| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Comment
The Roku 3 model says it's HDTV only.
The other, cheaper models of the Roku say they work with virtually any TV.
I'm surprised that the most expensive model only works with HDTVs.
Am I missing something? Why would they limit the most expensive model to HDTVs only, when the cheaper models work with most TVs?
I don't have a HDTV. So I assume the Roku 3 model would not work with my current TV.
Correct?
Also, since I don't have an HDTV, that means I can't play 720p or 1080p definition on my TV.
But I could watch those videos on my PC monitor, I assume, and get the 720p or 1080p definition effect.
|
04-17-13 10:12am
|
Reply
652
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Well designed tours can be useful, especially if they gave nice thumbnails of the site models, some indication of the site content (sample video previews, sample pictures, etc.).
But like Cybertoad stated, a good PU review gives a better idea of what the site is like, it's plus and minus points, etc.
So normally I want a PU review to check, before I join a site. Unless I think the site has some models that I really like, because I am a sucker for a pretty face.
|
04-17-13 07:51am
|
Reply
653
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I grew up on Playboy, so I don't mind some airbrushing. Some flaws can be distracting. And almost all women use cosmetics to increase their appeal. I don't like heavy make-up, but if you are doing a photoshoot or a video, then at least some make-up is needed for the camera, even for a "natural look".
|
04-16-13 05:37pm
|
Reply
654
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I think that X-Art and the Diesel Access network are two of my favorite glamcore offerings.
X-Art is more strictly glamcore, while Diesel's style is more varied, partially because they have more sites with different offerings.
Diesel has 18 Only Girls, Young Legal Porn, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, etc.
|
04-16-13 05:36pm
|
Reply
655
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Agree that video quality for the cam shows (the ones I was referring to) is poor. The video quality at their paysites are quite good, in contrast.
I assume that's because the girls shooting the cams are using low-quality, inexpensive cameras, as well as maybe being a function of the feed they are using (low bandwidth?--I am not technically inclined).
But for a free live cam show, that features a lot of nudity, some masturbation, sometimes sex between a model and a stunt cock, it might be worth checking out.
Depends on your tastes.
I have spent very little time watching these shows.
|
04-15-13 01:45pm
|
Reply
656
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Review
Very nice first review. Hope to see more. Welcome to PU.
|
04-14-13 08:02am
|
Reply
657
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've seen very little fisting. To be honest, I don't even recall a single scene. Maybe I haven't really seen any.
|
04-14-13 07:05am
|
Reply
658
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I don't think there is one factor that is the most important. There are several factors that are important, including quality of site contents, amount of content, how easy to site is to use, update rate, price, etc.
Maybe those factors aren't strictly related to the tour pages, but the tour is only part of what decides if I want to join a site or not.
|
04-11-13 05:24pm
|
Reply
659
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I figured it was the lawyers who recommend that.
But actually, to enter the PU web site, or to become a member, you also have to "state" or agree that you are of legal age, explicit material does not offend you, etc.
Just the way you have to operate, with the laws you need to be careful.
I went to see a dentist, had to sign an agreement that any disputes would be settled by arbitration (instead of in court), and that each dentist had their own separate practice, that you can't sue or arbitrate against all the dentists in the office or practice, just your own personal dentist.
We need to have are own personal lawyer with us, whenever we see a dentist, go to the hospital, etc., to be sure we are not giving up our legal rights.
|
04-10-13 01:25pm
|
Reply
660
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think Cybertoad said it best: a site has to be worth the cost. It's that simple.
There are many different ways you can value a site:
Amount of content, quality of content, ease of use.
But the price of a site is definitely one of the main factors, whether it's mentioned in the review or not.
|
04-09-13 07:56pm
|
Reply
661
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
The financial crisis in porn (and in many countries) is putting some nice sites out of business.
JustTeenSite recently went dark. You go to their URL, and the page times out without loading the site.
|
04-05-13 11:07pm
|
Reply
662
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I like to read the reviews at PU to get a sense of whether the site might be worthwhile joining.
But I also like a site to have a useful public tour pages, where they show the site models, and hopefully give some preview shots of the photography and videos the site features.
