BOTTOM LINE (CONTINUED):
You can flag (report) a problem with streaming or downloading a video with a handy hot link by the video.
You can post comments for each video (like or dislike, whatever).
The like/dislight buttons seem more realistic than at many other sites, which seem to favor almost unanimous approval. Team Skeet seems to allow negative votes on videos by members.
Bottom line summary:
1. If you don't experience slow connection speeds;
2. If you don't expect a glamcore experience that Blacked, Tushy, X-Art provides, but a more bread-and-butter approach to teen porn;
3. Many of the models are cute, even if not much effort is put into making them attractive.
4. Then, because of a low price ($17.87/month with PU discount), you get access to a large amount of teen hardcore videos in a wide variety of niches.
Giving the site and network a score of 85.
If it weren't for the complaints by some PU members about the slow connection speed, I would give the site and network a higher score.
But since there's an element of uncertainty of what you will be getting for your money, I think 85 is a fair score.
IN THE NEXT REPLY, SEE A LISTING OF THE SITES CONTAINED IN THE BASIC SITES YOU HAVE ACCESS TO, WITH THE NUMBER OF VIDEOS IN EACH SITE.
Physical books give a better, more familiar experience when reading, than ebooks.
But ebooks are usually cheaper, and more convenient to keep and read.
So I use both.
But most of my library is ebooks. Because of cost and convenience.
I'm really glad that ebooks were invented.
Even though you can't seem to hold the same affection and regard for them as a real book. It just seems like a different experience when you are reading a screen instead of a paper page. Less of a real connection.
I am suggesting that Amanda should give you 1 and 3/4 points for this comment/review.
You would have qualified for 2 full points if you had included the pros section of this site.
But this comment is really worth more than 2 points for anyone reading it and avoiding this site membership.
So, thanks for the heads up.
(But I would never have joined anyway, since the site-niche is not my cup of tea.)
In Los Angeles, I only use Spectrum for internet service.
Which is why I'm paying $45 for a 100 Mbps connection.
If I bundled internet, phone, and cable, I would be paying about $29 for each service, with a 100 Mbps connection speed.
What's nice about Spectrum, and Time Warner before that, was there were no data caps.
So I never had to worry about using too much.
But since I don't belong to Netflix, I don't think I use all that much bandwidth, anyway.
I'm much more selective about the porn I download today.
Back in the day, I used to stream the videos or slide show the photo sets, then download almost everything. Now I rarely download anything except what I feel is very good to great.
I was born in Los Angeles. Spent most of my life here.
But I lived in Augusta, GA for almost 18 years.
Nice town, but the summer weather was hot and humid.
Winters were mild, though.
But the insects: you had large cockroaches running over the streets at night.
You step out in the yard in the summer without a shirt, and in a few minutes, you're covered in mosquito bites.
You take a shower, and 10 minutes later, you're ready for another shower, in the summer.
I know people are supposed to get acclimated to the hot and humid weather, but I never did.
If you count the time I spend at PU (the main site I use for reviews on porn sites) and other review porn sites, I would guess 25-50% of my web time is spent on porn.
But if you add in the amount of news I read about Trump, who I believe is related to my porn addiction (there, I've admitted I'm a porn addict), the % goes up.
I need to cut down on my porn addiction.
I kicked cigarettes, so maybe I can kick porn.
But it took many tries before I was able to kick cigarettes completely. Many tries and many years.
I live in Los Angeles County.
I've been a member of Time Warner for internet for a few years.
I started with their slowest speed.
Paid around $30/month for 30 Mbps.
After 1 year, they raised the price to about $54/month.
While offering new subscribers 30 Mbps for $30.
I called the office, and they said that $54/month for 30 Mbps was the price for current subscribers, and that I didn't qualify for the new subscriber rate.
So I talked some more, and they finally offered me 50 Mbps for $40/month.
Which was faster and cheaper than the 30 Mbps for $54/month.
After one year, they said I no longer qualified for the $40/month introductory rate.
So I asked if I could have a cheaper plan, and they told me even if I dropped my internet speed, I would not qualify for a cheaper plan.
So I told them to end my service at the end of the current month.
And I paid T-Mobile for a one-month plan, with a slow internet connection.
Then I went into the Time Warner office, told them I was ending my service.
The sales clerk I spoke with, offered me a new plan at $45/month for 100 Mbps.
I was pissed, because I had already paid T-Mobile for a slower plan for 1 month.
But I told Time Warner to switch me to the $45/month for 100 Mbps plan. Then Time Warner changed to Spectrum.
Anyway, I now believe that 100 Mbps is the slowest speed that Spectrum offers in my area.
Which might explain why you got an upgrade to 100 Mbps, because that might be the slowest speed they offer in your area, as well.
