| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1076
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Value. Content quality and amount. Versus price. Plus any information on how easy the site is to use: site design, download speeds, etc. Plus whether to site contents appeals to my tastes.
|
03-20-12 07:17pm
|
Reply
1077
|
Tiny Becky
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
If I do join the site in the near future, I will give you a heads-up on my opinion.
|
03-20-12 07:15pm
|
Reply
1078
|
Watch Me Fucked
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
They still only have 19 videos at this site today, so no new videos added in the last 3 weeks. Maybe they will add updates sometime in the future, or just add recycled videos from their other sites.
But the network has a lot of really attractive models.
|
03-18-12 03:49pm
|
Reply
1079
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
The soft hardcore is what Playboy should have become a leader in. But they lost that opportunity many years ago. Just lacked imagination, I guess. But it was the next logical step in what they were providing. And now Playboy (and Penthouse) are basically has-beens.
|
03-18-12 03:37pm
|
Reply
1080
|
Tiny Becky
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the input, pat. I'll probably wait a while before joining this site/network. Unless I change my mind and find a few more models on this network that look as good as Tiny Becky. :)
|
03-18-12 11:15am
|
Reply
1081
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
About the same. I still look for new sites that provide good content for the money.
|
03-17-12 06:17am
|
Reply
1082
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I used to leave my desktop on. But now I use a laptop and normally turn it off when I'm off the computer.
|
03-16-12 03:06pm
|
Reply
1083
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the tip, exotics4me. The site layout or terminology can be confusing. Or maybe I'm just lazy, and expect everything to be labeled simply. Again, thanks, it helps to have experts around who know what they are doing. :)
|
03-09-12 11:10pm
|
Reply
1084
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
The site preview seems kind of short. I see that there are some sample photos and videos, but I usually like to see a list of all the models at the site, with thumbnails of those models.
|
03-09-12 01:03pm
|
Reply
1085
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Poor content quality. Then slow download speeds.
|
03-09-12 12:32pm
|
Reply
1086
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Anywhere from 2 to 4 days is fine with me. I could even accept 5 days if I have to. Does that make me easy to get along with?
|
03-07-12 08:19am
|
Reply
1087
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks for checking. I really appreciate it. I'm pretty sure I've seen the 10 photos each for Karen Sather and Sandy Greco already.
And I was hoping the old photos would have better definition than what I've seen before. But my guess is that photos on the site are probably not better definition, after all.
So I will probably wait a while before joining Penthouse.
|
03-07-12 08:11am
|
Reply
1088
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'm interested in how many photos there are of the three models listed below. They were among my all-time favorite Pets :)
Karen Sather
February 1973 - Pet of the Month
Sandi Greco
May 1973 - Pet of the Month
Cindy Mcdee
July 1973 - Pet of the Month
If you don't have the info, because your membership ran out, that's OK.
|
03-06-12 09:24pm
|
Reply
1089
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Attractive models, but the videos sound like a waste of time. And with site navigation problems, plus whatever, makes this a site that I would only join after I had explored much better sites.
|
03-06-12 01:27pm
|
Reply
1090
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
I was wondering how many photos there are for each individual model from the 1970s and 1980s? Are there just a few photos on each Penthouse Pet for each month back then, or is there more like 20-30 or more photos of the individual models?
I've seen some of the models back then which only had like 10 photos or so from their photoshoots back then (in the 1970s and 1980s). Does the Penthouse site have more extensive photos on their early Penthouse Pets?
|
03-06-12 01:21pm
|
Reply
1091
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
There are plenty of ways porn can be disgusting. When I see disgusting porn or abusive behavior, I just turn if off.
|
03-06-12 01:12pm
|
Reply
1092
|
Beauty Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Nice review, seems to cover the main points about the site and the network. I agree that the network is a bargain. I just re-joined the Royal Cash network yesterday.
|
03-04-12 04:10pm
|
Reply
1093
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
First, I don't have any contacts in porn.
Second, I don't think doing hard-core porn is a smart decision. It might look like easy money, but that's an illusion. I think most girls would be better off looking to make money elsewhere.
Softcore porn (simple nudity) might be alright, but hardcore is a poor choice.
|
03-04-12 03:43pm
|
Reply
1094
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Before I started using the Internet as a source of porn, I was mainly into softcore photos.
I paid little attention to hardcore videos.
If I wanted a video of a naked girl, I would watch a regular movie. Most movies are around 1 hour 30 minutes. And if there were one or more nude scenes, the total length of a girl flashing her breasts or ass was probably 45 seconds or less. (I'm talking about one of the starlets in the movie, not some gratuitous breast shots of some stripper.)
Since I got into the internet, and after joining PU, I've joined a number of hardcore video sites.
So I don't waste my time searching through a movie for the breast or ass shots anymore.
So did PU drag my tastes down, or should I be blaming the Internet?
But in general, I still prefer softcore photos over most videos.
|
11-18-11 12:53am
|
Reply
1095
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I thought this was covered in a previous poll, which asked where the camera should be focused on in a video.
Anyway, the entire girl should be covered.
With less coverage on the stunt cock.
But the videos where they mask the stunt cock's head are just annoying. If he's doesn't want his face exposed in a porn video, just use someone else as the stunt cock.
|
11-16-11 06:05am
|
Reply
1096
|
Anal Pantyhose
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
Excellent review, as usual.
Great details, great ideas, great wordplay.
My only complaint is that your reviews don't focus enough on the teen softcore sites that are my interest.
If you ever join any of those sites, I would find those reviews more helpful to me on a personal level.
(I think I forget to take my medicines last night, so please ignore this request if it seems off-topic.)
|
11-15-11 05:52am
|
Reply
1097
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Sometimes I admire the porn studs who keep going even when the woman says "Stop."
But that's not me.
|
11-14-11 05:05pm
|
Reply
1098
|
Showy Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
This is from the same company/partner/WhatEverYouCallIt behind Amour Angels. This new site is tiny compared to Amour Angels. And I'm guessing that both sites have a similar approach to photos and videos.
So if you like the style of Amour Angels, join that site, because it has a lot more content (models, photosets, videos) compared to Showy Beauty.
|
11-12-11 04:13pm
|
Reply
1099
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm like everyone else. External hard drives are the easiest and cheapest and fastest way to store. And trying to burn and manage a library of DVDs would be a nightmare.
|
11-12-11 07:11am
|
Reply
1100
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Fully nude, right at the climax. Why make us wait for the good parts, right?
Afterwards, the performers can sit around and discuss how they could have made the sex scene even better.
|
11-10-11 12:50am
|