The preview pages at some sites are just about worthless. No model listings, no information on the site contents, other than saying they have gorgeous models and the most exciting videos.
|
04-05-13 04:47am
|
Reply
663
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
I know some PU members seem to prefer if a site has exclusive content. And even The Best Porn seems to grade or mention if a site's content is 100% exclusive or not. But as long as I find a decent amount of new content at a site, I don't mind if the site is 100% exclusive.
As far as Diesel Access network or even Rub A Teen (part of the Team Skeet network) posting videos that were first posted at Teen Mega World (and are still at Teen Mega World), I don't mind. The versions at Diesel Access network and Rub a Teen are higher definition versions of those videos, which is a plus.
When I reviewed reviewed Rub a Teen, I gave it a score of 73, which is a low score. In the review I wrote:
"If you've been a member of Teen Mega World in the last 6 months, and you examined the Tricky Masseur site of that network, then you've probably seen all or almost all of the videos that are at Rub A Teen."
But if you hadn't seen those videos before, then the Rub a Teen site would have deserved a higher score.
|
04-03-13 10:39pm
|
Reply
664
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I haven't used a sledgehammer on my computer, but I did slap my laptop a few times until it quite working on me. True story. I don't know if the slaps were what broke the fucker.
|
04-03-13 06:27am
|
Reply
665
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm not currently a member of TMW.
But I was wondering if maybe they aren't changing the preview page, except for some software that changes the posting date for the videos that are shown.
That doesn't necessarily mean that there are no updates in the members area.
It could just be that they are not updating the "update" preview page to show the most recent videos added to the network.
I agree that a new member, or one who is not paying attention to the updates, would be confused by the dates shown on the public preview page for updates.
The Diesel Access network, or maybe it was the 2 Wow Porn and Wow Girls sites, had a similar problem, where the preview pages for each site showed videos from more than one site.
So someone expecting access to all the videos on the preview pages would have been disappointed. But Diesel fixed that problem, and now the preview page for each site just shows the videos that are in that site.
|
04-03-13 06:04am
|
Reply
666
|
Digital Playground
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
What can I say?
That great minds think alike?
That's better than saying that I'm too blind to see what's right before me.
I was thinking my post was original, or contributed something useful. Meh.
|
04-01-13 04:17pm
|
Reply
667
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Comment
I have signed up for a lot of "favorite" model alerts, but I have never gotten a single email alert.
I checked my email inbox (and spam box) every day.
But I have never gotten a single email alert from Metart when a model I listed in my favorites (and requested email notification) had a new photoset or video.
Nice idea, but poor execution.
|
04-01-13 04:45am
|
Reply
668
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
Is this some kind of philosophical question? I'm kind of groping in the dark, where most of the replies seem to imply the people know what the fuck is going on.
|
04-01-13 04:15am
|
Reply
669
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'm wondering how many poll respondents are differentiating between MB and Mb.
1 MB = 8 Mbit
The poll asks for MB speed.
I upgraded to 17.40 Mbps recently, which is 2.175 MB/sec.
Most of the poll replies are in the 11-30 MB/sec range, which seems very high to me.
|
03-28-13 09:02pm
|
Reply
670
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I use a different URL to test my computer, and the results seem different:
http://www.dslextreme.com/support/speedtest
Latency: 17 ms
(as far as I can tell, Ping and Latency are interchangeable terms. But maybe on a technical level there might be differences in the two terms).
Download speed: 8634 Kb/s
Upload speed: 1303 Kb/s
|
03-28-13 09:51am
|
Reply
671
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I recently upgraded (paid more) for my Internet connection.
Using the link jberryl69 provided, the results are:
http://www.speedtest.net/
Ping: 25 ms
Download speed: 17.40 Mbps
Upload speed: 1.39 Mbps
But I'm guessing that 17.40 Mbps equals 2.175 MB/sec, which is approximately what my PC reports when downloading files from the Internet.
|
03-28-13 09:39am
|
Reply
672
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
There aren't any photos (or videos) that come to mind where a girl holding a gun (or bazooka) is really sexy.
|
03-26-13 05:14pm
|
Reply
673
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Is watching a live chat show considered virtual sex?
I am not really sure what the term includes or excludes.
|
03-26-13 05:08pm
|
Reply
674
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
It depends on the girl, other factors.
|
03-26-13 04:54pm
|
Reply
675
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Stas RC's Reply
Thank you.
I think that will be very helpful to anyone interested in joining the site. This way, they can see exactly what sites they will have access to.
|
03-20-13 06:07pm
|