The only surprising thing is that they did not charge you a higher price.
Unless you are on a contract that specifies the lower price.
I'm on month to month service, with the price locked in for 12 months.
That's the system they use in my area.
A few sites are trying out the different membership levels of streaming only versus streaming + downloading for a higher price.
I don't think the different membership level pricing plan is really catching on, because I've looked at a lot of sites and very few sites seem to be offering that choice currently.
Diesel Network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) offered a choice of streaming only, with a higher priced streaming + downloading, a while back.
But they seem to have dropped the streaming only option. As far as I know.
The Best Porn (the sister site of Porn Users) still shows a streaming only membership for All Fine Girls.
But if I use the hot link from PU or TBP to access the All Fine Girls site, and hit the join link,
I only see streaming + download membership prices listed (for 1 month recurring, 1 month non-recurring, and 6 month recurring.
I'm a member of Diesel Access, with a diamond level membership, have been for over 1 year, which means I have access to all 3 sites.
But they are like many sites, that don't seem to have a need for a FAQ where membership prices and rules are posted inside the membership area.
Anyway, I'm glad that most porn sites do not offer a streaming versus streaming + downloading option.
That's personal preference.
To be honest, if I were more analytical, I should prefer the option of choosing a cheaper streaming only membership and a streaming + downloading option.
But I don't like having to make choices about this.
To be truthful, I used to download gobs of content from most porn sites.
But now I am more selective about what I download, and try to download only what I will watch again and again.
Unless there is some special reason: like, it's easier to watch a photo set on my PC, instead of trying to using the site's slideshow mechanism, which might be clunky to view.
One question on your review:
You write: "One day, I'm downloading at near max of 15Mbps, the next I'm barely getting 2Mbps."
Do you mean to write MBps, instead of Mbps?
B, with a capital letter, stands for Byte.
b, with a lowercase letter, stands for bit.
8 bits in a Byte.
2 Mbps, or even 15 Mbps, is very slow.
I'm with Spectrum (formerly called Time Warner), and I have a 100 Mbps connection.
There are slower and faster connections offered.
But 15 Mbps would be very slow, and Spectrum does not offer that slow a speed.
Whereas 15 MBps would be slightly faster than the connection I have.
Excellent review, as usual.
You cover the network sites in a comprehensive manner that clearly explains what each site does.
And you mention your own preferences, but try not to let them color your site review over much.
I don't remember when I was a member of most of these sites, but what I do remember is that I thought: many of the Dane Jones videos were high quality, with attractive young women in some hot scenes.
Dane Jones was a good site, with attractive young women in some hot scenes. Massage Rooms was also an very good site. Lesbea was a good lesbian site.
My vague impression is that the videos are excellent in technical quality: sharp focus, well lighted, good sound control, etc.
And like I said, some of the videos were hot (or that I really enjoyed watching them).
One reason for that is I like watching pretty girls and women. Doing sexy things.
I don't remember Girlfriends or Mom XXX or Fitness Rooms.
Mom XXX and Fitness Rooms don't fit into my preferred tastes.
Back in the early 1970s, before the internet, it was rare to see pretty girls in porn.
But since at least the 1990s, the floodgates have opened.
And it's hard to keep up with all these lovely girls.
The bottom line: an excellent, comprehensive review of a network.
You put a lot of time and energy and thought in writing this review.
Very impressive.
This is a full-fledged glamour site.
So they offer all the trimmings.
A zip file for the photo sets in low, medium and high definition.
A recent set:
low is 1.8 Megapixels
medium 10 Megapixels
high 36 Megapixels
They also offer the streaming for videos in
360p, 720p, 1080p.
The videos have a choice for download of:
360p, 540p, HD (which I assume is 720p), full HD (which I assume is 1080p).
Sorry, I am not going to download each file definition, because I'm not feeling well, and don't have the energy to verify the file sizes on my PC, at the moment.
But Tony Murano was a MetArt contributor for many years at MetArt, and if you have a MetArt membership, you can find many examples of his work (mainly photo sets).
You need to know who your primary billing agent is.
You also need to know at least some of the details/records for when you joined: username, password, sometimes the credit card used (or however you paid), sometimes the membership number.
When I joined the site, it was Epoch.
If you joined through Epoch, you are probably in luck.
They are easy to deal with, reliable.
Go to the Epoch site: https://www.epoch.com/
That is a secure site (https):
Enter 2 pieces of your membership:
member id
email
username
card number
(You should have gotten a confirming email when you joined.)
Or, you should have written down these details when you joined.
I try to keep a record of these details when I join a site.
Once you enter 2 of the membership details at the Epoch site, it will bring up your membership.
