS.
I am going to reply to this comment EVERY TIME I encounter a server problems with your site, just to show the world how non-stop this problem is.
So yes - today, the server is down *again*.
You may not think it is down, but having to click 'Refresh' several times = server is down. I wouldn't bother for a free site, let alone one expecting payment.
At what point does this become fraud? At what point does thebestporn.com disassociate itself with you?
I noticed that your server is CloudFlare. On their website, they have four different pricing tiers: Free, Pro, Business, and Enterprise. All four levels claim to have 'Basic DDoS Protection'. Does it not work? Which pricing tier do our ATK dollars pay for?
CloudFlare boasts on their page that Wells Fargo uses their services. Does Wells Fargo have these sorts of problems? What would happen if they did?
Has this mess awakened the powers-that-be at ATK, or are they still pinching pennies while the site goes down the drain?
|
12-19-14 12:21am
|
Reply
10
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
2 Free K's Comment
Final add-on:
I've been going back and forth on the ATK site while typing these comments, and it has taken over 30 minutes to get through a picture set.
I'll give it a month. After that, I'll make it official with a review. The site's score average should reflect its inaccessibility.
|
12-17-14 11:31pm
|
Reply
11
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
"Being under attack by unknown hackers has not only made us look bad to our members but it has also stopped our ability to bring in new ones. Not only because they can not access the site but because we are not getting bad reviews from currently members and they are leaving us."
100% accurate.
|
12-17-14 10:55pm
|
Reply
12
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
2 Free K's Comment
BTW, I've been an on-and-off subscriber to ATK for over ten years, and never had such problems. I realize security breaches are the "in" thing nowadays, but enough is enough.
|
12-17-14 10:52pm
|
Reply
13
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Capn - I agree. I had rejoined a couple of months ago with a discount, partly because there were some Carmen December updates I wanted. I noticed the exact same improvements you mentioned.
In fact, I'm about to rejoin, because they've added some new girls that are quite cute. If they keep up the good work, I'm going to have to update my score for them once again.
To the powers that be at ATK Hairy: keep up the good work, it has not gone unnoticed.
|
03-29-12 09:02pm
|
Reply
14
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
This site has brought out the vigilante in me. They will not change until they start losing $$$. I will scream it from the mountaintops - "Don't join ATK Hairy unless you wanna see a few cute girls and a bunch of freaks"!
Bad economy = tons of cute girls ready to get nekkid, and tons of porn-fiends who can't afford to look at ug-chicks. This should be a no-fail operation. How are they screwing this up??
If they already have 'ATK Petites', why can't they just create 'ATK Scary Hairy', already? Or at this point, 'ATK Natural, Pretty, and Slightly Hairy', since they apparently changed it to 'Scary [and Ugly] Hairy' without proper notice.
|
09-08-11 09:59pm
|
Reply
15
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks, man. I'm glad you spoke up about it first - I just wish I had listened. :) I had gotten one of those $20 email offers, I hadn't subscribed in a while, and there were a few chicks who had some new sets.
But even that wasn't worth it. With this being the beginning of the month - I just paid rent, and I'm wishing I hadn't even spent the $20, or at least spent it on better porn. It's sad.
|
09-06-11 10:02pm
|
Reply
16
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
No offense taken at all! You're probably right, once I thought about it. The technology I'm use at the moment is still a few years old, and when I think about how often I look at old sets from early-to-mid 2000s, I realize it's not very often - due to the size. I should probably start downloading the hi-res, and just find a viewer that makes it easier to set the magnification level. You have a very good point!
|
09-05-11 11:35pm
|
Reply
17
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
@ Messmer - sorry for the delay. If you haven't been on in a while, I'd suggest checking it out - they've probably acquired a few sets worth collecting. I don't recall any big changes regarding the undressing procedure. I feel the same as you - I hate it when they're nude ASAP. I think Sean R still draws it out the longest (although I wish he didn't have such a monopoly on the UK cutie dept).
Regarding the bigger photos, I never use them. They're too big (at least for my screen). If you're viewing on a T.V. they might be useful, but on a standard monitor you end up having to scroll too much. Luckily ATK quickly realized that, so they provide several viewing and download options.
|
06-03-11 08:58am
|
Reply
18
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
Anytime. I must add, too, that I appreciate the effort you've been putting into making the ATK sites as good as possible. Great customer service, great interviews, and great value for the dollar - keep it up! Karups and Nubiles try to cop your style, but ATK gives so much more, thus my allegiance is strong. The old folks have Playboy, I have ATK.
|
06-03-11 08:34am
|
Reply
19
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
That's a very good point about their honesty with the remastered video. I overlooked that. It's always pitiful finding an newly-featured update that you downloaded two years prior! I respect Bangbros for not doing that sort of thing.
|
07-03-12 12:07am
|
Reply
20
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
joekramer08's Reply
I've been meaning to check out Try Teens and its sister sites for a while now. I'm typically not even a fan of Euro porn, but that site struck me as exceptional.
I've been curious to try ExploitedCollegeGirls for some nice American girl debauchery, but I can't bring myself to pay that guy $35. BackroomCastingCouch is only $25, though. Both sites seem to cast American girls that don't look like blow-up dolls.
|
07-01-12 11:14am
|
Reply
21
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yeah, I've wondered if it's me, but I still like a lot of other sites I discovered around the same time, such as Amateur Allure and MyXXXPass. I don't mind tats, but I hate silicone tits. But even the chicks with natural boobs bore me at BangBros. All the chicks look the same: long-ass hair, fat ass, big tits, cheesy sunglasses, and usually too tan. It's like a haven for Jersey Shore rejects. I see these girls and I instantly think "LETS DO BODY SHOTS - WOOOOO!!!"
The increased presence of 'BangBros Remastered' clips is suspicious, and I can't even keep up with their new sites. WTF is Chongas and Pawg all about? Why have all these sites, but rarely update them. These guys were once key players, but nowadays, they might as well be PornPros.com (no offense to PornPros).
I'm glad I'm not alone regarding the excess focus on the guys, though. That was the worst part about Bang Bus, especially. You'll be watching a hot chick getting f--ked, and then the camera guy will suddenly zoom to Ramon's ugly ass face grinning at you. Who f--- wants to see that when they're about to nut??
|
07-01-12 11:04am
|
Reply
22
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
2 Free K's Comment
Another thing: hard drives keep getting larger and larger, and cheaper and cheaper. So why do I download less and less each time I join Bangbros?
|
06-30-12 11:59am
|
Reply
23
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Review
I've been very curious about this site. I remember eyeing it when it came with Gloryhole.com. Then they separated the two sites, and made each $34.99 instead of $29.99.
Have you been to both? Is one better than the other?
|
08-15-08 04:56am
|
Reply
24
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
I double-checked: there IS an update for "Rion". She is on page 13 of the Members page, next to "Aaralyn" Barra. I've noticed that the 'Blog' link from the main page does a more faithful job of representing the updates. It's thoroughly comprehensive.
If it's been a while since you joined, and you have to extra $$, I'd recommend it - solely on the hotness of a lot of the new girls (the pasty redhead named "Sarah" with the toe socks...jesus!). Just don't join expecting the other sites.
I know it's a tough battle - whether to give the fucker more money just to see the new, exclusive cuties; or boycott him so his practices change and/or he goes under.
If I could do it again, that "Sarah" chick would make me sellout...as "Rion" may do for you. Call me weak.
|
08-15-08 04:47am
|
Reply
25
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Review
Charlotte muthafuckin' Stokely!! Where has she been?
That ass is Twilight Zone.
|
08-15-08 04:52am
|
