| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
601
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I only use the one that comes wit IE and Firefox.
|
03-17-14 11:06am
|
Reply
602
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have no problem saying that this guy or that guy is good looking but I have no desire to sexually interact with anyone that has a penis and I do not want to see any men interact sexually with each other. I wouldn't even want to d a threesome if the other person was a guy but then again I have no desire to do a threesome if the other person is a girl but I could be persuaded to try the later. For those reason I would say that I am as straight as they come.
|
03-15-14 07:53am
|
Reply
603
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
I picked on ass or back but I was looking for other because the only thing that is important to me is that the cum shot be near where the guy's penis is at the moment of ejaculation so if the performers are in missionary then the cum shot should be near the vagina or the stomach.
All of the other choices are fine except for the face because I really dislike facials.
|
03-13-14 09:10am
|
Reply
604
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The only trials I join are those that offer full access so by default there is no censoring of their content. I have joined some limiting trials but that was years ago when I first started surfing the net. They all sucked and I don't think that as changed.
|
03-11-14 09:08am
|
Reply
605
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I haven't used one of those since my early days ofg surfing for porn because I quickly realised that they were a toss up between useless and a scam. I haven't seen anything since then to make me think that this has changed. I can see the appeal for sites that offer the 1$ trial because you make some money from the transaction and I guess the guys that offer either option hope that someone will forget to cancel and the rebill is usually quite high so they are sure to make a lot of money on those foolish people.
I'm trying to think of any site that I really enjoy that offer that kind of option and I can't think of one.
|
03-10-14 08:43am
|
Reply
606
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I used to read short stories but I sort of stopped doing that but can't remember why.
|
03-07-14 09:52am
|
Reply
607
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't know of I have ever seen one of those but then again maybe I have and I didn't pay attention to that because I already knew the price and was only going through the motion.
|
03-06-14 05:19pm
|
Reply
608
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's a pet peeve of mine that some sites don't give members a choice when it comes to the size of their video files. I'm already not a huge fan of HD so if all I can download are those types of files then it stands to reason that I'll pick and choose even more what I do or don't download.
|
02-13-14 08:28am
|
Reply
609
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
The only thing that can sour me toward a performer is when they have alter their appearance to such a degree that they are literally not the same person. Implants is often the most obvious alteration but
I've seen my share of facial reconstruction that leave me perplex.
|
02-11-14 08:23am
|
Reply
610
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like variety in life and that's why I say all of the above.
|
02-09-14 06:17pm
|
Reply
611
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
I picked it depends because I'd rather both be included in the scene and I always think it's too bad when only one is but I think cunnilingus is more stimulating for me because I'd rather watch the woman get pleasured than the guy.
|
02-07-14 09:55am
|
Reply
612
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have watched some in the past but I don't find it very sexually stimulating.
|
02-05-14 10:47am
|
Reply
613
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No I leave that to the professionals.
|
02-03-14 09:19am
|
Reply
614
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Screen resolution is what I use to determine if it's HD or not.
|
02-01-14 09:43am
|
Reply
615
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It really depends on the site but impulse buys are now rare for me because I got burned in the past and I'm more cautious. That and the fact that there are so few true new sites that it's really hard to impulse join any of them.
|
01-30-14 05:57pm
|
Reply
616
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I don't watch football. In fact I can't say that I watch any sports except for the odd hockey game but that is a must for Canadians.
|
01-24-14 05:57pm
|
Reply
617
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I picked no but I honestly can't say whether it does or doesn't because I rarely know that kind of information. I don't try to find out personal stuff like that because it might affect how I feel.
|
01-22-14 05:23pm
|
Reply
618
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Since tan lines means that the woman wore some type of bathing suit than they must be a little bit healthier than the ones without. Not by much of course but I don't believe that those without tan lines are staying inside while their friends are outside getting tanned.
|
01-20-14 02:38pm
|
Reply
619
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Being a huge fan of 70's and 80's movies than of course I love tan lines. I have to agree with Cybertoad that these really only look good on women with natural breasts and preferably if they have small C cups or smaller. Who can forget Stacey Donovan who probably never shot one scene without tan lines.
|
01-20-14 02:33pm
|
Reply
620
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Websters definition for acting is: The art or profession of performing the role of a character. this is not what a model does. That doesn't mean that I don't see where Denner is coming from but I don't consider what a model does as acting so much as posing.
After all no one thinks that a model who's wearing a business suit in a court room photo is a lawyer but we do if we see that same model wearing that same suit during a movies court room scene. Mind you that last part rarely happens because most models can't act. The best examples of that are all those models that tried their hand at acting.
I can count on my hand the number of models who were able to have an actual acting career.
|
01-16-14 10:14am
|
Reply
621
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
Probably my biggest pet peeve are those sites that generate their own passwords because they tend to always be funky weird and hard to remember but not far behind are those sites that have a pop-up log in window. The biggest reason why I don't like the pop-up window is partly because of my pet peeve regarding auto-generated passwords. It's happened more than once that I joined a site that had the auto-generated password and the pop-up window but where the log in info does not get copied to the pop-up window and that meant I had to log in to my email service to get that info.
|
01-14-14 10:00am
|
Reply
622
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
It's always the face first and then I move down.
|
01-12-14 09:09am
|
Reply
623
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I also picked #3 because there are quite a few days that can go by be before I visit a specific site but there are some reasons which are not mentioned in the choices. The most obvious one being that not every site updates on a daily basis so there is no reason to visit that site until there is a new update.
|
01-10-14 08:03am
|
Reply
624
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I picked never.
|
01-08-14 09:48am
|
Reply
625
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Of course it isn't. Why would any performer want to change her name every few weeks when word of mouth is an integral part of how their career grows.
I know that it's significantly harder to find all the scenes of Eastern European performers because they have so many different names that it's next to impossible to find them all without doing some serious research. You just have to look at North American performers to see that having only one name is better for a long term career.
|
01-06-14 06:32am
|