Cancelling is then easy.
Hope this helps.
Note: if the Epoch web site is not working, call them on the phone. They are very responsive and willing to help.
Excellent review.
Especially helpful is the recent update rate, that warns against the slowdown in new sets for the site.
But glad that MetArt support is so helpful.
What confuses me is that MetArt support states they do not own the site.
But I guess that's a legal structure, since the site is included in the MetArt network.
If you email customer support at MetArt or SexArt, they should give you a refund on your SexArt membership fee.
Just tell them that you unchecked the pre-checked offer to join SexArt, but was charged for the site anyway, by mistake.
MetArt customer service is first rate, and you should get a response to your email very soon.
And the customer service is helpful, and willing to reverse any charges that were made by mistake.
Customer service makes it easy to get your money back, if there was a mistake.
Post a note on this comment, to let us know how things turn out.
(I'm not associated with MetArt staff, except I do have active memberships with some of their sites.)
Excellent review.
Good overview, good site details.
Also good to see you writing new reviews.
It's been a while since your last one.
And you picked a site with a positive score, which is slightly better than a site to avoid, although both types of reviews are helpful.
Completely bald is rare.
Very short hair is less rare, depending on how short.
Buzz cut hair actually has several styles, and can look good on a teen.
If the teen is cute to begin with.
Some boob jobs are done so well you can't tell if the boobs are real or fake: even in a video, which is the best way to see if the boobs move naturally when the model is in motion.
But other boob jobs are so obviously fake, that is a real turn-off for me.
However, it depends on the viewer's preferences: some people don't care if the boobs are real or not, or maybe even prefer fake boobs.
Hugh Hefner seemed to prefer fake boobs, as far as I can tell.
And Barbi Benton, one of his early long-time girlfriends, had a boob job that was great: though I can't recall any nude videos of her: almost all her stuff was photos, back in the day (1960s and 1970s).
This was before the internet.
From the photos, you could not tell Barbi had a boob job.
Cute face, lovely body, bubbly personality, she was definitely a favorite of mine.
The people running the software are not aware of the price discrepancies.
And this one particular site has been allowed to run down:
You can no longer stream many of the videos.
A lot of the thumbnails for the videos (showing what the model looks like) have disappeared.
A lot of the photo sets for the videos have disappeared.
Many years ago, when they started this site, it was a separate join from the Teen Mega World network: You did not automatically gain access to all the sites in the network, which sites you got access to depended on which particular site you joined.
And the actual number of sites, and specific sites in your membership, was unknown.
Since then, they have improved the network immensely, making it easier to use, improving the quality of the videos and photo sets.
But the most recent network update was a step back.
They made navigation harder and more time consuming, to access the content at the different sites, to search the content at the different sites.
I still like the network, but not as much as I used to.
And they raised the yearly membership fee: I've bought year-long memberships several times.
Femjoy, along with many other porn sites, often have holiday special discounts.
So I would assume you can find a discounted rate during one of the holiday discounts.
But I think it's a stupid movie on Femjoy's part. Because as you mentioned, MetArt, Hegre, MPL Studios are strong competitors, and any one of them would be a better join because of the price difference.
(I'm a lifetime member of some of the MetArt sites--because it was just cheaper to pay a lifetime fee, instead of joining again and again.)
The non-secure login and site pages is a common problem across the entire network.
However, this is a common problem with many porn sites.
There is a small chance your login details (username and password) could be hacked.
And your ISP will keep a record of your visits to the porn sites, because the pages are non secure. So the US government can access a record of your visits to those porn sites.
The poor connection speeds have been reported by several PU members.
But other PU members do not have those problems.
It seems to be hit or miss.
If you do join the site/network, I recommend getting a refund on your membership fee if you experience poor connection speeds.
At least one member stated he asked for, and received a refund on his membership fee.
As I wrote, some PU members love the network.
Others hate it, mainly because of the poor connection speeds, which makes viewing or downloading the content difficult.
The same for me.
If I look at the non-member preview page for updates, there are no updates shown.
Poor web preview design.
Previously, they had a non-member update page, that was misleading:
They mixed thumbnails of videos from the 3 different sites together, but did not make it clear they were showing updates from all 3 sites.
Some PU members complained that was misleading, because they were expecting to find the videos when they joined one of the sites, and found out some of the videos were posted at one of the other sites, that they did not have access to (without paying for another membership).
My guess is that, in spite of running porn sites for many years, some of the staff still don't know what they are doing.
So they make simple mistakes.
That hurts the appeal and value of the sites.
But all 3 sites in the Diesel Access network do update daily.
(They recently added a 4th site to the network, but that requires a separate membership: UltraFilms.)
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
